Revision as of 02:05, 23 March 2007 editKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 editsm wikify← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:17, 23 March 2007 edit undoFadix (talk | contribs)5,105 edits Remove, he say the Khan's wanted to trial him for genocide, he does not call it such.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''March Days''' or '''March Events''' refer to a period during the ], when | The '''March Days''' or '''March Events''' refer to a period during the ], when | ||
the ] allied with the ] of the Baku Soviet to suppress ] in a bid to gain control of ]. The result was an inter-ethnic warfare, which resulted in the massacre of up to 12,000 Azerbaijanis <ref>"New Republics in the Caucasus", ''The New York Times Current History'', v. 11 no. 2 (March | the ] allied with the ] of the Baku Soviet to suppress ] in a bid to gain control of ]. The result was an inter-ethnic warfare, which resulted in the massacre of up to 12,000 Azerbaijanis <ref>"New Republics in the Caucasus", ''The New York Times Current History'', v. 11 no. 2 (March | ||
1920), p. 492</ref><ref>Michael Smith. "Anatomy of Rumor: Murder Scandal, the Musavat Party and Narrative of the Russian Revolution in Baku, 1917-1920", ''Journal of Contemporary History'', Vol 36, No. 2, (Apr. 2001), p. 228</ref><ref name="Smith">{{ru icon}} </ref>, which some sources classified as a "genocide" <ref>Peter Hopkirk, "Like hidden fire. The Plot to bring down the British Empire", Kodansha Globe, New York, 1994, p. 281. ISBN-10: 1-56836-127-0</ref><ref></ref>. The ] set out to take revenge for the persecution and ] at the hands of the ].<ref name="Croissant-14">Michael P. Croissant. ''The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Causes and Implications'', p. 14. ISBN 0-275-96241-5</ref> Less than six months later, in September 1918, ]'s ] supported by local Azeri forces recaptured Baku killing "an estimated 10,000 Armenians". <ref></ref> | 1920), p. 492</ref><ref>Michael Smith. "Anatomy of Rumor: Murder Scandal, the Musavat Party and Narrative of the Russian Revolution in Baku, 1917-1920", ''Journal of Contemporary History'', Vol 36, No. 2, (Apr. 2001), p. 228</ref><ref name="Smith">{{ru icon}} </ref>. The ] set out to take revenge for the persecution and ] at the hands of the ].<ref name="Croissant-14">Michael P. Croissant. ''The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Causes and Implications'', p. 14. ISBN 0-275-96241-5</ref> Less than six months later, in September 1918, ]'s ] supported by local Azeri forces recaptured Baku killing "an estimated 10,000 Armenians". <ref></ref> | ||
== Preceding events == | == Preceding events == |
Revision as of 02:17, 23 March 2007
The March Days or March Events refer to a period during the Russian Civil War, when the Armenian Revolutionary Federation allied with the Bolsheviks of the Baku Soviet to suppress Musavat in a bid to gain control of Baku. The result was an inter-ethnic warfare, which resulted in the massacre of up to 12,000 Azerbaijanis . The Dashnaks set out to take revenge for the persecution and genocide suffered by Armenians at the hands of the Ottomans. Less than six months later, in September 1918, Enver Pasha's Army of Islam supported by local Azeri forces recaptured Baku killing "an estimated 10,000 Armenians".
Preceding events
After the Bolshevik revolution in 1917, "the Bolsheviks, led by Stepan Shaumian, the ‘Caucasian Lenin’, had virtual control of Baku, the richest and largest city in the Azerbaijani heartland. To make matters worse, Shaumian was an Armenian, and already there were alarming signs that, at his instigation, Armenian nationalists and Bolsheviks in Baku had reached an accommodation clearly directed against the Azerbaijanis". This success could be partly attributed to millions in gold roubles paid to the Armenians by the British government.
On March 9, 1918, the staff of Azerbaijani Savage Division arrived in Baku. Its Commander, General Talyshinski was immediately arrested by the Baku Soviet, which resulted in calls for armed resistance to the Soviet among the Azerbaijanis in the city . Only a few days before the arrival of General Talyshinski and his staff, Stepan Shaumyan, the leader of Baku Soviet, had received a telegram from Lenin which read:
- Dear Comrade Shaumyan:
- Many thanks for the letter. We are delighted by your firm and decisive policy; do unite with it a most cautious diplomacy, which is doubtlessly made necessary by the present most difficult situation, and we shall win.
