User talk:Enigmaman: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:29, 16 December 2009 editJCbot (talk \| contribs)Bots8,820 edits Bot: Notification regarding WP:NODRAMA. using AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 14:50, 19 February 2024 edit undoChris troutman (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers54,800 edits now listed as missing
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Not around\|left Misplaced Pages\|{{BASEPAGENAME}}\|April 10, 2023}}
	{{message
			{{semi-retired}}
	\| bgcolor = white
	\| border-color = black
	\| color = black
	\| linkcolor = blue
	\| width = 80%
	}}

	{{Archive box\|		{{Archive box\|
Line 24:		Line 19:
	] <br />		] <br />
	] <br />		] <br />
	]		] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			] <br />
			]
	}}		}}

			{{-}}
	<b>If you leave a message here, I'll reply here. The same applies to you. If I leave a message on your page, I keep it watchlisted and I'll see when you reply. Thank you.</b>
			== Precious==
	{{TOCleft}}
			{{user precious\|header="...a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... "\|thanks=for quality articles about personalities such as ] and ], for work for ] when it was active, for quoting "...a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... ", for {{diff\|User talk:Floquenbeam\|901464720\|\|support}} and {{diff\|User talk:Floquenbeam\|903900304\|\|the perfect solution}}, - enigmaticmaman, repeating from 10 years ago:}}
	{{WPPJ-BLP}}
			You are recipient no. ] of Precious, a prize of ]! --] (]) 15:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
			{{User QAIbox
			\| title = Awesome
			\| image = Cscr-featured.svg
			\| image_upright = 0.35
			\| bold = ]
			}}
			--] (]) 15:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
			:Thanks, Gerda. I imagine I'm one of the few 2009 recipients still here. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
			:: Well, not so few, - I joined 2009, DYK? I normally look up if someone found precious 10 years ago (mostly by ]) is still active and deserves a refreshed award. For you, it was the opposite: I noticed you on Floq's page, and thought "precious!", but then saw your entry and waited a bit ;) - Nice to meet you! --] (]) 15:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
			::: :-) ]<sup>]</sup> 16:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
			]
			:::: We'll wait for your return. --] (]) 21:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

			== I'm sad to see you leave Misplaced Pages ==
	== Minor thing ==
	Hi Enigmaman,
	I had not seen the other NPAs otherwise I would have considered a longer block (was a bit rushed and thought an immediate response was good) but just so you know your comment on the block log: (01:31, 4 November 2009 Enigmaman (talk \| contribs \| block) blocked Mr Unsigned Anon (talk \| contribs) (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (Personal attacks or harassment: repeated personal attacks after block. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Cptnono&oldid=323559877#My_friend.2C_you_are_a_fool and more) (unblock \| change block)) implies the personal attacks at Cptnono's page were after the NPA block when in fact they were before it. After your second block he did indeed make more personal attacks at you on his talk page so whatever the niceties the outcome of a weeks block looks right. --] ] 21:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
	:Yeah, I thought the first block should've been longer. He could've been blocked for his actions after the return from the first block, but it would've have been nearly as long if just for that. He attacked two different users with a variety of names in the linked exchange alone. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

			I hope that your retirement isn't permanent, and that you decide to return to Misplaced Pages (whenever that may be). I'll miss you a lot, and I hope to hear from you in the future someday when you make your return. Should I never hear from you again, please know that I wish you well and I wish you a life of happiness and well-being. It was a pleasure to know you and work with you here, and I am sad to see you go...... ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 17:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
	== UNBLOCK REQUEST FROM EARLIER TODAY ==
			:I am not happy. Things are getting worse and worse on Misplaced Pages. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
			::Just to add my sadness about your retirement...and my thanks for your input at RFPP. Take care. ] (]) 10:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

			==Your draft article, ]==
	Hey, it's OK. Don't bother yourselves too much about unblocking that library IP. I was at the library earlier today. Am back home now. Thanks for your help and attention. ] (]) 23:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
			]

			Hello, Enigmaman. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]".
	==Stadium of Light==

			In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia ], the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit\|Draft:CloudBuy\|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc\|db-afc}}, {{tlc\|db-draft}}, or {{tlc\|db-g13}} code.
	The world famous "stadium of light" is a football ground in Portugal. A name Benfica FC have used for their stadiums since 1952.

			If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at ]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
	Sunderland AFC used the same name for their stadium in 1997. Why on earth, when people search for “stadium of light” do they get the Sunderland version?

			Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ]<sup>(])</sup> 10:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
	Sunderland fans have completely taken ownership of the English translation, and have crudely differentiated their page from the actual “stadium of light” as they use the English translation and the original ground use a Portugese translation.
			:You got it deleted before the message even appeared for me, so this is not a helpful message. You could've notified me first. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

			== A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process ==
	The fact being, the names are the same. And English speaking fans have referred to the portugese ground as “stadium of light” since the 1950s.

			Hello!
	It’s reprehensible. Say, someone decided to create a building in Madrid with a Spanish translation of the words “grace” and “land”, and then take ownership of the word in Spain, on the basis that theirs is newer and is the local translation? And say “oh, your version isn’t the same, as yours is in a foreign language. Spanish people should be diverted to this version, even if they are looking for the vastly more famous building”.

			The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate ] that followed ] you’ve been part of.
	The fact that fans are being diverted to the stadium who frankly nicked the name – just by claiming that Portugese people use the portugese translation, is reprehensible.

			Please fill out to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
	What about the billion English speakers, who use the English translation. Why divert us to Sunderland!?

			The privacy policy for this survey is . This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
	~~ <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:36, 5 November 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:I don't know, but what do I have to do with this? I edited the page a few times some months ago, and that's it. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
	::Follow-up: You should not have moved it without discussion. That's out of line. Clearly, there are people who disagree with you. You moved it and then came here to complain about it? 1)I have little to do with this. 2)You already moved it. What are you complaining about now? ]<sup>]</sup> 17:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

			Thank you for your participation, ] 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
	== In case you're interested... ==
			<!-- Message sent by User:Trizek (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Trizek_(WMF)/sandbox/temp_MassMessage_list&oldid=19553910 -->

			== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==
	] on that RFA courtesy blanking edit war on which you commented. ] (]) 16:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
	:Yeah, had his talk watchlisted. Thanks. I don't really have anything to say beyond my initial comment. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
	::Avoiding the drama boards is generally a wise strategy; cheers. ] (]) 17:26, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::Absolutely. One more comment, though: I'm convinced that Shalom is still socking at the present time. Not sure if people want to do anything about it. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
	::::It wouldn't shock me. ] (]) 17:38, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::A quick search reveals ], and it seems he's been using another account for his "other" editing. ]<sup>]</sup> 18:08, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	== Talk page ==
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2019\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	You should know, judging by how long you've been here, that I have the right to remove any or all messages from my talk page. Removing them from my talk page signifies that I have read them. You're an administrator. You should know this. If you don't, ] --<span style="text-shadow:silver 2px 2px 2px"> ] (] ● ])</span> 15:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
	:I know this, and I never said you didn't have the right. But removing the messages, especially with rollback, is extremely rude. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
	::It's extremely rude because, frankly, I could care less for you at this point in time. Sorry. --<span style="text-shadow:silver 2px 2px 2px"> ] (] ● ])</span> 16:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::It's "couldn't care less". At least use proper English if you're going to be unnecessarily rude to other editors. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:43, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
	::::Both are correct, the former is slang relying on sarcasm. --] 16:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::Correct. It's not proper English. Most people say it because they simply don't think about what they're saying, not because they intend to be sarcastic. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
	::::::As for your "last comment" on my talk page, do not make assumptions about me. You don't know me. Now, I would appreciate it if you would leave me alone and refrain from adding more comments to my talk page. Thank you. --<span style="text-shadow:silver 2px 2px 2px"> ] (] ● ])</span> 16:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::I didn't make any assumptions. I asked you nicely to stop making improper reports at AIV. It just makes a mess for me to clean up, which I did. I warned both users for you. I also thought you might get along well with another user who reverts messages left for him. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::Also, if you don't want people leaving messages for you, you should consider not leaving messages for them. You've now edited my talk page four times. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
	== Re: Edit War: The Pirate Bay ==
			</td></tr>
			</table>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=926750323 -->
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>]
			Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

			From the ], <mark style="background:Silver">] ] ] </mark> 01:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
	Well I was just changing the status of the website to "temporarily offline" because it was offline at that time! A user named JeremyWJ kept on undoing my changes. What have I done wrong? The fact that he kept undoing my changes made me furious to keep on undoing his changes. Moreover, who is JeremyWJ? It's not like he's the keeper of this website. Anyone can change any information on Misplaced Pages as long as it's not vandalism and if you start blocking people for that, I don't have anything left to say. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:14, 7 November 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			</div>
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>]
			Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

			From the ], ]<sup>]</sup> 13:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
	:Understand that wikipedia is not a place where we update on the status of something every time it changes for a little bit. With that logic we would have to edit, for example, every article of stores, restaurants, and such each night when they close for 5-6 hours at night. You misunderstand the meaning of "status". It is -not- about where the site is online right here and now, but its overall status. For sites that are still going (despite temporary downtime) they are considered Active/Online. All website articles through Misplaced Pages use this same rule. Again, refer to the talk page of The Pirate Bay, the talk page for the Website article template, and you can even check out WP:NOTNEWS for policy on this. Also this is not the place to discuss this, but I responded since you already started it here. As for who I am, I am just a normal user like you. I'm very active in the Pirate Bay and other file sharing articles. Just understand that although I see why you think it should have been changed when it was offline, you were going against general consensus, along with Misplaced Pages policy by doing so. As for why we -both- were almost blocked was because of WP:3RR. You are only allowed 3 reverts per article per 24 hours by policy. We both got out of hand, but I've been trying very very hard to keep that article from being changed to offline when it does go out. Understand that this site is nearing its final days and when people change it to anything saying offline they think the site is gone for good (with good reason because that is what it would should mean). ] (]) 08:40, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
			</div>
	::Not up to me to decide who is "right" and who is "wrong". In the end, you're both wrong for gross violations of ] and can consider yourselves fortunate that you weren't blocked. ]<sup>]</sup> 00:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

	== :( ==		==Your input==
			I have an RfC going on at ] regarding using all caps in an article and would appreciate the input of some long-standing Misplaced Pages editors who may be familiar with the policy, or at least be able to interpret the existing policy with some clarity. Thanks for your time! ] (]) 23:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
	Alf left. <font color="red">]</font><font color="orange">]</font><font color="yellow">]</font> 11:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

	== ~~Maximo~~ V. ~~Lorenzo~~ ~~article~~ ==		== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
	Thank you for putting a block on the users vandalizing! However just after you placed the block, it was attacked by the same ip,

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	The specific ips/name attacking are-
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2020\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	Username: Hucastlaz
	"76.93.171.168"
	"74.105.38.24"
	"98.18.50.1"
	"98.18.38.11"
	"98.194.14.79"
	"24.218.151.129"
	"173.33.105.34"

			If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
	I actually know who these people are, and they will get friends to vandalize the site, the main effort is by the 98 ip in georgia.
			</td></tr>
	I'm actually not good at this sort of thing so i appreciate your help!
			</table>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=990308186 -->
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>]
			Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

			From the ], ]<sup>]</sup> 04:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
			</div>

			== ] ==
	] (]) 21:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

			This title is salted. Can you unprotect to allow promotion of draft into mainspace? ] is a different topic. It is well cited. I have checked for notability. It should be moved to ]. I was asked for help on my talkpage. Regards,-] (]) 14:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
	:Protected for a week. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
			:Enigmaman is inactive. Hey {{u\|Eddie891}} Can you help with this ? --] (]) 15:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
			:{{u\|Nizil Shah}}, I have un-salted so the draft can be mainspaced as it's clearly not an A7 candidate. The new article may of course still be tagged if it is not notable, I have not closely reviewed the case. Thanks for the ping, {{u\|Gaza world}}. Cheers, ] <small>''<sup> ]</sup> <sub>]</sub>'' </small> 15:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
			::I do not know anything about this. I SALTed the title some years ago after it had been deleted multiple times by various admins. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

			== ] ==
	I appreciate it, but this has been the same people for months ( and i don't talk to them or instigate anyway ) so after the protection goes down, and new vandalism arises, I will ask for a more perm protection....Thank you for your work! <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:Before yesterday, the article had only been edited four times since July. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

			Hi Enigmaman, your edit on the above page has been removed because the content claimed is not support by any source. You are welcome to put it back in if you would support it with an independent, reliable source by providing an inline citation. Thank you.]<sup>(])</sup> 04:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
	== ] ==
			:No, it has a source. His official UFC page. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
	Any chance you could comment on this user's current unblock request? Thanks. – <small>] (])</small> 01:38, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	:Unblocked. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	::Cool beans, thanks for having a look. I'll try to keep an eye on them, since they seem prone to edit warring. ;) – <small>] (])</small> 02:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::He shouldn't have been reported to AIV, but obviously it's my fault for placing an improper block. I saw the warnings and the edits, but I didn't look carefully enough at the edits, and I didn't notice just about all the warnings were from one person. I wish people would use AIV for what it was intended for. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	::::Hey, I appreciate you re-instating my account. I wasn't trying to vandalize. I also think Z's latest edit, removing all reference to MJ's push off on Byron Russell, is foolish. Most people visiting the Byron Russell page, this far after his retirement, will be doing so because of that play, which is one of the most iconic plays in league history. Anyway thanks for re-instating me. -Xapxapxap
	:Enigmaman, do you believe that we should assert, as a fact, that Jordan pushed off Russell? Maybe I should have tried some sort of dispute resolution process, but I'm pretty confident that Xapxapxap's wording wouldn't pass muster at a GA or FA discussion. (Not to imply that the article has ever been close to that level of quality, regardless of that sentence.)
	:In any case, I would appreciate it if you could at least put the page on your watchlist. Someone just made edit to the page, but I don't want to end up blocked. ]''']''' 05:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	::It's a very famous play. There are reliable sources talking about it. If it were up to me, it'd be in the article. If not to say that he actually pushed off, at least to point out that many believe a foul should have been called. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:14, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	::As for the edit, I don't see a problem with it. You have to understand, Russell is remembered by the casual fan mostly for that play. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:15, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::Yes, I understand that, and I've never disputed that people believe that Jordan pushed off Russell. We could mention that in the article, if presented in an appropriate fashion. The issue is this: should we state, as an unqualified fact, that Jordan ''did'' push off Russell? Even though there was no foul called? The last edit says, "Jordan started to dribble right, then crossed over to his left, ''pushing off'' Russell." ]''']''' 05:24, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::Oh, and before someone says something, I'm not . People are free to run a checkuser on me to verify that. ]''']''' 05:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
	::::I don't think there will be a checkuser run. :) I think most would agree he pushed off, but I would say it shouldn't be worded that way. Maybe "appeared" to push off, which caused a lot of controversy in the aftermath, or something to that effect. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

			<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
	== Overturned speedies ==
			<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2021\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	Yeah. You want to do it? <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 04:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
	:Not particularly. I just noticed the DRV and saw several of the participants say it should be overturned and sent to AfD. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
	::Usually admins take care of those if there's consensus to take to afd. If one doesn't, I'll either ask one to do so, or do it myself. <span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>, his otters and a clue-bat • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 04:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

			If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
	== AIV not the right venue? ==
			</td></tr>
			</table>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1056563129 -->

			==Disambiguation link notification for December 17==
	I see you very quickly removed without suggesting an alternative venue. Where should it go? ] (]) 17:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
	:], but I handled it for you, so you don't have to bother. You shouldn't report those to AIV. AIV is for blocking. The IP can't be blocked anyway because it hasn't edited in days. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

			Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]<!-- ( \| )-->. Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small>
	== Disappearance of AE claim ==

	<s~~>Hey.~~ ~~The~~ AE ~~claim~~ ~~that I filed against MUA has disappeared from the AE~~ ~~boards~~. ~~Any~~ ~~idea~~ ~~why~~ ~~this~~ ~~happened~~ ~~and~~ ~~where~~ I ~~can~~ ~~find~~ ~~it? Any help would be appreciated~~. Thanks~~</s>--~~] (]) 01:09, 15 ~~November~~ ~~2009~~ (UTC)		It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 06:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
	:Never mind. The claim has since re-appeared and I have no explanation for its disappearance and subsequent re-appearance.--] (]) 02:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

			== Element Fresh ==
	== Something interesting I found today ==

			Hi! I see you are the closer for ]. I found an article from '']'' . Would it help if I checked for some Chinese sources about the bankruptcy? If I can find enough I could start a DRV.
	] working in conjunction with apparent IP socks, worked to falsify the information on bios of Chespirito (a show) actors and actresses. This led to the information sticking in a number of cases, because the account edited after the IP socks, and regular rollback of course simply rolled it back to the version edited by the socks. ] will show you where it stuck. ]<sup>]</sup> 05:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
			] (]) 01:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
			: I started ] as a draft. If you're interested, please feel free to give feedback. Thank you ] (]) 23:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

			==Happy First Edit Day!==
	==WP:SOAP==
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Happy First Edit Day!</span>]
			Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

	An ~~excellent example can be found~~ ]. --] 16:37, 20 ~~November~~ ~~2009~~ (UTC)		From the ], ]<sup>]</sup> 11:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
			</div>

			== ] ==
	== Worth noting ==

			Hi Enigmaman. You fully protected ] on 2 July 2018 after ] was closed as "delete". I created a deletion review at ] regarding restoring the article using a new draft I wrote. ] (]) 07:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
	. ]-] 17:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
	== Thanks ==

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	I don't recall crossing paths with you, but thanks for the re-welcome. A ] as us old gutter punks know it is always nice to hear. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 03:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2022\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	== Talk Layout ==

			If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
	Hey, I'm noticing a large amount of whitespace at the top of your talkpage. I'm thinking this could be corrected as easily as placing {{tl\|TOCleft}} immediately before the BLP notice. Just a thought =D --] 21:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
	:Sounds good to me. Go ahead. :) ]<sup>]</sup> 21:56, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
	::{{Done}} Beautious =D --] 21:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

			</div>
	== SPI streamlining ==
			</div>
			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 -->

			== BDE ==
	Hello. The ] team recently removed several of the more ], to make way for people who have expressed interest in becoming active with the process. As some people who were removed have expressed no interest or wish to return to clerking, access to the bot functions have also been revoked. Of course, if you wish to remain a clerk, just readd your name to the list; but we do ask that you remain minimally active with the process. Thanks. <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 01:00, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

			May your soul be bound up in the bond of eternal life. ] (]) 03:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
	== 72 fortnights? ==
			:{{u\|Danthecan}}, sincere apologies if I've misunderstood this message, but if you have evidence that Enigmaman has passed away, please send an email to info-en@wikimedia.org so they can take steps to secure the account. ] (]) 04:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

			== Precious anniversary ==
	Is that a valid block time for {{IPvandal\|70.91.195.205}} — ] ] 19:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
			{{User QAIbox/auto\|years=Four}}
	:Sure. 13 previous blocks, including a prior block for a year. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:50, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
			--] (]) 05:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
	::Typically IP block lengths should ceiling at 1 yr (unless it's an open proxy). Also: what prompted the extension? They hadn't edited since the 1 yr had been put in place. I see you've done this on a bunch of IPs for no apparent reason. –<font face="verdana" color="black">]</font>] 19:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
	:::I noticed IPs with a long history of vandalism were getting blocked for 48 or 55 hours, so I've had to review a whole slew of blocks. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
	::::A good deal of the ones you reblocked with the peculiar length were already serving year blocks. –<font face="verdana" color="black">]</font>] 20:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
	== Thanksgiving_(United_States) ==
	I note that you have undone my edits to ], requesting Citations about food donation. Why? ] (]) 19:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
	:Dunno. I suppose you can put it back, but I suggest you only use one. Putting it after every sentence can get a little annoying for readers. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:07, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
	:fair comment. ] (]) 06:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

			== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
	== before putting wrong warnings on someone page why not look. ==

			<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
	You claim im in a edit war, I do not see where you think i am doing this i am adding this to the I am waring you not not place unfounded warings on my page thank you. ] (]) 07:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div>
	:You are engaged in an edit war. That is a fact. I'm sure you think your edits are correct, but you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who doesn't. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
			<div class="ivmbox-text">
	:: I feel you are harassing me now if you feel i am edit waring then get Another administrator to verify this and they do i will stop you are just angry and consider edit waring because i reverted your edit you can bolck me if you want all i will do is get another IP so that does not scare me at all. ] (]) 07:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
			Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y\|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data\|2023\|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
	:::Oh, so now you're threatening to sock around your block? That's enough. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

			The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
	== Hey ==

			If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx\|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
	I've sent you a g-mail. ]] 07:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

			</div>
	== Fun times ==
			</div>

			<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->
	Anything you can do about This guy (,
			==Happy First Edit Day!==
	,
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	)? Zealot, worked into a rage over his spam links being deleted, now abusing Twinkle warnings. --] 22:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
			{{ombox
	:Blocked. Looks to be headed for indef. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
			\| name = First Edit Day
	::Thanks much. I love the guys who decide they know what wikipedia ''SHOULD'' be (usually in direct conflict with existing policies) and then scream to high heaven about anyone who disagrees. I'm surprised I wasn't called a fascist. Maybe I didn't let him go long enough. --] 22:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
			\| image = ]

