Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:40, 27 March 2005 view sourceGrunt (talk | contribs)8,638 edits →Matters currently in Arbitration: Rex071404 3← Previous edit Revision as of 13:27, 28 March 2005 view source Tkorrovi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,655 edits Paul BeardsellNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
* New requests to the top, please. * New requests to the top, please.


Paul Beardsell
=New requests=
When adding new requests, please give them an appropriate title as well as a subsection for arbitrator's votes.


==Template==
===Involved parties=== ===Involved parties===
<!--provide links to the user page of each party and to all accounts they have edited with. Briefly summarize case. No details. -->


]
*
]
Personal attacks

⚫ ===Statement by ] ===
Artificial Consciousness article was created by me in July, 2003. There were no
problems until March, 2004, and several people edited the article. From March,
2004, Paul Beardsell started to edit it, and started frequent personal attacks
against me, which have continued now more than a year. I acted in a civil way and never
responded them with offenses, apologized when there were misunderstandings, but
the attacks, and also lies with which he, and some others, which I cannot say
how many of these were sock puppets, tried
to give a bad impression of me to others, didn't stop.<br><br>
In December, 2004,
the mediation started by Cimon Avaro, a member of the Mediation Committee
, but the
mediation failed, Paul Beardsell reacted with more personal attacks on mediation
page
,
in addition to personal attacks by others on Simon Avaro talk page.
<br><br>
The article's talk page is also unreasonably long because Paul Beardell et al forced
talk about trivial issues, and often nonsese, seemingly trying to make
everything concerning the article a nonsense, or hard to follow. He also tried
to delete almost all the content of the article several times without
discussion, and made several attempts to create a parallel article like [[Artificial
consciousness according to Tkorrovi]]
without my consent and with mostly not my text. He often reverts my changes without
discussion or even explanation. There was also one NPOV label violation, putting label back
without explaining, while all the requirements for removing the label required
by the Misplaced Pages rules, were fulfilled . Considering all that I, and probably
some others, were almost unable to edit the article in last months. He also added to article a nonsense, not
related to the subject, like a text about disabled writer Christopher Nolan.<br><br>
Personal attacks by ] (same as ])
against me on the article's talk
page only (mostly negative personal comments):<br>
<br>Paul Beardsell was informed of this arbitration request at .
] 13:27, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)


⚫ ===Statement by party 1===
Please limit your statement to 500 words


===Statement by party 2=== ===Statement by party 2===

Revision as of 13:27, 28 March 2005

Shortcut
  • ]
Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions
Motion name Date posted
Arbitrator workflow motions 1 December 2024

The last step of dispute resolution is a request for arbitration. Please review other avenues you should take. If you do not follow any of these routes, it is highly likely that your request will be rejected. If all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the Arbitration Committee.

Please place comments on the talk page, not here.

Structure of this page

The procedure for accepting requests is described in the Arbitration policy. Important points:

  • Be brief. Put a quick list of the nature of the complaints. Place the request itself on this page, rather than a subpage, but if you need to, link to detailed evidence in the standard template format elsewhere.
  • You are required to place a notice on the user talk page of each person you lodge a complaint against. You should confirm this by providing diffs of the notification at the bottom of your complaint.
  • Please sign and date at least your original submission with "~~~~."
  • New requests to the top, please.

Paul Beardsell

Involved parties

User:tkorrovi Paul Beardsell Personal attacks

Statement by User:tkorrovi

Artificial Consciousness article was created by me in July, 2003. There were no problems until March, 2004, and several people edited the article. From March, 2004, Paul Beardsell started to edit it, and started frequent personal attacks against me, which have continued now more than a year. I acted in a civil way and never responded them with offenses, apologized when there were misunderstandings, but the attacks, and also lies with which he, and some others, which I cannot say how many of these were sock puppets, tried to give a bad impression of me to others, didn't stop.

In December, 2004, the mediation started by Cimon Avaro, a member of the Mediation Committee , but the mediation failed, Paul Beardsell reacted with more personal attacks on mediation page , in addition to personal attacks by others on Simon Avaro talk page.

The article's talk page is also unreasonably long because Paul Beardell et al forced talk about trivial issues, and often nonsese, seemingly trying to make everything concerning the article a nonsense, or hard to follow. He also tried to delete almost all the content of the article several times without discussion, and made several attempts to create a parallel article like [[Artificial consciousness according to Tkorrovi]] without my consent and with mostly not my text. He often reverts my changes without discussion or even explanation. There was also one NPOV label violation, putting label back without explaining, while all the requirements for removing the label required by the Misplaced Pages rules, were fulfilled . Considering all that I, and probably some others, were almost unable to edit the article in last months. He also added to article a nonsense, not related to the subject, like a text about disabled writer Christopher Nolan.

Personal attacks by Paul Beardsell (same as User:Psb777) against me on the article's talk page only (mostly negative personal comments):

Paul Beardsell was informed of this arbitration request at . Tkorrovi 13:27, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)


Statement by party 2

Please limit your statement to 500 words


Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0)

Requests for Clarification

If you need to clarify the precise meaning of a previous decision of the Arbitration Committee, your request should go here.

User:Robert Blair

The ArbCom recently decided upon the case of Robert Blair.

Since that time, there has been a significant number of edits by anonymous users on pages that Blair regularly edited. Many of these edits resemble Blair's editing style, though I have not yet amassed firm evidence for ban evasion.

Please would the AC a) advise on what actions should be taken if ban evasion is suspected, and b) make any changes or additions to the final decision, as they see fit? Jakew 14:13, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)

Comments by Arbitrators

  • If a ban is evaded through use of a sockpuppet, the appropriate action is to indefinitely block the sockpuppet account and notify the arbcom such that the ban timer is reset. If such actions continue for an extended period of time, file a request with us. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 15:15, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
  • Concur with Grunt. Could we get a sockpuppet check from David? Ambi 23:50, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Probably not - I can only check back a week. Would need dev assistance. In the meantime, shoot the sock - David Gerard 21:47, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Agree, admins should block socks as soon as they are sure about them. Non admins should post any evidence they have (such as editing styles) on WP:AN/I so that an admin can take the necessary action. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 08:52, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Shoot the socks on sight, sanity-check with WP:AN/I. Robert Blair's editing style is, uh, pretty distinctive - David Gerard 10:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

User:Iasson and User:Faethon

(CC to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Iasson)

There is currently an injunction in place against User:Iasson forbidding him from editing any deletion-related article.

Does this injunction also apply to User:Faethon and his sockpuppets? Faethon is still claiming to be a separate entity from Iasson. User:Aeropus II of Macedon (A Faethon sockpuppet) made an anonymous vote on Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/The Tetragrammaton in the Bible , and is apparently using, as his defense, the fact that he is not User:Iasson to get around the injunction. history

For the purpose of dispute resolution when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar behavior they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets. Although I contend that Faethon et al display similar behaviour to Iasson, I would like to ask for arbitrator clarification to see if the injunction also applies to the Faethon accounts, and to the Acestorides & the List of Greeks accounts. --Deathphoenix 20:19, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This may be a moot point now because User:Aeropus II of Macedon is blocked for being a public account. --Deathphoenix 23:33, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Comments by arbitrators

  • I see it's currently in play on WP:AN/I. If it's not seriously disputed, common sense (the identical behaviour, the public account status) would be enough for shooting on sight to be reasonable action in good faith IMO - David Gerard 17:55, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Matters currently in Arbitration

/Template

Please also see Template:ArbComCases.

Archives

Category: