| Revision as of 21:28, 15 March 2007 editMehrshad123 (talk | contribs)655 edits Suspected puppetmaster← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:45, 16 March 2007 edit undoFaranbazu (talk | contribs)157 edits →[] caseNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| == Suspected puppetmaster == | == Suspected puppetmaster == | ||
| ==] case== | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| == Shervink, Mehrshad and SG Plan for a Major Vandalism == | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| * Hi Arti.Heads Up! I've just read this piece of jem in 's talk page. Enjoy! | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. | |||
| --------------------------------- | |||
| ] 21:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Holy smokes! That article has gotten way out of control. My suggestion is to use the last known "good" version, and then add in any useful/NPOV information from the recent edits. What do you think? ♠ SG →Talk 23:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Well, we could leave that article as-is for a few days while we separately create a new one at User:SG/Reza Shah. Once we make an article that is sufficiently neutral and accurate, we could move it over to the actual Reza Shah page. ♠ SG →Talk 16:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| This is reaching crisis proporations - I have fixed some of the damages, but reading through it, I find that the vandalism done by "Faranbazu" and his sockpuppet accounts has been on-going for weeks and it is extensive throughout the article. I will try to contribute more time in removing the falsified, nonsensical information and references, but would appreciate help from other editors in this work. Shervin: thanks for the heads-up. You should be able to get through now. Mehrshad123 18:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:45, 16 March 2007
An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 09:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Your comment
Firstly, please don't put comments on my user page, use my talk page instead. Editing other people's user pages (rather than talk pages) is considered vandalism, but I assume you were not aware of that. Secondly, I have not vandalized nor removed content from Reza Shah's page, unlike you. I merely asked for references, and I noted that due to the recent one-sided edits the article has become imbalanced and POV and thus does not meet GA criteria anymore. Shervink 10:10, 6 March 2007 (UTC)shervink
Reza Shah
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Reza Shah, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rayis 17:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Note
Regarding comments such as this and this: I must remind you about WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. These are two of Misplaced Pages's offcial policies, and they have to be followed. Thanks. Khoikhoi 03:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Reza Shah research
I appreciate your avid interest in this topic! I have added a note regarding the efforts of Allied Powers against Reza Shah during WW II which I hope can steer general fact finding activities in the right direction so that we can have an accurate picture. Mehrshad123 21:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Accusations of Vandalism
I am not clear on why you reverted my fix to a previously vandalized article and accused me of "vandalism" for doing this - you also said that I should use the discussion page. If you had read the discussion page you would have seen my lengthy comment on the on-going vandalism ---> Please be aware that you have violated at least two policies of Misplaced Pages in doing so.
Your report to WP:AIV
You recently reported User:Mershad123 to the vandalism noticeboard. I have removed this report, as it is quite clear that this is a content dispute. In the future, please refrain from reporting content disputes at the noticeboard. You may wish to try dispute resolution instead. Natalie 19:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Natalie. This person has a long history of sockpuppetry, Vandalism, and Personal attacks on editors as well as desciplinary action. I will proceed with filing a formal complaint on behalf of all the other editors. Mehrshad123 20:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
content dispute
I understand your frustration - content disputes can be very frustrating. Going through dispute resolution will probably be the easiest way to solve your problems, and will hopefully yield a better article in the long run! Natalie 21:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Suspected puppetmaster
Shervink, Mehrshad and SG Plan for a Major Vandalism
- Hi Arti.Heads Up! I've just read this piece of jem in 's talk page. Enjoy!
Holy smokes! That article has gotten way out of control. My suggestion is to use the last known "good" version, and then add in any useful/NPOV information from the recent edits. What do you think? ♠ SG →Talk 23:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, we could leave that article as-is for a few days while we separately create a new one at User:SG/Reza Shah. Once we make an article that is sufficiently neutral and accurate, we could move it over to the actual Reza Shah page. ♠ SG →Talk 16:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC) This is reaching crisis proporations - I have fixed some of the damages, but reading through it, I find that the vandalism done by "Faranbazu" and his sockpuppet accounts has been on-going for weeks and it is extensive throughout the article. I will try to contribute more time in removing the falsified, nonsensical information and references, but would appreciate help from other editors in this work. Shervin: thanks for the heads-up. You should be able to get through now. Mehrshad123 18:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)