Talk:Reuben Swinburne Clymer: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:30, 10 November 2007 editBetacommandBot (talk \| contribs)931,490 editsm auto assessed← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 23:46, 12 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,817,386 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Occult}}, {{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\|living=no\|listas=Clymer, R. Swinburne\|1=
	{{WPBiography
			{{WikiProject Biography}}
	\|living=no
			{{WikiProject Occult\|importance=low}}
	\|class=Start
			{{WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism\|importance=Low}}
	\|priority=
	}}		}}

			==Untitled==
	{{WPOccult\|class= Start\|auto=yes\|importance=}}
	Clymer also wrote many books about the Rosicrucian Fraternal Order. This page needs to be expanded.		Clymer also wrote many books about the Rosicrucian Fraternal Order. This page needs to be expanded.
	== WikiProject class rating==		== WikiProject class rating==
	This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. ] 03:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)		This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. ] 03:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

			== Notability ==

			There is only one reference, the link is dead, and the website is a private organisation. Is this notable? ] (]) 14:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


			I can't find reference the Arnold Krumm Heller ever accepted within his orders the Law of Thelma. I only see him against it in any articles. Please provide source until source is provided, should be removed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 22:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			== Sources for possible overhaul ==

			I went through Google Books and grabbed links for what did not immediately appear to fail ].
			{{cot\|1=Nevermind, did the overhaul}}
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			*
			{{cob}}
			Due to a recent large acquisition of books, I'm resorting my personal library, but once it's done I might find some more sources. ] (]) 18:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
			:Nevermind, did the overhaul, used most of the sources. ] (]) 19:55, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

			== Bias ==

			A large number of the edits to this wiki thread are grossly biased. I think the page should be revised to account for it's blatantly strong anti-FRC and pro AMORC bias. One order prolifically advertises (and solicits) (AMORC) while Clymer's order is not only more humble but also more historically veritable. They have real documents and sources showing a lot of the history claimed as false by this page to be true, and even Pansophers (an unbiased peer review of RC societies) gives the FRC and Clymer a much higher rating on terms of traditional teachings and historical veritability. Whoever edited this clearly has bias and this wiki cannot currently be used as a helpful source for research. ] (]) 05:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:46, 12 February 2024

This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Clymer also wrote many books about the Rosicrucian Fraternal Order. This page needs to be expanded.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability

There is only one reference, the link is dead, and the website is a private organisation. Is this notable? Captain Abu Raed (talk) 14:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I can't find reference the Arnold Krumm Heller ever accepted within his orders the Law of Thelma. I only see him against it in any articles. Please provide source until source is provided, should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.10.77.186 (talk) 22:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Sources for possible overhaul

I went through Google Books and grabbed links for what did not immediately appear to fail WP:RS.

Nevermind, did the overhaul
The Watkins Dictionary of Magic The Dictionary of the Esoteric Secret Societies by John Lawrence Reynolds Modern Alchemy : Occultism and the Emergence of Atomic Theory by Mark Morrisson The Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor by Joscelyn Godwin, Christian Chanel, and John Patrick Deveney Paschal Beverly Randolph: A Nineteenth-Century Black American Spiritualist, Rosicrucian, and Sex Magician, by John Patrick Deveney "A Hot Bed of the Anti-vaccine Heresey": Opposition to Compulsory Vaccination in Boston and Cambridge, 1890-1905, by Karen Walloch Encyclopedic Handbook of Cults in America, by J. Gordon Melton The Invisible History of the Rosicrucians, by Tobias Churton In Search of the Swan Maiden: A Narrative on Folklore and Gender, by Barbara Fass Leavy and Daniel G. Calder Thirty-five Receipts from "The Larder Invaded", by William Woys Weaver The Rosicrucians: The History, Mythology, and Rituals of an Esoteric Order, by Christopher McIntosh Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Western Esotericism, by Hugh B. Urban Making the Detective Story American: Biggers, Van Dine and Hammett and the Turning Point of the Genre, 1925-1930, by J.K. Van Dover The Rosicrucian Enlightenment Revisited, by John Matthews

Nevermind, did the overhaul

Due to a recent large acquisition of books, I'm resorting my personal library, but once it's done I might find some more sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Nevermind, did the overhaul, used most of the sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Bias

A large number of the edits to this wiki thread are grossly biased. I think the page should be revised to account for it's blatantly strong anti-FRC and pro AMORC bias. One order prolifically advertises (and solicits) (AMORC) while Clymer's order is not only more humble but also more historically veritable. They have real documents and sources showing a lot of the history claimed as false by this page to be true, and even Pansophers (an unbiased peer review of RC societies) gives the FRC and Clymer a much higher rating on terms of traditional teachings and historical veritability. Whoever edited this clearly has bias and this wiki cannot currently be used as a helpful source for research. 71.72.213.146 (talk) 05:07, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Categories: