Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kirbytime: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:32, 17 May 2007 editG-Dett (talk | contribs)6,192 edits Curious← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:07, 6 July 2023 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors375,838 edits Notification: listing of Template:Foreignlang at WP:Templates for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
(11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''I always respond to messages here.'''
<!-- Zubbles -->


== Replaceable fair use Image:Hammasa_np6.jpg ==
{| class="infobox" width="150"
]
|-
Thanks for uploading ''']'''. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under ], but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our ] in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
!align="center"|]
]
----
|-
|align="center"|], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]


# Go to ] and edit it to add {{tlx|di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, '''without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template'''.
# On ], write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.


Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, ], or by taking a picture of it yourself.
''']'''
----
|-
|align="center"|]
|}
<!--Archive box ends here, please post below this line-->


If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on <span class="plainlinks"></span>. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:di-replaceable fair use-notice --> ]] 16:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
== {{tl|Afghanistan-newspaper-stub}} ==
== Nomination for deletion of ] ==

]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 15:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at ], at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at ], in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at ] - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 10:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

== Trolling and soapboxing... ==

I really don't see how I'm trolling or soapboxing by pointing out that an article that criticizes Israel gets a lot more interest than one that is about the conditions of Palestinians. The suggestion I made was earnest and constructive, and one can only take note of the reaction. I'd be absolutely fine reporting this to the Admin board, so feel free to revert again. --] 20:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Constructive for what??? You're assuming bad faith on the part of all editors who disagree with you. And not just that, you're grouping them all together and claiming that all of them, collectively, use double standards in a very specific and identical way. That is clearly trolling.--]♥] 20:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
:Though I didn't find that section particularly helpful or constructive either, I'm not seeing the section in ] that actually backs up deleting it. Did you mean to link to a different guideline? ] 20:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

::I didn't expect there to be so much controversy regarding this. I will not remove the section anymore. Bladestorm, I removed it per ], which is linked from ]. I've done this before, and nobody complained about that, and in fact one user thanked me for it.--]♥] 20:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

:::I did not make any assertions about any or all editors that disagree with me, and I clearly juxtaposed "some" vs "the vast majority," and made it clear this was my conclusion. --] 20:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

:::::That doesn't matter. I still would like to know how your comment is constructive towards improving the article. Pointing fingers doesn't help one lick.--]♥] 20:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

==Signature==

I just noticed you had changed it. Thank you very much :) ]] 23:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks for your help ==
with various articles. Thanks very much. Cheers, --] 08:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

== Standardising Qur'an citations ==

Hi, as someone who edits Islam related articles, I was wondering if you could ] on my proposal for standardising the citation of the Qur'an using a single template. Thanks. → ] <sup>(] • ])</sup> — 21:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

== MDS America merge ==

Hello. In a follow-up to ], a merge of the article ] into ] has been proposed. You can voice your opinion, if any, on the matter at ]. Thanks, ] 21:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==
I undid your edit because after a long discussion, consensus was to have "criticisms" instead of "allegations." Allegations is too POV. Please use the talk page before making POV changes in the futute.--] 20:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

What long discussion are you referring to? I checked the talk page and found pejman arguing against "criticisms".--]♥] 20:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
:See ] and ]. We finally agreed on ]'s version, which was to use "criticisms." --] 21:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't see any comments by ] in that section. That section doesn't even discuss what we are talking about now.--]♥] 21:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
:see here --] 21:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Those are talking about "said vs claimed", not "allegations vs criticisms". Are you sure you are linking me to the correct diffs?--]♥] 21:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
:The point I was trying to make was that we agreed on Jossi's version for the wording int the page, because it was more neutral. --] 21:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
::Who is "we"? You don't have consensus.--]♥] 21:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==
Please use the talk page before making changes like the ones you did in the future.--] 21:50, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

:If you look at the talk page, I asked Matt57 to justify the fair use of the photo by proving all the requirements per the list I presented. He has not done it yet, so there is nothing for me to say on the talk page. I didn't think my second edit would be controversial, but since it has, I'll discuss it on the talk page--]♥] 21:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

I have blocked you for 24 hours for persistent edit warring on ], ] and ]. Whether or not you have technically violated the ] I am uncertain; however, you are being extremely disruptive with your edit warring. This is why you are being blocked. Please discuss issues on talk pages and do not assume it is the other party's responsibility to give his or her justification first. Thank you. ] 02:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, although I think this block is extremely unjustified, I stand by your concerns and have decided to not request an unblock. But I would very much appreciate it if, instead of blocking me, I volunteer not to edit the articles in question for a week. I feel that my contributions to other subjects on Misplaced Pages (such as math, and the reference desks) is much too valuable to be stopped by this. Thank you for your consideration.--]♥] 02:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

And by the way, I only reverted my userpage twice.--]♥] 02:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)



