Misplaced Pages

Debra Milke: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:31, 9 December 2020 editMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 25 templates: del empty params (3×); hyphenate params (4×);Tag: AWB← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:07, 23 March 2024 edit undoBabbaQ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users104,504 edits Rescuing 22 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5Tag: IABotManagementConsole [1.3] 
(15 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|German-American woman (born 1964)}}
{{Infobox person {{Infobox person
| name = Debra Milke | name = Debra Milke
Line 17: Line 18:
}} }}


'''Debra Jean Milke''' (née Sadeik; born March 10, 1964) is a ]-] woman who spent over 25 years in prison in the state of ]. She was one of three people sentenced to ] for the December 2, 1989 shooting death of her four-year-old son, Christopher Conan Milke. Her alleged conspirators were her roommate James Lynn Styers and his friend Roger Mark Scott. Neither ] against her and both agreed that she was not present at the shooting. Scott implicated Milke as the mastermind while Styers said she had no involvement whatsoever. They implicated each other as the actual shooter.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/20130711wild-card-may-sway-milkes-retrial.html|title=Wild card confession may sway Debra Milke’s murder retrial|first=Michael|last=Kiefer|website=azcentral.com}}</ref> Who that was remains a subject of speculation. '''Debra Jean Milke''' (née Sadeik; born March 10, 1964) is a ]-] woman who spent over 25 years in prison in the state of ]. She was one of three people sentenced to ] for the December 2, 1989 shooting death of her four-year-old son, Christopher Conan Milke. Her alleged conspirators were her roommate James Lynn Styers and his friend Roger Mark Scott. Neither ] against her and both agreed that she was not present at the shooting. Scott implicated Milke as the mastermind while Styers said she had no involvement whatsoever. They implicated each other as the actual shooter.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/20130711wild-card-may-sway-milkes-retrial.html|title=Wild card confession may sway Debra Milke's murder retrial|first=Michael|last=Kiefer|website=azcentral.com|access-date=2019-07-08|archive-date=2016-03-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160328134845/http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/20130711wild-card-may-sway-milkes-retrial.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Who that was remains a subject of speculation.


With the passage of time Milke's conviction became increasingly polarizing, largely due to the conduct and testimony of ] ] ] Armando Saldate Jr. Saldate testified that Milke confessed to him. The alleged confession was uncorroborated, however, and Milke is adamant it did not occur.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2015/03/24/justice/arizona-debra-milke-death-sentence/index.html|title=Debra Milke, who spent 22 years on death row, has murder case tossed|author=Saeed Ahmed and Greg Botelho|website=CNN}}</ref> Saldate was later accused of ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/debra-milke-update-ex-detective-seeks-out-of-arizona-womans-retrial|title=Debra Milke update: Ex-detective seeks out of Arizona woman's retrial - ABC15 Arizona|access-date=2016-12-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161104120924/http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/debra-milke-update-ex-detective-seeks-out-of-arizona-womans-retrial|archive-date=2016-11-04|url-status=dead}}</ref> Questions about whether a confession was made and whether Milke had voluntarily waived her '']'' ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://archive.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2010/01/12/20100112milke0112.html|title=Retrial possible in 1989 murder case of Debra Milke|website=archive.azcentral.com}}</ref> Saldate's long history of misconduct,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/23/arizona-son-murder-debra-milke-retrial-charges-dismissed|title=Arizona woman who spent nearly half her life on death row will not face retrial|first=Lauren|last=Gambino|date=March 23, 2015|via=www.theguardian.com}}</ref> and ] Noel Levy ], became central issues of Milke's ]s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/innocence-debra-milke-exonerated-from-arizona-death-row|title=INNOCENCE: Debra Milke Exonerated from Arizona Death Row|website=Death Penalty Information Center}}</ref> With the passage of time Milke's conviction became increasingly polarizing, largely due to the conduct and testimony of ] ] ] Armando Saldate Jr. Saldate testified that Milke confessed to him. The alleged confession was uncorroborated, however, and Milke is adamant it did not occur.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2015/03/24/justice/arizona-debra-milke-death-sentence/index.html|title=Debra Milke, who spent 22 years on death row, has murder case tossed|author=Saeed Ahmed and Greg Botelho|website=CNN|date=24 March 2015|access-date=8 July 2019|archive-date=8 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708225944/https://www.cnn.com/2015/03/24/justice/arizona-debra-milke-death-sentence/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Saldate was later accused of ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/debra-milke-update-ex-detective-seeks-out-of-arizona-womans-retrial|title=Debra Milke update: Ex-detective seeks out of Arizona woman's retrial - ABC15 Arizona|access-date=2016-12-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161104120924/http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/debra-milke-update-ex-detective-seeks-out-of-arizona-womans-retrial|archive-date=2016-11-04|url-status=dead}}</ref> Questions about whether a confession was made and whether Milke had voluntarily waived her '']'' ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://archive.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2010/01/12/20100112milke0112.html|title=Retrial possible in 1989 murder case of Debra Milke|website=archive.azcentral.com|access-date=2016-12-08|archive-date=2016-12-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220200057/http://archive.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2010/01/12/20100112milke0112.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Saldate's long history of misconduct,<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/23/arizona-son-murder-debra-milke-retrial-charges-dismissed|title=Arizona woman who spent nearly half her life on death row will not face retrial|first=Lauren|last=Gambino|newspaper=The Guardian|date=March 23, 2015|via=www.theguardian.com|access-date=December 7, 2016|archive-date=December 21, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221053712/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/23/arizona-son-murder-debra-milke-retrial-charges-dismissed|url-status=live}}</ref> and ] Noel Levy ], became central issues of Milke's ]s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/innocence-debra-milke-exonerated-from-arizona-death-row|title=INNOCENCE: Debra Milke Exonerated from Arizona Death Row|website=Death Penalty Information Center|access-date=2019-07-08|archive-date=2019-07-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708225944/https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/innocence-debra-milke-exonerated-from-arizona-death-row|url-status=live}}</ref>


In March, 2013, a three-judge panel of the ] unanimously overturned Debra Milke's conviction. In their ruling, the judges excoriated the conviction.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://volokh.com/2013/03/15/ninth-circuit-panel-overturns-murder-conviction/|title=Ninth Circuit Panel Overturns Murder Conviction|first=Eugene|last=Volokh|date=March 15, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/03/14/07-99001%20web%20-%20corrected.pdf|title=PDF of United States Ninth Circuit Court's ruling}}</ref> Milke was released on $250,000 bond that September by Judge Rosa P. Mroz of the ] Superior Court.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-arizona-woman-released-after-decades-on-death-row-2013sep06-story.html|title=Arizona woman released after decades on death row|date=September 6, 2013|website=San Diego Union-Tribune}}</ref> County prosecutor Bill Montgomery unsuccessfully appealed the decision to the ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/04/21/bill-montgomery-debra-milke-appeals/26142983/|title=AZ Supreme Court lets Milke ruling stand as precedent|website=azcentral}}</ref> which blocked a proposed retrial.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/arizona-supreme-court-wont-allow-retrial-of-debra-milke-6663644|title=Arizona Supreme Court Won't Allow Retrial of Debra Milke|first=Matthew|last=Hendley|date=March 18, 2015|website=Phoenix New Times}}</ref> On March 23, 2015, all charges against Debra Milke were formally dismissed ] by Judge Mroz.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/03/23/debra-milke-murder-charges-dismissed-abrk/70323844/|title=Murder charges formally dismissed against Milke|website=azcentral}}</ref> In March, 2013, a three-judge panel of the ] unanimously overturned Debra Milke's conviction. In their ruling, the judges excoriated the conviction.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://volokh.com/2013/03/15/ninth-circuit-panel-overturns-murder-conviction/|title=Ninth Circuit Panel Overturns Murder Conviction|first=Eugene|last=Volokh|date=March 15, 2013|access-date=December 6, 2016|archive-date=December 20, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161220080915/http://volokh.com/2013/03/15/ninth-circuit-panel-overturns-murder-conviction/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/03/14/07-99001%20web%20-%20corrected.pdf|title=PDF of United States Ninth Circuit Court's ruling|access-date=2013-03-14|archive-date=2013-03-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130319102852/http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/03/14/07-99001%20web%20-%20corrected.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Milke was released on $250,000 bond that September by Judge Rosa P. Mroz of the ] Superior Court.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-arizona-woman-released-after-decades-on-death-row-2013sep06-story.html|title=Arizona woman released after decades on death row|date=September 6, 2013|website=San Diego Union-Tribune|access-date=July 8, 2019|archive-date=July 8, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708225942/https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-arizona-woman-released-after-decades-on-death-row-2013sep06-story.html|url-status=live}}</ref> County prosecutor Bill Montgomery unsuccessfully appealed the decision to the ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/04/21/bill-montgomery-debra-milke-appeals/26142983/|title=AZ Supreme Court lets Milke ruling stand as precedent|website=azcentral|access-date=2019-07-08|archive-date=2020-11-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201123173221/https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/04/21/bill-montgomery-debra-milke-appeals/26142983/|url-status=live}}</ref> which blocked a proposed retrial.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/arizona-supreme-court-wont-allow-retrial-of-debra-milke-6663644|title=Arizona Supreme Court Won't Allow Retrial of Debra Milke|first=Matthew|last=Hendley|date=March 18, 2015|website=Phoenix New Times|access-date=July 8, 2019|archive-date=July 8, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190708225944/https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/arizona-supreme-court-wont-allow-retrial-of-debra-milke-6663644|url-status=live}}</ref> On March 23, 2015, all charges against Debra Milke were formally dismissed ] by Judge Mroz.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/03/23/debra-milke-murder-charges-dismissed-abrk/70323844/|title=Murder charges formally dismissed against Milke|website=azcentral|access-date=2019-07-08|archive-date=2021-02-27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210227225119/https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/03/23/debra-milke-murder-charges-dismissed-abrk/70323844/|url-status=live}}</ref>

Milke has filed a civil wrongful conviction lawsuit. It names the city of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Bill Montgomery, and Armando Saldate, among others, as defendants.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://globalwrong.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/debra-milke-lawsuit.pdf|title=PDF of Milke's complaint}}</ref>


==Biography== ==Biography==
Debra Milke (Sadeik) was born in ], West Germany, to a ] father and a German mother. In 1965 the Sadeik family moved to the U.S., where Milke attended high school and college. She married Mark Milke in 1984 and gave birth to one son, Christopher Conan Milke, in 1985. Debra and Mark divorced in 1988.<ref name=PNT1991>{{cite news|last=Rubin|first=Paul|title=Death-row Debbie: No one wanted to believe she could kill her child|url=http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1991-04-10/news/death-row-debbie-no-one-wanted-to-believe-she-could-kill-her-child/|access-date=28 June 2012|newspaper=Phoenix New Times|date=10 April 1991}}</ref> Debra Milke (Sadeik) was born in ], West Germany, to a ] father and a German mother. In 1965 the Sadeik family moved to the U.S., where Milke attended high school and college. She married Mark Milke in 1984 and gave birth to one son, Christopher Conan Milke, in 1985. Debra and Mark divorced in 1988.<ref name=PNT1991>{{cite news|last=Rubin|first=Paul|title=Death-row Debbie: No one wanted to believe she could kill her child|url=http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1991-04-10/news/death-row-debbie-no-one-wanted-to-believe-she-could-kill-her-child/|access-date=28 June 2012|newspaper=Phoenix New Times|date=10 April 1991|archive-date=18 March 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130318034042/http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1991-04-10/news/death-row-debbie-no-one-wanted-to-believe-she-could-kill-her-child/|url-status=dead}}</ref>


==Murder investigation and conviction== ==Murder investigation and conviction==
In August 1989, Debra Milke and her son Christopher Milke moved into an apartment with Jim Styers, a man she knew through her sister. On December 2, 1989, Styers took 4-year-old Christopher to the ] mall in ], Arizona. That afternoon he called Milke, who was doing laundry at the apartment, and told her that the boy had disappeared from the mall. Styers alerted mall security, while Milke dialed ]. A missing person investigation was launched. The next day Phoenix police arrested Roger Scott, a long-time friend of Styers. After more than fourteen hours of interrogation, Scott admitted that he knew where Christopher was and that the boy was dead. He directed the police to a desert area north of Phoenix, where Christopher's body was discovered. Christopher had been shot three times in the head. According to the lead case detective Armando Saldate Jr., Scott claimed that Styers had committed the murder and that Styers had told him Milke had "wanted it done." However, Scott would not testify against Milke at her trial.<ref name="9th">, decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 14 March 2013</ref> In August 1989, Debra Milke and her son Christopher Milke moved into an apartment with Jim Styers, a man she knew through her sister. On December 2, 1989, Styers took 4-year-old Christopher to the ] mall in ], Arizona. That afternoon he called Milke, who was doing laundry at the apartment, and told her that the boy had disappeared from the mall. Styers alerted mall security, while Milke dialed ]. A missing person investigation was launched. The next day Phoenix police arrested Roger Scott, a long-time friend of Styers. After more than fourteen hours of interrogation, Scott admitted that he knew where Christopher was and that the boy was dead. He directed the police to a desert area north of Phoenix, where Christopher's body was discovered. Christopher had been shot three times in the head. According to the lead case detective Armando Saldate Jr., Scott claimed that Styers had committed the murder and that Styers had told him Milke had "wanted it done." However, Scott would not testify against Milke at her trial.<ref name="9th"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130319102852/http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/03/14/07-99001%20web%20-%20corrected.pdf |date=2013-03-19 }}, decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 14 March 2013</ref>


Styers, who had helped in the initial search for Christopher, was arrested and interviewed by police after being implicated by Scott. Milke voluntarily went to the ] sheriff's office where she was interrogated by Saldate. The interrogation was not recorded or witnessed by anyone other than Detective Saldate. Three days later, in a written report of the interrogation, Saldate indicated Milke had confessed to arranging the murder of her son Christopher. Styers, who had helped in the initial search for Christopher, was arrested and interviewed by police after being implicated by Scott. Milke voluntarily went to the ] sheriff's office where she was interrogated by Saldate. The interrogation was not recorded or witnessed by anyone other than Detective Saldate. Three days later, in a written report of the interrogation, Saldate indicated Milke had confessed to arranging the murder of her son Christopher.


Scott was offered a plea-bargain, 21 years in prison for second degree murder, in return for testifying against Milke and Styers. He wanted to take the deal but his lawyer rejected it.<ref name=pnt>{{cite web|title=U.S. Appeals Court Berates Lawyer-Turned-Judge's Work in the "Going to See Santa" Murder Case|work=Phoenix NewTimes|date=11 June 2009|url=http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2009-06-11/news/federal-appeals-court-berates-lawyer-turned-superior-court-judge-s-work-in-going-to-see-santa-murder-case/full/}}</ref> Scott was offered a plea-bargain, 21 years in prison for second degree murder, in return for testifying against Milke and Styers. He wanted to take the deal but his lawyer rejected it.<ref name=pnt>{{cite web|title=U.S. Appeals Court Berates Lawyer-Turned-Judge's Work in the "Going to See Santa" Murder Case|work=Phoenix NewTimes|date=11 June 2009|url=http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2009-06-11/news/federal-appeals-court-berates-lawyer-turned-superior-court-judge-s-work-in-going-to-see-santa-murder-case/full/|access-date=2013-03-25|archive-date=2015-04-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402111316/http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2009-06-11/news/federal-appeals-court-berates-lawyer-turned-superior-court-judge-s-work-in-going-to-see-santa-murder-case/full/|url-status=dead}}</ref>


Milke was charged with ] to commit first degree murder, ], child abuse, and ]. At trial, prosecutors relied on the alleged confession and pointed to a possible motive: Milke had taken out a $5,000 life insurance policy on her son.<ref name="pnt"/> Milke, however, who worked at an insurance agency, had not purposefully negotiated the policy, but obtained it as a part of her regular employee benefits package. She had discussed the policy with Styers.<ref>{{cite book|title=Encyclopedia of Capital Punishment in the United States, 2d ed.|author=Louis J. Palmer Jr.|publisher=McFarland|year=2008|page=109|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FVQrAwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA109&ots=Mpn20aegxi&dq=insurance%20policy%20milke&pg=PA109#v=onepage&q=insurance%20policy%20milke&f=false}}</ref> Milke was charged with ] to commit first degree murder, ], child abuse, and ]. At trial, prosecutors relied on the alleged confession and pointed to a possible motive: Milke had taken out a $5,000 life insurance policy on her son.<ref name="pnt"/> Milke, however, who worked at an insurance agency, had not purposefully negotiated the policy, but obtained it as a part of her regular employee benefits package. She had discussed the policy with Styers.<ref>{{cite book|title=Encyclopedia of Capital Punishment in the United States, 2d ed.|author=Louis J. Palmer Jr.|publisher=McFarland|year=2008|page=109|isbn=9780786451838|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FVQrAwAAQBAJ&q=insurance+policy+milke&pg=PA109}}</ref>


In October 1990, she was convicted of all charges and sentenced to ]. Styers and Scott were charged and tried separately. Both were convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death. In October 1990, she was convicted of all charges and sentenced to ]. Styers and Scott were charged and tried separately. Both were convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death.


==Appeals== ==Appeals==
In December 2007, the ] of Arizona filed an ] in support of Milke, who by then had been on death row for 18 years. The brief raised questions "regarding the admissibility of uncorroborated and unrecorded confessions" by Milke.<ref name="ACLU of Arizona amicus brief">{{Cite web|url=http://www.acluaz.org/sites/default/files/documents/Milke%20--%20ACLU%20Amicus%20Brief%20in%209th%20Cir.pdf|title=American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona amicus brief}}</ref> In September 2009, the ] found that there was "no evidence" that Milke had "voluntarily" waived her right to remain silent and ordered federal court judge ] to decide if the case merited a new trial.<ref name="PNT blog"> Valley Fever blog, ''Phoenix New Times'', 12 January 2010. Retrieved 26 June 2012.</ref> At the subsequent evidentiary hearing, Broomfield disagreed with the appeals court's opinion and found that Milke had validly waived her ].<ref name="PNT blog 2010">{{cite news|last=Rubin|first=Paul|title=Local Federal Judge Disagrees With Higher Court; Says No To Child-Killer Debra Milke's Claim Of Miranda Rights Violation|url=http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/02/local_federal_judge_disagrees.php|access-date=28 June 2012|newspaper=Phoenix New Times|date=2 February 2010}}</ref> In December 2007, the ] of Arizona filed an ] in support of Milke, who by then had been on death row for 18 years. The brief raised questions "regarding the admissibility of uncorroborated and unrecorded confessions" by Milke.<ref name="ACLU of Arizona amicus brief">{{Cite web|url=http://www.acluaz.org/sites/default/files/documents/Milke%20--%20ACLU%20Amicus%20Brief%20in%209th%20Cir.pdf|title=American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona amicus brief|access-date=2012-06-12|archive-date=2012-09-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120916235748/http://acluaz.org/sites/default/files/documents/Milke%20--%20ACLU%20Amicus%20Brief%20in%209th%20Cir.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> In September 2009, the ] found that there was "no evidence" that Milke had "voluntarily" waived her right to remain silent and ordered federal court judge ] to decide if the case merited a new trial.<ref name="PNT blog"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100117072202/http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/01/will_convicted_child_killer_de.php |date=2010-01-17}} Valley Fever blog, ''Phoenix New Times'', 12 January 2010. Retrieved 26 June 2012.</ref> At the subsequent evidentiary hearing, Broomfield disagreed with the appeals court's opinion and found that Milke had validly waived her ].<ref name="PNT blog 2010">{{cite news|last=Rubin|first=Paul|title=Local Federal Judge Disagrees With Higher Court; Says No To Child-Killer Debra Milke's Claim Of Miranda Rights Violation|url=http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/02/local_federal_judge_disagrees.php|access-date=28 June 2012|newspaper=Phoenix New Times|date=2 February 2010|archive-date=25 January 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130125093242/http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/02/local_federal_judge_disagrees.php|url-status=dead}}</ref>


==Conviction overturned== ==Conviction overturned==
On March 14, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit threw out Milke's conviction, ruling that Milke did not receive a fair trial.<ref name="CNN">. ], 2013-03-14.</ref> It held that Milke's rights had been violated by the failure to turn over Saldate's personnel file to the defense. That file included multiple instances of misconduct, including eight cases where confessions, indictments or convictions were thrown out because Saldate either lied under oath or violated the suspects' rights during interrogations. The court ruled that because "the prosecution did not disclose Saldate's history of misconduct," Arizona had violated its obligation to turn over ] to the defense.<ref name=9th/> In their opinion the Circuit Court said, On March 14, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit threw out Milke's conviction, ruling that Milke did not receive a fair trial.<ref name="CNN"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130320005009/http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/14/justice/arizona-death-sentence-overturned/index.html |date=2013-03-20 }}. ], 2013-03-14.</ref> It held that Milke's rights had been violated by the failure to turn over Saldate's personnel file to the defense. That file included multiple instances of misconduct, including eight cases where confessions, indictments or convictions were thrown out because Saldate either lied under oath or violated the suspects' rights during interrogations. The court ruled that because "the prosecution did not disclose Saldate's history of misconduct," Arizona had violated its obligation to turn over ] to the defense.<ref name=9th/> In their opinion the Circuit Court said,


<blockquote>Milke's alleged confession, as reported by Saldate, was the only direct evidence linking Milke to the crime. But the confession was only as good as Saldate's word, as he's the only one who claims to have heard Milke confess and there's no recording, written statement or any other evidence that Milke confessed. Saldate's credibility was crucial to the state's case against Milke. It's hard to imagine anything more relevant to the jury's—or the judge's—determination whether to believe Saldate than evidence that Saldate lied under oath and trampled the constitutional rights of suspects in discharging his official duties. If even a single juror had found Saldate untrustworthy based on the documentation that he habitually lied under oath or that he took advantage of women he had in his power, there would have been at least a hung jury. Likewise, if this evidence had been disclosed, it may well have led the judge to order a new trial, enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, at least, impose a sentence less than death. The prosecution did its best to impugn Milke's credibility. It wasn't entitled, at the same time, to hide the evidence that undermined Saldate's credibility. (p. 42)<ref name="9th"/></blockquote> <blockquote>Milke's alleged confession, as reported by Saldate, was the only direct evidence linking Milke to the crime. But the confession was only as good as Saldate's word, as he's the only one who claims to have heard Milke confess and there's no recording, written statement or any other evidence that Milke confessed. Saldate's credibility was crucial to the state's case against Milke. It's hard to imagine anything more relevant to the jury's—or the judge's—determination whether to believe Saldate than evidence that Saldate lied under oath and trampled the constitutional rights of suspects in discharging his official duties. If even a single juror had found Saldate untrustworthy based on the documentation that he habitually lied under oath or that he took advantage of women he had in his power, there would have been at least a hung jury. Likewise, if this evidence had been disclosed, it may well have led the judge to order a new trial, enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, at least, impose a sentence less than death. The prosecution did its best to impugn Milke's credibility. It wasn't entitled, at the same time, to hide the evidence that undermined Saldate's credibility. (p. 42)<ref name="9th"/></blockquote>


==Release from jail== ==Release from jail==
On July 8, 2013, Arizona Attorney General's Office announced its intention to retry Milke and seek the death penalty for the murder of her son. Milke was released on September 6, 2013,<ref name="CNN_Release">{{cite news|url = http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/06/justice/arizona-milke-release/|work = CNN|title = Debra Milke, Arizonan who had murder conviction tossed, is freed – CNN.com|date = 7 September 2013}}</ref> with a $250,000 bond set by Judge Rosa Mroz of Maricopa County Superior Court.<ref>{{cite news|title=Debra Milke Released: Judge Allows Arizona Woman Bail After Second Accusation In Son's Death|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/05/debra-milke-released_n_3876050.html|publisher=PAUL DAVENPORT and BOB CHRISTIE, Huffington Post|access-date=7 September 2013|date=5 September 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Woman on death row could be freed to await retrial |url=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEATH_ROW_WOMAN?SITE=FLDAY&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181006154820/http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEATH_ROW_WOMAN?SITE=FLDAY&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT |url-status=dead |archive-date=6 October 2018 |publisher=DB News Journal |access-date=6 September 2013 }}</ref> Milke left the jail without talking to reporters, and lived in a house in Phoenix bought by her supporters.<ref name="CNN_Release"/> On December 18, 2013, Judge Mroz granted Saldate's request to invoke his ] not to testify.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/20131213arizona-debra-milke-case-detective-ruling-fifth-amendment.html |title=Detective in Milke case can plead 5th, judge rules|author=Kiefer,Michael|publisher=azcentral.com}}</ref> On July 8, 2013, Arizona Attorney General's Office announced its intention to retry Milke and seek the death penalty for the murder of her son. Milke was released on September 6, 2013,<ref name="CNN_Release">{{cite news|url = http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/06/justice/arizona-milke-release/|work = CNN|title = Debra Milke, Arizonan who had murder conviction tossed, is freed – CNN.com|date = 7 September 2013|access-date = 7 September 2013|archive-date = 7 September 2013|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130907013216/http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/06/justice/arizona-milke-release/|url-status = live}}</ref> with a $250,000 bond set by Judge Rosa Mroz of Maricopa County Superior Court.<ref>{{cite news|title=Debra Milke Released: Judge Allows Arizona Woman Bail After Second Accusation In Son's Death|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/05/debra-milke-released_n_3876050.html|publisher=PAUL DAVENPORT and BOB CHRISTIE, Huffington Post|access-date=7 September 2013|date=5 September 2013|archive-date=6 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130906155217/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/05/debra-milke-released_n_3876050.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Woman on death row could be freed to await retrial |url=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEATH_ROW_WOMAN?SITE=FLDAY&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181006154820/http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DEATH_ROW_WOMAN?SITE=FLDAY&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT |url-status=dead |archive-date=6 October 2018 |publisher=DB News Journal |access-date=6 September 2013 }}</ref> Milke left the jail without talking to reporters, and lived in a house in Phoenix bought by her supporters.<ref name="CNN_Release"/> On December 18, 2013, Judge Mroz granted Saldate's request to invoke his ] not to testify.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/20131213arizona-debra-milke-case-detective-ruling-fifth-amendment.html|title=Detective in Milke case can plead 5th, judge rules|author=Kiefer,Michael|publisher=azcentral.com|access-date=2013-12-18|archive-date=2015-03-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150328231954/http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/20131213arizona-debra-milke-case-detective-ruling-fifth-amendment.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