- The difficulties are unfathomable; up to now we have been saved by the contradictions and conflicts and the struggle among imperialists. Be able to use these conflicts; now it is necessary to learn diplomacy.
- Best wishes and greetings to all the friends
- V. Ulyanov (Lenin)
On 30 March the Soviet received information that the Muslim crew of the ship Evelina was armed and ready to revolt against the Soviet. The report lacked foundation in fact, but the Soviet acted on it and disarmed the crew which tried to resist. In response, a huge crowd gathered in the yard of one of the Baku mosques and adopted a resolution demanding the release of the rifles confiscated by the Soviet from the crew of the Evelina. The next day, a delegation of Muslims asked the Soviet to restore the arms. One of the Bolshevik leaders, Prokopius Dzhaparidze, promised to satisfy this demand, but in the meantime shooting started in the streets.
In 1907, the funeral of a local Social Democrat swelled into a huge demonstration, and among its organizers was a young Bolshevik activist from Georgia, Joseph Stalin. The mass funerals fore-shadowed still greater ethnic violence, most immediately a further round of the Baku Armenian-Muslim clashes known as "the March Days of 1918."
Massacre on 30-31 March, 1918
By 6 p.m, 30 March, 1918, Baku was filled with fighting. Trenches were being dug, barricades erected, and preparations made for warfare. The Soviet side, led by Shaumyan, realized that full civil war was starting and its own forces were insufficient against Azerbaijani masses led by Musavat. Allies were found among Baku Mensheviks, S.R.'s, and the Kadets (right-wing liberals), which promised support the Bolsheviks as the champions of the "Russian Cause."
Musavat quickly noticed the nationalist nature of the conflict perpetrated by the Shauyman-led Soviet. Musavat's newspaper, Achiq Söz, wrote that the Bolsheviks, who had fought the Mensheviks for a whole year, were now uniting even with Kadets and the Dashnaks, and that such cooperation could only be explained by policy of provoking one nationality against the other. It further stated that instead of fighting a class war, Soviet was involved in a tragic capitulation of democracy.
But it was neither the Kadets, nor the Mensheviks, nor the S.R.'s who saved the Soviet during the March Days. It was the Dashnaktsutiun, with its military organization, that tipped the scaled in its favor. At first, the Armenian National Council proclaimed its neutrality in the quarrel between the Musavat and the Soviet; it has even been suggested that the Armenians told the Musavat that the latter might expect their help against the Bolsheviks. If this was the case, then the Armenians were largely responsible for provoking the massacre that ensued, because the Musavat plunged into the armed conflict, thinking that it had only one enemy to face. In fact, Suren Shaumyan, the brother of Stepan Shaumyan wrote that "the Muslim National Council would not have taken up arms, had it not confidence in its ally ."
On 31 March 1918, the ultimatum was issued by the Baku Soviet to Musavat, with the term of compliance set at 3 p.m. on 1 April, 1918. Although Musavat accepted the ultimatum, the fighting was uncontrollable on the streets of Baku, and the Armenians who had loudly proclaimed their neutrality suddenly swung towards the Soviet and joined the attack against the Musavat:
- In that bloodthirsty episode, which had such fatal effects upon the Muslims, the principal part was played by the Armenians, who were then in Baku, clustering as elsewhere around their nationalist party ... The truth is that the Armenians under the guise of Bolshevism, rushed on the Muslims and massacred during a few frightful days more than 12,000 people, many of whom were old men, women, and children.
An Azerbaijani Boshevik, Sultan Medjid Efendiev, wrote:
- The Dashnaks, who for handsome pay protected the capitalists, Taghiev, Naghiev, and others, massacred to a man, in the name of the Soviet, the population of entire blocks and sections inhabitted by the Muslim poor. The Dashnaks under the command of such millionaires as Lalaiev and others, were now destroying not only the Musavatists but Muslims in general... The course of events led to a situation in which the comrades who stood at the head of the Soviet, Shaumyan, Japaridze, and others, became themselves prisonsers of Dashnaks..
