| Revision as of 15:27, 11 April 2007 editMiranda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,620 edits →Please Stop: (re:)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:35, 11 April 2007 edit undoJohn Smith's (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers13,813 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
| ] <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 05:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | ] <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 05:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | ||
| :This situation has been resolved. There is no need to file a checkuser. '''<font color="teal" face="georgia">]</font>''' 15:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | :This situation has been resolved. There is no need to file a checkuser. '''<font color="teal" face="georgia">]</font>''' 15:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Checkuser== | |||
| Can you also add "209.160.65.68" to the search, please? I think he's the same guy as VietFire. Thanks, ] 22:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:35, 11 April 2007
Reply
No. John Reaves (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- See User talk:Mutt Lunker, he has checkuser question. John Reaves (talk) 21:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Answered. Real96 22:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Le Mans
Hi.
As I can see you're online, can you have a look ath Le Mans for me please. The script size seems a bit wrong and I'm not sure how to change it
Stui 21:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I corrected it. You forgot to place the tag at the end of the citation. See this. Real96 21:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Ah cheers - I didnt do the original editing though, i just noticed the oddity and didnt have a clue what to look for XD Stui 16:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Congratulations
Hey, thanks for adding the image of the mop to my user page. I hadn't actually noticed that image before, so you've added to my store of Misplaced Pages knowledge. Thanks! --Akhilleus (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Existent Article
If exist Marie Antoinette. What one user Papirini, create a article wiht name User:Papirini/Marie Antoinette?. Excusme, if cause problem for you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.112.14.232 (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC).
- Lo siento que ingles no este tu lingua prima. Pues, ese articulo esta en espacia del usario y es legitimo. (Translation : Sorry that your language isn't English. However, the article is in user space and is legit.) Real96 06:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Your semi-automated re-prod of CIAO! Festival
I noticed you re-added the {{dated prod}} template after the creator of the article removed it. Since WP:PROD allows for anyone to remove the {{dated prod}} if they object to deletion for any reason, please look carefully at future removals of the prod template and do not revert unless the removal is really not an objection to deletion; however most such removals are (from my own experience). If you really think the article should be deleted anyway, nominate it for AFD. Resurgent insurgent 08:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- It's vandalism if a user removed the speedy templates or the afd templates. Also, I was about to tag the article as db-adv, but I noticed that there was an existing template. So, I reverted it. Real96 19:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Misidentification
This section was new, added by User:4.224.24.94 four minutes before it was initially reverted. The section appears to be composed of deliberate factual errors, and removing it was the correct course of action. –Gunslinger47 19:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- I was confused upon why this was reverted by different IPs without any edit summaries. I was going to request semi-protection on the article. but I received the new messages bar. Thanks for telling me. Real96 19:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 15 | 9 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Please Stop
How many times must I post this to people? The guidelines clearly state my right to delete content on my own talk page, so please stop reverting my edits. This is getting extremely tiring and is very unfair to me.67.163.193.239 22:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Warnings help to keep track of the pattern of vandalism which is coming from this IP address. Please see the guidelines. Real96 22:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
You are mistaken. I am being spammed with fake and uncalled for warnings, and have reported this to the admin noticeboard. The guidelines say I can delete my talk page. Please respect my wishes and stop reverting my deletions.67.163.193.239 22:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- I commented on the thread related to this incident here at ANI. P.S.: Your IP talk page doesn't "belong to you." Real96 22:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
It does so! I read the guidelines. My IP and my talk page. Why can't you guys just stop harassing me?67.163.193.239 22:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- 239 is correct that you are technically allowed to remove comments from your account's user talk page. You are encouraged to archive and not delete, but it's not a strictly mandated policy. This even applies to good faith, valid warnings. All that said, it's quite rude to do so without good reason or explanation. Handled inappropriately, it could potentially violate Misplaced Pages:Civility. –Gunslinger47 23:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- In this case, the user's talk page guideline doesn't apply, since this is a dynamic IP. Real96 03:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, good point. :) –Gunslinger47 04:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- In this case, the user's talk page guideline doesn't apply, since this is a dynamic IP. Real96 03:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
...however, this matter has been taken care of (due to archiving warnings). Thanks. Real96 04:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
It was an admin decision to allow my user page to be blanked, so please STOP reverting the deletions and drawing attention back to it. Ivo and I will be continuing the discussion on HIS talk page, so that mine is not spammed again.67.163.193.239 07:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: AN/I
They already posted a thread there early this morning. John Reaves (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I commented there. Real96 22:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppet complaints
I haven't been editing. It also isn't fair that individuals who are editing and doing bad are being blamed on me. Please file a checkuser
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Maxman23
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Maxman23&direction=next&oldid=114961187
You can also go on do the "This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.
· " That you may see on some userpages that are just ip address based. My brother is doing better. thanks. i'm going to copy and paste this to robotam.
mykungfu —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.131.205.111 (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC).
- This situation has been resolved. There is no need to file a checkuser. Real96 15:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Checkuser
Can you also add "209.160.65.68" to the search, please? I think he's the same guy as VietFire. Thanks, John Smith's 22:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)