Revision as of 06:11, 3 April 2007 editMonopolizer (talk | contribs)12 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 20:33, 13 March 2024 edit undoCycloneYoris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,726 edits Restore R cats. |
(12 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
'''Potential competition''', a fundamental conception in ], refers to the possibility of new entrants into a given market. The opposite is a ] which is a situation where competition is against the law. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
The market in question can be defined in both product and geographic terms, or both. See ], i.e. it can refer to the market for ] in ]. |
|
|
|
{{R with history}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{R to section}} |
|
Potential competition might be represented for that particular market by local shoe manufacturers, who could without prohibitive expense re-tool their machinery to make sneakers. Or it could refer to the sneaker manufacturers of northern New Jersey, who could move their product across the ] if profits there proved enticing. |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
The fact that there is the potential for competition pressures defacto monopolies to keep prices low. |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|