| Revision as of 06:48, 30 March 2007 editKjartan8 (talk | contribs)135 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:08, 30 March 2007 edit undoTeabing-Leigh (talk | contribs)237 edits →MessageNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ==Message== | ==Message== | ||
| This statement "However, this is not a direct quote. No Primary source evidence exists of this quote." is ] and is not allowed, along with numerous other problems with your edits. ] 06:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | This statement "However, this is not a direct quote. No Primary source evidence exists of this quote." is ] and is not allowed, along with numerous other problems with your edits. ] 06:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Kjartan8 Quoting Stanley Wolpert, Mansergh and Sir Francis Tuker is NOT original research. Stop making excuses for your attempts to deliberately distort history. You are guilty of vandalism of the worst kind and I will carefuly monitor your lies from now on. ] 07:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:08, 30 March 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Teabing-Leigh, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Bhadani (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Message
This statement "However, this is not a direct quote. No Primary source evidence exists of this quote." is Original Research and is not allowed, along with numerous other problems with your edits. Kjartan8 06:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Kjartan8 Quoting Stanley Wolpert, Mansergh and Sir Francis Tuker is NOT original research. Stop making excuses for your attempts to deliberately distort history. You are guilty of vandalism of the worst kind and I will carefuly monitor your lies from now on. Teabing-Leigh 07:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)