Misplaced Pages

Talk:West Siberian Laika: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:12, 19 September 2007 editCoaster1983 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,025 edits note← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:49, 13 March 2024 edit undoBattyBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,934,006 editsm top: Fixed/removed unknown WikiProject parameter(s) and general fixes per WP:Talk page layoutTag: AWB 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}} {{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Dogs|class=Start}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Dogs|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Russia|importance=low}}
}}


==Recent Changes== ==Recent Changes==
Line 11: Line 14:
*There is some subjectivity in the article. This needs to be rewritten in a neutral tone. *There is some subjectivity in the article. This needs to be rewritten in a neutral tone.
That all said, the article has been improved by the addition of references and more information about the breed. --] 02:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC) That all said, the article has been improved by the addition of references and more information about the breed. --] 02:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

== Needs editing ==
Still no wikilinks or inline citations two years later, and still unreadable. I have tagged the long, difficult to read (incoherent) section on dog raising, training and hunting under the heading "Temperament". Please replace with a short, clearly stated and inline-cited sentence or two about temperament, and arrange the other information in sections on hunting or rearing.--] (]) 19:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:49, 13 March 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the West Siberian Laika article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconDogs Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Dogs To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Dogs:

WikiProject iconRussia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent Changes

I have noticed that the article has been drastically changed in the last week or so. Overall, I feel that the article's quality regressed from the previous version prior to edits made on September 11. Currently, the article has the following issues:

  • Poor organization. The behavior section has an almost unreadable block of text. This text contains the physical description of breed which should be in its own section
  • The article needs to be Wikilinked.
  • The dog breed infobox has been removed twice. This needs to stay in the article since all dog breed articles have this infobox.
  • Improper formating of images which results in a link instead of the image.
  • Two of the references point to forums, which are not considered reliable sources. They should be removed.
  • There is some subjectivity in the article. This needs to be rewritten in a neutral tone.

That all said, the article has been improved by the addition of references and more information about the breed. --Coaster1983 02:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Needs editing

Still no wikilinks or inline citations two years later, and still unreadable. I have tagged the long, difficult to read (incoherent) section on dog raising, training and hunting under the heading "Temperament". Please replace with a short, clearly stated and inline-cited sentence or two about temperament, and arrange the other information in sections on hunting or rearing.--Hafwyn (talk) 19:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Categories: