| Revision as of 01:41, 1 April 2007 editSean William (talk | contribs)6,648 edits yeah, my name's not flava flav← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:56, 1 April 2007 edit undoIAmTheCoinMan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,566 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 40K | |maxarchivesize = 40K | ||
| Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
| Hi PullToOpen. I'll never place another inscrutable joke on an RfA again. Sorry. ] (], ]) 15:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | Hi PullToOpen. I'll never place another inscrutable joke on an RfA again. Sorry. ] (], ]) 15:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :No worries. I understood it the first time I saw it :). ] 20:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | :No worries. I understood it the first time I saw it :). ] 20:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Fool! == | |||
| 3RR | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. PTO 15:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You guys are on 3 reverts im on two. You guys broke the rules go die! | |||
Revision as of 15:56, 1 April 2007
User talk:Sean William/header.css
Your RfA opening sentence
Your RfA opening sentence made me realise that I used the exact same opening sentence for both my RfA and RfB. Yours was similar to mine... but mine were identical! That's odd. Good luck, by the way :-) --Deskana (talk) 00:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, I'm actually laughing pretty hard right now. I changed it at the last minute from "I'm going off the deep end", too... Cheers, PTO 00:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Impersonator
Hello. Thanks for blocking on Simple English Misplaced Pages. I browsed through the IP block list and some vandal (possibly a "Kate McAuliffe" vandal) impersonated both me and my sister. I knew that it was not my sister because I checked the contributions of this user and found an edit that no one in my family would do. Amos Han 00:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not a problem. We've had a long term vandal there who was obsessed with a girl named "Kate McAuliffe", so the name stuck. PTO 00:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- I know. I know who that long term vandal is. He is one of my classmates at my school. He is such a crazy person. I do agree that he is extremely obsessed with Kate McAuliffe. All I hear him say is "Sean McAuliffe has a beautiful sister" and "Misplaced Pages has a crush on Kate McAuliffe" and things like that. Hopefully he will stop doing that, now that I am extremely tired of hearing that. Amos Han 01:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
RCU
You asked me to choose one single code letter in 2 RCU I made , . I fulfilled your request, please do the check. Thanks.--MariusM 08:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- One has been declined, and the other completed. PTO 20:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers. - Michael Billington (talk) 10:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
Your RfA
Hi PullToOpen. I'll never place another inscrutable joke on an RfA again. Sorry. Xiner (talk, email) 15:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- No worries. I understood it the first time I saw it :). PTO 20:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Fool!
3RR Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. PTO 15:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
You guys are on 3 reverts im on two. You guys broke the rules go die!