Misplaced Pages

Cold fusion research: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:23, 1 January 2008 editEd Poor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,217 edits Either 200 chemists and physicists had spent the past nine years doing incompetent experiments and engaging in full-blown self-delusion, or ...← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:20, 5 June 2024 edit undoCBDunkerson (talk | contribs)Administrators15,424 edits No longer protectedTags: Manual revert 2017 wikitext editor 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{merge|cold fusion}} #REDIRECT]
'''Cold fusion research''' began with an experiment in 1989:
*an insulated glass jar containing ] (commonly known as heavy water) in which two ]s were immersed, one of them a coil of ] wire, the other a rod of ] - a precious metal comparable in value to gold. A small voltage between the electrodes decomposed the deuterium oxide into oxygen and ] (a form of hydrogen), some of which was absorbed into the palladium.
*This was high school chemistry. But Fleischmann believed that if the process continued long enough, deuterium atoms could become so tightly packed in the palladium, ] would occur.

A science reporter following up years later wrote:
*I found myself faced with an impossible choice: Either 200 chemists and physicists had spent the past nine years doing incompetent experiments and engaging in full-blown self-delusion, or a genuine discovery of great importance had been discredited so thoroughly, some ornery retirees and tenured professors were the only ones who still had the courage even to mention it.

Latest revision as of 13:20, 5 June 2024

Redirect to: