| Revision as of 03:35, 16 May 2007 editKirbytime (talk | contribs)2,961 edits →unblock← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:07, 6 July 2023 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors375,838 edits Notification: listing of Template:Foreignlang at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (46 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''I always respond to messages here.''' | |||
| == Replaceable fair use Image:Hammasa_np6.jpg == | |||
| ] | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: | |||
| # Go to ] and edit it to add {{tlx|di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, '''without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template'''. | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="150" | |||
| # On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. | |||
| |- | |||
| !align="center"|] | |||
| ] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="center"|], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, ], or by taking a picture of it yourself. | |||
| If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> ]] 16:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''']''' | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ---- | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 15:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |align="center"|] | |||
| |} | |||
| <!--Archive box ends here, please post below this line--> | |||
| == {{tl|Afghanistan-newspaper-stub}} == | |||
| Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at ], at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at ], in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at ] - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 10:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Trolling and soapboxing... == | |||
| I really don't see how I'm trolling or soapboxing by pointing out that an article that criticizes Israel gets a lot more interest than one that is about the conditions of Palestinians. The suggestion I made was earnest and constructive, and one can only take note of the reaction. I'd be absolutely fine reporting this to the Admin board, so feel free to revert again. --] 20:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Constructive for what??? You're assuming bad faith on the part of all editors who disagree with you. And not just that, you're grouping them all together and claiming that all of them, collectively, use double standards in a very specific and identical way. That is clearly trolling.--]♥] 20:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Though I didn't find that section particularly helpful or constructive either, I'm not seeing the section in ] that actually backs up deleting it. Did you mean to link to a different guideline? ] 20:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I didn't expect there to be so much controversy regarding this. I will not remove the section anymore. Bladestorm, I removed it per ], which is linked from ]. I've done this before, and nobody complained about that, and in fact one user thanked me for it.--]♥] 20:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I did not make any assertions about any or all editors that disagree with me, and I clearly juxtaposed "some" vs "the vast majority," and made it clear this was my conclusion. --] 20:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::That doesn't matter. I still would like to know how your comment is constructive towards improving the article. Pointing fingers doesn't help one lick.--]♥] 20:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Signature== | |||
| I just noticed you had changed it. Thank you very much :) ]] 23:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for your help == | |||
| with various articles. Thanks very much. Cheers, --] 08:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Standardising Qur'an citations == | |||
| Hi, as someone who edits Islam related articles, I was wondering if you could ] on my proposal for standardising the citation of the Qur'an using a single template. Thanks. → ] <sup>(] • ])</sup> — 21:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == MDS America merge == | |||
| Hello. In a follow-up to ], a merge of the article ] into ] has been proposed. You can voice your opinion, if any, on the matter at ]. Thanks, ] 21:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I undid your edit because after a long discussion, consensus was to have "criticisms" instead of "allegations." Allegations is too POV. Please use the talk page before making POV changes in the futute.--] 20:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| What long discussion are you referring to? I checked the talk page and found pejman arguing against "criticisms".--]♥] 20:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :See ] and ]. We finally agreed on ]'s version, which was to use "criticisms." --] 21:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I don't see any comments by ] in that section. That section doesn't even discuss what we are talking about now.--]♥] 21:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :see here --] 21:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Those are talking about "said vs claimed", not "allegations vs criticisms". Are you sure you are linking me to the correct diffs?--]♥] 21:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The point I was trying to make was that we agreed on Jossi's version for the wording int the page, because it was more neutral. --] 21:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Who is "we"? You don't have consensus.--]♥] 21:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Please use the talk page before making changes like the ones you did in the future.--] 21:50, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :If you look at the talk page, I asked Matt57 to justify the fair use of the photo by proving all the requirements per the list I presented. He has not done it yet, so there is nothing for me to say on the talk page. I didn't think my second edit would be controversial, but since it has, I'll discuss it on the talk page--]♥] 21:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| I have blocked you for 24 hours for persistent edit warring on ], ] and ]. Whether or not you have technically violated the ] I am uncertain; however, you are being extremely disruptive with your edit warring. This is why you are being blocked. Please discuss issues on talk pages and do not assume it is the other party's responsibility to give his or her justification first. Thank you. ] 02:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, although I think this block is extremely unjustified, I stand by your concerns and have decided to not request an unblock. But I would very much appreciate it if, instead of blocking me, I volunteer not to edit the articles in question for a week. I feel that my contributions to other subjects on Misplaced Pages (such as math, and the reference desks) is much too valuable to be stopped by this. Thank you for your consideration.--]♥] 02:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| And by the way, I only reverted my userpage twice.--]♥] 02:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Kirbytime, | |||
| Thanks for your help with the article. Cheers, --] 08:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == unblock == | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been '''indefinitely blocked''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:. In my opinion you are done here. I have started a thread on ] to review this block.|. In my opinion you are done here. I have started a thread on ] to review this block.|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:1|··]] 03:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3}} -->{{{category|]}}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=Is this a fucking joke? Indefinite block?|decline=No, it would appear that this is serious. — ] ] 03:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)}} | |||
| :Reviewing admin, please see ] thread. ··]] 03:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Heimstern Läufer, it is an "extremely pleasant unblock request" because it wasa an "extremely pleasant" block! Notice how matt57 never mentioned ANYTHING to me, like "hey, this might not be fair use, keep it out". The top of ANI says that users in question should be notified if their name is brought up. Just before I was blocked, please look at the contrib: is that what you consider trolling? I've been blocked without being given a chance to defend myself. It's almost like you guys are asking me to sockpuppet.--]♥] 03:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:07, 6 July 2023
Replaceable fair use Image:Hammasa_np6.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hammasa_np6.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 16:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Foreignlang
Template:Foreignlang has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)