==Dismissal of charges== ==Dismissal of charges==
On December 11, 2014, an Arizona state appeals court ordered the dismissal of murder charges against Milke, ruling that a retrial would result in unconstitutional ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/case-tossed-against-woman-held-22-years-sons-death-n266791 |title=Case Tossed Against Woman Held 22 Years in Son's Death|author= Associated Press|publisher=nbcnews.com}}</ref> On March 17, 2015 the Arizona Supreme Court declined to review the appeal court decision,<ref>{{Cite news|url = http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/03/17/arizona-supreme-court-debra-milke/24921417/|title = Arizona Supreme Court declines review of appeal that freed Debra Milke|last = Michael|first = Kiefer}}</ref> and on March 23, 2015, Judge Rosa Mroz dismissed the case.<ref>{{Cite news|url =http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/23/debra-milke-case-tossed_n_6924472.html|title =Debra Milke, Who Spent 22 Years On Death Row, Has Murder Case Thrown Out|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20150324015200/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/23/debra-milke-case-tossed_n_6924472.html|archive-date =2015-03-24|url-status =dead}}</ref> On December 11, 2014, an Arizona state appeals court ordered the dismissal of murder charges against Milke, ruling that a retrial would result in unconstitutional ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/case-tossed-against-woman-held-22-years-sons-death-n266791 |title=Case Tossed Against Woman Held 22 Years in Son's Death |date=12 December 2014 |agency=Associated Press |publisher=nbcnews.com |access-date=7 October 2019 |archive-date=12 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112004634/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/case-tossed-against-woman-held-22-years-sons-death-n266791 |url-status=live }}</ref> On March 17, 2015 the Arizona Supreme Court declined to review the appeal court decision,<ref>{{Cite news|url = http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/03/17/arizona-supreme-court-debra-milke/24921417/|title = Arizona Supreme Court declines review of appeal that freed Debra Milke|last = Michael|first = Kiefer|access-date = 2015-03-23|archive-date = 2015-04-02|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150402175239/http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2015/03/17/arizona-supreme-court-debra-milke/24921417/|url-status = live}}</ref> and on March 23, 2015, Judge Rosa Mroz dismissed the case.<ref>{{Cite news|url =http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/23/debra-milke-case-tossed_n_6924472.html|title =Debra Milke, Who Spent 22 Years On Death Row, Has Murder Case Thrown Out|archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20150324015200/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/23/debra-milke-case-tossed_n_6924472.html|archive-date =2015-03-24|url-status =dead}}</ref>


==Civil suit==
On October 29, 2020 U.S. District Judge Rosyln Silver issued a 50-page order dismissing Milke's entire case, and barring her from re-filing it. In her ruling Judge Silver said that Milke had knowingly destroyed evidence, failed to obey court orders, and deeply questioned whether Milke's claims were true. Silver was openly skeptical of the findings of now-disgraced US Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski, who had ordered the case against Milke vacated in 2013. (case CV-15-00462-PHX-ROS)
In 2015, Milke filed a civil lawsuit in federal court against the city of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Bill Montgomery, and Armando Saldate, among others.<ref>{{cite news |last=Gambino |first=Lauren |date=2015-03-24 |title=Arizona woman cleared after 22 years on death row: 'This is not happiness' |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/24/arizona-debra-milke-cleared-22-years-death-row |work=] |access-date=2022-02-05 |archive-date=2022-02-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220205203032/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/24/arizona-debra-milke-cleared-22-years-death-row |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://globalwrong.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/debra-milke-lawsuit.pdf|title=PDF of Milke's complaint|access-date=2016-12-06|archive-date=2016-12-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221085037/https://globalwrong.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/debra-milke-lawsuit.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> It stated she was a victim of malicious prosecution and was denied a fair trial. However, in 2020, after years of wrangling over ], a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, saying Milke "destroyed evidence... failed to review her own files, provided materially incomplete discovery responses, and asserted baseless claims of privilege."<ref>{{cite news |last=Anglen |first=Robert |date=2020-10-31 |title=Debra Milke's wrongful conviction lawsuit against Phoenix dismissed by federal judge |url=https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2020/10/31/debra-milke-wrongful-conviction-lawsuit-against-phoenix-dismissed-federal-judge/6096393002/ |work=] |location=] |access-date=2022-02-05 |archive-date=2022-02-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220205210612/https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix/2020/10/31/debra-milke-wrongful-conviction-lawsuit-against-phoenix-dismissed-federal-judge/6096393002/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite court |litigants=Milke v. City of Phoenix |vol=497 |reporter=F. Supp. 3d |opinion=442 |court=] |date=2020-10-29 |url=https://casetext.com/case/milke-v-city-of-phx-2 |access-date=2022-02-05}}</ref> While the judge preferred to levy a monetary sanction, because Milke stated she could not afford to pay one, the case was instead dismissed with ]. Milke appealed, but a federal appeals court upheld the dismissal.<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Milke v. City of Phoenix |vol= |reporter= |opinion= |court=] |date=2022-01-27 |url=https://casetext.com/case/milke-v-city-of-phoenix |access-date=2022-02-05}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
Line 68: Line 68:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Milke, Debra}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Milke, Debra}}

] ]
] ]
Line 73: Line 74:
] ]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 13:07, 23 March 2024

German-American woman (born 1964)
Debra Milke
BornDebra Jean Sadeik
(1964-03-10) March 10, 1964 (age 60)
West Berlin, West Germany
Known forConviction for son's murder; former Arizona death row inmate

Debra Jean Milke (née Sadeik; born March 10, 1964) is a German-American woman who spent over 25 years in prison in the state of Arizona. She was one of three people sentenced to death for the December 2, 1989 shooting death of her four-year-old son, Christopher Conan Milke. Her alleged conspirators were her roommate James Lynn Styers and his friend Roger Mark Scott. Neither testified against her and both agreed that she was not present at the shooting. Scott implicated Milke as the mastermind while Styers said she had no involvement whatsoever. They implicated each other as the actual shooter. Who that was remains a subject of speculation.

With the passage of time Milke's conviction became increasingly polarizing, largely due to the conduct and testimony of Phoenix police detective Armando Saldate Jr. Saldate testified that Milke confessed to him. The alleged confession was uncorroborated, however, and Milke is adamant it did not occur. Saldate was later accused of perjury. Questions about whether a confession was made and whether Milke had voluntarily waived her Miranda rights, Saldate's long history of misconduct, and prosecuting attorney Noel Levy withholding Saldate's personnel record from the defense, became central issues of Milke's appeals.

