Revision as of 18:27, 7 July 2005 editMdkarazim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users649 edits Support Information | Latest revision as of 11:20, 28 January 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,800 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(620 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | |||
Could someone place a link of some sort to this article that shows the accuracy of the information therein? It's not that I don't believe what's here, I am just curious to see where it comes from. I am particularly interested in hearing about the PowerPC/x86 support that is going to be simulataneously supported in this new OS. I was under the impression that Tiger was going to be the "end-of-the-line" OS for PowerPC systems. It's very interesting to see things stating otherwise. ] 2005-07-07 18:27:25 (UTC) | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B| | |||
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|importance=high}} | |||
}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| archiveheader = {{tan}} | |||
| maxarchivesize = 175k | |||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| counter = 4 | |||
| algo = old(365d) | |||
| archive = Talk:Mac OS X Leopard/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{{Archive box|auto=yes|age=365|units=days|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} | |||
== 10.5.9 Sorbet Leopard == | |||
I've heard of an unofficial version of Mac OS X 10.5 called ''Sorbet Leopard''. Maybe include some info about Sorbet Leopard in the article? (Or maybe create a separate article about that subject?) ] (]) 16:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
:A quick Google Search found , but that's not much of a ], and the references it gives are on Reddit and MacRumors forums, so not exactly reliable sources, either. | |||
:I didn't see any official site for it. There seems to be enough talk about it to indicate that it's not just a hoax (i.e., a big troll by multiple contributors), but not much in the way of details. My ''guess'' is that, ''if'' it exists, it's probably somebody taking a Leopard release, tweaking the open-source parts from the equivalent Darwin release, and releasing that, but that's just a bit of ] (if a quick guess even qualifies as "research") on my part, so there's no chance that I'd put that in an article. | |||
:I'm not inclined to say anything about it in the article without reliable sources. ] (]) 20:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:20, 28 January 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mac OS X Leopard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
10.5.9 Sorbet Leopard
I've heard of an unofficial version of Mac OS X 10.5 called Sorbet Leopard. Maybe include some info about Sorbet Leopard in the article? (Or maybe create a separate article about that subject?) Blacky the Bre (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- A quick Google Search found this page on the Apple wiki on fandom.com, but that's not much of a reliable source, and the references it gives are on Reddit and MacRumors forums, so not exactly reliable sources, either.
- I didn't see any official site for it. There seems to be enough talk about it to indicate that it's not just a hoax (i.e., a big troll by multiple contributors), but not much in the way of details. My guess is that, if it exists, it's probably somebody taking a Leopard release, tweaking the open-source parts from the equivalent Darwin release, and releasing that, but that's just a bit of original research (if a quick guess even qualifies as "research") on my part, so there's no chance that I'd put that in an article.
- I'm not inclined to say anything about it in the article without reliable sources. Guy Harris (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)