| Revision as of 17:09, 6 November 2009 editEnigmaman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,744 edits →Talk page: rep← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:50, 19 February 2024 edit undoChris troutman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers54,800 edits now listed as missing | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|left Misplaced Pages|{{BASEPAGENAME}}|April 10, 2023}} | |||
| {{message | |||
| {{semi-retired}} | |||
| | bgcolor = white | |||
| | border-color = black | |||
| | color = black | |||
| | linkcolor = blue | |||
| | width = 80% | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Archive box| | {{Archive box| | ||
| Line 24: | Line 19: | ||
| ] <br /> | ] <br /> | ||
| ] <br /> | ] <br /> | ||
| ] | ] <br /> | ||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] <br /> | |||
| ] | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{-}} | |||
| <b>If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. The same applies to you. If I leave a message on your page, I keep it watchlisted and I'll see when you reply. Thank you.</b> | |||
| == Precious== | |||
| {{user precious|header="...a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... "|thanks=for quality articles about personalities such as ] and ], for work for ] when it was active, for quoting "...a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... ", for {{diff|User talk:Floquenbeam|901464720||support}} and {{diff|User talk:Floquenbeam|903900304||the perfect solution}}, - enigmaticmaman, repeating from 10 years ago:}} | |||
| You are recipient no. ] of Precious, a prize of ]! --] (]) 15:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| }} | |||
| --] (]) 15:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, Gerda. I imagine I'm one of the few 2009 recipients still here. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| :: Well, not so few, - I joined 2009, DYK? I normally look up if someone found precious 10 years ago (mostly by ]) is still active and deserves a refreshed award. For you, it was the opposite: I noticed you on Floq's page, and thought "precious!", but then saw your entry and waited a bit ;) - Nice to meet you! --] (]) 15:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::: :-) ]<sup>]</sup> 16:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :::: We'll wait for your return. --] (]) 21:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == I'm sad to see you leave Misplaced Pages == | |||
| {{WPPJ-BLP}} | |||
| I hope that your retirement isn't permanent, and that you decide to return to Misplaced Pages (whenever that may be). I'll miss you a lot, and I hope to hear from you in the future someday when you make your return. Should I never hear from you again, please know that I wish you well and I wish you a life of happiness and well-being. It was a pleasure to know you and work with you here, and I am sad to see you go...... ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 17:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == User Ansehnlisch == | |||
| :I am not happy. Things are getting worse and worse on Misplaced Pages. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::Just to add my sadness about your retirement...and my thanks for your input at RFPP. Take care. ] (]) 10:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your draft article, ]== | |||
| Hello there | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello, Enigmaman. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]". | |||
| I’ve started an ANI thread () on ] who you blocked temporarily some weeks ago. His user page redirects to another user, so a link to the contribs page. | |||
| In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia ], the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:CloudBuy|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code. | |||
| regards. --] (]) 22:49, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at ]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. | |||
| == Maia Campbell == | |||
| Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ]<sup>(])</sup> 10:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Why did you remove my contributions to the Maia Campbell page? The info is correct. I would appreciate it if you can put it back. | |||
| :You got it deleted before the message even appeared for me, so this is not a helpful message. You could've notified me first. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process == | |||
| ] (]) 03:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! | |||
| :Unreferenced negative information about a living person. Find a ] before you consider inserting it in the article again. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate ] that followed ] you’ve been part of. | |||
| == Thanks for your help with BLPs! == | |||
| Please fill out to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes. | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The BLP Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Your hard work on BLPs in general, and at ] specifically, is much appreciated. That page has now been sunsetted (and I hope never to need to bring it back) but the work you did there (whether by bringing articles forward, reviewing them, or protecting them... or even by questioning or criticizing the process!) was of great help to the project. See you in the trenches! ++]: ]/] 01:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thanks for the barnstar. Sad to see the sunset, even though the userproject wasn't serving much purpose with the lack of reports. I checked in every few days, only to see nothing new each time. I guess my RfA didn't help matters. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Most excellently deserved barnstar for you to Enigma.--] <sup>]</sup> 07:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The privacy policy for this survey is . This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic. | |||
| == re ] == | |||
| Thank you for your participation, ] 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| Good block. ''']''' (]) 15:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Trizek (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Trizek_(WMF)/sandbox/temp_MassMessage_list&oldid=19553910 --> | |||
| :If that is the case, you may wish to compile evidence and think about a possible ] submission. ''']''' (]) 21:45, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
| == A user that you blocked has returned with a new account. == | |||
| <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
| I noticed that you had blocked an account for ]. I believe that same person has started a new account called ]. Their edits and edit summaries are almost identical. Thank you. ] (]) 18:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| :I was beaten to the block by Bubba.hotep. ]<sup>]</sup> 01:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Can You == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| block ] because he keeps adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles {{#if:Frankie Jonas|, like he did to the article ]}} please. ] (]) 16:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </td></tr> | |||
| </table> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=926750323 --> | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>] | |||
| Have a very happy first edit anniversary! | |||
| From the ], <mark style="background:Silver">] ] ] </mark> 01:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :What, for entering a name and birthdate? That's hardly a reason to block, and I don't see it as controversial. You're both edit-warring, though, and you need to stop. ]<sup>]</sup> 01:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>] | |||
| Have a very happy first edit anniversary! | |||
| From the ], ]<sup>]</sup> 13:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::Actually I was the one to stop him from doing it. I was trying to help. ] (]) 18:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==Your input== | |||
| == wheel war, protection of ] == | |||
| I have an RfC going on at ] regarding using all caps in an article and would appreciate the input of some long-standing Misplaced Pages editors who may be familiar with the policy, or at least be able to interpret the existing policy with some clarity. Thanks for your time! ] (]) 23:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == | |||
| FYI, I suspect there's no (ec) function on the protection code. So we can both hit "submit" and they'll go into the system. ] (]) 07:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Yep. It's been filed as a bug before and this isn't the first time I've protected something at almost the same exact time as another administrator. When that happens and I'm the last one in, I just revert to the other protection. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Good to know. So I'll either do what you propose, or get in a page protection war with another editor. That'll ]. :-) ] (]) 07:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
| ==94.192.38.247 on ANI== | |||
| <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| Since you were a blocking admin on this user back in August, you may want to comment on the current ANI thread ongoing . Thanks. - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;">] • ] • 02:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Purpose == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I hate doing that on Misplaced Pages. I teach high school, and part of my lesson for the day was exploring what Misplaced Pages is and how it is the most honest record of human existence, etc, etc. Part of that lesson was demonstrating how the power of millions of contributors corrects mistakes almost instantly. I just finsihed with the last class of the day and won't be doing that anymore. ;) {{unsigned|Metaltrav}} | |||
| </td></tr> | |||
| </table> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=990308186 --> | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>] | |||
| Have a very happy first edit anniversary! | |||
| From the ], ]<sup>]</sup> 04:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == mustafa halilsoy delete == | |||
| </div> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| what is the reason for deleting mustafa halilsoy page? {{unsigned|193.140.249.2}} | |||
| This title is salted. Can you unprotect to allow promotion of draft into mainspace? ] is a different topic. It is well cited. I have checked for notability. It should be moved to ]. I was asked for help on my talkpage. Regards,-] (]) 14:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :] ]<sup>]</sup> 19:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Enigmaman is inactive. Hey {{u|Eddie891}} Can you help with this ? --] (]) 15:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Nizil Shah}}, I have un-salted so the draft can be mainspaced as it's clearly not an A7 candidate. The new article may of course still be tagged if it is not notable, I have not closely reviewed the case. Thanks for the ping, {{u|Gaza world}}. Cheers, ] <small>''<sup> ]</sup> <sub>]</sub>'' </small> 15:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::I do not know anything about this. I SALTed the title some years ago after it had been deleted multiple times by various admins. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== ] == | ||
| Hi Enigmaman, your edit on the above page has been removed because the content claimed is not support by any source. You are welcome to put it back in if you would support it with an independent, reliable source by providing an inline citation. Thank you.]<sup>(])</sup> 04:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
| I bit that claim of his hook, line and sinker, I'm afraid. I am more than glad you blocked the guy. "Tendentious" doesn't begin to describe this. More like "troll" at this point. :) Frankly, I have never heard of a block of a single IP shutting down an entire school. Besides, shoudn't they be reading rather than editing? Just a thought. Anyway, you did the right thing and I'll keep an eye on this IP for awhile. Thanks! ] (]) 00:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :No, it has a source. His official UFC page. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == | |||
| == Article Format == | |||
| <table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
| Enigmaman, | |||
| <tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| There is a lot of Tweeting and Blogging going on about my State Senator's wikipedia article and how people have been sabotaging it. | |||
| I noticed that you had removed a lot of good information from his article. I was wondering if it needs to be in a specific format to | |||
| be allowed to remain on that page or if you just deleted all of it since the article was being messed with. It is all accurate | |||
| information that can be cited by multiple sources. Any info you could provide would be greatly appreciated. | |||
| The article is "Mark E. Amodei". Thanks and have a good night! ] (]) 05:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :It needs to be written properly in coherent paragraphs. As it stood, it was junk. See the articles of other politicians as an example. Can you link to the tweeting and blogging? ]<sup>]</sup> 05:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Quickie == | |||
| </td></tr> | |||
| </table> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1056563129 --> | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for December 17== | |||
| Anyway way you can suss out whether ] is a sock account for the permanently banned ]? Mr S is a relatively new account and has a fetish for discography pages.. which was BBHS's favourite haunting place. Whether the account is making good edits or bad edits... when you are permanently banned by community sanction... you are banned for good.... I think anyways. And BBHS is definitely banned from the Wik. ]-] 15:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- ( | )-->. Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 06:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Why was the WWE Raw Guest Host reverted? If you look at the reference every guest host has had this remark on their page. You mentioned your reason; however, using that reason, every show he has appeared on will have to be reverted. --] (]) 00:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Element Fresh == | |||
| == Re: ] at AIV == | |||
| Hi! I see you are the closer for ]. I found an article from '']'' . Would it help if I checked for some Chinese sources about the bankruptcy? If I can find enough I could start a DRV. | |||
| What's complex about this issue, and why not AIV? <b>]</b> ] 05:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 01:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| : I started ] as a draft. If you're interested, please feel free to give feedback. Thank you ] (]) 23:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| :Long time user, not a vandalism only account, very complex issue. If there is to be a block, it wouldn't come from AIV. AIV is for straightforward vandalism cases. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>] | |||
| Have a very happy first edit anniversary! | |||
| From the ], ]<sup>]</sup> 11:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well then, I'll ask you to take a look at his userlinks and see if a block is justified. <b>]</b> ] 05:26, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :::That will take more than a few minutes, so it'll have to wait until tomorrow. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Enigmaman. You fully protected ] on 2 July 2018 after ] was closed as "delete". I created a deletion review at ] regarding restoring the article using a new draft I wrote. ] (]) 07:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'll take a look now, although it would probably be best located on a noticeboard. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
| :::::I would recommend you take this to AN/I and make your case there. If you do, be sure to leave a message for Koavf to alert him to the thread. He wasn't the only one removing the speedy tag there. I don't find his overall behaviour to be especially satisfactory, but a block at this point would only serve to get me in trouble for making a unilateral move without consulting the community. At AIV, we're typically dealing with accounts/IPs that are vandalism-only. Koavf is clearly not a vandalism-only account, and as such, any block would lead to controversy. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| ==Hah== | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I'd say your block summary for ] is one of the funniest things I've seen here in a while. --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">] ]</span> 14:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : :) How did you come across it? After you brought it up, I just ''had'' to revert him. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Lurking at the genre troll page- lead me to his list of contribs, with the current block posted at the top. --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">] ]</span> 18:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm pleased to hear that it's still being used. Unfortunately, with Pat inactive, it hasn't received many updates of late. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'll bet there's a class somewhere where people are taught how to trace contributions and figure out how someone got from point A to point B. I also bet I'd find that class absolutely fascinating. --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">] ]</span> 18:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'd take that class. :P ]<sup>]</sup> 18:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I just saw the block reason because I <s>stalk</s> follow this talk page. Awesome reason :-) OTOH, that sort of PC association is being held against ] in his current RFA bid. Never go full retard, as ] say. ] (]) 23:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :''Never''. Deathknell of any serious actor. --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">] ]</span> 04:54, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == dana jacobson == | |||
| </div> | |||
| I don't follow why allegedly is being used with respect to her intoxication and reportedly with respect to what got her suspended. What was reported (in the article currently cited on her Wiki page) is that she also said "f--- Jesus" so I don't understand why that's being left out. It makes sense that ESPN took measures to hide footage of this event considering the inflammatory nature of the outburst but what Wiki stands to lose I don't know... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| </div> | |||
| :what wiki stands to lose? As far as I can recall (I have not edited that article in quite a while), the jesus remark was never properly sourced. A blog claimed it happened, but the reliable sources did not mention it until maybe later on. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 --> | |||
| == BDE == | |||
| == Thanks for looking in on Utan == | |||
| May your soul be bound up in the bond of eternal life. ] (]) 03:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| I sometimes forget how helpful the Utan list is. But it needed a cleanout since some of the accounts and numbers are long dormant. Perma-blocked Prophaniti has lots of IPs still within his reach. (he must be in a school. How have you been? I have been well despite recent distracting from the cause. I miss Pat. ]-] 08:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Danthecan}}, sincere apologies if I've misunderstood this message, but if you have evidence that Enigmaman has passed away, please send an email to info-en@wikimedia.org so they can take steps to secure the account. ] (]) 04:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : ]-] 08:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :: ]-] 11:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::already done. I blocked one of his regular IPs last night for six months. Thought that might help. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:57, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Precious anniversary == | ||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Four}} | |||
| --] (]) 05:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| He's created a sock to keep his rant on his talkpage. I can haz IP block? --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">] ]</span> 12:46, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks like ] took care of it. With any luck, he won't be able to resist reverting that page on more socks. Let's empty the drawer out. (Sorry to sound so gleeful. It just pains me to think of how many MetalObserver links he added). --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">] ]</span> 13:05, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I can't keep up with tedder! He gets to things on my talk before I read them. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:57, 1 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Mind saying why? == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| I noticed your drive-by comment elsewhere. It's not relevant to that situation, right? Mind telling me why? Did you know about ]? I don't see where you commented there. ] ] 16:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I never comment on RfCs. Is it relevant? Not really. Was just agreeing with the other person. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ::That's not agreement- that's a silly distraction. If I'm a bad admin who should not have the bit, that's an issue. But it's a ''separate'' issue from whether someone else shouldn't have the bit. It doesn't help move things forward to mix issues together this way. ] ] 17:22, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :::It surely was agreement. One person says something and another agrees. As for why I bothered to agree, it's because I feel that you should make the first move. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:25, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 --> | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| This user has again vandalized ]. Was previously banned for 24 hours. Is there any way we can protect the article? Thanks. ] (]) 14:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| :Blocking the offending editor is preferable to protection in this case. I have done so. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:02, 5 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| == Mandy Moore == | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%); | |||
| Hello. Back in May, you voiced concerns about ]'s feature article status. Doesn't seem like anything has been done to improve the article since then, and when I came across the article recently, I had similar concerns. I'd like to nominate the article for FAR, but as an IP, I can't complete the nom. Could you do so for me? See ]. Thanks. ] (]) 01:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| :Will do it now. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| :{{done}} Thanks for the reminder. I had forgotten about the article and my suggestion. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Enigmaman! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Gaza War == | |||
| ==Censorship and Vandalism on Gaza War (Operation Cast Lead)== | |||
| A mutual friend informed me that you might be able to help me with a serious problem that I've encountered editing this piece. Well documented, relevant, Sourced edits are continuously reverted because they don't present a particular point of view. I'm not presenting any point of view, just well-sourced relevant material. Please go to this site and you'll see what I am talking about. I have also published an article concerning insidious censorship on Misplaced Pages. When accessing this site, you'll see what I mean. Any help you can extend would be greatly appreciated.--] (]) 04:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Before I even saw what the reverts were over, I see it needs full protection, so we'll start with that. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::The most vile of the bunch is ] (]) who was already warned that he would be blocked for persistent vandalism to this site. Please go to his talk page to see what I'm referring to. Another "editor," ] (]) accused anyone making an edit inconsistent with his views, to be an Israeli agent and working for the Israeli government and this can be found in the discussion page under the sub-heading "'''Garlasco'''" There are a few of us who are only trying to restore some balance into the artice and not turn it into a platform for any particular side. Please check out the two "editors" that I've mentioned. Thanks--] (]) 06:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::This is the latest drivel from ] (])"Finally I found that recruitment office. Now where is jiujitsuguys bankacount so he can get that recrutbonus? Lookie new bombwest. Wonder what happen if I push this red button. Oh shii.... Mr Unsigned Anon (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2009" | |||
| :::And the latest pearl from ] (]) "like that because of the strong pro-israel contingent on Misplaced Pages. I think they work for the Israeli government myself. Da'oud Nkrumah" 03:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dnkrumah (talk • contribs) | |||
| :::Something should be done about these two characters who contribute nothing except for name-calling and discourse--] (]) 06:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there. Im quite tired of ] (]) way of accuse me of things. A very manipulative guy. Quite sure his editing and edit warring is a good reason you had to protect the side. "The most vile" is a interesting way of describe me as I refrained to edit ] sinse both me and Jiujitsu was told to calm down for almost two days ago. See his talkpage for notes to behave ] ]] He has editwarred quite much since and neglected experienced editors policybased views. | |||
| About "the latest drivel". Its easy to say he taking things out of content in the 'most vile' way. And almost laughtable, if not trgic, when one read what is just above my sentense: | |||
| "It's good to see that we still have our senses of humor.--] (]) 05:15, 8 October 2009 (UTC)" That was obviously not true... see the section here. ] | |||
| Allso se this on Wikiquette ] ] ] and carfully check his responce after I desided to exit the dispute. He got help from ] (]) :s spurious collection of editdiffs and false comments. | |||
| I could go on but at whole Jiujitsuguy is very disrupive both in his way of editing article Gaza War and in false accusations like here on your talkside. | |||
| So concluded: Isnt ] (]) :s advaced bickering enough for banhammer I dont know. ] (])(probably the mutual friend) is not without blame in both edit warring and bickering. Please take a good look at those guys, specially Jiujitsu who had the stomach to write the above (your intervention at Gaza War but needed though) | |||
| Regards ] (]) 09:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#MR_Unsigned_Anon_2 for more information about this issue. --<font face="Lucida Calligraphy">]</font> (] • ]) 13:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hi again. I guess my reply to jiujitsuguy been red by you. Now I like some advice how to proceed. I looked at arbritation but those case seem diferent, more about problems thretening Misplaced Pages as a project or for resolving big stalemated disputes with many editors involved. My experience after I reported personal attacks at wikiquette was that it was to complicated for the independent editors involved and no solution or responce towards a solution is presented yet. A demand Tyw7 that I dont revert jiujitsuguy:s edits, that both parts calm down etc . A warning against vandalizing, kindly enough reverted. I guess there is no project thretening situation between jiujitsuguy and me as we dont editwar but the status quo is not good. My possition is: | |||
| Lack of faith in jiujitsuguy as the editor presented itself as a person unfamiliar with truthworth. | |||
| Editor is s a possibly a activist for Israeli POV shoving difficulitis in neutral editing. | |||
| My requests can be stated for now for giving a hint of help where to take this case: | |||
| 1. Clarification that jiujitsuguy personally attacked me in first place presented at Wikiquette alerts. | |||
| 2. Clarification that jiujitsuguy attacked me again on the Wikiquette after I withdrow my complant. | |||
| 3. Clarification that jiujitsuguy on multiple occations lied and tried to with lies and manipulation impose warnings and sanctions on me by fellow editor and fellow administrators and putting me in a bad day with false accusations. | |||
| 4. jiujitsuguy should act accoording to the above and apology. jiujitsuguy should be supervised in case above behavour repeate, banhammer willbe delivered. | |||
| 5. jiujitsuguy editwaring povpuching and similar activities can be solved when it appears, regrettably I have no doubt that disputes will raise henceforth around that editor but hopfully Im not among the affected. I have confidence that administrators will in jiujitsuguy:s edithistory find facts and deliver apropriate remidies. | |||
| 6. Stellarkid:s involvement investigated (to tired to expand nw) | |||
| Regards ] (]) 08:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Surely I can just back off if you recomend it but I really hate haveing all these accusations and crapp hanging over me ] (]) 08:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Ahem :-) == | |||
| IP 86.129.194.36 is another Prophaniti IP sock. edit warring and genre trolling. same-ol', same-ol'. ]-] 13:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} ]<sup>]</sup> 16:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Now another one - 86.146.156.162. ]-] 22:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Blocking now... ]<sup>]</sup> 04:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Jimmy McConnell== | |||
| I would say there were several inconstencies over the article, but some editors have already took care of it. Thanks for checking! —<i>]</i> <sup><small>]/]/]</small></sup> 15:48, 10 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Website URL redirects== | |||
| "03:13, 17 July 2009 Enigmaman (talk | contribs | block) deleted "Delta-air.com" (R3: Recently-created, implausible redirect) (view/restore)" | |||
| I restored the redirect, as it is the first URL domain used by Delta Air Lines. ] says "Websites or content which fail these guidelines but are linked to a topic or subject which does merit inclusion may be redirected to that topic or subject rather than be listed for deletion." ] (]) 02:21, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :OK. Not much to say here. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked user named Prophaniti == | |||
| Is now using {{IP|86.137.114.216}}. ] (]) 12:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} ]<sup>]</sup> 20:08, 12 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == re: Utan == | |||
| email. ]-] 12:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Deleting Talk pages == | |||
| I saw that you deleted ], and I think it's wrong. Just because the page was deleted doesn't mean the talk page should be deleted. From what I heard, it had information on WHY it was deleted, which is important for if someone wants to re-create the page. In the future please do not delete talkpages unless they are empty expect for banners. Thanks, <sub style="color:#00008B;">''']'''</sub> <sup>(]·])</sup> 17:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Typically talk pages of deleted pages are deleted as well. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::(lurker) Per ], talk pages that are "abandoned" are typically deleted- this is/was even done by a bot. ] (]) 19:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Well, if its in the rules, I suppose it does no good arguing with just you. I dont feel like starting a big debate though, so I will just say that I am strongly against it, because it says why the article was deleted most of the time. I also dont like it when people redirect talkpages with content. <sub style="color:#00008B;">''']'''</sub> <sup>(]·])</sup> 03:23, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No problem. Just a heads up that it might get deleted/rounded up. (addition) This BRFA should help you with the context, as well as exemption possibilities: ]. And Enigmaman, let us know if you'd rather we continue this conversation elsewhere. ] (]) 03:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Feel free to continue it here. Blake, your issue is not with me, because I'm just going along with precedent. If the community were to decide that talk pages should not be deleted, I would leave them alone when deleting an article. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:42, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Post AfD/CSD cleanup == | |||
| If you have time. Just noticed some lingering cats. and pages associated with the band 7th Reign which has already been deleted.. but these other pages have been left behind aas un-associated trash. See ]. The category itself can go. Two of the members can stay because they were members of a notable band. But 'Johnny Roberts' and Jared Tomlinson are both nn's with no notability other than being members of the deleted band. Here is the link. As mentioned Brian Soulard and Adrian Robichaud can stay. Some of the others can be deleted including the 3 image uploads listed on the 'what links here' page.. I will follow up and remove the red links from the pages that are keepers. Let me know when the page deletes are done and I will so the red cleanup. Thanks! ]-] 13:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I deleted Roberts and Tomlinson. The category should probably be deleted as well, but I'll defer to another admin to be sure. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::'''zzzzot''', category deleted. ] (]) 20:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == A soapboxer discussed earlier. == | |||
| If are undone. Then the undoer (a possibility of 2 that have been discussed before) are acting in bad faith and are here to use Misplaced Pages as a ] to holler their own ] at the top of their typing fingers. One of them insists on persistent personal attacks against one of the highest regarded admins the Wik has ever had. Even if the page were reverted to prove a point... the fact that the personal attacks have never ceased is more than enough reason to block. ]-] 16:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : If he doesn't revert again.. his Verbal cabal will. Just watch. Its like a gaggle of soapboxers using the Wik for their own agenda. ]-] 20:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::So I see a big part of the dispute is whether he's retired or not. Shouldn't this be fairly easy to verify? ]<sup>]</sup> 20:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == New IP sock == | |||
| For Prophaniti = 86.129.201.145. ]-] 18:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I see he's taken to to complain about my "abuse" in protecting pages. I actually did this at the suggestion of ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ===Further thoughts on this === | |||
| :We are all very familiar with Prophaniti's IP socks. When thqat range edits anything to do with heavy metal it is pretty much a given that its Prophi. That being said 2 other former editors who are now completely and totally banned after long term abuse (much of it in the 'heavy metal' world) are named ] and ](known originally as ]. These accounts have long since been banned. If you look at the "suspected socks" category for Daddy Crapsoul you will see a few IPs very similar to Prophi. If you look at the suspected (and confirmed) sock categories for Leyasu (] and ]) ... Hmm??? ... look at the numbers showing up there. Its not something easily twigged out. Yes the numbers are there. But Leyasu was horrible at communicating coherently in English compared to Prophi who is slightly mentally impaired... but his posts convey a coherent message. Daddy Kindsoul (also from the same IP-ville) was a smooth talkin' troll who plead his case in lengthy diatribes that were hilarious to read because he was always wrong (no matter how much he felt otherwise). How much of a stretch is it to think that Prophi (Metalkommandant et al) might be a resurrected self of either of these 2 banned uber-trolls? Is there any power mighty enough in the Wiki world that can thread these accounts into a single ball of banned-user ooze? Or... just as good... prove me wrong. I've been wrong at least 3 times in the last 5 wiki-years. Although unlikely.. I could be wrong again. Who knows? :-) ]-] 18:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::You'd have to make a compelling argument for a checkuser to look into it, I suppose. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::I am not good at compelling arguments. My best skill-set is to just tell people to f**k off. Which works perfectly well and helps to improve the overall quality of edits from troublesome users. Except every now and then it bunches up the panties of one of Wiki's useless uber-whiners. Which results in busy productive people having their time wasted. Kinda like my occasional whining to you... HAHA! ''':-D''' ]-] 19:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I'll approach a checkuser. Don't get your hopes up, though! ]<sup>]</sup> 19:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Add: Some of the users you mentioned aren't going to be lumped in because of stale stuff, most likely. AFAIK, checkusers can only check up to three months back. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I never do. I am just happy that I got the chance to whine about it. HAHA! again. On a more serious (and still fun note) I have at least 47 barnstars in mind to shove your way for everything that you do around here. You are one of the best, level-headed, focused admins Wiki has. Don't ever get P O'd and quit. We need all the bright shiners we can muster. Whatever you Wiki-salary is...they don't pay you enough. OH WAIT!!... you get paid the same as I do... with barnstars! :-) ]-] 19:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == 1 down... 46 to go == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Admin's Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | What can I say... you are simply one of the best. Keep on doing what you do. And the Wik will be a better place. ]-] 20:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Gaza War 2 == | |||
| Not quite sure why or how this got unlocked, but no way is it resolved. It needs to be locked again. And some guidance needs to be provided regarding the lede, or this battling will go on indefinitely, I fear. ] (]) 20:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :It was unlocked automatically because the protection was set for a week. ]<sup>]</sup> 21:30, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Any chance of getting it for longer? ] (]) 22:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::(butting in, because I'm good at it). I changed my mind and didn't lock it down for the 2 weeks I initially set, because full-protection is pretty extreme. The editors have been warned, this is a second chance for them to settle down. If they don't settle down tomorrow when the article opens up, one or more editors will be blocked for violating ]. That keeps all of the 'pedia from being entirely restricted from editing the article. ] (]) 22:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey Stellarkid. If you have complains about editwarring, just stop yourself. I cant avoid to note the similarity between your and Jiujitsuguys tactic. Editwarring and baww on admin:s talkpage the same time! Gaming the system? ] (]) 04:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Alert == | |||
| Hi, just in case you haven't seen this I would like to point out ]. I think it is unfortunate that these disgruntled users got a chance to get back at him like this. ] ]</font> 02:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I wish there was something I could do. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::These same users are now of him being caught with his pants around his ankles. --] 13:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::People removing Libs's comments from talk pages are the least of our concerns, really, but I restored them anyway. There's no good reason to remove them, even if they really were all from Libs. I think you know what the greater concern is. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::There's nothing to be done about Libs's "''involvement''" until he can return and speak for himself. --] 18:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::With regards to the Pete Townshend talk, the user apparently intends to edit war over it, so I give up. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] and 23prootie socks == | |||
| Hi Enigmaman, what appear to be IP socks of {{user|23prootie}} are continuing to edit war in the ] article and it's talk page - the relevant IPs are {{user|119.95.7.96}} and {{user|121.28.34.69}}. If you have time, could you please look into this? I'd block them and extend 23prootie's block myself, but I've been involved in various discussions involving this editor, so I don't feel comfortable going beyond semi-protecting the article. Thanks, ] (]) 10:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} Made the block indefinite. As for the IPs, you semiprotected the page, so I won't bother with those. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:02, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for that. ] (]) 21:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == reply == | |||
| Yep, it's good to be back! Been lots of vandalism lately. ] ] 18:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == User:23prootie == | |||
| He emailed me asking for a definite block instead of an indefinite ban, thoughts? ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 01:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, he's been socking a lot. I think we'd first want a commitment to stop socking, and then it could be revisited in a few months. I don't know that you could set a definite expiration right now, though. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Just to but in, this editor also used sock puppet accounts in an attempt to evade a block earlier this year and promises to change their behavior in return for an unblock everytime they're blocked but continues edit warring as soon as the block expires anyway. ] (]) 10:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Cool, I didn't have that background on it, I concur with the indef. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 16:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Problems with an article == | |||
| You sent me a message about editing ]. | |||
| I most certainly didn't edit this. Clearly someone has used my IP to access this page or Misplaced Pages has listed it wrongly. Either way, I will look into it. Furthermore, I would never willingly sabotage an article. I am sorry for the inconvieniance this has caused you but I can assure you it was not me who did this. | |||
| Yours, TheMaxxBass <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == HM211980 == | |||
| (Or should I say ]) continues to fiddle with genres. But it's not ] territory if you know the ], right? --] 19:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Blocked again. I don't know which is worse, the fact that he's still genre trolling and edit-warring after three blocks, or the fact that he insists that I'm an abusive admin and that he isn't doing anything wrong. I should've made it indefinite, but I was feeling lenient, I guess. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::ur jsut a rouge admin on a mission to cover up the TRUHT about these bands --] 19:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::But seriously, some people just have no grip on reality. The worst ones are the ones that genuinely believe ] doesn't apply to them, because they're 'experts'. --] 19:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Hi Enigmaman, quick question: Have you blocked him again? I ask because his shows an active block placed by you, but there is no active block notice on his talk page (the most recent one, from the 14th, is expired). If you don't mind, could you add a fresh notice to his talk page so that others (like myself) will know that he is blocked when we go to leave him warnings? As you can see I'm trying to nudge him in the right direction with regard to sourcing genres, but his nasty habit of removing warnings & calling them "vandalism" or "argumentative" causes confusion, as I didn't realize he'd been warned & blocked for these things numerous times already. I've taken the liberty of restoring all of the past warnings & block notices he's received, and placing all that predate this month in an archive page. Hopefully this will help other editors who come to leave him fresh warnings, as they'll be able to see that he's been warned about these things dozens of times already. --] (]) 05:22, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{done}} The editor refuses to admit it was edit-warring, insults other users, and continues the behavior that led to warnings and blocks in the past. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Thanks. I totally understand the reasons, and I'm not opposed to the block at all. I just wanted to make sure the corresponding notice was posted, for purposes of clarity. --] (]) 07:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| dude whats wrong with you ? | |||
| why cant i edit the damn saw 6 page. | |||
| no one wants to here the whole story when its under "plot" | |||
| get it right... <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :I have no idea who you are or what you're talking about. I don't edit "saw 6". ]<sup>]</sup> 20:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Ugh == | |||
| Please block {{vandal|71.182.100.116}} as indeffed genre troll {{vandal|Spooky873}}. Thanks. --] 22:43, 24 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, see if you can't extend his SIX MONTH block at {{vandal|67.242.56.62}} (for making exactly the same edits, and screaming at admins that revert them.) --] 22:47, 24 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} ]<sup>]</sup> 02:07, 25 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Input request == | |||
| I'd appreciate your input on ]. I've created a template for a single RfA row, with the further intention that it would be usable at ] as well, by use of any of p/passed/promoted to suppress that column. Comments appreciated on my talk page...I'm going to ask others for input as well. I'm trying to make it neater and I want to make sure the process is reasonable before going all-out; I am considering converting the entire history. <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] {{!}} ]</span></small> 18:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Ugh x2 == | |||
| I'm starting to smell troll all over {{user|Peter Napkin Dance Party}}- starting with his name. Can you keep an eye? --] 21:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Looks and smells that way to me. About that "Master editor" thing, it will be removed. If he does not agree to, I will. In the past, it's been agreed that users are not allowed to fake various awards, regardless of whether it amuses them to do so. ]<sup>]</sup> 21:46, 27 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Fun fact of the day: any edit that results in a net reduction in page size is now called "Section Blanking", regardless of justification. --] 16:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::I guess so. Pretty darn rude of him, but that appears to be his specialty. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Hmm, another odd duck at ]. I'd like to lodge an official challenge against the {{tl|User en}} on that page. He seems to think that he has the authority to impose his own rules on his talkpage. The kicker- ''no vandalism warnings allowed''. --] 23:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I remember someone called "Dumpster muffin" who started posting rules about who was and wasn't allowed to post on his talk page. That guy also blanked every single message left for him. What's interesting here is that this time an IP is doing it! Reading the text, it sounds like a rather young child. I can keep an eye on the page, I guess. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Meh, no real rulebreaking, strictly speaking. Though the vast majority of his edits have been in userspace (and none of his article edits have even approached the event horizon of "Constructive". I considered linking ], but he'd just delete it. --] 23:39, 28 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Mary Surratt == | |||
