Revision as of 12:07, 17 March 2007 editHuldra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,885 edits rm PA← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:12, 17 March 2007 edit undoTHF (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,107 edits →March 2007Next edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
==Present absentees== | ==Present absentees== | ||
By the way, do you think ] should be renamed ]? Either way, they should definitely be linked to the same place. Do you know how to do that? ] 23:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | By the way, do you think ] should be renamed ]? Either way, they should definitely be linked to the same place. Do you know how to do that? ] 23:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
=== March 2007 === | |||
{{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to ] other editors, as you did here: ]. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- {{uw-npa1}} --> ] 11:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
:I´m sorry you took that as a personal attack; I fail to understand why. Could you please be more specific? Exactly what was a personal attack? Thank you. ] | |||
::See ]: comment on edits, not on editors, and ]. I don't know why you brought up : it was not a substantive edit, it was responding to the fact that a previous editor had so that the bottom of the page's formatting had been wrecked, and my edit summary said precisely that. Yet you falsely accused me of POV-pushing in the Naeim Giladi article, you falsely misrepresented the ANI's conclusions about me (where the consensus of editors was that I adhered to NPOV), and you falsely misrepresented my edit history. You'll note on the Israel Shahak RFC that I disagreed with Jay about the inclusion of quotes from Duke and Zundel; I thought they should be excluded. If you have a problem with my edits, raise them through appropriate ] channels, rather than wikistalking me and personally attacking me in a talk page of an article I've never touched. See ]. -- ] 12:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:12, 17 March 2007
Please leave any messages on this page. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Our mutual friend
Have a look at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Incivility, disruptive editing, and stalking-like behavior from Isarig. What do you think? Abu ali 20:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Cheer up!
I just categorized Helen Thomas as an Arab-American journalist, so now there's five. Majoreditor 03:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back
If you want a laugh have a look at Talk:Racism by country where User:Halaqah has tried for months to get a tiny section on Israeli racism added and whose efforts have been deleted time and again. The length to which some editors are prepared to go, the extent to which they are prepared to sacrifice their own credibility by raising increasingly outlandish arguments in order to try to remove anything remotely critical of Israel, has to be seen to be believed. Just don't waste your time getting involved in this argument. Your talents are best used elsewhere. Abu ali 15:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
to say that, in Akko, Israelis killed 80 Palestinians for no apparent reason and kidnapped and killed Palestinian children is also just 'remotely critical' of Israel?
Is that an improvement? (Third Way (Palestine))
Is your de-fact deletion of Third Way (Palestine) An improvement? methinks not. Some description, even unsourced, is better than none, which would make it a stub! Samfreed 19:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Invitation
You have been invited to join the WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort focused on improving Misplaced Pages's coverage of Africa. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading! |
Belovedfreak 20:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
It's you that deserves a branstar my dear Huldra
I might have beat you to writing that article, but you beat me to the awarding of a barnstar. I too have long admired your edits, your sensible way of dealing with insensibility, your tireless efforts to improve content, layout, everything about Misplaced Pages. And so I award you:
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
for your substantive contributions to building this encyclopedia and the sensitivity and finesse you display in all your interactions with the community Tiamut 15:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
Tiamut 15:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Humor is good and very much needed around here. People (myself being one of the foremost examples :) can take ourselves too seriously sometimes. While you might be old enough to be my mother, you are way cooler than most around here (which doesn't surprise me - my mom and most moms I know are very cool). I hope to be as cool as mom and grandmother in the years to come. No kids yet, but I sure am looking forward to it. Tiamut 19:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wow Huldra. You couldn't be any more wonderful. It's great to have you around here too and thanks so much for doing that redirect. I know I've typed those words in before looking for the article that wasn't there. It feels good to have it now. Almost like we gave them some of the presence that was absent. ;) You know the funny thing about misery, is that it can breed humor. People in the refugee camps taught me that laughing at the absurdity of it all is a useful survival tactic. Not that seriousness isn't often called for, but dark humor can be the handmaiden of the oppressed. Best regards and see you around soon. Tiamut 00:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Present absentees
By the way, do you think Internally Displaced Palestinians should be renamed Present Absentees? Either way, they should definitely be linked to the same place. Do you know how to do that? Tiamut 23:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
March 2007
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:Israel Shahak. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TedFrank 11:54, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- I´m sorry you took that as a personal attack; I fail to understand why. Could you please be more specific? Exactly what was a personal attack? Thank you. Huldra
- See WP:NPA: comment on edits, not on editors, and assume good faith. I don't know why you brought up this edit: it was not a substantive edit, it was responding to the fact that a previous editor had mangled the page so that the bottom of the page's formatting had been wrecked, and my edit summary said precisely that. Yet you falsely accused me of POV-pushing in the Naeim Giladi article, you falsely misrepresented the ANI's conclusions about me (where the consensus of editors was that I adhered to NPOV), and you falsely misrepresented my edit history. You'll note on the Israel Shahak RFC that I disagreed with Jay about the inclusion of quotes from Duke and Zundel; I thought they should be excluded. If you have a problem with my edits, raise them through appropriate WP:DR channels, rather than wikistalking me and personally attacking me in a talk page of an article I've never touched. See WP:DE. -- TedFrank 12:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)