In March, 2013, a three-judge panel of the United States Ninth Circuit Court unanimously overturned Debra Milke's conviction. In their ruling, the judges excoriated the conviction. Milke was released on $250,000 bond that September by Judge Rosa P. Mroz of the Maricopa County Superior Court. County prosecutor Bill Montgomery unsuccessfully appealed the decision to the state supreme court, which blocked a proposed retrial. On March 23, 2015, all charges against Debra Milke were formally dismissed with prejudice by Judge Mroz.

Biography

Debra Milke (Sadeik) was born in West Berlin, West Germany, to a U.S. Air Force father and a German mother. In 1965 the Sadeik family moved to the U.S., where Milke attended high school and college. She married Mark Milke in 1984 and gave birth to one son, Christopher Conan Milke, in 1985. Debra and Mark divorced in 1988.

Murder investigation and conviction

In August 1989, Debra Milke and her son Christopher Milke moved into an apartment with Jim Styers, a man she knew through her sister. On December 2, 1989, Styers took 4-year-old Christopher to the Metrocenter mall in Phoenix, Arizona. That afternoon he called Milke, who was doing laundry at the apartment, and told her that the boy had disappeared from the mall. Styers alerted mall security, while Milke dialed 9-1-1. A missing person investigation was launched. The next day Phoenix police arrested Roger Scott, a long-time friend of Styers. After more than fourteen hours of interrogation, Scott admitted that he knew where Christopher was and that the boy was dead. He directed the police to a desert area north of Phoenix, where Christopher's body was discovered. Christopher had been shot three times in the head. According to the lead case detective Armando Saldate Jr., Scott claimed that Styers had committed the murder and that Styers had told him Milke had "wanted it done." However, Scott would not testify against Milke at her trial.

Styers, who had helped in the initial search for Christopher, was arrested and interviewed by police after being implicated by Scott. Milke voluntarily went to the Pinal County sheriff's office where she was interrogated by Saldate. The interrogation was not recorded or witnessed by anyone other than Detective Saldate. Three days later, in a written report of the interrogation, Saldate indicated Milke had confessed to arranging the murder of her son Christopher.

Scott was offered a plea-bargain, 21 years in prison for second degree murder, in return for testifying against Milke and Styers. He wanted to take the deal but his lawyer rejected it.

Milke was charged with conspiracy to commit first degree murder, kidnapping, child abuse, and first-degree murder. At trial, prosecutors relied on the alleged confession and pointed to a possible motive: Milke had taken out a $5,000 life insurance policy on her son. Milke, however, who worked at an insurance agency, had not purposefully negotiated the policy, but obtained it as a part of her regular employee benefits package. She had discussed the policy with Styers.

In October 1990, she was convicted of all charges and sentenced to death. Styers and Scott were charged and tried separately. Both were convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death.

Appeals

In December 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona filed an amicus brief in support of Milke, who by then had been on death row for 18 years. The brief raised questions "regarding the admissibility of uncorroborated and unrecorded confessions" by Milke. In September 2009, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that there was "no evidence" that Milke had "voluntarily" waived her right to remain silent and ordered federal court judge Robert Broomfield to decide if the case merited a new trial. At the subsequent evidentiary hearing, Broomfield disagreed with the appeals court's opinion and found that Milke had validly waived her Miranda rights.

Conviction overturned

On March 14, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit threw out Milke's conviction, ruling that Milke did not receive a fair trial. It held that Milke's rights had been violated by the failure to turn over Saldate's personnel file to the defense. That file included multiple instances of misconduct, including eight cases where confessions, indictments or convictions were thrown out because Saldate either lied under oath or violated the suspects' rights during interrogations. The court ruled that because "the prosecution did not disclose Saldate's history of misconduct," Arizona had violated its obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. In their opinion the Circuit Court said,

Milke's alleged confession, as reported by Saldate, was the only direct evidence linking Milke to the crime. But the confession was only as good as Saldate's word, as he's the only one who claims to have heard Milke confess and there's no recording, written statement or any other evidence that Milke confessed. Saldate's credibility was crucial to the state's case against Milke. It's hard to imagine anything more relevant to the jury's—or the judge's—determination whether to believe Saldate than evidence that Saldate lied under oath and trampled the constitutional rights of suspects in discharging his official duties. If even a single juror had found Saldate untrustworthy based on the documentation that he habitually lied under oath or that he took advantage of women he had in his power, there would have been at least a hung jury. Likewise, if this evidence had been disclosed, it may well have led the judge to order a new trial, enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, at least, impose a sentence less than death. The prosecution did its best to impugn Milke's credibility. It wasn't entitled, at the same time, to hide the evidence that undermined Saldate's credibility. (p. 42)

Release from jail

On July 8, 2013, Arizona Attorney General's Office announced its intention to retry Milke and seek the death penalty for the murder of her son. Milke was released on September 6, 2013, with a $250,000 bond set by Judge Rosa Mroz of Maricopa County Superior Court. Milke left the jail without talking to reporters, and lived in a house in Phoenix bought by her supporters. On December 18, 2013, Judge Mroz granted Saldate's request to invoke his 5th Amendment right not to testify.

Dismissal of charges

On December 11, 2014, an Arizona state appeals court ordered the dismissal of murder charges against Milke, ruling that a retrial would result in unconstitutional double jeopardy. On March 17, 2015 the Arizona Supreme Court declined to review the appeal court decision, and on March 23, 2015, Judge Rosa Mroz dismissed the case.

Civil suit

In 2015, Milke filed a civil lawsuit in federal court against the city of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Bill Montgomery, and Armando Saldate, among others. It stated she was a victim of malicious prosecution and was denied a fair trial. However, in 2020, after years of wrangling over discovery, a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, saying Milke "destroyed evidence... failed to review her own files, provided materially incomplete discovery responses, and asserted baseless claims of privilege." While the judge preferred to levy a monetary sanction, because Milke stated she could not afford to pay one, the case was instead dismissed with prejudice. Milke appealed, but a federal appeals court upheld the dismissal.

See also

References

  1. Kiefer, Michael. "Wild card confession may sway Debra Milke's murder retrial". azcentral.com. Archived from the original on 2016-03-28. Retrieved 2019-07-08.
  2. Saeed Ahmed and Greg Botelho (24 March 2015). "Debra Milke, who spent 22 years on death row, has murder case tossed". CNN. Archived from the original on 8 July 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  3. "Debra Milke update: Ex-detective seeks out of Arizona woman's retrial - ABC15 Arizona". Archived from the original on 2016-11-04. Retrieved 2016-12-06.
  4. "Retrial possible in 1989 murder case of Debra Milke". archive.azcentral.com. Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2016-12-08.
  5. Gambino, Lauren (March 23, 2015). "Arizona woman who spent nearly half her life on death row will not face retrial". The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 21, 2016. Retrieved December 7, 2016 – via www.theguardian.com.
  6. "INNOCENCE: Debra Milke Exonerated from Arizona Death Row". Death Penalty Information Center. Archived from the original on 2019-07-08. Retrieved 2019-07-08.
  7. Volokh, Eugene (March 15, 2013). "Ninth Circuit Panel Overturns Murder Conviction". Archived from the original on December 20, 2016. Retrieved December 6, 2016.
  8. "PDF of United States Ninth Circuit Court's ruling" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-03-19. Retrieved 2013-03-14.
  9. "Arizona woman released after decades on death row". San Diego Union-Tribune. September 6, 2013. Archived from the original on July 8, 2019. Retrieved July 8, 2019.
  10. "AZ Supreme Court lets Milke ruling stand as precedent". azcentral. Archived from the original on 2020-11-23. Retrieved 2019-07-08.
  11. Hendley, Matthew (March 18, 2015). "Arizona Supreme Court Won't Allow Retrial of Debra Milke". Phoenix New Times. Archived from the original on July 8, 2019. Retrieved July 8, 2019.
  12. "Murder charges formally dismissed against Milke". azcentral. Archived from the original on 2021-02-27. Retrieved 2019-07-08.
  13. Rubin, Paul (10 April 1991). "Death-row Debbie: No one wanted to believe she could kill her child". Phoenix New Times. Archived from the original on 18 March 2013. Retrieved 28 June 2012.
  14. ^ Debra Milke v. Charles Ryan Archived 2013-03-19 at the Wayback Machine, decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 14 March 2013
  15. ^ "U.S. Appeals Court Berates Lawyer-Turned-Judge's Work in the "Going to See Santa" Murder Case". Phoenix NewTimes. 11 June 2009. Archived from the original on 2015-04-02. Retrieved 2013-03-25.
  16. Louis J. Palmer Jr. (2008). Encyclopedia of Capital Punishment in the United States, 2d ed. McFarland. p. 109. ISBN 9780786451838.
  17. "American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona amicus brief" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2012-09-16. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
  18. "Will Convicted Child-Killer Debra Milke Win New Trial? We're Betting She Will". Archived 2010-01-17 at the Wayback Machine Valley Fever blog, Phoenix New Times, 12 January 2010. Retrieved 26 June 2012.
  19. Rubin, Paul (2 February 2010). "Local Federal Judge Disagrees With Higher Court; Says No To Child-Killer Debra Milke's Claim Of Miranda Rights Violation". Phoenix New Times. Archived from the original on 25 January 2013. Retrieved 28 June 2012.
  20. Arizona woman's murder conviction, death sentence overturned Archived 2013-03-20 at the Wayback Machine. CNN, 2013-03-14.
  21. ^ "Debra Milke, Arizonan who had murder conviction tossed, is freed – CNN.com". CNN. 7 September 2013. Archived from the original on 7 September 2013. Retrieved 7 September 2013.
  22. "Debra Milke Released: Judge Allows Arizona Woman Bail After Second Accusation In Son's Death". PAUL DAVENPORT and BOB CHRISTIE, Huffington Post. 5 September 2013. Archived from the original on 6 September 2013. Retrieved 7 September 2013.
  23. "Woman on death row could be freed to await retrial". DB News Journal. Archived from the original on 6 October 2018. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
  24. Kiefer,Michael. "Detective in Milke case can plead 5th, judge rules". azcentral.com. Archived from the original on 2015-03-28. Retrieved 2013-12-18.
  25. "Case Tossed Against Woman Held 22 Years in Son's Death". nbcnews.com. Associated Press. 12 December 2014. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2019.
  26. Michael, Kiefer. "Arizona Supreme Court declines review of appeal that freed Debra Milke". Archived from the original on 2015-04-02. Retrieved 2015-03-23.
  27. "Debra Milke, Who Spent 22 Years On Death Row, Has Murder Case Thrown Out". Archived from the original on 2015-03-24.
  28. Gambino, Lauren (2015-03-24). "Arizona woman cleared after 22 years on death row: 'This is not happiness'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 2022-02-05. Retrieved 2022-02-05.
  29. "PDF of Milke's complaint" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-12-21. Retrieved 2016-12-06.
  30. Anglen, Robert (2020-10-31). "Debra Milke's wrongful conviction lawsuit against Phoenix dismissed by federal judge". The Arizona Republic. Phoenix, Arizona. Archived from the original on 2022-02-05. Retrieved 2022-02-05.
  31. Milke v. City of Phoenix, 497 F. Supp. 3d 442 (D. Ariz. 2020-10-29).
  32. Milke v. City of Phoenix (9th Cir. 2022-01-27), Text.

External links

Categories: