User talk:Ron Ritzman: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 05:00, 10 September 2011 editAndresGottlieb (talk \| contribs)38 edits →Deleted Yael Meyer ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 23:01, 7 April 2024 edit undo2603:6081:78f0:75e0:44de:e4:ae45:45ce (talk)No edit summary
(749 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Not around\|3=October 2021}}
	{{tmbox \| text = '''Note to administrators'''. You are free to undo any of my ] once. I will not consider it ] if you have a good reason. However, if it's an AFD close then please discuss it with me first unless the close is completely backwards.</br></br></br>'''Note to all editors'''. 75% of you are probably better editors then I am. If you disagree with an edit I make, feel free to ]. If I'm uncivil or otherwise violating a policy/guideline then ]. (but please don't use a template :)}}
			{{busy\|msg=Note to other administrators. You are free to respond to queries on any of my previous administrative actions on my behalf. This includes reopening/overturning AFD closes.}}
			{{tmbox \| text = '''Note to administrators'''. You are free to undo any of my ] once. I will not consider it ] if you have a good reason. </br></br></br>'''Note to all editors'''. 75% of you are probably better editors then I am. If you disagree with an edit I make, feel free to ]. If I'm uncivil or otherwise violating a policy/guideline then ]. (but please don't use a template aside from ] {{smiley}})}}
	{{talkheader\|search=yes}}		{{talkheader\|search=yes}}
	<!-- dummy edit -->		<!-- dummy edit -->
	== Deleted Pseudoscience Page Comes Back to Life ==
	*{{revisions\|CrossFire Fusor}}
	*{{revisions\|CrossFire Fusion Reactor}}
	*{{revisions\|Phase_Displacement_Space_Drive}}
	A Wiki page entitled '''CrossFire Fusor''', that was deleted in October 2010, as a result of this AfD debate:

			== Request for undeletion ==
	http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CrossFire_Fusor

			{{ping\|Ron Ritzman}} Hey, I am just writing in regards to the article ]. They won't let me undelete the article on the request page so I am just writing you here. I am well versed with the MMA notability requirements and this subject fits the current criteria for notability. Thanks in advance ] (]) 16:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
	now appears to have come back to life, in a new page here:
			==] nomination of ]==
			]

			Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as ], to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is considered ] and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Repeated vandalism may result in the ]. Under ], the page has been nominated for deletion.
	http://en.wikipedia.org/CrossFire_Fusor

			If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-vandalism-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (] \| ]){{Citation needed\|date=March 2021}} 21:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
	As discussed in the AfD, the above page appears to be pseudoscientific nonsense, strung together by a 42 year old guy named Moacir L. Ferreira, from Curitiba, Brazil, who has a degree in computational science, and clearly a very active sci-fi imagination.
			:Disregard, my mistake ] (] \| ]){{Citation needed\|date=March 2021}} 21:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

			== Administrators will no longer be ] ==
	Another apparent bit of pseudoscience by Moacir L. Ferreira implanted on Misplaced Pages can be found here:

			A ] Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove ] from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with ], choose to ] this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the ]. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
	http://en.wikipedia.org/Phase_Displacement_Space_Drive
			<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=1058184441 -->

			== How we will see unregistered users ==
	These pages should be nominated for deletion.

			<section begin=content/>
	Clearly there is an intent to populate Misplaced Pages with his self-published pseudoscience.
			Hi!

			You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
	] (]) 08:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
	*{{done}}. However, ] will have to go to ]. --] (]) 22:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

			When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
	== Message to 50.99.244.233 wrt ] ==

			Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin '''will still be able to access the IP'''. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on ] to help.
	*{{revisions\|Kunjaliyan}}
	The article was not deleted. It was moved to the ] as a result of ] because the ]. If I had not done this then the article most likely would have been deleted. The article is at ]. You are welcome to work on it there and when the film is released and/or it gets more coverage then it can be moved back into article space. --] (]) 23:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

			If you have not seen it before, you can ]. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can ] to ].
	== ] ==
	* I received this message. But, as you fully protected page ], I better pass ]'s message to you. ] (]) 09:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
	*:{{inbox\|''Hi Anthony. Would you unprotect ] for me so I can update the draft with my changes? See ] for background about the speedy deletion. Thank you, ] (]) 08:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)''}}
	::Anthony, you were involved at ]. I think the full protection in this situation is uncontroversial enough that you can unprotect it yourself. I will have to log off soon, and I'd like to post the changes now instead of later. ] (]) 09:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
	*{{done}} ] (]) 09:16, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
	**Thank you! I have the draft with my changes. ] (]) 09:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

			We have ] this identity could work. '''We would appreciate your feedback''' on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can ]. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
	I'll trust Anthony's judgement on this matter but normally it's reasonable to protect pages that are temporarily restored for DRV. --] (]) 12:27, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
	:I understand that pages restored for DRV are generally protected. However, because this was a speedy deletion, and because I had addressed the speedy deletion reason with a rewrite, I think it was a good application of unprotection. ] (]) 15:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

			Thank you.
	== An AFD you closed was restarted two days later ==
			/]<section end=content/>

			18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
	You closed ] as No consensus, and Phearson, who said delete in that debate, two days after your close opened a new AFD at ]. Can you speedy close this and warn him of the rules? ] 00:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Target_lists/Admins2022(3)&oldid=22532499 -->
	:While I didn't say "with leave to speedy renominate", there wasn't a lot of participation in the first AFD so let's let this one run its course. What would help is if you or another one of the "keep" !voters could find another ] or 2 to compliment the one found in the first AFD. --] (]) 00:38, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

			== New administrator activity requirement ==
	== ] ==

			{{ivmbox\|The administrator policy has been updated with new ] following a successful ].
	Please userfy deleted article under ]. --] (]) 02:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
	:*{{done}}. As a side note, I'm sorry that this had to go. I was quite active on IRC back in the day and there should be room for verifiable sourced articles on these IRC networks that have been around for a while but ]. --] (]) 00:28, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
	:::Thank you. It is as I thought, one of the deprecated sources, IRC-Junkie.org, is actually a reliable source due to expertise (see ] and . During the this was misrepresented by the nom as "a blog". Is this grounds for deletion review? Anyways, I'll source the thing further. --] (]) 05:50, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

			Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
	== Question regarding delete ==
			#Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
	*{{revisions\|4pm}}
			#Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
	Hello ron,
	im sorry, i fail to see why you would delete my wiki.

			Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
	The result was speedy delete. I'm going to close this as a CSD G11 so if someone wishes to write sourced neutral article on the subject they may do so. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
			}}
	4pm
			22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
			<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=All_administrators&oldid=1082922312 -->

			== ] 2007 deletion discussion ==
	4pm (edit\|talk\|history\|links\|watch\|logs) – (View log)
	(Find sources: "4pm" – news · books · scholar · free images)

			as called by User {{u\|JoshuaZ}}. Was there another deletion discussion later over the resurrected page?
	Blatant advertisement for a non-notable company. No third-party hits on Google, and article cites subject's own website and non-English references as sources. sixtynine • spill it • 14:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
			I am not disputing your good faith in handling this at the time, but something clearly went awry which does need disentangling.] (]) 09:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

			== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
	Delete 95% of the content as blatant advertising. This is basically a sales brochure for the product. After that, I'm not sure whether it meets wp:notability. North8000 (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

	First, non-notable company? What, just because we are a start-up we are not allowed to post on wikipedia?
	Im sorry, but if you consider our wiki blatant-advertising, take a look at any other software on the list comparing project management sofware, the wiki i set up was absolutely no different from any of the others. Article cites subject's own website: again look at the list of comparable project management software, but if that is a problem there is absolutely no problem for us to delete that reference.

			]
	In essence, could you please explain why you are deleting our wiki while keeping comparable others online.
			Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

			Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ].
	Thank you <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:I deleted it because it wasn't an "article" it was an "advertisement". Also, per your use of "we" and "our" above, it's obvious that you have a serious ]. One indication that a subject might ] (but by itself not sufficient) is if a neutral editor with no connection to the subject chooses to write a ] article on the subject. I'm very sorry to have to say this but you are not that editor and the article I deleted was not that article. As far as ] are concerned, I can't comment or take any action on them unless they are nominated for deletion. --] (]) 13:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
	== Deleted cristian ceballos ==
	*{{revisions\|Cristian Ceballos}}
	Hi,

			Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
	You have deleted the page on Tottenham footballer cristian ceballos. Not sure why you have done this as the player is of similar noteriety to many other young footballers whose pages are still in tact. The player is of particular interest to Tottenham Hotspur fans for whom he signed this year <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	:If you click "afd" above, you will see that there was a discussion where it was decided that he isn't notable yet. If I hadn't deleted it another admin would have. However, if you still think he's notable and know of sources that demonstrate that notability that weren't considered in the AFD, you are welcome to ]. --] (]) 00:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

			== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
	== Deleted Yael Meyer ==
	*{{revisions\|Yael Meyer}}
	Hello,

	Almost a year ago, you deleted the article I created for Yael because of lack of independent reliable sources. Now she's much more notable and I have sources to fix it, can it be temporarily undeleted so I can do it?

			]
	Thank you,
			Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

			Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ].
	] (]) 20:50, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
	*{{done}} Userfied to ]. Once you have sourced the article, you can present it to ]. Since this is currently an unsourced ], the "NOINDEX" line I added to the top must remain there until it's moved back into article space. --] (]) 01:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

			Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 08:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
	Thank you very much. I've just sourced the article. Can I ask you to please help me check if everything is ok now? How do I present it to "Deletion review"? Thanks again.

			== Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==


			]
			Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

			Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ].

			Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] 00:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

			== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
			]
			Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

			Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ].

			Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 23:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

			== Deletion review for ] ==
			An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote -->
			====]====
			:{{DRV links\|Andrew Stewart Jamieson\|xfd_page=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Andrew Stewart Jamieson\|article=Andrew Stewart Jamieson}}
			ASJ is in the news again due to a heraldic invitation design (). This allows for more RS cites. ] 17:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:01, 7 April 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Ron Ritzman has not edited Misplaced Pages since October 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.Note to other administrators. You are free to respond to queries on any of my previous administrative actions on my behalf. This includes reopening/overturning AFD closes.

Note to administrators. You are free to undo any of my administrative actions once. I will not consider it wheel warring if you have a good reason.

Note to all editors. 75% of you are probably better editors then I am. If you disagree with an edit I make, feel free to revert and discuss. If I'm uncivil or otherwise violating a policy/guideline then let me know. (but please don't use a template aside from this one

)

This is Ron Ritzman's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Request for undeletion

@Ron Ritzman: Hey, I am just writing in regards to the article Justin Frazier. They won't let me undelete the article on the request page so I am just writing you here. I am well versed with the MMA notability requirements and this subject fits the current criteria for notability. Thanks in advance HeinzMaster (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe mama

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Joe mama, to Misplaced Pages. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. 5a5ha seven (talk | contribs) 21:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Disregard, my mistake 5a5ha seven (talk | contribs) 21:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hyatt Regency Birmingham 2007 deletion discussion

This discussion appeared to have ended in delete as called by User JoshuaZ. Why did you mark it as "Keep" on the talk page in 2009? Was there another deletion discussion later over the resurrected page? I am not disputing your good faith in handling this at the time, but something clearly went awry which does need disentangling.Romomusicfan (talk) 09:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:25, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 23:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review for Andrew Stewart Jamieson

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Andrew Stewart Jamieson. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Andrew Stewart Jamieson

ASJ is in the news again due to a heraldic invitation design (link). This allows for more RS cites. Arlo James Barnes 17:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Categories: