| Revision as of 20:20, 6 April 2007 editZombieSlayer54 (talk | contribs)59 edits →Notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:42, 6 April 2007 edit undoEVula (talk | contribs)39,066 edits →Notice: Further NoticeNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| I still say that it is not nonsense. If there is no evidence against, but some, albeit highly debatable, evidence for it, I can only conclude that it MAY be true. That is why I put supposedly. It is apparently your belief that that is not true, and therefore you call my edits "vandalism", even though I'm simply putting the facts down. No evidence against the truth, so... {{unsigned|ZombieSlayer54}} | I still say that it is not nonsense. If there is no evidence against, but some, albeit highly debatable, evidence for it, I can only conclude that it MAY be true. That is why I put supposedly. It is apparently your belief that that is not true, and therefore you call my edits "vandalism", even though I'm simply putting the facts down. No evidence against the truth, so... {{unsigned|ZombieSlayer54}} | ||
| :The publisher marketed it as "fiction" without Brooks complaining, and he also went on to write a zombie novel set in the future, rather than doing anything to seriously alert the world to the zombies that really exist. I agree that it's fun to pretend that zombies are real (I'll be at the Fleshmob zombie walk tomorrow), but a factual encyclopaedia isn't an appropriate place to pretend stuff for fun. --] 17:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | :The publisher marketed it as "fiction" without Brooks complaining, and he also went on to write a zombie novel set in the future, rather than doing anything to seriously alert the world to the zombies that really exist. I agree that it's fun to pretend that zombies are real (I'll be at the Fleshmob zombie walk tomorrow), but a factual encyclopaedia isn't an appropriate place to pretend stuff for fun. --] 17:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| You do realize I believe in the existance of zombies, right? And Brooks only didn't complain so as to actually sell the book. If he had the chance, he'd change the genre to "Documentary", or the such. And he wrote the novel in order to give people a sense of what to expect in a Class 4 zombie outbreak. | You do realize I believe in the existance of zombies, right? And Brooks only didn't complain so as to actually sell the book. If he had the chance, he'd change the genre to "Documentary", or the such. And he wrote the novel in order to give people a sense of what to expect in a Class 4 zombie outbreak. {{unsigned|ZombieSlayer54}} | ||
| ===Further Notice=== | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:48 hours|a period of '''48 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:continuing to introduce nonsense to '']''|'''continuing to introduce nonsense to '']'''''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to make ''useful'' contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 20:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> | |||
| This is your final warning. The next time you edit the article to read as "supposed fiction", I'm blocking your account for good. I'd love to see you make some ''constructive'' edits in the project, rather than continuing to undermine the purpose of the encyclopedia. | |||
| If you feel that this block is unfair, feel free to use the {{tl|unblock}} template for another administrator's opinion on the matter. ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 20:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:42, 6 April 2007
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in The Zombie Survival Guide. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --McGeddon 13:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Notice
Additionally, please stop adding nonsense to that particular article. This is your final warning; if you continue to vandalize the article, you will be indefinitely blocked. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Is it nonsense if there is no proof of Max Brooks saying he doesn't believe in zombies, yet plenty of proof of him saying that does, so therefore having no evidence to say his book is false? And if I will have to be banned indefinitely to support my beliefs, then so be it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZombieSlayer54 (talk • contribs)
- That... that's really too ridiculous to actually take seriously. EVula // talk // ☯ // 23:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Nice to know you think I'm a clown. You believe what you want to believe, and I believe what I want to believe. Just don't impose your beliefs on Misplaced Pages just because you're a mod, ok? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZombieSlayer54 (talk • contribs)
- My status as an administrator has nothing to do with the fact that Misplaced Pages is intended to be a serious project. Adding nonsense is not looked highly upon, and edit-warring even less so. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
I still say that it is not nonsense. If there is no evidence against, but some, albeit highly debatable, evidence for it, I can only conclude that it MAY be true. That is why I put supposedly. It is apparently your belief that that is not true, and therefore you call my edits "vandalism", even though I'm simply putting the facts down. No evidence against the truth, so... — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZombieSlayer54 (talk • contribs)
- The publisher marketed it as "fiction" without Brooks complaining, and he also went on to write a zombie novel set in the future, rather than doing anything to seriously alert the world to the zombies that really exist. I agree that it's fun to pretend that zombies are real (I'll be at the Fleshmob zombie walk tomorrow), but a factual encyclopaedia isn't an appropriate place to pretend stuff for fun. --McGeddon 17:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
You do realize I believe in the existance of zombies, right? And Brooks only didn't complain so as to actually sell the book. If he had the chance, he'd change the genre to "Documentary", or the such. And he wrote the novel in order to give people a sense of what to expect in a Class 4 zombie outbreak. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZombieSlayer54 (talk • contribs)
Further Notice
This is your final warning. The next time you edit the article to read as "supposed fiction", I'm blocking your account for good. I'd love to see you make some constructive edits in the project, rather than continuing to undermine the purpose of the encyclopedia.
If you feel that this block is unfair, feel free to use the {{unblock}} template for another administrator's opinion on the matter. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)