			\| imageright = ]
	, he needs sorting, I don't have my temps anymore so I can't warn, poss. future block. , scroll down to about 30th Nov and you'll see some genre changes, but I'm not sure if he's a cleaner or a genre troll... I shouldn't even be editing anymore. I gotta get away before I start editing regularly! Take care guys. Keep up the genre troll work whenever you have time. :-) ]] 21:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
			\| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: repeating-linear-gradient(300deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite, MistyRose 50%);

			\| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center;
	:They haven't been warned! ]<sup>]</sup> 21:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
			\| plainlinks = yes

			\| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Enigmaman! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
	== UV/Gwarrior page ==
			}}

	,
	,


	Christ's sake --] 17:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

	:, but wait a ! If that's not interesting then I don't know what is. ]] 15:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
	::In other words, if that doesn't scream DUCK, I don't know what does. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
	:::I'm totally wasted but I'll try my best to reply: Let's see some progress here, E-man, from one of our active Wiki members! Report to ] (or whatever link it is) by you? :-) Have a good night! ]] 02:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
	::::, - It would appear that Rock Soldier makes few to no edits in the same nine-hour span every day (depending on time zone, which he doesn't specify), and Greg D has no such downtime. In my non-expert analysis, something IRL is causing that dead space in RS, like bed (assuming Pacific time based, for sake of argument, on Greg D) or a job, and if those things actually AREN'T an issue and he's able to pull all-nighters consistently to edit as Greg D, it doesn't make sense to me that he never did that on his main account earlier in his account's history. It seems overly sinister to entertain the thought of him setting up plausible deniability for a sock not created until nine months later. I understand there's an editing style overlap, but to me that doesn't account for this. Now if only Greg's initial response had been ''this'', rather than tossing up a ridiculous CSD tag and riling the troops. --] 16:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

	==A Watchful Eye==

	- warned, damage control complete- need someone to be able to block if he decides to continue :P --] 22:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
	:blocked indef. ]<sup>]</sup> 22:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

	{{Tb\|Xeno}}

	== Re Barnstar ==

	Hi

	Thanks for the Barnstar! --] (]) 00:57, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

	== From user page ==

	I have warned gersracing about repeatedly removing referenced work in the Jimi Hendrix Cry of Love page and replacing it with his unreferenced POV several times. I then reported it as vandalism, whereupon I was told by (whoever) that "this site is only for persistent vandals - and advised to contact you? I would have thought his actions fit the bill "persistent"] (]) 19:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
	:It said to report it to the 3RR board, because it appears to be edit-warring rather than vandalism. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

	==Keshia Chanté==
	Please help that 99.248.83.188 user cleanup up ] - don't blindly revert them, the article is a mess. ] (]) 02:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
	:It sure is a mess. That doesn't change the fact that the IP's edits were inappropriate. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
	::Actually, I don't think they were inappropriate. They were removing an unsourced BLP violation. ] (]) 02:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
	:::Errr, if that's all they were doing, they wouldn't have gotten reverted so many times. Look at the top of that edit. I reverted that, and I would revert it again. The edits were inappropriate, although removing the problematic material in the lead happened to be constructive. Don't know how it got in there. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
	::::Yeah, wasn't a good one, but I can see their getting frustrated after being reverted and blocked so many times for the valid edit. I wonder where they think they've reported? ] (]) 02:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
	:::::Dunno, sounds like a legal threat to me. I'll keep an eye on the IP and find out who added the bogus BLP vio in the first place. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

	:Why would you do instead of editing like your comments to talk pages suggested you should? ]<sup>]</sup> 02:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
	::Ah, don't look at my reverts and at the robot tags "refs removed, etc" - they were wrong too. Just click those refs and see for yourself. Another thing, I wouldn't semiprotect an article when "vandals" are identified and blocked. I wouldn't revert you too, thus let's talk first. Cheers. ] (]) 03:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
	:::I reverted by mistake. That I should have reverted my revert - no doubt, but I started to read the article instead and realized that one edit was just a hint - that its all rotten with allegation and wrong refs behind them - reverting one edit there won't help. (Woogee started to cleanup deeper now). Then I went to other editors and they all confessed that their reverts were blind, made at high speed. Nobody's wrong, hard to stop a sword in a fight, lets calm down and cleanup. BTW, me being admin is not always relevant in this case. ] (]) 03:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

	== Whats up. ==

	yeeeeah I kinda left a hate message on that guy Jbimo8 or something like that on his talk page. He talked bad about my Miami Dolphins so I ripped him a new one. Please dont get mad. He deserved it. Im a loyal editor to Wiki.] (]) 06:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
	:I'll let it go this time because you're so damn funny, but in the future, you can't attack people just because they vandalized an article on your favorite team or player or whatever. They'll probably get blocked anyway, as this guy did. ]<sup>]</sup> 06:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

	==]==

	Hi

	I thought I'd point this page out to you because I'm not sure if you deleted it in error or not. It's just the last time I was editing his page I only saw some warning templates? I think I posted a warning template about ], I gave him a final warning owing to the sheer amount of vandalism that had been carried out. Just thought I'd check I hadn't done anything wrong?

	Oh and thanks for protecting Leona Lewis :) --] (]) 00:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
	:No, you didn't do anything wrong. I was trying to add the temp category to the page and couldn't, so I just deleted it. User was blocked. And you're welcome. :) ]<sup>]</sup> 01:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

	== Scieberking ==

	Hi, this user ] after causing the trouble at Pete Townsend yesterday is now leaving you are blocked from editing templates and causing similar issues everywhere he goes.. . ] (]) 20:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
	:Blocked. Even putting this aside, he's edit-warring on another page after being warned about the Pete Townshend article. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
	::Nice one, he is not as yet much of an asset, perhaps it will help him understand, regards. ] (]) 21:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
	:::i'm not sure is indicative of deeper understanding ... ] (]) 11:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
	:::: Dear ]. I'd really appreciate if you stop doing personal attacks for instance "thank you for revealing your true color" and "he is not as yet much of an asset". Who are you to reach a verdict on me? I've been contributing positively on Misplaced Pages, whether inside or outside music. --] (]) 06:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

	== question on sock block ==

	] is denying connection to CosmicLegg, and I must admit, I don't see diffs which make the connection, nor do I see an SPI or Checkuser case which does either. COuld you please post the evidence on TheQueenCorner's talk page so I can decline the unblock request? Thx. --]''''']''''' 05:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

	: Also ] appears to be a sock of CosmicLegg. Thanks. --] (]) 06:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
	:I'm going to grant the unblock, as on review, the evidence does not appear strong enough. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


	Will defend my self as required. Scieberking appears to have used this account 115.167.93.138 when editing. Please file an SPI for that one. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:Knock yourself out. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:11, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

			==missing==
	==]==
			Hi. You are now ], as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">] (])</span></span> 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
	I notice that you gave User:Haroldsultan a warning about vandalism on his talk page. I think he is not a vandal but a good faith editor, who probably should have been given a bit more guidance about how to edit instead of a warning. He was trying to add a new POV to the "Tzniut" article and doing this to a well-watched article is not an easy process, even for users that have made thousands of edits. I've left him a message on his talk page offering to help him with editing, and giving him links to some of the policies. Do you agree with me, and can you think of anything else he might need to know? Thanks. --]] 00:52, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
			<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->
	:He's been edit-warring over the page, before and after its protection. ]<sup>]</sup> 01:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
			<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%;">Removal from member list</span>]
	He's a new user and does he even know what edit-warring is, and what to do instead of it? --]] 02:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
			You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee ]. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself.
	:Undoing a harmless edit (from a new user's POV) for no reason at all? When I was new, I didn't randomly start reverting people for kicks. I also do not look favorable on what he was doing, considering there's a good possibility he was one or more of the IPs. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
	Not only do I think he's likely to be the IPs, I think he almost certainly is the IPs. The IPs are all from the same geographic location, and a location I'm not surprised about--as I commented on his Talk page, I believe this User is a particular person I know in real life. It's possible that he didn't remember his password at times, or just didn't feel like logging in to what I'm pretty sure are public computers. I don't understand why he would undo the template, but I could imagine a POV that the template is ugly and his edit wasn't destroying content. Now that you've communicated your view to him and to me, maybe the best thing to do is start discussing things on his Talk page instead of yours, sit back and see how he handles things when he returns? --]] 02:54, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
	:One would think someone using Columbia's IPs would be a little bit more educated. That's in reference to Harold. I'm not impressed by his approach, his behaviour, or his words. His response to the chatter on his talk was to resume edit-warring. Including the IPs, he's up to like ten reverts now. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:56, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

			Best wishes, <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">] (])</span></span> 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
	==]==
			</div>
	Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial ], you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at ]. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! ] (]) 04:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:50, 19 February 2024

This user left Misplaced Pages. Enigmaman has not edited Misplaced Pages since April 10, 2023. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.

Archives

Pre-March
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
Nov/December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April/May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
Sept-Oct 2009
Nov-Dec 2009
Jan-Apr 2010
May-Dec 2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015-2016
2017
2018
2019

Precious

"...a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... "

Thank you for quality articles about personalities such as Sid Luckman and Félix Houphouët-Boigny, for work for project Living people when it was active, for quoting "...a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma... ", for support and the perfect solution, - enigmaticmaman, repeating from 10 years ago: you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2240 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Gerda. I imagine I'm one of the few 2009 recipients still here. Enigma 15:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Well, not so few, - I joined 2009, DYK? I normally look up if someone found precious 10 years ago (mostly by Rlevse) is still active and deserves a refreshed award. For you, it was the opposite: I noticed you on Floq's page, and thought "precious!", but then saw your entry and waited a bit ;) - Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

:-) Enigma 16:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

We'll wait for your return. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm sad to see you leave Misplaced Pages

I hope that your retirement isn't permanent, and that you decide to return to Misplaced Pages (whenever that may be). I'll miss you a lot, and I hope to hear from you in the future someday when you make your return. Should I never hear from you again, please know that I wish you well and I wish you a life of happiness and well-being. It was a pleasure to know you and work with you here, and I am sad to see you go...... ~Oshwah~ 17:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

I am not happy. Things are getting worse and worse on Misplaced Pages. Enigma 20:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Just to add my sadness about your retirement...and my thanks for your input at RFPP. Take care. Lectonar (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:CloudBuy

Hello, Enigmaman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CloudBuy".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages! CASSIOPEIA 10:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

You got it deleted before the message even appeared for me, so this is not a helpful message. You could've notified me first. Enigma 20:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, Bobherry Talk Edits 01:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU 13:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Your input

I have an RfC going on at Talk:Gwar#RfC_about_GwarBar_vs_GWARbar regarding using all caps in an article and would appreciate the input of some long-standing Misplaced Pages editors who may be familiar with the policy, or at least be able to interpret the existing policy with some clarity. Thanks for your time! NJZombie (talk) 23:21, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU 04:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Pranav Pandya

This title is salted. Can you unprotect to allow promotion of draft into mainspace? Draft:Pranav Pandya (Gujarati poet) is a different topic. It is well cited. I have checked for notability. It should be moved to Pranav Pandya. I was asked for help on my talkpage. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Enigmaman is inactive. Hey Eddie891 Can you help with this ? --Gazal world (talk) 15:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Nizil Shah, I have un-salted so the draft can be mainspaced as it's clearly not an A7 candidate. The new article may of course still be tagged if it is not notable, I have not closely reviewed the case. Thanks for the ping, Gaza world. Cheers, Eddie891 _Work 15:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

I do not know anything about this. I SALTed the title some years ago after it had been deleted multiple times by various admins. Enigma 16:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Max Griffin (fighter)

Hi Enigmaman, your edit on the above page has been removed because the content claimed is not support by any source. You are welcome to put it back in if you would support it with an independent, reliable source by providing an inline citation. Thank you. Cassiopeia 04:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

No, it has a source. His official UFC page. Enigma 15:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burton (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Burton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Element Fresh

Hi! I see you are the closer for Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Element Fresh. I found an article from The Beijinger that it had developed a partnership with a tennis player named Li Na and now it's gone bankrupt. Would it help if I checked for some Chinese sources about the bankruptcy? If I can find enough I could start a DRV. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

I started User:WhisperToMe/Element Fresh as a draft. If you're interested, please feel free to give feedback. Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU 11:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2022 June 20#Matthew Tye

Hi Enigmaman. You fully protected Matthew Tye on 2 July 2018 after Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Matthew Tye (3rd nomination) was closed as "delete". I created a deletion review at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2022 June 20#Matthew Tye regarding restoring the article using a new draft I wrote. Cunard (talk) 07:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

BDE

May your soul be bound up in the bond of eternal life. Danthecan (talk) 03:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Danthecan, sincere apologies if I've misunderstood this message, but if you have evidence that Enigmaman has passed away, please send an email to info-en@wikimedia.org so they can take steps to secure the account. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!
Hi Enigmaman! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

missing

Hi. You are now listed as missing, as we seek to recognize those editors who impacted the project and are no longer contributing. Should you ever return or simply don't want to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Please do not see this message as any sort of prod to your activity on wiki, as we all would hope to enjoy life after having edited here. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Removal from member list

You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Misplaced Pages Birthday Committee birthday list. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself.

Best wishes, Chris Troutman (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Categories: