| Revision as of 15:48, 19 December 2007 editCailil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,119 editsm clarify which section I'm suggesting this be merged into← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:37, 25 August 2023 edit undo1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers198,074 editsm rcats | ||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | #REDIRECT ] | ||
| {{Cleanup|date=December 2006}} | |||
| {{mergeto|Feminism#Post-feminism|talk:feminism#merge_post-feminism}} | |||
| '''Post-feminism''' (or '''post-feminism''') is a term used to describe a range of viewpoints that position themselves as reactions to ]. The term was first used in the 1980s to signify a backlash over ]. It now denotes a wide range of theories, some of which argue that feminism is no longer relevant to today's society.<ref>Modleski, Tania. Feminism without Women: Culture and Criticism in a “Postfeminist” Age. New York: Routledge, 1991, 3. </ref> | |||
| {{R from alternative hyphenation}} | |||
| One of the earliest uses of the term was in ]'s 1982 article "Voices of the Post-Feminist Generation," published in '']''. This article was based on a number of interviews with women who largely agreed with the goals of feminism, but did not identify as feminists.<ref>Rosen, Ruth. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America. New York: Viking, 2000, 275, 337. </ref> | |||
| {{R with history}} | |||
| The post-feminist texts which emerged in the 1980s and '90s portrayed ] as a monolithic entity, thereby allowing the author to criticize these generalizations.<ref> Jones, Amelia. “Postfeminism, Feminist Pleasures, and Embodied Theories of Art,” New Feminist Criticism: Art, Identity, Action, Eds. Joana Frueh, Cassandra L. Langer and Arlene Raven. New York: HarperCollins, 1994. 16-41, 20. </ref> Some claimed that feminism forced women to view themselves as victims, while others posited that women had grown disenchanted with feminism and now wished to return to domesticity. Others claimed that feminism had its merits, but must be extended to reflect the changing experiences and expectations of women. | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ==References== | |||
| <references/> | |||
| ==Further reading== | |||
| * Rene Denfeld, ''The New Victorians: A Young Woman’s Challenge to the Old Feminist Order'', (New York: Warner Books, 1995) | |||
| * Camille Paglia, ''Sex Art and American Culture: Essays'', (Vintage, 1992) | |||
| * Katie Roiphe, '']: Fear, Sex and Feminism on Campus'' (1993) | |||
| * Sophia Phoca, Rebecca Wright "Introducing Postfeminism", (Icon Books 1999) | |||
| ] | |||
| {{fem-stub}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:37, 25 August 2023
Redirect to:
- From an alternative hyphenation: This is a redirect from a title with an alternative hyphenation of the target name. Pages that link to this redirect may be updated to link directly to the target page if that results in an improvement of the text. Do not "fix" such links if they are not broken. Also, these links should not be replaced with piped links.
- With history: This is a redirect from a page containing substantive page history. This page is kept as a redirect to preserve its former content and attributions. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated), nor delete this page.
- This template should not be used for redirects having some edit history but no meaningful content in their previous versions, nor for redirects created as a result of a page merge (use {{R from merge}} instead), nor for redirects from a title that forms a historic part of Misplaced Pages (use {{R with old history}} instead).