== ] ==
Hi Kirbytime,

Thanks for your help with the article. Cheers, --] 08:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

== unblock ==
{{archive top}}
<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been '''indefinitely blocked''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:. In my opinion you are done here. I have started a thread on ] to review this block.|. In my opinion you are done here. I have started a thread on ] to review this block.|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:1|··]] 03:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3}} -->

{{unblock reviewed|1=Is this a fucking joke? Indefinite block?|decline=No, it would appear that this is serious. — ] ] 03:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)}}

:Reviewing admin, please see ] thread. ··]] 03:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer, it is an "extremely pleasant unblock request" because it wasa an "extremely pleasant" block! Notice how matt57 never mentioned ANYTHING to me, like "hey, this might not be fair use, keep it out". The top of ANI says that users in question should be notified if their name is brought up. Just before I was blocked, please look at the contrib: is that what you consider trolling? I've been blocked without being given a chance to defend myself. It's almost like you guys are asking me to sockpuppet.--]♥] 03:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

This is beyond absurd. I honestly ask that someone review my edits today and see if anyone considers them trolling:

# 03:19, 16 May 2007 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Science (→mouse) (top)
# 03:00, 16 May 2007 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Science (→Macadamia nuts - inedible to everything except for man and parrot...)
# 02:48, 16 May 2007 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Mathematics (→Interesting math topic for a presentation) (top)
# 02:00, 16 May 2007 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wikiislam (→Wikiislam)
# 01:48, 16 May 2007 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2007 May 13 (→world evolution) (top)
# 01:44, 16 May 2007 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2007 May 14 (→What do the British call people who come from the United States?)
# 01:41, 16 May 2007 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Humanities (→God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything)
# 01:31, 16 May 2007 (hist) (diff) Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Science (Intelligent Design, my wagon!)

Indef block, indeed.--]♥] 03:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

And finally, the only reason I put it there is so that I can look at the article later on. I mean gosh, look at the bad faith matt57 assumes. He uses legal language against me.--]♥] 03:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

:Kirbytime, I'm a trusting guy, and even I have to stretch further than I'm willing to to believe you didn't know exactly what you were doing and that there would be negative reactions to your actions. That's the exact definition of trolling: actions meant to draw negative reactions. ] ] 03:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

:::Heimstern Läufer, with all due respect, I swear that I had no intention of trolling by doing that. This hidden comment was for an entirely different purpose than the "fuck you" hidden comment. I didn't even know what that number meant until about fifteen minutes ago. I was at the library when a friend of mine told me about it via an instant messenger. The library was closing, so I quickly copy-pasted it into my talk so I could look it up at home. I come home, sign into Misplaced Pages, answer a few questions at the ref desks, look up the number, click random article a few times, find a spelling mistake, hit edit... *boom*. Indef blocked. Is that fair? --]♥] 03:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, please block my sockpuppets from helping people at reference desks. Excellent work.--]♥] 03:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

How about I just get banned from editing Islam, Jewish, or sex related articles? Those topics seem to be the only ones that other users don't like.--]♥] 04:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

''...what's his reason? - I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer, as a Christian is? If you prick us do we not bleed? If you tickle us do we not laugh? If you poison us do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?'' <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>

That last message crossed the line into trolling again. This page is now protected. ] 06:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
----
* Kirbytime, you're digging your own grave here. I think you have lost your sense of perspective and you probably need to spend some time away from the project; I suspect that if you come back in a month or so and ask niucely you will stand some chance, given that there are good edits back in your history, but your recent edits have varied between strident and trolling, and you don't seem to be self-correcting, so nobody is likely to unblock you at the moment. Please don't be tempted to blame this on The Cabal (]), there are editors who broadly agree with your views on the disputed topics but who still consider your current behaviour to be worrisome. And yes, we do appreciate those who help out at the ref desks, but equally, those who help there have to enjoy the trust of the community, becuase we refer inquiries to the foundation mailing lists there, and we have to be able to trust the ref desk folks to be reliably on-message in terms of policy. So: please take a break from the Wiki-wars, come back refreshed, and ask again in a month or so. If you are willing to do that, ] and I'll unprotect your talk page so you'll be able to make a request when the time comes. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

:I have reverted my protection. I'm not comfortable having people continue to talk at him while denying him right of reply. ] 11:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
:::Um, actually, I unprotected it. ] ] 19:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
::::Ah, so you did. ] 00:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

::Hesperian, that's a quote from Shakespeare.--]♥] 15:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
:::...quoting a character who played the victim while insisting upon his right to inflict harm on others. If you're endorsing that quote, you've completely missed Shakespeare's point. ] 00:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
::::That was '''not''' a reference to me. Notice how I did not sign that quote, and opted instead to use nowiki tags on the quote. In particular, I was describing a certain ''other'' user with that quote. You know, the one that stalks me and sends me obscene emails.--]♥] 02:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::So you were explaining your "stalker"'s actions in terms of his ethnicity. Trolling. This is exactly the kind of behaviour that saw you blocked, and exactly the reason you're not likely to be unblocked for a very long time, and then only under protest. ] 02:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
::::::Wrong. It's not my fault that you are woefully ignorant of Shakespeare. Read the context of that quote.--]♥] 02:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
:::::::You're still trolling. You put out a quote containing references to Jews and revenge, you studiously avoid saying what is meant by it, and you sit back and enjoy the discussion that ensues. I for one shall no longer feed you; you're off my watchlist. ] 02:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
::::::::Looks like someone fell asleep during Shakespeare 101. If you seriously think that quote is about Jews and/or revenge, then I ''wish you a very happy time editing Misplaced Pages''.--]♥] 02:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

And also, Please see ].--]♥] 15:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

== Edit requests ==

First time I was blocked, I made several edit requests. Thanks to everyone who participated. Seeing as how the prospect of ''bandeh'' getting unblocked soon seems unlikely, compounded by the fact that I still want to contribute to Misplaced Pages, then the only way for me to do it now is by edit requests. Just because I'm blocked doesn't mean I can't still help. So here is how it works. I list articles here by a single asterisk, mention their problem, and YOU go out and fix them. Then you come here and put <nowiki><s></s></nowiki> tags around the request and sign your name at the double asterisk, along with any comments (<nowiki>~~~</nowiki>). All article edits here will be noncontroversial.--]♥] 03:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


=====Edit request=====
*]: <s>The factorization fails to parse. Also,</s> a mention of ] (this should be a redirect to ]) should be there.
**

*]: Resize the huge image.
**

*]: Remove HTML ("<a name="Theme" id="Theme"></a>")
**

*]:Wikilink the first mention of ].
**

*]: POV "alleged prophet Muhammad's daughter" to "]'s daughter" or something.
**

== nothing ==

<!-- <div class="usermessage"><div class="plainlinks">You have '''] (]).'''<small><sup>(FAKE, LOL)</sup></small></div></div>

{{User WP Judaism}}
{{User WikiProject Islam}}
{{User WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch}}
{{userWPA2}}
{{user wikipedia/Pages needing translation into English}}
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=BLOG |info=This user has a }}
{{Userbox |border-c=#000 |border-s=1 |id-c=#fff |id-s=12 |id-fc=#000 |info-c=#039 |info-s=8 |info-fc=#fff |id=Wiki |info=This user's account was created: <font color="red">]</font>}}

----

=Hello there!=
Kirbytime (--]♥]) is a 39-year old (born 11 January 1968, ]) ] living in ].<sup class="noprint">&#91;]&#93;</sup> {{#if: {{NAMESPACE}} || {{#if:{{{date|}}}|]|]}}]}} At least, that's what ] says. ;)

{{Babel|if=|ar-1|de-1|en|es-2|fa-4|ru-1|el-1|la-1|iso15924{{!}}Cyrl{{!}}5|ot|java-2|html-1}}

== Articles I have created (Go vandalize them now =D ) ==


*Science-related:
**]
**]
**]
*Math-related:
**]
**]
**]
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk"
|-
|]
|An entry from ''']''' appeared on Misplaced Pages's ] in the ''']''' column on ], ].
|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes||]}}
|}
*Religion-related:
**]
**]
*People-related:
**]

This does not include redirects. Redirects can go fuck themselves.<sup class="noprint">&#91;]&#93;</sup> {{#if: {{NAMESPACE}} || {{#if:{{{date|}}}|]|]}}]}}

== Images I have uploaded ==
]
]
==Other information==
"To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion."
{{ user aim|kirbybeam }}
*]
*]
*]

== Epic accusation of Jewish conspiracy on Misplaced Pages ==

**'''Comment''' I don't know why it would be uncivilized to point out that you, the closer of the TfD ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] are Jewish, or that other editors on the TfD, such as the nominator ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] are Jewish, or at ''least'' speak Hebrew, as well. These allegations of bandwagoning aren't a form of personal attack; obviously cross-posting the TfD to ] skewed the results. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 22:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

<small>Taken from </small>


Yay, I'm Jewish!
:!מזל טוב



==Notices==
]-]-]-
*Action taken: 21:15, 5 September 2006 ] (] | ]) blocked "] (])" with an expiry time of 24 hours (grossly inappropriate edit summaries)



==Hidden==
]
] -->

==Curious==
Kirbytime, I'm curious, what's the hidden message you left that started this whole uproar?--] 19:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:07, 6 July 2023

Replaceable fair use Image:Hammasa_np6.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Hammasa_np6.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 16:12, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Foreignlang

Template:Foreignlang has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)