| Thanks. I can take my nap now, secure in the knowledge Mary won't be dancing in my dreams. :) Seriously, thanks. ] (]) 15:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Editwarring at Gaza war == | |||
| I think its protectiontime again. I would prefere a version with Stellarkids reverts undone. ] (]) 06:00, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :See ] before replying here- it'd be nice to centralize the discussion.. ] (]) 06:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, I diddnt know if anyone of you was online but as both of you have been involved befor, Tedders talk then. ] (]) 06:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disruptive Conduct by Mr Unsigned Anon, Gaza War== | |||
| Mr Unsigned Anon has filed a complait against Stellarkid here Unsigned Anon has a nasty tendency of attempting to silence and muzzle those who don't share his radical view by filing complaints and requests for enforcement. I have compiled a list of diffs on Unsigned Anon on the Arb notice boards evidencing his disruptive edits that include edit warring and racial profiling. please have a look.--] (]) 06:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :ArbCom already rejected an RfAr, claiming that admins can handle the situation. I sure can't. I could block everyone for edit-warring, or full protect the page. I guess request for enforcement is the next step. I'll have a look, but I don't think I can do anything either way. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::I was going to reply, but did so at this section instead: ]. This discussion is pretty scattered, but replying over there keeps this from spreading one more place. ] (]) 07:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::For the record, I was just cruising around, and discovered . I think it may be the "sock" Mr Anon was talking about. ?? ] (]) 03:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Looks plausible. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Deletion review for ]== | |||
| An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ] (]) 03:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :It was so long ago that I have no recollection of participating in that AfD. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:03, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Minor thing == | |||
| Hi Enigmaman, | |||
| I had not seen the other NPAs otherwise I would have considered a longer block (was a bit rushed and thought an immediate response was good) but just so you know your comment on the block log: (01:31, 4 November 2009 Enigmaman (talk | contribs | block) blocked Mr Unsigned Anon (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (Personal attacks or harassment: repeated personal attacks after block. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Cptnono&oldid=323559877#My_friend.2C_you_are_a_fool and more) (unblock | change block)) implies the personal attacks at Cptnono's page were after the NPA block when in fact they were before it. After your second block he did indeed make more personal attacks at you on his talk page so whatever the niceties the outcome of a weeks block looks right. --] ] 21:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, I thought the first block should've been longer. He could've been blocked for his actions after the return from the first block, but it would've have been nearly as long if just for that. He attacked two different users with a variety of names in the linked exchange alone. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == UNBLOCK REQUEST FROM EARLIER TODAY == | |||
| Hey, it's OK. Don't bother yourselves too much about unblocking that library IP. I was at the library earlier today. Am back home now. Thanks for your help and attention. ] (]) 23:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Stadium of Light== | |||
| The world famous "stadium of light" is a football ground in Portugal. A name Benfica FC have used for their stadiums since 1952. | |||
| Sunderland AFC used the same name for their stadium in 1997. Why on earth, when people search for “stadium of light” do they get the Sunderland version? | |||
| Sunderland fans have completely taken ownership of the English translation, and have crudely differentiated their page from the actual “stadium of light” as they use the English translation and the original ground use a Portugese translation. | |||
| The fact being, the names are the same. And English speaking fans have referred to the portugese ground as “stadium of light” since the 1950s. | |||
| It’s reprehensible. Say, someone decided to create a building in Madrid with a Spanish translation of the words “grace” and “land”, and then take ownership of the word in Spain, on the basis that theirs is newer and is the local translation? And say “oh, your version isn’t the same, as yours is in a foreign language. Spanish people should be diverted to this version, even if they are looking for the vastly more famous building”. | |||
| The fact that fans are being diverted to the stadium who frankly nicked the name – just by claiming that Portugese people use the portugese translation, is reprehensible. | |||
| What about the billion English speakers, who use the English translation. Why divert us to Sunderland!? | |||
| ~~ <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :I don't know, but what do I have to do with this? I edited the page a few times some months ago, and that's it. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Follow-up: You should not have moved it without discussion. That's out of line. Clearly, there are people who disagree with you. You moved it and then came here to complain about it? 1)I have little to do with this. 2)You already moved it. What are you complaining about now? ]<sup>]</sup> 17:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == In case you're interested... == | |||
| ] on that RFA courtesy blanking edit war on which you commented. ] (]) 16:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, had his talk watchlisted. Thanks. I don't really have anything to say beyond my initial comment. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Avoiding the drama boards is generally a wise strategy; cheers. ] (]) 17:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Absolutely. One more comment, though: I'm convinced that Shalom is still socking at the present time. Not sure if people want to do anything about it. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It wouldn't shock me. ] (]) 17:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::A quick search reveals ], and it seems he's been using another account for his "other" editing. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == |
==missing== | ||
| Hi. You are now ], as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">] (])</span></span> 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Removal from member list</span>] | |||
| You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee ]. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself. | |||
| Best wishes, <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">] (])</span></span> 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| You should know, judging by how long you've been here, that I have the right to remove any or all messages from my talk page. Removing them from my talk page signifies that I have read them. You're an administrator. You should know this. If you don't, ] --<span style="text-shadow:silver 2px 2px 2px"> ] (] ● ])</span> 15:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :I know this, and I never said you didn't have the right. But removing the messages, especially with rollback, is extremely rude. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::It's extremely rude because, frankly, I could care less for you at this point in time. Sorry. --<span style="text-shadow:silver 2px 2px 2px"> ] (] ● ])</span> 16:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's "couldn't care less". At least use proper English if you're going to be unnecessarily rude to other editors. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Both are correct, the former is slang relying on sarcasm. --] 16:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Correct. It's not proper English. Most people say it because they simply don't think about what they're saying, not because they intend to be sarcastic. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::As for your "last comment" on my talk page, do not make assumptions about me. You don't know me. Now, I would appreciate it if you would leave me alone and refrain from adding more comments to my talk page. Thank you. --<span style="text-shadow:silver 2px 2px 2px"> ] (] ● ])</span> 16:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I didn't make any assumptions. I asked you nicely to stop making improper reports at AIV. It just makes a mess for me to clean up, which I did. I warned both users for you. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:50, 19 February 2024
 | This user left Misplaced Pages. Enigmaman has not edited Misplaced Pages since April 10, 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Precious
"...a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... "
Thank you for quality articles about personalities such as Sid Luckman and Félix Houphouët-Boigny, for work for project Living people when it was active, for quoting "...a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... ", for support and the perfect solution, - enigmaticmaman, repeating from 10 years ago: you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2240 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gerda. I imagine I'm one of the few 2009 recipients still here. Enigma 15:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Well, not so few, - I joined 2009, DYK? I normally look up if someone found precious 10 years ago (mostly by Rlevse) is still active and deserves a refreshed award. For you, it was the opposite: I noticed you on Floq's page, and thought "precious!", but then saw your entry and waited a bit ;) - Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- We'll wait for your return. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm sad to see you leave Misplaced Pages
I hope that your retirement isn't permanent, and that you decide to return to Misplaced Pages (whenever that may be). I'll miss you a lot, and I hope to hear from you in the future someday when you make your return. Should I never hear from you again, please know that I wish you well and I wish you a life of happiness and well-being. It was a pleasure to know you and work with you here, and I am sad to see you go...... ~Oshwah~ 17:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- I am not happy. Things are getting worse and worse on Misplaced Pages. Enigma 20:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Just to add my sadness about your retirement...and my thanks for your input at RFPP. Take care. Lectonar (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:CloudBuy
Hello, Enigmaman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CloudBuy".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages! CASSIOPEIA 10:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
- You got it deleted before the message even appeared for me, so this is not a helpful message. You could've notified me first. Enigma 20:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, Bobherry Talk Edits 01:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU 13:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Your input
I have an RfC going on at Talk:Gwar#RfC_about_GwarBar_vs_GWARbar regarding using all caps in an article and would appreciate the input of some long-standing Misplaced Pages editors who may be familiar with the policy, or at least be able to interpret the existing policy with some clarity. Thanks for your time! NJZombie (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU 04:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Pranav Pandya
This title is salted. Can you unprotect to allow promotion of draft into mainspace? Draft:Pranav Pandya (Gujarati poet) is a different topic. It is well cited. I have checked for notability. It should be moved to Pranav Pandya. I was asked for help on my talkpage. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Enigmaman is inactive. Hey Eddie891 Can you help with this ? --Gazal world (talk) 15:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nizil Shah, I have un-salted so the draft can be mainspaced as it's clearly not an A7 candidate. The new article may of course still be tagged if it is not notable, I have not closely reviewed the case. Thanks for the ping, Gaza world. Cheers, Eddie891 Work 15:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- I do not know anything about this. I SALTed the title some years ago after it had been deleted multiple times by various admins. Enigma 16:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Max Griffin (fighter)
Hi Enigmaman, your edit on the above page has been removed because the content claimed is not support by any source. You are welcome to put it back in if you would support it with an independent, reliable source by providing an inline citation. Thank you. Cassiopeia 04:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- No, it has a source. His official UFC page. Enigma 15:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burton (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Burton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Element Fresh
Hi! I see you are the closer for Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Element Fresh. I found an article from The Beijinger that it had developed a partnership with a tennis player named Li Na and now it's gone bankrupt. Would it help if I checked for some Chinese sources about the bankruptcy? If I can find enough I could start a DRV. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- I started User:WhisperToMe/Element Fresh as a draft. If you're interested, please feel free to give feedback. Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU 11:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2022 June 20#Matthew Tye
Hi Enigmaman. You fully protected Matthew Tye on 2 July 2018 after Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Matthew Tye (3rd nomination) was closed as "delete". I created a deletion review at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2022 June 20#Matthew Tye regarding restoring the article using a new draft I wrote. Cunard (talk) 07:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
BDE
May your soul be bound up in the bond of eternal life. Danthecan (talk) 03:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
- Danthecan, sincere apologies if I've misunderstood this message, but if you have evidence that Enigmaman has passed away, please send an email to info-en@wikimedia.org so they can take steps to secure the account. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Enigmaman! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) |  |
missing
Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee birthday list. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself.
Best wishes, Chris Troutman (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Categories: