| Revision as of 10:42, 16 October 2009 editMakeswell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,356 edits →Enlightenment (concept)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:03, 12 November 2023 edit undoTNstingray (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,040 edits Notification: listing of Iron Queen at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{CheckedSockpuppet|Altenmann|Altenmann}} | |||
| Talk page archives: ] | Talk page archives: ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Line 4: | Line 6: | ||
| ==Enlightenment (concept)== | ==Enlightenment (concept)== | ||
| Moved to ]. ] (]) 15:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I created the Enlightenment (religious) page tonight in order to preserve that material and direct people with that interest, etc I just left the Enlightenment (concept) page alone for now. I was wondering why you reversed my edit as I gave some reasons in the edit summary and really just created less confusion because the previous, well now just the Enlightenment (concept) page, has too many unrelated concepts. I was kind of surprised when I saw that all I had written was simply deleted. It would probably be best imho at this point to just either delete the Enlightenment (concept) page or to run with the definition as a lack of ignorance, or to have insight, but then only really the section on Kant, and possibly Nietzsche, would be appropriate so it might then just make more sense to put that section under the Kant page and delete the Enlightenment (concept) page; how Do pages get deleted? You probably don't need to read the rest unless you want to help out with the Enlightenment (concept) page... ] (]) 10:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==External Links== | |||
| I am fully aware that the Misplaced Pages "nofollow" function means that external links have no ranking benefit for their destination pages. | |||
| Did you take the time to see that every link I posted was to a ] that provides free help to people suffering from agoraphobia? | |||
| Today, now that those links have been removed, there are people suffering from agoraphobia who are not finding badly-needed help because there are now ZERO external links on the[REDACTED] agoraphobia page. And these are people who already have great difficulty getting help. **Agoraphobics have a high suicide rate too. | |||
| External links ARE allowed in wikipedia-- but they must relate to the article topic and must be non-commercial in nature. | |||
| Those links met both criteria. | |||
| ] (]) 22:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Misplaced Pages is encyclopedia, not medical advisor. We link only websites which contribute to '''article content'''. ] of various medical organizations. Suffering people may easily find all these organizations themselves, if they have computer, since they read wikipedia. Being a non-profit and "providing help" is not open ticket to wikipedia. Please read ]. ] (]) 23:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == RS == | |||
| Hi Mukadderat, I must apologize for my earlier rudeness. It was not intended and I withdraw the comment I made. I was writing out of frustration. Everything to do with that page has been very frustrating throughout its history, and I would welcome your help in sorting it out. I'm going to try not to think about it for a few hours, and hopefully after a break and some sleep, I'll be able to explain the background calmly, so that you can see where the problems lie. Again, I am sorry for being snippy. ] 05:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == AfD of first-class cricketers == | |||
| Hi. Please read ] and ]. Anyone who played ] meets the site's ] criteria. The fact that there may currently be minimal available data about the subject does not matter since the article can be created as a ] until such time as someone can expand it. You need to understand the site guidelines before using AfD and it is always better if you are unsure about an article to raise a question on the talk page of the relevant project, in this case at ]. ----<b>] | <sup><i>]</i></sup></b> 05:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| ] Hello Mukadderat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''2''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Armen Oganesyan}}</small> | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Abdullah Abbas Nadwi}}</small> | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 07:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Possible edit-warring== | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:Article|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 17:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Please don't engage in tit-for-tat warn-a-thons like this one . ] (]) 19:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please stop harassing me. Please discuss article content. You are the one who started the revert war. I invited you to state your objections in article talk page. ] (]) 23:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == AFD on Mycosporine-like amino acids == | |||
| You gave a keep on ] but the AFD tag is still in the article. I could remove that myself but I think other houskeeping is required which I am not familiar with. ] (]) 14:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Expansion of Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee == | |||
| Hi there. I saw you created the article ]. I have written a longer more up-to-date version and it can be found on ]. I don't add it now myself because I work with one group with a perspective in the current situation (ALG) and I want to be sure there is consensus for this change. What do you think? I have also asked for advice at Wikiproject United States and the Help Desk too. --] (]) 19:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, someone else took care of it, but please have a look, if you like. --] (]) 21:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| :'''This journalist does not appear to meet any of the criteria for ]; unable to find sufficient coverage to meet ].''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">](])</span> 23:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==Category:Slaves of the Muslim world== | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 17:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == lurs in america and america and germany and sweden == | |||
| hi , can you give me some useful information about lurs of other countries exept iran , iraq , oman? | |||
| please help me!--] (]) 12:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why. | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| == Hey, the reason I proposed for deletion == | |||
| Hi, the page you created seems to have been abused by other editors (I didnt look too much at the history of the changes) but right now its only purpose seems to be for attacking the subject due to some dispute between the professor and some of his students. That is why I've nonimated it for deletion. However, if the page can be improved with some details on the subject that are actually useful, I'd support its continuation. Hope you understand. ] (]) 20:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>Unsourced - duplicates ]</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| Hey, I noticed you reverted the old page to its original form. I would like to work with you and see that you've done a lot of editing, so we could make the page much better. | |||
| Right now the page covers topics which are not related to one another and the Talk: Enlightenment (concept) page shows this with a bunch of users saying how the page should be removed or sounds like a half-baked high school project etc. | |||
| You left no answer to why you reversed the edit anywhere. I'd love to know why so that we can work together. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| from merriam webster's online dictionary, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/enlightenment: | |||
| "Main Entry: en·light·en·ment | |||
| Pronunciation: \in-ˈlī-tən-mənt, en-\ | |||
| Function: noun | |||
| Date: 1654 | |||
| 1 : the act or means of enlightening : the state of being enlightened | |||
| 2 capitalized : a philosophic movement of the 18th century marked by a rejection of traditional social, religious, and political ideas and an emphasis on rationalism —used with the | |||
| 3 Buddhism : a final blessed state marked by the absence of desire or suffering" | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] <sup>(])</sup> 07:13, 26 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
| The parts falling under the 2nd definition above, describing the time when the Age of Enlightenment started and then ended obviously need to go on the Age of Enlightenment page if they're not there already. This includes the section titled: Adorno's and Horkheimer's definition of "enlightenment", which is very misleading here as they are talking about the Age of Enlightenment but it's just called Enlightenment. I will move those parts tonight myself. | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| the next two quotes when used together show clearly what Kant meant by his use of the word enlightenment... | |||
| == "Eu nacional" listed at ] == | |||
| from Merriam Webster's Online Dictionary, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/enlightened: | |||
| ] | |||
| "Main Entry: enlightened | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Function: adjective | |||
| == "PSM (Disambiguation)" listed at ] == | |||
| Date: 1652 | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: Contentious topic designation removed == | |||
| 1 : freed from ignorance and misinformation <an enlightened people> <an enlightened time> | |||
| 2 : based on full comprehension of the problems involved <issued an enlightened ruling>" | |||
| Hello {{u|Mukadderat}}, | |||
| This is from the Enlightenment (concept), page: "In his famous 1782 essay What Is Enlightenment?, Immanuel Kant described it as follows: | |||
| Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage. Tutelage is the incapacity to use one's own understanding without the guidance of another. Such tutelage is self-imposed if its cause is not lack of intelligence, but rather a lack of determination and courage to use one's intelligence without being guided by another." | |||
| As a very late update to the ] arbitration case, the ] designation, previously "discretionary sanctions", originally "article probation", has been removed following a successful | |||
| Kant appears to be using the first above definition of 'enlightened', being free from ignorance and false information. Since under (1) from the definition of 'enlightenment', he is referring to a state of being free from ignorance and false ideas. This is much different from the Buddhist use of the word enlightenment, which is under a different section in the m-w definition, and in general is a much different state than just being wise. I think this doesn't warrant a separate page for Kant's idea since he's just saying that to be wise you have to think for yourself, though this might be appropriate on Kant's webpage in wikipedia. If you really want to give Kant his own enlightenment page then be my guest, but Kant is not talking about the same type of enlightenment that occurs amongst religious people, and which happened for Buddha, so his definition should not be on an Enlightenment (religious) page. Same thing with Nietzsche I suppose though I don't see him actually use the word enlightenment anywhere in that quote. | |||
| Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic designation remain in force and are governed by the ]. | |||
| So then I guess that if you just want to have a page on enlightenment as freedom from ignorance and false views then go for it. That would be a very appropriate place for Kant's version of "Enlightenment" and maybe Nietzsche's too. | |||
| This notification may be mostly unnecessary, but as you had been a party to the original case, I thought you might be interested in hearing that after about 15 years, this remnant has been removed. Until today, it was listed at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:General_sanctions#Arbitration_Committee-authorised_sanctions}}. | |||
| Best regards,<br>] (]) 19:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Alright it's getting very late. I simply left the Enlightenment (concept) page alone for now and re-created the Enlightenment (religious) page. I'm not sure what you want to achieve with the Enlightenment (concept) page, perhaps for just that dictionary definition of seeing clearly or understanding or solving some problem. Anyways, goodnight. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 12#Iron Queen}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 21:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:03, 12 November 2023
 | This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Altenmann (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to this sockpuppet investigation for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |  |
Talk page archives: Archive 1 Archive 2
Enlightenment (concept)
Moved to Talk:Enlightenment (spiritual)#Removed from my talk page. Mukadderat (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Misplaced Pages Watch
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Misplaced Pages Watch. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Watch (5th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
External Links
I am fully aware that the Misplaced Pages "nofollow" function means that external links have no ranking benefit for their destination pages.
Did you take the time to see that every link I posted was to a non-profit organization that provides free help to people suffering from agoraphobia?
Today, now that those links have been removed, there are people suffering from agoraphobia who are not finding badly-needed help because there are now ZERO external links on the[REDACTED] agoraphobia page. And these are people who already have great difficulty getting help. **Agoraphobics have a high suicide rate too.
External links ARE allowed in wikipedia-- but they must relate to the article topic and must be non-commercial in nature.
Those links met both criteria.
Sean7phil (talk) 22:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages is encyclopedia, not medical advisor. We link only websites which contribute to article content. wikipedia is not a web directory of various medical organizations. Suffering people may easily find all these organizations themselves, if they have computer, since they read wikipedia. Being a non-profit and "providing help" is not open ticket to wikipedia. Please read wikipedia:Notability (organizations). Mukadderat (talk) 23:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
RS
Hi Mukadderat, I must apologize for my earlier rudeness. It was not intended and I withdraw the comment I made. I was writing out of frustration. Everything to do with that page has been very frustrating throughout its history, and I would welcome your help in sorting it out. I'm going to try not to think about it for a few hours, and hopefully after a break and some sleep, I'll be able to explain the background calmly, so that you can see where the problems lie. Again, I am sorry for being snippy. SlimVirgin 05:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
AfD of first-class cricketers
Hi. Please read WP:CRIN and WP:ATHLETE. Anyone who played first-class cricket meets the site's WP:Notability criteria. The fact that there may currently be minimal available data about the subject does not matter since the article can be created as a WP:STUB until such time as someone can expand it. You need to understand the site guidelines before using AfD and it is always better if you are unsure about an article to raise a question on the talk page of the relevant project, in this case at WT:CRIC. ----Jack | 05:36, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Mukadderat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 21 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Armen Oganesyan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Abdullah Abbas Nadwi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Possible edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Article. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Frotz (talk) 17:26, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please don't engage in tit-for-tat warn-a-thons like this one . Frotz (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please stop harassing me. Please discuss article content. You are the one who started the revert war. I invited you to state your objections in article talk page. Mukadderat (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Time Cube
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Time Cube. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Time Cube (6th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
AFD on Mycosporine-like amino acids
You gave a keep on Mycosporine-like amino acids but the AFD tag is still in the article. I could remove that myself but I think other houskeeping is required which I am not familiar with. Thincat (talk) 14:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Expansion of Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee
Hi there. I saw you created the article Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee. I have written a longer more up-to-date version and it can be found on my user page. I don't add it now myself because I work with one group with a perspective in the current situation (ALG) and I want to be sure there is consensus for this change. What do you think? I have also asked for advice at Wikiproject United States and the Help Desk too. --As in liberty (talk) 19:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, someone else took care of it, but please have a look, if you like. --As in liberty (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Oben Özaydın
The article Oben Özaydın has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This journalist does not appear to meet any of the criteria for WP:WRITER; unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J04n(talk page) 23:48, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Category:Slaves of the Muslim world
Category:Slaves of the Muslim world, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
lurs in america and america and germany and sweden
hi , can you give me some useful information about lurs of other countries exept iran , iraq , oman? please help me!--دیارا (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of George Saliba
The article George Saliba has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Hey, the reason I proposed for deletion
Hi, the page you created seems to have been abused by other editors (I didnt look too much at the history of the changes) but right now its only purpose seems to be for attacking the subject due to some dispute between the professor and some of his students. That is why I've nonimated it for deletion. However, if the page can be improved with some details on the subject that are actually useful, I'd support its continuation. Hope you understand. Code16 (talk) 20:43, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Controversy (law)
The article Controversy (law) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced - duplicates Case or Controversy Clause
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seraphim System 07:13, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Caucasian muhajirs has been nominated for discussion
Category:Caucasian muhajirs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
"Eu nacional" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eu nacional. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Eu nacional until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Nabla (talk) 16:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
"PSM (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect PSM (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#PSM (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat: Contentious topic designation removed
Hello Mukadderat,
As a very late update to the Prem Rawat arbitration case, the contentious topic designation, previously "discretionary sanctions", originally "article probation", has been removed following a successful request for amendment.
Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic designation remain in force and are governed by the contentious topics procedure.
This notification may be mostly unnecessary, but as you had been a party to the original case, I thought you might be interested in hearing that after about 15 years, this remnant has been removed. Until today, it was listed at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions § Arbitration Committee-authorised sanctions.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
"Iron Queen" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Iron Queen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 12 § Iron Queen until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 21:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)