Once the Soviet had called upon the Dashnaktsutiun to lend its assistance in the struggle against the Azerbaijani nationalists in Baku, the "civil war" degenerated into massacre, with ethnic Armenians and Azeris killing each other irrespective of their political affiliations or social and economic position. That the attack was directed just as much against the civilian population as against the military detachments of Musavat there can be no doubt. Every Azerbaijani whom the Dashnak bands could catch was killed, and many Persians lost their lives too. According to various sources, a total of between 3,000 to 12,000 Muslims were killed during the violence. In fact, Shaumyan said that 20,000 men took part in the fighting:
- For us the results of the battle were brilliant. The destruction of the enemy was complete. We dictated to them the conditions which were signed without reservation. More than 3,000 were killed on both sides.
Shaumyan further "admitted that the participation of the Armenian units ‘lent the civil war, to some extent, the character of a national massacre’, adding that ‘the Muslim poor suffered severely’".
Aftermath
The March events touched off a series of massacres all over Azerbaijan. According to Firuz Kazemzadeh:
- "The brutalities continued for weeks. No quarter was given by either side: neither age nor sex was respected. Enormous crowds roamed the streets, burning houses, killing every passer-by who was identified as an enemy, many innocent persons suffering death at the hands of both the Armenians and Azerbaijanis. The struggle which had begun as a political contest between the Musavat and the Soviet assumed the characters of a gigantic race riot.".
The Armenian archbishop, Bagrat, wrote a letter to the Armenian mission in Baku, explaining the March Events. The letter began with the accusation that the Azerbaijanis, being the disciples of the Turks and the Germans, could not be trusted. Having thus disposed of the Azerbaijani version of the events, Bagrat stated that the battle was waged by the Musavat and the Soviet, while the Armenians remained neutral. He continued by saying that some Armenian soldiers took part in the fighting, but that those were only isolated individuals for whom the Armenian National Council could not be held responsible. The Archbishop placed the entire guilt upon the Musavat, calling it the helper of Turks. As far as massacred of civilians was concerned, Bagrat denied that the Armenians had anything to do with it; in fact, he claimed that the Armenians gave shelter to some 20,000 Muslims during the struggle.. Persian Armenians in Baku tried to and saved many lives of their fellow citizens, which may have been the basis for Bagrat's exaggerated assertion that some 20,000 Muslims were saved by Armenians.
Although not an isolated incident, given the participation of the Azerbaijanis during the Ottoman offensive on Armenia in early 1918, the March Days played a significant role in bringing pre-existing inter-ethnic tensions to the forefront of Armenian-Azeri relations. According to various sources a total of between 3,000 to 12,000 Muslims were killed during the violence. Less than six months later, in September 1918, in a period called September Days , Enver Pasha's Army of Islam supported by local Azeri forces recaptured Baku and subsequently killed an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 ethnic Armenians in retaliation.
The rough figures presented above by Michael Croissant, however, are clarified by the data from the Armenian National Council. According to Dr. Firuz Kazemzadeh, "on 15th September, 1918, Azerbaijani troops burst into the city. The Turks remained outside for three days, while Azerbaijanis took a full measure of revenge for the March Events. Figures gathered by a special commission of the Armenian National Council indicate that 5,248 Baku Armenians were massacred. Moreover, 1,500 Armenian refugees from other parts of the Caucasus who happened to have been in Baku at the wrong time were killed. To this Commission added 2,240 Armenians whose corpses were found in the streets but whose identities were never established. Thus the total reached 8,988. It must be noted that these figures were gathered by the Armenian National Council, whom one can hardly expect to be objective in such a matter; yet, considering the general run of events, they cannot be much exaggerated ".
