Misplaced Pages

David Bukay: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:06, 8 November 2005 edit80.178.203.155 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:44, 8 June 2024 edit undoApaugasma (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,864 edits Reverted 1 edit by Sharekizek (talk): Rv block evasion (Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SheryOfficial)Tags: Twinkle Undo 
(168 intermediate revisions by 78 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Israeli political scientist}}
Dr. '''David Bukay''' teaches in the Political Science Department at the University of Haifa. Among his fields of specialization are: the Arab-Israeli conflict; inter-Arab relations and the Palestinian question; international terrorism and fundamental Islam; theoretical issues and political applications in the Middle-East; Asad's foreign policy towards Israel and Lebanon; the culture approach to understanding the Middle-East.
'''David Bukay''' is a Professor of Middle East Studies at the ]. He is the author of ''Islamic Fundamentalism and the Arab Political Culture''. He specializes in the ]; inter-Arab relations and the Palestinian question; international ] and fundamental ]; theoretical issues and political applications in the ]; ]'s foreign policy towards ] and ]; the culture approach to understanding the Middle-East.


==Views==
'''Ph.D'''
Bukay is a supporter of the controversial ] thesis of the ]. He argues that there is a wide gap between what he categorises as "Western political culture" and "the Arab-Islamic political culture". Bukay also holds controversial opinions in his own right. In a speech to a conference in Jerusalem in 2003, he argued that "the aggressiveness and fanaticism of Islamic fundamentalism is an existentially lethal phenomenon". He went on to claim that "Islam and democracy are totally incompatible, and are mutually inconclusive. The same applies to Modernity, which is perceived as a threat to Islamic civilization", and that "Leaders and policy-makers in the West refuse to grasp that the Islamic and Palestinian terrorism embodies the SARS decease: Suicide and Ruin Syndrome of democratic society. Until it is understood that this struggle is the war between the Son of Light against the Sons of Darkness, that they represent the invasion of the Huns, in order to destroy modern culture—the world will continue to face an existential more growing threat".<ref name=JerusalemSummit>Bukay, David. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161024095148/http://www.jerusalemsummit.org/eng/full.php?id=23&speaker=72&summit=32 |date=October 24, 2016 }}, First Jerusalem Summit, October 12–14, 2003.</ref>


In his book ''Arab-Islamic Political Culture'', Bukay writes: "This is a culture where rumors are an integral part of social activity, and they quickly become absolute truth that cannot be challenged. It has to do with exaggerations, flights of fancy, and especially, in a society that believes in conspiracies, a society wherein every date is important, that remembers everything and forgives nothing. This is a society wherein the lie is an essential component of behavior patterns, and lying is endorsed by religious sages".<ref name=Culture>Bukay, David. {{cite web|url=http://www.acpr.org.il/ENGLISH-NATIV/issue1/bukay-1.htm |title=The First Cultural Flaw in Thinking: The Arab Personality |accessdate=2006-12-03 |url-status=bot: unknown |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071205101531/http://www.acpr.org.il/ENGLISH-NATIV/issue1/bukay-1.htm |archivedate=December 5, 2007 }}, ''NATIV'', Vol. 1, 2003.</ref>
University of Haifa


According to an article in '']'', Bukay also wrote in the same book: "There is no condemnation, no regret, no problem of conscience among Arabs and Muslims, anywhere, in any social stratum, of any social position". The article further alleges that he distributed a document to his students stating that "when an Arab or a Muslim opens his remarks with the expression wallahi, he is apparently intending to lie".<ref name=Rappaport>Rappaport, Meron. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001061915/http://news.haaretz.co.il/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=570225 |date=October 1, 2007}}, '']'', April 28, 2005.</ref>
Recent publications


Bukay held a presentation at the 2008 "Facing Jihad" conference in Jerusalem,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://facingjihad.com/schedule|title=About Facing Jihad: A Lawmakers' Summit|accessdate=January 21, 2023|work=Facing Jihad|archive-date=February 4, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090204130510/http://facingjihad.com/schedule|url-status=bot: unknown}}</ref> a ] summit hosted by MK ] that included a screening of the film '']'' by ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Das Fanal von Wangen: Der Schweizer Minarettdiskurs - Ursachen und Folgen|first=Oliver|last=Wäckerlig|year=2014|pages=213–214|publisher=Akademikerverlag|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260115101|language=German|isbn=978-3-639-49757-1}}</ref> His 2016 book ''Islam and the Infidels: the Politics of Jihad, Da'wah, and Hijrah'' cites ]'s ] thesis as "acclaimed research".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://archive.org/stream/IslamAndInfidelsDavidBukay/Islam%20and%20Infidels%20%28David%20Bukay%29_djvu.txt|title=Full text of "Islam And Infidels ( David Bukay)"|accessdate=23 January 2023}}</ref>
- Books:
* '''Total Terrorism in the Name of Allah: The Emergence of the New Islamic Fundamentalists'''. Shaarei-Tikva: Ariel Center for Policy Research, 2002.
* '''Arab-Islamic Political Culture'''. Shaarei-Tikva: Center for Policy Research, 2003.
* Ed.: '''Muhammad’s Mosters: a Comprehensive Guide to Radical Islam for Western Audience'''. Green Forest, Ar.: Balfour Books, 2004.
* '''Arafat, the Palestinian National Movement and Israel: The Politics of Masks and Paradox'''. New York: Mellen Press, 2005.


==Criticism==
- Articles:
The Arab Association for Human Rights alleged that in the 2004–2005 University of Haifa semester Bukay made a number of offensive and anti-Arab remarks in his lectures, including "we should shoot terrorists in the head in front of their families" as a deterrent and "destroy a whole house, with everyone in it,” in order to get rid of one wanted person, that "the Arabs are just alcohol and sex", and that "the Arabs are stupid and have contributed nothing to humanity."<ref name=ArabHRA>]. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927215142/http://www.arabhra.org/publications/reports/Word/YearlyReport2005English.doc |date=2007-09-27}}, ], June 2005.</ref> Bukay wrote a lengthy article rebutting the claims, insisting that the comments attributed to him had been fabricated.<ref>Bukay, David. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061217124537/http://www.acpr.org.il/ENGLISH-NATIV/08-issue/bukay-8.htm |date=December 17, 2006}}, ''NATIV'', Volume 8, October 2005.</ref> The rector of the University conducted his own investigation and concluded that the alleged remarks "were not made in the way they were quoted and parts of sentences that were uttered in different contexts were yoked together by manipulation."<ref name=Rappaport /> The AAHR also took issue with a number of statements he made in an article titled "The First Cultural Flaw in Thought: The Arab Character"; the latter were also criticized by the ], which stated they "fall... into the trap of old and hurtful stereotypes, which express prejudices that are liable to be very destructive..."<ref name=Rappaport/>
* '''Zionists, Post-Zionists and Pseudo-Zionists: The Media Leftist Complex and the al-Aqsa Intifadah''', in: S. Sharan (ed.). Israel and the Post-Zionists. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2003.
* '''the New Islamic Anarchistic Groups''', in: D. Bukay. Muhammad’s Monsters.


==Publications==
----
===Books===
''This text is a letter sent by David Merhav to Dr. David Bukay, after the first was misled in regard to expressions made by Bukay in one of his lectures. The letter reveals that the comments related to Bukay were not said, so Merhav apologized''
* ''Islam and the Infidels: the Politics of Jihad, Da'wah, and Hijrah''. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2016.
* ''Total Terrorism in the Name of Allah: The Emergence of the New Islamic Fundamentalists''. Shaarei-Tikva: Ariel Center for Policy Research, 2002.
* ''Arab-Islamic Political Culture''. Shaarei-Tikva: Center for Policy Research, 2003.
* Ed.: ''Muhammad's Monsters: A Comprehensive Guide to Radical Islam for Western Audiences''. Green Forest, Ar.: Balfour Books, 2004.
* ''Arafat, the Palestinian National Movement and Israel: The Politics of Masks and Paradox''. New York: Mellen Press, 2005.
* ''From Muhammed to Bin Laden: Religious and Ideological Sources of the Homicide Bombers Phenomenon''. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2008.


===Articles===
'''A Personal Letter Concerning the Bukay Affair: Personal Apology by David Merhav'''
* "Zionists, Post-Zionists and Pseudo-Zionists: The Media Leftist Complex and the al-Aqsa Intifadah", in: S. Sharan (ed.). ''Israel and the Post-Zionists''. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2003.
* "The New Islamic Anarchistic Groups", in: D. Bukay. ''Muhammad's Monsters''.


==Notes==
---------------
{{Reflist}}


{{Authority control}}
Dear friends,
After circulating the findings of the investigation carried out by the Rector of the University of Haifa, Professor Yossi Ben-Artzi (who concluded that all of the quotes related to Dr. David Bukay in the media were false), I got a letter which charged me with spreading lies and defamations across the web, although I was not author of the article in which the accusations were made against Bukay, as I was merely a circulator of a news' item published in Israeli news website. Therefore, a disciplinary trial had to be carried out against me on Wednesday, March 16. I am glad to inform you that it going to be cancelled, and nothing will take place on March 16.
After a thorough investigation, and after a personal conversation with Dr. Bukay, I felt that it is my obligation is to apologize.
I arrived to the conclusion - due to information given to me - that the quotes in Nana news website were not said by Bukay as they were formulated by the reporter and by Bukay's student, Mr. Fadi Abu-Yunes. Mr. Abu-Yunes announced the Rector of the University that he did not say the quoted accusations against Bukay.
Unfortunately, Abu-Yunes - though aware of my letter circulated to academics and other people with whom I have a contact - did not bother to contact me in order to inform of his decision to deny the quotes related to Bukay. He did so only in a conversation with the Rector, letting me to circulate false news’ item.
In a phone conversation I had with Mr. Abu-Yunes, he told me that Bukay did preach to murder all the Arabs and that the Rector's report was mendacious. A day latter, I got a phone call from other person, who apparently spoke to Abu-Yunes, and told me that Bukay did not preach to shoot the all Arabs in their heads but only the Arab terrorists. A day afterwards I asked Abu-Yunes to come with me to a notary in order to make a statement, in which he will state that Bukay did preach for a mass murder of innocent Arabs. He agreed.
A day afterwards I got another phone call from the same man, who clarified that Bukay did not say the quotes related to him, and Abu-Yunes denies the quotes in Nana's report.
After having a face-to-face conversation with Bukay, I concluded that all the quotes related to him were false and that I was misled by opportunistic, unprincipled and scoundrel elements.


{{DEFAULTSORT:Bukay, David}}
I will make myself clear: I don't accept, by definition, Bukay's views and outlook. I don't agree with his analyses as they were published in books and articles he wrote. I am standing in total disagreement with him. Nonetheless, I believe that Bukay did not say the quotes related to him, and therefore he is an innocent person.
]
]
Cynical, unprincipled and dishonest villains used me, as they knew that I am committed to peace, equality, humanism, liberty, justice and fairness. For two weeks, neither Abu-Yunes nor any other person who read my letter, even tried to notify me that Bukay and/or Abu-Yunes, if to believe him, were misquoted in the Nana website.
]
]
I believe that it is my duty to apologize and ask for Bukay's pardon and I am taking my hands off this entire affair.
]
Please find, in attachment, the Hebrew version of my apology. Below you'll find an English version of it.
Yours,
David Merhav

* * *
March 15, 2005
To Dr. David Bukay
The School of Political Science
University of Haifa, Israel
A Letter of Apology and Clarification
On January 27 I sent a letter through my electronic mail to my mailing list, in which I translated into English the news' item published in Nana news website that dealt with your alleged expressions.
Lately, I received the findings of the investigation held by Professor Yossi Ben-Artzi, the Rector of the University of Haifa. The investigation concluded that the report in Nana website does not consists of any element of truth. Furthermore, from documents given to me, I understood that most of the course's participants deny the expressions related to you, including a student that part of the quotes in the news' item were related to her. They defined the quotes related to you as "blood libel".
Therefore I concluded that lie, falsification and distortion are standing in the core of the quotes related to you. In light of the Rector's report, accepted unquestioningly by the signed below, I decided to express my sincere apology and my deep sorrow since you were hurt by the publications circulated by the signed below without any sort of malice aforethought, based upon sincere concern to the University's reputation.
I would like to add that the Rector's report related to the affair was circulated to the mailing list of the signed below, in English as well as in Hebrew.

I would like to express my regret concerning the sad conducting of this affair, and I am delivering my sincere apology to you. I would like to condemn unequivocally those who misused my sincere concern for fair, respectable, equal and just academy to all of its students - from all nationalities and religions - in order to advance personal and political interests that nothing exists between them and genuine fairness, respect and justice - my personal values.

Finally, I would like to inform you that this letter would be sent, in Hebrew and English versions, to all the addresses listed in my mailing list, to which my publications were sent.
Yours Sincerely,
David Merhav
Undergraduate student
The Department of Philosophy
University of Haifa, Israel

Latest revision as of 14:44, 8 June 2024

Israeli political scientist

David Bukay is a Professor of Middle East Studies at the University of Haifa. He is the author of Islamic Fundamentalism and the Arab Political Culture. He specializes in the Arab–Israeli conflict; inter-Arab relations and the Palestinian question; international terrorism and fundamental Islam; theoretical issues and political applications in the Middle East; Asad's foreign policy towards Israel and Lebanon; the culture approach to understanding the Middle-East.

Views

Bukay is a supporter of the controversial Huntington thesis of the Clash of Civilisations. He argues that there is a wide gap between what he categorises as "Western political culture" and "the Arab-Islamic political culture". Bukay also holds controversial opinions in his own right. In a speech to a conference in Jerusalem in 2003, he argued that "the aggressiveness and fanaticism of Islamic fundamentalism is an existentially lethal phenomenon". He went on to claim that "Islam and democracy are totally incompatible, and are mutually inconclusive. The same applies to Modernity, which is perceived as a threat to Islamic civilization", and that "Leaders and policy-makers in the West refuse to grasp that the Islamic and Palestinian terrorism embodies the SARS decease: Suicide and Ruin Syndrome of democratic society. Until it is understood that this struggle is the war between the Son of Light against the Sons of Darkness, that they represent the invasion of the Huns, in order to destroy modern culture—the world will continue to face an existential more growing threat".

In his book Arab-Islamic Political Culture, Bukay writes: "This is a culture where rumors are an integral part of social activity, and they quickly become absolute truth that cannot be challenged. It has to do with exaggerations, flights of fancy, and especially, in a society that believes in conspiracies, a society wherein every date is important, that remembers everything and forgives nothing. This is a society wherein the lie is an essential component of behavior patterns, and lying is endorsed by religious sages".

According to an article in Haaretz, Bukay also wrote in the same book: "There is no condemnation, no regret, no problem of conscience among Arabs and Muslims, anywhere, in any social stratum, of any social position". The article further alleges that he distributed a document to his students stating that "when an Arab or a Muslim opens his remarks with the expression wallahi, he is apparently intending to lie".

Bukay held a presentation at the 2008 "Facing Jihad" conference in Jerusalem, a counter-jihad summit hosted by MK Aryeh Eldad that included a screening of the film Fitna by Geert Wilders. His 2016 book Islam and the Infidels: the Politics of Jihad, Da'wah, and Hijrah cites Bat Ye'or's Eurabia thesis as "acclaimed research".

Criticism

The Arab Association for Human Rights alleged that in the 2004–2005 University of Haifa semester Bukay made a number of offensive and anti-Arab remarks in his lectures, including "we should shoot terrorists in the head in front of their families" as a deterrent and "destroy a whole house, with everyone in it,” in order to get rid of one wanted person, that "the Arabs are just alcohol and sex", and that "the Arabs are stupid and have contributed nothing to humanity." Bukay wrote a lengthy article rebutting the claims, insisting that the comments attributed to him had been fabricated. The rector of the University conducted his own investigation and concluded that the alleged remarks "were not made in the way they were quoted and parts of sentences that were uttered in different contexts were yoked together by manipulation." The AAHR also took issue with a number of statements he made in an article titled "The First Cultural Flaw in Thought: The Arab Character"; the latter were also criticized by the Anti-Defamation League, which stated they "fall... into the trap of old and hurtful stereotypes, which express prejudices that are liable to be very destructive..."

Publications

Books

  • Islam and the Infidels: the Politics of Jihad, Da'wah, and Hijrah. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2016.
  • Total Terrorism in the Name of Allah: The Emergence of the New Islamic Fundamentalists. Shaarei-Tikva: Ariel Center for Policy Research, 2002.
  • Arab-Islamic Political Culture. Shaarei-Tikva: Center for Policy Research, 2003.
  • Ed.: Muhammad's Monsters: A Comprehensive Guide to Radical Islam for Western Audiences. Green Forest, Ar.: Balfour Books, 2004.
  • Arafat, the Palestinian National Movement and Israel: The Politics of Masks and Paradox. New York: Mellen Press, 2005.
  • From Muhammed to Bin Laden: Religious and Ideological Sources of the Homicide Bombers Phenomenon. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2008.

Articles

  • "Zionists, Post-Zionists and Pseudo-Zionists: The Media Leftist Complex and the al-Aqsa Intifadah", in: S. Sharan (ed.). Israel and the Post-Zionists. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2003.
  • "The New Islamic Anarchistic Groups", in: D. Bukay. Muhammad's Monsters.

Notes

  1. Bukay, David. "Cultural Fallacies in Understanding Islamic Fundamentalism and Palestinian Radicalism" Archived October 24, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, First Jerusalem Summit, October 12–14, 2003.
  2. Bukay, David. "The First Cultural Flaw in Thinking: The Arab Personality". Archived from the original on December 5, 2007. Retrieved 2006-12-03.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link), NATIV, Vol. 1, 2003.
  3. ^ Rappaport, Meron. "In the name of truth" Archived October 1, 2007, at the Wayback Machine, Haaretz, April 28, 2005.
  4. "About Facing Jihad: A Lawmakers' Summit". Facing Jihad. Archived from the original on February 4, 2009. Retrieved January 21, 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  5. Wäckerlig, Oliver (2014). Das Fanal von Wangen: Der Schweizer Minarettdiskurs - Ursachen und Folgen (in German). Akademikerverlag. pp. 213–214. ISBN 978-3-639-49757-1.
  6. "Full text of "Islam And Infidels ( David Bukay)"". Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  7. Cook, Jonathan. "On the Margins: Annual Review of Human Rights Violations of the Arab Palestinian Minority in Israel 2005" Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine, Arab Association for Human Rights, June 2005.
  8. Bukay, David. "The Image of Evil: On the Hideous Slander of Arab Students, Anti-Zionist Jews and the Scoop-Chasing Media" Archived December 17, 2006, at the Wayback Machine, NATIV, Volume 8, October 2005.
Categories: