Misplaced Pages

Talk:Racism/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Racism Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:20, 8 January 2007 editZakisan5 (talk | contribs)29 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:37, 9 April 2023 edit undoGeneralrelative (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,193 edits Take it to the talk page if you'd like to discuss improving this article.Tag: Manual revert 
(26 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
*More diverse representation from non-White, non-Western opinions/sources which might are poorly represented due to very issues of institutional racism discussed here. This article is victim of discussing the state of oppressed people by non-oppressed people. How many Native Australian ref? How many African ones, how many views from grassroots orgs?--] (]) 09:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
== Nazism, Facism and Shôwa imperialism==

Flying Tiger, I would like to discuss on this matter more productively.
at first I’d like to say that you labeled my sentences quite easily as ‘Propaganda’ without investigating the contents of my idea. It is easy way to label something like it, but it will create nothing new.
Please make sure the points below;
1. I would never advocate everything what the Emperor of Japan had done in the past. As I stated in the sentence which you deleted, ‘We also have to take notice that in those times, at the height of imperialism, the tendencies of racism were all around the world. it is fact that Japanese Military also had the similar tendency to it, for example, they sometime called white superpowers, which colonized almost all Asian Countries except for Japan, as 'Kichiku'(Devil)’. Of couse I hate all kinds of racism, in those days it did exsist all over the world, of course in Japan.
2. However, as I stated ‘we have to take notice of the fact that Japanese regime had never tried to do the genocide on Chinese, Koreans or any other races in Asian countries. Japan genuinely had warfare against the Allies and China, in contrast to Nazis which tried to exterminate the Jews who were pure civilians’. As you may admit, the Emperor of Japan never had such genocidal policies. I mean, it is a evidence that it is not ‘State Racism’. It makes big deffrence.
3. Nevertheless, you deleted all my sentence and add your ideas on ‘State Racism’ and intentionally, you emphasized the wrong doings of Emperor of Japan much more than Germany (to make readers feel that Japan did worse things regarding rasicm that Nazis Germany, even though you admitted that the Genocide had never been the officail policy of Japanese government), that is ‘Propaganda’
if you really hate the ‘racism’ itself, why you have done like this?
4. Also, I would like you to explain the reason why ‘Chiune Sugihara, who had saved thousands of Jews by his single-handed decision as the consul of the Empire of Japan to Lithuania, were never punished or accused by the his Government’? This story has been well know all over the world as now he is called ‘Japanese Schindler’, Still you insist on your idea that Japan had obvious sysytem of ‘State Racism’? If you only want to advocate specific ideas and attack somethnig specific, you should not do it on Misplaced Pages.
5. Also, you misinterprit my idea I did never say that ‘only Nazi germany comitted genocide’. But as I stated above ‘in those times, at the height of imperialism, the tendencies of racism were all around world. it is fact that Japanese Military also had the similar tendency to it’. I just stated ‘to consider Nazism and Japanese government before and during World War II as similar racist movements’ is not fair regarding it’s scale and also substance. I already have written the reason above.
6. For your information, the members of unit 731 were never punished by the Allies (U.S.) in return for the data of the results of experiments. Do you still think that they did that for the racism?

Please answer above, and let me know whether you would like to pursuit of the truth of the history or just do the propaganda of your own ideas. If latter, if though I give you millions of references, you will easily deny them all for the reason being ‘every reference is propaganda for classic-right wing’.

Latest revision as of 23:37, 9 April 2023

  • More diverse representation from non-White, non-Western opinions/sources which might are poorly represented due to very issues of institutional racism discussed here. This article is victim of discussing the state of oppressed people by non-oppressed people. How many Native Australian ref? How many African ones, how many views from grassroots orgs?--Inayity (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)