See also
References
- "New Republics in the Caucasus", The New York Times Current History, v. 11 no. 2 (March 1920), p. 492
- Michael Smith. "Anatomy of Rumor: Murder Scandal, the Musavat Party and Narrative of the Russian Revolution in Baku, 1917-1920", Journal of Contemporary History, Vol 36, No. 2, (Apr. 2001), p. 228
- ^ Template:Ru icon Michael Smith. "Azerbaijan and Russia: Society and State: Traumatic Loss and Azerbaijani National Memory"
- ^ Michael P. Croissant. The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Causes and Implications, p. 14. ISBN 0-275-96241-5
- Human Rights Watch. “Playing the "Communal Card": Communal Violence and Human Rights”
- Peter Hopkirk, "Like hidden fire. The Plot to bring down the British Empire", Kodansha Globe, New York, 1994, p. 281. ISBN-10: 1-56836-127-0
- ibid., pp. 262-266, 287
- Firuz Kazemzadeh. Struggle For Transcaucasia (1917 - 1921), New York Philosophical Library, 1951, p. 70.
- Stepan Shaumyan, Статьи и речи, Baku, p. 224
- Документы об истории гражданской войны в С.С.С.Р., Vol. 1, pp. 282–283.
- Claims of the Peace Delegation of the Republic of Caucasian Azerbaijan presented to the Peace Conference in Paris, Paris, 1919, pp. 18–19.
- "The Russian Revolution as National Revolution: Tragic Deaths and Rituals of Remembrance in Muslim Azerbaijan (1907–1920)," Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, vol. 49 (2001).
- Tchalkhouchian, Gr. Le livre rouge, Paris, Veradzenout, 1919, pp. 85-86
- B. Baikov. Воспоминания о революции в Закавказии, Memoirs of Russian Kadet in Baku 1917 - 1920, p. 122.
- Firuz Kazemzadeh. Struggle for Transcaucasia (1917 - 1921), New York Philosophical Library, 1951, p. 71
- Achiq Söz, No. 627, 1918.
- Firuz Kazemzadeh. Struggle For Transcaucasia (1917 - 1921), New York Philosophical Library, 1951, p. 71.
- Suren Shaumyan. "Бакинская Коммуна 1918-го года", Пролетарская Революция, No. 12 (59), 1926, p. 78.
- Tchalkhouchian, Gr., open citation, pp. 85-86
- Claims of the Peace Delegation of the Republic of Caucasian Azerbaijan Presented to the Peace Conference in Paris, Paris, 1919, pp. 18-19.
- Жизнь Национальностей, No. 25 (33), 6th July, 1919 as cited in Firuz Kazemzadeh, open citation, p. 74.
- Firuz Kazemzadeh. Struggle For Transcaucasia (1917 - 1921), New York Philosophical Library, 1951, p. 75.
- Известия, No. 90, Moscow, 9th May, 1918.
- Ratgauzer, Ia. Революция и гражданская война в Баку. Baku, 1927, p. 144.
- Peter Hopkirk, "Like hidden fire. The Plot to bring down the British Empire", Kodansha Globe, New York, 1994, p. 287. ISBN-10: 1-56836-127-0
- Firuz Kazemzadeh. Struggle for Transcaucasia (1917 - 1921), New York Philosophical Library, 1951, p. 73.
- ^ The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Causes and Implications By Michael P. Croissant - Page 14, quoted word-to-word from Firuz Kazemzadeh, "Struggle for Transcaucasia", 1951, p. 73 Cite error: The named reference "azeris" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- Firuz Kazemzadeh. Struggle for Transcaucasia (1917 - 1921), New York Philosophical Library, 1951, p. 73.
- Jean Loris-Melikof. La revolution russe et les nouvelles Republiques Transcaucasiennes, Paris, Felix Alcan, 1920, pp. 115-117.
- Firuz Kazemzadeh. Struggle for Transcaucasia (1917 - 1921), New York Philosophical Library, 1951, p. 73.
- Human Rights Watch. "Playing the 'Communal Card': Communal Violence and Human Rights"
- Croissant. Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict, p. 15.
- Firuz Kazemzadeh. "Struggle for Transcaucasia (1917-1921)", New York Philosophical Library 1951, p. 143-144.
- B. Ishkhanian. Великие ужасы в городе Баку, Tiflis, 1920, pp. 28-30 as quoted by Firuz Kazemzadeh, "Struggle for Transcaucasia", p. 144.