| Revision as of 06:19, 31 May 2020 editVorbee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,877 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:49, 10 July 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,131 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] |
| (10 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo = old(365d) | archive = Talk:John of the Cross/Archive %(counter)d | counter = 1 | maxarchivesize = 150K | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | minthreadsleft = 4 }} |
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=People|class=B}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|living=no|listas=John of the Cross|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=B|listas=John of the Cross}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|
{{WikiProject Christianity|class=B|importance=Top|catholicism=yes|anglicanism=yes|saints=yes|theology-work-group=yes|catholicism-importance=Top|anglicanism-importance=High|saints-importance=Top|theology-importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=Top|catholicism=yes|anglicanism=yes|saints=yes|theology-work-group=yes|catholicism-importance=Top|anglicanism-importance=High|saints-importance=Top|theology-importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Spain|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Spain|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WPReligion|class=B|importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Mysticism|importance=mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{OnThisDay|date1=2019-12-14|oldid1=930610104}} |
|
{{OnThisDay|date1=2019-12-14|oldid1=930610104}} |
| Line 17: |
Line 18: |
|
mystical experience." I felt it detracted from both the tone and content of the article. The reality of whether or not St. John is a "genius" or "will always be remembered" is not directly relevant to the facts of the article. Ultimately the sentence represented an opinion concerning the value of St. John and his poetry, something which seemed to already be properly framed with the context of the article as it related to his influence on the church and on literary figures. The same could be said of placing his poetry on par with a "mystical experience," an interesting thought but not directly relevant to the matter at hand. The article as a whole though, is excellent, kudos to the original authors. -WTG (still need to make a user account :-/ ) |
|
mystical experience." I felt it detracted from both the tone and content of the article. The reality of whether or not St. John is a "genius" or "will always be remembered" is not directly relevant to the facts of the article. Ultimately the sentence represented an opinion concerning the value of St. John and his poetry, something which seemed to already be properly framed with the context of the article as it related to his influence on the church and on literary figures. The same could be said of placing his poetry on par with a "mystical experience," an interesting thought but not directly relevant to the matter at hand. The article as a whole though, is excellent, kudos to the original authors. -WTG (still need to make a user account :-/ ) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
==Proposal for new WikiProject== |
|
== Pardon the glib factor. I gather most people visiting this article are "serious". I know, I get it.... == |
|
|
⚫ |
I have made a proposal at ] for a new WikiProject - WikiProject Mysticism. I wonder whether any one readers of this article would be interested in joining this WikiProject? ] (]) 06:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Age at time of death== |
|
However, if laughter isn't God's ultimate gift... to paraphrase Gene Rodenberry about laughter, "for that instant, you humans are immortal". I guess the same could be said of orgasms : ) Different beast, similar vibe. Just gotta love Dopamine, Serotonin and GABA : )<br>...Anyway, among the funniest beings ever is Doug Adams! It dissapointed me not to find any reference in the article links to Doug's "The Long Dark Teatime of the Soul". And to forestall, I've had to undergo several operations to reconstuct my thorax from reading Doug, but the one I'm presently bitching about I haven't been able to get yet... |
|
|
|
The box in the top-right hand corner of this article says that at his death, John of the Cross was forty-six. The article says he was born in 1542 and died in December 1591 - would that have made his age at the time of his death forty-nine? ] (]) 17:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Discalced Carmelite == |
|
Lighten up a bit guys! If bleating laugher isn't the best proof that there is a God, I declare myself even more clueless and agnostic than I thought I was... - Manuel from México, D.F.: valinorrim-wiki@yahoo.com.mx] (]) circa 20:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. John of the Cross was a Discalced Carmelite (O.C.D.). He was apart of the reform with St. Teresa of Avila who started the Discalced Carmelites. He was not an O.Carm but a Discalced Carmelite (O.C.D) ] (]) 01:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC) |
|
:Roddenberry, Adams, God.... all dead. <br> -- Love & kisses, Nietzsche. |
|
|
::: - XXXOOO 2 U 2 Neesh : ) —Manuel : ) And yep, I get the joke : þ Called "life" last I checked? And Now For Something Completly Blasphemous: I'm going to quote Joss Whedon at you. "The hardest thing in this world is to live in it." That one Ecce Homo enough for ya? I mean the question with love. For real. The chair recognises the honored Gentleman/Lady from Angstland. Kindred, methinks. ] (]) 07:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
==File:St-John-of-the-Cross.jpg Nominated for Deletion== |
|
|
{| |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| ] |
|
|
| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for deletion at ] in the following category: ''Deletion requests - No timestamp given'' |
|
|
;What should I do? |
|
|
''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. |
|
|
* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use) |
|
|
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, please stop reverting/changing this tag. He was a reformer of O. Carm. but was the founder and therefore part of the Discalced Carmelites (OCD) this is obvious and universally recognized in every history of the order, biography, and by both of the orders themselves. I am unsure why this keeps being changed. The page for Teresa of Ávila has it correct as OCD, and they were both on the same parallel journey, with her being older in fact, yet there is no confusion in that case. St. John of the Cross is the co-founder and the male component in establishing monasteries for friars of the Discalced Carmelite (O.C.D.) order, and this is what he is known for and his life's work, this is what should be included on the page. ] (]) 15:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 16:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Typos == |
|
|
|
|
|
''His writings were first published inJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the CrossJohn of the Cross 1618,'' for example, plus several disjointed sentences. I'm not at all knowledgeable of the subject, so won't attempt to edit. |
|
|
|
|
|
What brought me here was ] March 2012 Novelette "Ernesto" by Alec Nevala-Lee, which is preceded by his Biolog by Richard A.Lovett. The story begins in Madrid a year after beginning of ]. It quickly moves to the Church of St. John of the Cross at a monastery in Segovia, the scene of several "miraculous" cures of terminal cancer, with a postscript in Havana a year after the war ends. |
|
|
{{cquote|''Ernesto laughed. "Not much of a miracle. He arranged to remove the hinges from the door of his cell. Now that's the kind of saint I can admire." He looked out at the trees. "If John deserves sainthood, it's because he understood the dark night of the soul. You can look for God all your life and find nothing in the end. And for a true believer, that nothingness is enough.'' Nada y nada y nada."|}} |
|
|
--] (]) 14:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708111722/http://it.calameo.com/books/00004334368800212522c to http://it.calameo.com/books/00004334368800212522c |
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 07:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Conflicting Sources == |
|
|
|
|
|
The section on his early life states he was of converso background but the source (from Roth) only mentions it in passing and does not provide any evidence for it. Meanwhile, the Catholic biographies linked at the bottom of the page, give a detailed account of his family background and do not mention them being conversos. IMO, saying he is a converso just because of the Roth source is undue weight and if kept it should be with the added stipulation that "at least one author alleges" he was from a converso family. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Making a redirect== |
|
|
Elsewhere in Misplaced Pages I have typed in "Juan de la Crux" but got a red wikilink. Can some one please see to making this a redirect to this page? Many thanks, ] (]) 15:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
==Proposal for new WikiProject== |
|
| ⚫ |
I have made a proposal at ] for a new WikiProject - WikiProject Mysticism. I wonder whether any one readers of this article would be interested in joining this WikiProject? ] (]) 06:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
I have corrected a great deal of the article's grammar and formatting, but would like more help with regards to ensuring a coherent organisation with respect to other Misplaced Pages articles on saints. Crculver 03:37, 25 Jan 2004 (UTC)
I removed this last line:
"No question about it, Saint John of the Cross is one of those geniuses that will always be remembered. His poetry is so serene and beautiful. A true
mystical experience." I felt it detracted from both the tone and content of the article. The reality of whether or not St. John is a "genius" or "will always be remembered" is not directly relevant to the facts of the article. Ultimately the sentence represented an opinion concerning the value of St. John and his poetry, something which seemed to already be properly framed with the context of the article as it related to his influence on the church and on literary figures. The same could be said of placing his poetry on par with a "mystical experience," an interesting thought but not directly relevant to the matter at hand. The article as a whole though, is excellent, kudos to the original authors. -WTG (still need to make a user account :-/ )
The box in the top-right hand corner of this article says that at his death, John of the Cross was forty-six. The article says he was born in 1542 and died in December 1591 - would that have made his age at the time of his death forty-nine? Vorbee (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
St. John of the Cross was a Discalced Carmelite (O.C.D.). He was apart of the reform with St. Teresa of Avila who started the Discalced Carmelites. He was not an O.Carm but a Discalced Carmelite (O.C.D) 70.162.61.242 (talk) 01:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Yes, please stop reverting/changing this tag. He was a reformer of O. Carm. but was the founder and therefore part of the Discalced Carmelites (OCD) this is obvious and universally recognized in every history of the order, biography, and by both of the orders themselves. I am unsure why this keeps being changed. The page for Teresa of Ávila has it correct as OCD, and they were both on the same parallel journey, with her being older in fact, yet there is no confusion in that case. St. John of the Cross is the co-founder and the male component in establishing monasteries for friars of the Discalced Carmelite (O.C.D.) order, and this is what he is known for and his life's work, this is what should be included on the page. 98.97.176.235 (talk) 15:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
