| Revision as of 18:20, 10 January 2022 editWeagesdf (talk | contribs)105 edits questioning whether this is a necessary "to do".Tag: Reverted← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 23:37, 9 April 2023 edit undoGeneralrelative (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,193 edits Take it to the talk page if you'd like to discuss improving this article.Tag: Manual revert |
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
*More diverse representation from non-White, non-Western opinions/sources which might are poorly represented due to very issues of institutional racism discussed here. This article is victim of discussing the state of oppressed people by non-oppressed people. How many Native Australian ref? How many African ones, how many views from grassroots orgs?--] (]) 09:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
*More diverse representation from non-White, non-Western opinions/sources which might are poorly represented due to very issues of institutional racism discussed here. This article is victim of discussing the state of oppressed people by non-oppressed people. How many Native Australian ref? How many African ones, how many views from grassroots orgs?--] (]) 09:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
:Based on the definitions of racism in this post, wouldn't the idea that a diversity of thought being based on a diversity of ethnicities/races, be racist? Presumably, whether one believes that races are subspecies or not, it is a whole step further to think that either humans are incapable of empathizing with those in different situations, or that race/ethnicity alters how we think (assuming we are not just talking about adding anecdotal experiences to the wiki).] (]) 18:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC) |
|