Misplaced Pages

Latest revision as of 11:52, 25 February 2024

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Luxembourg Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"The total ban on sexuality was lifted in 1792." What the hell were you smoking? ;-)

http://www.europaforum.public.lu/fr/actualites/2008/07/question-angel-homo/index.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.12.171.218 (talk) 22:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Extra information for the page.

I came across this article and it states some information about the progress of the Same-sex marriage bill: http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/tag/luxembourg So maybe if anyone thought it relevant, they could possibly update the page? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.142.73 (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Council of State's opinion

After an approval at the first reading, the bill goes to the Council of State for the opinion. The Council could recommend the second reading, if views the bill negatively. If the second reading is not recommended, then the bill is promulgated and published in the official journal. See this bill as example (see especially the second table from the bottom on the website). I suppose that the Council has one month to submit the opinion. Ron 1987 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Correct (well, first/second vote, rather than reading and Council of State must agree rather than recommend), but this is just a formality, they almost always agree to skip the second vote. Even the Minister of Justice excepts the law to be published in July already. SPQRobin (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

The source cited by Ngagnebin, in the last paragraph says that the second vote should take place within 3 months, unless the Council of State agree to skip it. So, the avis is necessary. Ron 1987 (talk) 20:33, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Correct. My mistake. :) It should still need the Grand Duke's promulgation after the Council of State's avis, I think. :) I might be wrong, again though. But I read it everywhere :) Ngagnebin (talk) 20:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Of course it needs promulgation. And it doesn't need the Council of State's avis, which is the opinion given to bills before a parliamentary vote. After the (first) parliamentary vote, a second one needs to happen, except if the Council of State agrees to skip that second vote, which is generally granted. It's a bit of a peculiar process (see article 59 of the Constitution). And after that agreement, the legislative process is formally complete, after which the Grand Duke can promulgate it and then the bill is published in the Mémorial (which should happen somewhere in July, the Minister of Justice said). The bill goes into effect six months later, which would thus be January 2015 if the previous steps go well. SPQRobin (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

The Grand Duke has no say in the matter Grand_Duke_of_Luxembourg#Constitutional_role, all it needs is to be published in the gazette (memorial). I will delete the reference to the Grand Duke. 24.108.58.1 (talk) 05:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

He needs to promulgate the law (it doesn't really matter if that's mentioned in the article or not), but you are right in the sense that he is no longer formal part of the legislative process (i.e. no royal assent needed), so technically the law has been adopted. SPQRobin (talk) 11:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Rename

The article should be moved to Same-sex marriage in Luxembourg, as it has been already legalized. --Freddy eduardo (talk) 20:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Same-sex marriage in Luxembourg. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.lequotidien.lu/politique-et-societe/45647.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

• B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
• WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
• B-Class law articles
• Low-importance law articles
• WikiProject Law articles
• B-Class Luxembourg articles
• Mid-importance Luxembourg articles
• WikiProject Luxembourg articles