Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:53, 2 June 2023

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:Jad Krimeed reported by User:Pppery (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

Page: Margham (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jad Krimeed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Margham&diff=prev&oldid=1156911936

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Margham&diff=1157584736&oldid=1157583094
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Margham&diff=prev&oldid=1157581839
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Margham&diff=1157416204&oldid=1157368638
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Margham&diff=1157358692&oldid=1157334689
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Margham&diff=1157078415&oldid=1157077849
6. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Margham&diff=1157071327&oldid=1156940046

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Jad_Krimeed&diff=prev&oldid=1157274402

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Margham&diff=prev&oldid=1157275301

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Jad_Krimeed&diff=prev&oldid=1157590794

Comments:

Not technically a 3RR violation as the reverts are spread out over several days, but nevertheless disruptive edit warring. Some of the edits are by an IP who is clearly the same person editing while logged out. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

• Indefinitely blocked. I've also blocked Special:contributions/94.207.250.234, the user's IP, for one week. The user appears to be doing the same thing here as they did at it.wiki, where they've also been indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much Pppery and Bbb23 - I was at my wit's end with this one. I didn't want to go to ANI, because it's a cesspit basically, but these edits are widespread and wholly disruptive/unhelpful. I had reported it to an admin, but she didn't take it up. Is there any way to rollback the whole lot, because there's very little merit in any of it - we're looking at non-existent 'communities', banged in with a template that lists a bibliography of books that don't even mention them, images that are recaptioned from generic 'desert picture' to specifically mention a place that is only a marker in a GIS map. There are also duplicates like Al O'shoosh for Al-Ashoosh and Al Meryal / Mereiyeel - and redlinks on pretty much every page. AND mad claims like the Rub Al Khali being in the desert south of Dubai - it's not. I can't see merit to any of it, but I also don't have time for the cleanup... Best - and thanks again - Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I suspect that the new creations will be handled properly by New Page Patrol without the need for an explicit cleanup effort, and Bbb23 has already draftified many of them. I'll look more closely at the edits to existing articles when I get a chance tomorrow. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks again Pppery - I've started in and will also come back and likely PROD most of the new creations and generally restore pages that have had their content replaced by GIS markers and the like. There's quite a lot of it, though! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I spent way too much time reviewing all the article creations. My decision as to whether to draftify them was not exactly scientific. It was more how "ugly" they were in terms of material and references. Also, I did not verify references because that would have taken way longer, and I didn't have the energy or the stomach for it. Obviously, if the places are hoaxes - or even if there are enough hoax claims - they can be tagged WP:G3. The articles can also be nominated for deletion. The drafts can too, but deleting drafts through discussion is harder. I still don't understand how the user was able to so rapidly create the pages. Were they copying something from somewhere? If so, I couldn't figure out the source. Why were they using a additional citations needed maintenance template dated July 2016 for all the articles? Maybe I'm just overly cynical, but there's something else going on here, but for the life of me I couldn't figure out what.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I reverted all of the article overwrites except for Lahbab where the old stable version was entirely unsourced. I'll leave the new article creations for new page patrol to handle * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Jad appears to have been using a PDF of some Municipality land usage demarcation document, and copy/pasting a template of core content into each new article (the bibliography, for instance, is just two random UAE-focused books, there's no linkage to these places) with the name, as usual a transliteration from Arabic, and faking a picture using generic desert images from Commons. Lahbab is little more than a roundabout with some shops and a truck stop, but I'll try and expand that article tomorrow as well as try and review the state of things/creations. I'd hoped notifying an admin would have nipped this issue in the bud earlier, but am glad the template (presumably) triggered this process! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I think that's everything fixed now, thanks again Pppery and Bbb23. There's some mess in the template Neighbourhoods and Areas of Dubai that I can't work out because I'm a dolt, but I think reason has generally been restored. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User:WhatNameShouldIHave reported by User:Soetermans (Result: No violation)

Page: Apex Legends (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: WhatNameShouldIHave (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 19:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1157747790 by Ferret (talk)"
2. 18:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC) ""
3. 17:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "Added Weapons list."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. And even if it were, no diffs of attempts to resolve the dispute, nor notification of this report on the user's talk page, were posted in the report. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User:Exdg77 reported by User:Aman.kumar.goel (Result: Blocked 24h)

Page: Jawaharlal Nehru (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Exdg77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 20:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1157751586 by Capitals00 (talk) rv disruptive revert, with no reason put forward for reverting the changes to the lead."
2. 03:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "Tharoor has been completely replaced wherever I cited him with scholarly alternatives . Please do not use Tharoor as a justification to do a blanket revert. All the edits I have made are properly sourced from scholarly literature."
3. 01:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1157645340 by Capitals00 (talk) this was not the subject of an edit war? I incorporated feedback and have added other sources to make up for whatever perceived problems with using Tharoor here and there."
4. 19:49, 29 May 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1157610456 by Aman.kumar.goel (talk) Tharoor follows scholarly material which I can put as the primary source instead if there is a consensus he is not to used? He is not the only source I used. And what justification is there for reverting the lead, whcih draws from the main body of the article?"
5. 19:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1157609542 by Aman.kumar.goel (talk) the edits have been fully sourced with scholarly works, and the lead only includes material from the main body of the article. I disagree with this revert."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 19:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 17:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "/* Editing dispute */"

Comments:

Clear cut edit warring and page ownership. Aman Kumar Goel 21:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Please see the discussion on Talk:Jawaharlal Nehru started at 02:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC). I started the discussion to be constructive and reach a consensus after I learned about editing warring and the Three-Revert Rule. For context, User:Aman.kumar.goel has seemingly agreed about the edits I made to the main body of the article, but User:Aman.kumar.goel keeps reverting the lead without providing a proper justification. I made the most recent revert at 20:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC) after User:Aman.kumar.goel reverted the lead without reaching consensus, and without providing a justification, or attempting to engage in any debate to that end. As for the rules, I was first informed about edit warring at 17:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC), and the Three-revert-rule at 19:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC). Since then, I have made edits at 19:49, 29 May 2023 (UTC), 01:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC), and 03:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC) within a 24 hour period. The most recent revert at 20:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC) was after the 24 hour period. To clarify, I have slept and woke up after reading to improve the article, and working on it all day. It is not strategic on my end to get around the rule, if anyone is wondering. Additionally, I should stress that the revert at 01:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC) has little to do with any of the previous editing dispute. Another user User talk:Capitals00 reverted reference formatting I had done, which is why I am confused and state "this was not the subject of an edit war?". I then mentioned the editing dispute because I think User talk:Capitals00 reverted something that he did not mean to. As such, I contend that the revert 01:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC) should not be considered evidence of edit-warring and the Three Revert Rule. I only hope to be constructive and engaging to any and all feedback, and responded to User:Aman.kumar.goel, and another user User:DaxServer on Talk:Jawaharlal Nehru about the disputes. At all times, I offered compromise and willingness to make changes to reach consensus. Eventually, User:Aman.kumar.goel seemingly stopped disputing edits to the main body of the article. However, the user is now still reverting the lead, without any justification. In this, I have been supported by the user User:Neveselbert, who reverted User:Aman.kumar.goel's reverting of the lead at 18:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC), with the edit summary of "rv disruptive reversion of good-faith edits". I contend that onus is on the User:Aman.kumar.goel to provide a justification for reverting the lead, without offering justifications on the talk page, or information on the edit summary. I contend that the User:Aman.kumar.goel is displaying edit-warring and page ownership behavior in attempting to maintain a preferred version of the lead section without any constructing debate about changes, or the lack thereof. Exdg77 (talk) 22:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Addendum. You can also observe on my talk page User_talk:Exdg77 that I responded to User:Aman.kumar.goel's notification of an editing dispute by offering to debate and reach consensus, around 19:58, 29 May 2023, just 10 minutes he wrote on my page. I was ignored, and User:Aman.kumar.goel kept escalating his reverts until it has now come to this. In any case, another user User:Fowler&fowler has reverted the lead too. I had sounded him out on his talk page to debate the changes. I am going to defer to that user's rationale for doing so for now. There is no editing dispute from my perspective for the time being.

Exdg77 (talk) 23:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Exdg77 is a new user who is learning the ropes. They seem to be amenable to discussion. They should be cut some slack. But they should stay away from highly trafficked controversial article and should instead cut their teeth on small, disregarded pages. I don't believe they are ready for the big pages. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Because 3RR is the only real bright-line rule of Misplaced Pages, it should require serious extenuating circumstances to not enforce. These aren't present here. We do not typically waive it for "new users learning the ropes." Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User:Cortador reported by User:Czello (Result: Partially blocked 2 weeks)

Page: Boris Johnson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Cortador (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Revision as of 07:03, 31 May 2023
2. Revision as of 07:46, 31 May 2023
3. Revision as of 08:16, 31 May 2023
4. Latest revision as of 08:27, 31 May 2023

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

The four edits that Czello labels as "reverts" above are only three. The fourth edit is my original contribution to the article, and not a revert. Despite linking to the talk page, Czello himself has done two reverts himself, and has made no effort to resolve the issue on the talk page. Also, this is the second time that Czello falsely labels an original edit of mine as a "revert" (see here ). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortador (talk • contribs) 16:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiLawyering isn't a good look. Also, per WP:EW, it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule. — Czello 16:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

You know what also isn't a good look? Repeatedly making false accusations. Cortador (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

It wasn’t false, hence the block. — Czello 18:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes, it was. You, for the second time, claims original edits to be reverts. Cortador (talk) 19:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Cortador, an admin reviewed this and found you were in the wrong. You can continue to misunderstand how WP:EW works all you like but it's likely to just earn you more blocks in the future if you resume. — Czello 20:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

None of which changes that you repeatedly made false claims. That why you never took your first accusation to the admins (though you kept making empty threats). Cortador (talk) 04:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks from editing this specific article only. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User:Cossde reported by User:Oz346 (Result: Both blocked 72 hours)

Page: Sri Lanka Armed Forces (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Cossde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sri_Lanka_Armed_Forces&diff=1157686361&oldid=1157681492
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sri_Lanka_Armed_Forces&diff=1157693545&oldid=1157692309
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sri_Lanka_Armed_Forces&diff=1157712538&oldid=1157695099
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sri_Lanka_Armed_Forces&diff=1157713965&oldid=1157712931

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ACossde&diff=1157870823&oldid=1153769569

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3ASri_Lanka_Armed_Forces&diff=1157714350&oldid=1157712890

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ACossde&diff=1157871161&oldid=1157870823

Comments:
Please see discussion below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Multiple_conduct_issues_with_user_Cossde

Reply: As evedent in the objective of this incident report is to ilicite personal retribution, it has been confirmed by an Adminstrator that Oz346 has engaged in a personal attack against me. Cossde (talk) 14:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

• Both editors blocked – for a period of 72 hours. Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User:അദ്വൈതൻ reported by User:NebY (Result: Partially blocked 3 months)

Page: Marriage in ancient Rome (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: അദ്വൈതൻ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Consecutive edits made from 17:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC) to 17:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
   1. 17:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC) "Lead section specified. For disagreements, follow up the talk page."
   2. 17:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC) "Follow up the talk page. Check the cited valid sources if any dispute arises. Improvements made with genuine valid citations aren't supposed to be simply revert. If there is any dispute on the sources cited, discuss it in the talk page. Avoid edit warring"
2. 16:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC) "Restored. Check the cited valid sources if any dispute arises. Improvements made with genuine valid citations aren't supposed to be simply revert. If there is any dispute on the sources cited, discuss it in the talk page. Avoid edit warring"
3. Consecutive edits made from 22:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC) to 08:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
   1. 22:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "Check the cited valid sources if any dispute arises. Improvements made with genuine valid citations aren't supposed to be simply revert. If there is any dispute on the sources cited, discuss it in the talk page. Avoid edit warring"
   2. 08:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC) "Lead section specified"
4. Consecutive edits made from 19:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC) to 19:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
   1. 19:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "POV edit of lead section removed"
   2. 19:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC) "Check the cited valid sources if any dispute arises. Improvements made with genuine valid citations aren't supposed to be simply reverted. If there is any dispute on the sources cited, talk."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 17:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Marriage in ancient Rome‎‎."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. Consecutive edits made from 18:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC) to 11:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC) on Talk:Marriage in ancient Rome

Comments:

In April 2023, editor was warned and then blocked for 1 week for edit-warring on this same article, which I hadn't noticed when I warned them after their fifth reverting/undoing-work-of-others edit in the last 24 hours. Editor continued to edit-war. NebY (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 3 months from editing this article only. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

User:92.40.218.255 reported by User:Yae4 (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

Page: Open-source firmware (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 92.40.218.255 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 04:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "My undo is NOT vandalism. Please get your head out of your ass. Undid revision 1157971115 by Yae4 (talk)"
2. 03:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "PLEASE CITE SECONDARY SOURCES. libreboot.at doesn't even have any releases, half of the website doesn't work, and it isn't mentioned anywhere. it's basically a mirror of old libreboot and even links directly to releases from libreboot proper, rather than having their own. completely spurious reference that does not belong on[REDACTED] at all. thank you.Undid revision 1157969704 by Yae4 (talk)"
3. 03:45, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "Once again removed link with spuriously primary source (does not meet Misplaced Pages citation guidelines) - Undid revision 1157968780 by Yae4 (talk)"
4. 03:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "Delete link that only has *primary* sources. Why they are primary: whois on libreboot.at domain reveals "GNU Hostmaster" and (at least today) has the same IP address subnet as GNU.org. The people involved are also heavily involved with GNU and FSF, for example Adrien was a Libreplanet presenter and Denis was a replicant developer which gets FSF funding, and has written on fsf blog several times in the past. (Denis and Adrien are the leaders of libreboot.at)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 03:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing on Open-source firmware‎."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 03:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "/* double standards much? */ Reply"
2. 04:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "/* double standards much? */ SPA"

Comments:

See also their activity at Libreboot and my user talk. Yae4 (talk) 04:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Note: A series of IPs in the same range appear to be the same person. -- Yae4 (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Behavior similarity of 92.40.171.213, now in a 1-year block: Special:Diff/1040594016/1040731767. -- Yae4 (talk) 05:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

User:185.234.68.71 reported by User:Czello (Result: /28 range blocked 48 hours; article semi-protected for a week)

Page: Turning Point UK (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 185.234.68.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 14:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1158032279 by Cambial Yellowing (talk)"
2. 14:58, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1158031997 by Cambial Yellowing (talk)"
3. 14:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1158031816 by Slatersteven (talk)"
4. 14:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1158030786 by Slatersteven (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: diff

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Note as well IP 185.234.68.79 ]. Slatersteven (talk) 15:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 48 hours, the /28 range that includes both IPs used. Bbb23 has also semi-protected the page for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 18:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

] reported by User:Bethsheba Ashe (Result: Declined – malformed report)

Page:  Page-multi error: no page detected.
User being reported: User-multi error: no username detected (help).

diff=next&oldid=1154100705

Diffs of the user's reverts:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Gematria

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Gematria https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Bethsheba_Ashe

https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Skyerise#I'm_reporting_you_for_edit_warring_on_the_Gematria_page

Bethsheba Ashe (talk) 18:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Bbb23 (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

User:Skyerise reported by User:Bethsheba Ashe (Result: )

Page: Gematria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Skyerise (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Special:Diff/1155113927

Diffs of the user's reverts:

• 18:47, 16 May 2023
• 19:41, 31 May 2023
• 22:18, 31 May 2023
• 22:22, 31 May 2023
• 13:50, 1 June 2023
• 13:51, 1 June 2023
• 14:19, 1 June 2023

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1158056318

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Special:Diff/1158056318

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Special:Diff/1158062079

Comments:

•  Note: I have refactored this malformed report and, as part of that, removed entries within "Diffs of the user's reverts" that are not edits by the reported user. @Bethsheba Ashe: Is this what you wanted your report to be like?—Alalch E. 21:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Yes. Thank you so much! I will learn from this. :-) Bethsheba Ashe (talk) 22:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

User:220.236.126.177 reported by User:PhinsUp23 (Result: )

Page: List of National Rugby League records (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 220.236.126.177 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_National_Rugby_League_records&oldid=1157694826 & https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_National_Rugby_League_records&oldid=1158176469

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_National_Rugby_League_records&diff=prev&oldid=1158165524
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_National_Rugby_League_records&diff=prev&oldid=1158177071
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_National_Rugby_League_records&diff=prev&oldid=1158179312
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_National_Rugby_League_records&diff=prev&oldid=1158180255
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_National_Rugby_League_records&diff=prev&oldid=1158181969

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: This is the 2nd time this IP user has engaged in this sort of behaviour over the last month. They were previously blocked for two weeks for consistently reverting another section of the same page (discussion on talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:List_of_National_Rugby_League_records#Wayne's_900). I have not mentioned the current issues on the article talk page, but did attempt to do so on their user talk page and mentioned how the source I suspect they were using was out of date in my own revert. They have refused to explain their reason and instead deleted my comments from their talk page (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:220.236.126.177&diff=cur&oldid=1158182078).

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:220.236.126.177&diff=prev&oldid=1158184139 They have almost immediately removed the notice from their talk page, as seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:220.236.126.177&diff=prev&oldid=1158184892

Comments:

This really should not be an issue. I can somewhat understand the point of view they held in the previous controversy that they were blocked for, which has since been resolved by adding a note showing both sides of the issue, but this is a clear-cut case of denying simple facts. Verifying that their source is outdated is simple, as it only requires being able to count to 12, while they have refused to explain how they calculate their percentages, which is a basic mathematical equation. 58.333 rounding down to 58.33 instead of rounding up to 58.34 is not something that any rational person should be disputing. If my own behaviour also seems out of line, I apologize, as the fact that this is even an issue at all is extremely frustrating and I tried to give valid reasoning behind my initial reverts of the IP user's reverts before stopping and resorting to this process. PhinsUp23 (talk) 13:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Exactly. This reporting is completely uncalled for and a waste of time. Yet you did it anyway. 220.236.126.177 (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

User:94.13.62.241 reported by User:Dora the Axe-plorer (Result: )

Page: A Girl like Me (Rihanna album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 94.13.62.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 14:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1158196505 by Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) sockpuppet of user:Blueberry72"
2. 14:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1158193783 by Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) sock of user:Blueberry72"
3. 13:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1158183193 by Blueberry72 (talk)"
4. 06:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC) "Undid revision 1158143923 by Blueberry72 (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 14:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC) "Warning: Potential three-revert rule violation see also uw-ew (RW 16.1)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

block evasion Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 15:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

There's now a block request at AIV, and a page protection request thus far pending. Both actions would be appropriate. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

• Correction: Spicy has responded. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

User:Titus Gold reported by User:DeCausa (Result: )

Page: Prince of Wales (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Titus Gold (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Extensive talk page discussion across multiple issues

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring