Revision as of 04:58, 26 April 2017 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,781 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Occupy movement/Archive 4) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:33, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,562 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] | ||
(19 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|archive = Talk:Occupy movement/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Occupy movement/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=MiszaBot I |age=2 |units=month }} | |||
{{controversial}} | {{controversial}} | ||
{{not a forum}} | {{not a forum}} | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|1= | ||
{{WikiProject OWS |
{{WikiProject OWS|importance=Top}} | ||
{{WikiProject Politics |
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Sociology |
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=mid|Social movements=yes}} | ||
{{WikiProject Nonviolence |
{{WikiProject Nonviolence}} | ||
{{WikiProject Philosophy |
{{WikiProject Philosophy |importance=mid |social=yes}} | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject QRpedia}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject QRpedia}} | ||
{{Notice|{{find}}}} | {{Notice|{{find}}}} | ||
{{topic|Occupy movement}} | {{topic|Occupy movement}} | ||
==Ultimate failure, and subsequent similar movements== | |||
==Delete Page== | |||
Recently, France's "Yellow Vests" protests have been compared to Occupy Wall Street. Here are some sources which do that: (lots more in Google News). | |||
Unfortunately this page is zeitgeist related, it will be deleted right now.] (]) 04:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == External links |
||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120621090449/http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/05/occupy-wall-street-direct-actionnewsfeed=true to http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/05/occupy-wall-street-direct-actionnewsfeed=true | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} | |||
Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 03:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
I feel that this article in general is missing the bigger picture, and is sometimes written as if it was still early 2012. It mentions little, fairly hollow victories (e.g. that supposedly the Bank of England encouraged bankers and politicians "to behave in a more moral way"), but doesn't mention that its goals of reducing income inequality basically failed. | |||
== Adding Social Media Section == | |||
As the second article I linked to above notes: ''"However what most of the European governments and the Brussels did was to target the working class cutting wages and pensions, laying off thousands of workers, while big businesses, banks were going unpunished which avoided paying taxes, although the main reason for the financial crisis and the subsequent recession worldwide was their greed."'' | |||
I am proposing an edit to the Occupy movement page to include a section on Social Media. Social Media was highly influential for this movement, which differentiates it from previous inequality protests and is important for the reader to understand the movement better. I have written in my sandbox (https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Zootberg/sandbox) if anyone is interested in proofreading what I am proposing. Please feel free to comment on my sandbox, or on this talk page here. I have a couple other edits in my sandbox and could use some peer reviewers to check them out! I will go ahead and make edits in a couple days if nobody feels strongly against this. | |||
It seems pretty clear that future historians will view Occupy Wall Street as a symptom of widespread public anger about certain issues which failed to get them resolved ''at the time'', but was perhaps a prelude to more consequential changes in the future (a little like the ] was a prelude and practice run to 1917). ] (]) 13:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 20:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Origins of Occupy are in Egypt, not the U.S. == | ||
⚫ | Occupy organizers in the U.S. explicitly took inspiration from occupiers in Tahrir Square in Egypt and from Arab Spring activists in Tunisia (http://occupywallst.org/forum/first-official-release-from-occupy-wall-street/). The first paragraph of this encyclopedia entry should make that fact more clear. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
It doesn´t overal matter that a 1% has 99% of the paper, what does matter is if you yourself can maintain PPP=1, and that, does not depend on that 1%´s redistribution of that what that 1% would be alleged to have, but on that 1%´s using that coinage to bribe all and every congressman to maintain Ppp=1, before everyone else does them in (that 1% that is). | |||
== Populista? == | |||
This form of mistake is similar to playing golf at lane 18, and swinging a hole in one, but on lane 17, but with a passion purely reserved for those that feel they have nothing much to loose. | |||
NO es populimo? el populismo es una respuesta sencilla a un problema complejo, y esto es totalmente lo contrario. ] (]) 23:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
So, overal, yes, the movement seems correct, but simply does not have enough leverage to force that 1% to comply, their overal bribery relationships being in their own nearfield, for fear of being arrested when they go to a congress in a mid or far field. | |||
⚫ | == External links == | ||
Is there a solution to this? Well, yes, but political sloganist of the anon and scientiology behavior studies have prelabelled that terrorist, in the same form and manner that during history they have coined the label communist, socialist and overal many another form of schysm through the addition of the suffix ist or ism. | |||
:There are sixteen entries in the "External links" section and subsection.. Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion. | |||
Recommendation: None, if you´re not willing to start training with waepons of Warfair. | |||
*] states: {{tq|Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.}} | |||
*] states: {{tq|There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Misplaced Pages. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.}} | |||
*]: {{tq|Minimize the number of links}} | |||
*]: {{tq|...and access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{tl|cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.}} | |||
:There are 46 links in the "See also" section and subsections and 15 in the "Further reading". With the "External links" that is a total of 77 links. This is indicative of far too many links. | |||
:Remove excessive links and 2013 maintenance tag. -- ] (]) 18:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Impact on bankers == | |||
Arab spring: Big mistake, there was no apriori where the individuals within that 1% of the United States would have alotted farmers to become governance, if those farmers would not hand over the totality of the petroleum production at 10 usd/barrel. | |||
I was considering copying the following line from the ] article to the Impact section of this article. I leave it to the editors of this article to determine if it is appropriate and how to merge it with existing content. | |||
⚫ | |||
{{tpb|In October 2012 Haldane said the ] protesters... had persuaded bankers and politicians "to behave in a more moral way".<ref name=Andy>{{cite news| url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9641806/Occupy-protesters-were-right-says-Bank-of-England-official.html| title =Occupy protesters were right, says Bank of England official| work =]| author=James Kirkup|date=29 October 2012|accessdate=30 October 2012|location=London}}</ref><ref name = "OccupyCorrect">{{cite news|url= http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/09b53a94-2271-11e2-8edf-00144feabdc0.html|title= BoE's Haldane says Occupy was right|work= ]|author1=Hannah Kuchler |author2=Claire Jones |date = 30 October 2012|accessdate=30 October 2012|format={{registration required}}}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/2012/616.aspx|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121106172105/http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Pages/speeches/2012/616.aspx|url-status=dead|title='A leaf being turned' - speech by Andrew Haldane: 29 October 2012 'Socially useful banking' conference at Friend's House, Euston, London on 29 October 2012|archivedate=6 November 2012}}</ref>{{reflist-talk}}}} ] (]) 13:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:33, 10 July 2024
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Occupy movement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Occupy movement. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Occupy movement at the Reference desk. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Points of interest related to Occupy movement on Misplaced Pages: Category |
Ultimate failure, and subsequent similar movements
Recently, France's "Yellow Vests" protests have been compared to Occupy Wall Street. Here are some sources which do that: (lots more in Google News).
I feel that this article in general is missing the bigger picture, and is sometimes written as if it was still early 2012. It mentions little, fairly hollow victories (e.g. that supposedly the Bank of England encouraged bankers and politicians "to behave in a more moral way"), but doesn't mention that its goals of reducing income inequality basically failed.
As the second article I linked to above notes: "However what most of the European governments and the Brussels did was to target the working class cutting wages and pensions, laying off thousands of workers, while big businesses, banks were going unpunished which avoided paying taxes, although the main reason for the financial crisis and the subsequent recession worldwide was their greed."
It seems pretty clear that future historians will view Occupy Wall Street as a symptom of widespread public anger about certain issues which failed to get them resolved at the time, but was perhaps a prelude to more consequential changes in the future (a little like the 1905 Russian Revolution was a prelude and practice run to 1917). Esn (talk) 13:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Origins of Occupy are in Egypt, not the U.S.
Occupy organizers in the U.S. explicitly took inspiration from occupiers in Tahrir Square in Egypt and from Arab Spring activists in Tunisia (http://occupywallst.org/forum/first-official-release-from-occupy-wall-street/). The first paragraph of this encyclopedia entry should make that fact more clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.194.182 (talk) 17:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Populista?
NO es populimo? el populismo es una respuesta sencilla a un problema complejo, y esto es totalmente lo contrario. 88.10.28.92 (talk) 23:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
External links
- There are sixteen entries in the "External links" section and subsection.. Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
- ELpoints #3) states:
Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
- LINKFARM states:
There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Misplaced Pages. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
- WP:ELMIN:
Minimize the number of links
- WP:ELCITE:
...and access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
- There are 46 links in the "See also" section and subsections and 15 in the "Further reading". With the "External links" that is a total of 77 links. This is indicative of far too many links.
- Remove excessive links and 2013 maintenance tag. -- Otr500 (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Impact on bankers
I was considering copying the following line from the Andy Haldane article to the Impact section of this article. I leave it to the editors of this article to determine if it is appropriate and how to merge it with existing content.
In October 2012 Haldane said the Occupy movement protesters... had persuaded bankers and politicians "to behave in a more moral way".
References
- James Kirkup (29 October 2012). "Occupy protesters were right, says Bank of England official". Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 30 October 2012.
- Hannah Kuchler; Claire Jones (30 October 2012). "BoE's Haldane says Occupy was right" ((registration required)). Financial Times. Retrieved 30 October 2012.
- "'A leaf being turned' - speech by Andrew Haldane: 29 October 2012 'Socially useful banking' conference at Friend's House, Euston, London on 29 October 2012". Archived from the original on 6 November 2012.
Daask (talk) 13:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- B-Class social movements task force articles
- Social movements task force articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Mid-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Organisations using QRpedia