| Revision as of 14:36, 21 September 2012 editKnitwitted (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,001 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:15, 14 July 2023 edit undoTpbradbury (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,283 edits most of these from 11 years ago seem to have been done |
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 27: |
Line 27: |
|
|other= |
|
|other= |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
*Conform all references to the ] used in the article. |
|
|
*Add information about the Oxfordian arguments being rebutted to "Oxford's knowledge of court life" |
|
|
*Add mainstream context about Shakespeare's use of legal terms and concepts to "Oxford's education" |
|
|
*Add mainstream context to "Science" |
|
*Add mainstream context to "Science" |
|
*Rewrite "Chronology of the plays and Oxford's 1604 death" in a more organised way |
|
|
*Add citations to "Family connections" and "Theatre connections" for Oxfordians claiming this information as evidence |
|
|
*Write section on Oxfordian publications, including ''Brief Chronicles'' |
|
*Write section on Oxfordian publications, including ''Brief Chronicles'' |
|
*Use sources such as Fowler 1986 and Sobran 1997 to write a paragraph on allegations of verbal parallels in Oxford's letters and poetry |
|
|
*Cite all facts about Oxford's life to reliable sources rather than fringe ones |
|
|
*Figure out what the heck Tom Reedy insists we need to write for Stritmatter's themes to be included |
|
