Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mark viking: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:44, 15 January 2024 editSolomon7968 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users12,932 edits Question: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 18:32, 15 January 2024 edit undoMark viking (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,286 edits Question: ReplyNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:


Following some links I saw your comment at ]. As per you Springer and World Scientific are the best publishers for math and physics. As such I wonder f you know the same for biology and chemistry? ]] 14:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Following some links I saw your comment at ]. As per you Springer and World Scientific are the best publishers for math and physics. As such I wonder f you know the same for biology and chemistry? ]] 14:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
: For graduate and professional level biology books, I don't think there are any publishers that are as dominant and well thought of as Springer is for Mathematics. It seems a more heterogeneous publishing field. The university-associated publishers like OUP are still well-regarded in biology. For biology journal publishing, Nature, Science, and Cell Press are considered top tier. Medical publishing is a whole separate ecosystem with its own publishers. I don't know much about chemistry publishers. I know that ] and ] are major publishers with top journals, but I don't know how well-regarded they are for their book publishing. --<code>&#123;&#123;u&#124;]&#125;&#125;&nbsp;{]}</code> 18:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:32, 15 January 2024

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5


This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Zilog Z280

What do you think about this? Similar aritcle and my BEFORE is showing just mentions in passing? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

I haven't performed a BEFORE style search on other members of the Z80 family. There is some coverage, e.g. . I consider author Al Williams (of Dr. Dobbs fame) as being a reliable source for this sort of topic. But it seems clear that a merge of verifiable bits and redirect could be a reasonable alternative to deletion for this processor as well. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 20:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Question

Following some links I saw your comment at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 April 25#Category:Chapman & Hall books. As per you Springer and World Scientific are the best publishers for math and physics. As such I wonder f you know the same for biology and chemistry? Solomon7968 14:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

For graduate and professional level biology books, I don't think there are any publishers that are as dominant and well thought of as Springer is for Mathematics. It seems a more heterogeneous publishing field. The university-associated publishers like OUP are still well-regarded in biology. For biology journal publishing, Nature, Science, and Cell Press are considered top tier. Medical publishing is a whole separate ecosystem with its own publishers. I don't know much about chemistry publishers. I know that The American Chemical Society and The Royal Society of Chemistry are major publishers with top journals, but I don't know how well-regarded they are for their book publishing. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 18:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)