Revision as of 17:46, 8 March 2009 editLavinhirani (talk | contribs)4 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 09:48, 9 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,702,930 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Luxembourg}}, {{WikiProject India}}, {{WikiProject Mining}}, {{WikiProject Companies}}, {{WikiProject United States}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(43 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
] should not be merged into the article ] for the following reasons: |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|
1. ] has not been merged into ArcelorMittal's article. |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Luxembourg|importance=High}} |
|
2. ] was a past entity, and it's accomplishments cannot be combined with those of ArcelorMittal's |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject India|importance=mid}} |
|
3. MittalSteel had a different set of directors and executives than ArcelorMittal |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Mining|importance=mid}} |
|
] (]) 22:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=top}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:ArcelorMittal/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
|
I have the same view i.e that Mittal Steel should not be merged into Arcelor Mittal as technically , legally and culturally they are different companies. Even if mittal steel does not exist anymore it does provide a useful antitheses for students and knowledge mongers alike to know what the older company was all about . |
|