Revision as of 03:28, 16 April 2005 editXiong (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,526 edits archive to history← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:40, 16 April 2005 edit undoNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 edits →meta-templatesNext edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
: It is not "gone". Like so many Talk pages, it grew so large it would no longer load easily. I archived it to history, and there is a link to old discussion. I summarized the old discussion, too. I also preserved the comment you made during the archival process. — ]]] 01:10, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC) | : It is not "gone". Like so many Talk pages, it grew so large it would no longer load easily. I archived it to history, and there is a link to old discussion. I summarized the old discussion, too. I also preserved the comment you made during the archival process. — ]]] 01:10, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC) | ||
I'll say it stronger than Omegatron - stop screwing around with the talk page. Your "summary" does not make up for the fact that you removed a substantial amount of recent discussion, replacing it with your own skewed interpretation of the discussion. -- ] ] 05:40, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:40, 16 April 2005
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Template for discussion ...}} with {{subst:Template for discussion ...}}.
Archive: 2005 March 29 2005 April 7 2005 April 16
- A community is like a ship: every one ought to be prepared to take the helm.
- The most crying need in the humbler ranks of life is that they should be allowed some part in the direction of public affairs. That is what will develop their faculties and intelligence and self-respect.
- You should never wear your best trousers when you go out to fight for freedom and truth.
- --(An Enemy of the People)
- A lie, turned topsy-turvy, can be prinked and tinselled out, decked in plumage new and fine, till none knows its lean old carcass. -- (Peer Gynt)
- I hold that man is in the right who is most closely in league with the future. --(letter to Georg Brandes)
Following the custom of other, wiser Wikipedians, I now reply on this page to Talk on this page. Please avoid fragmented discussions.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Wow... that's a heck-a-lota watchin'. (I've replied). Kevin Rector (talk) 05:33, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
Charter Convention
- Charter Convention?? What's that all about? Kevin Rector (talk) 05:44, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
The Wikipedian Community is now in a state of Convention. Members wishing to caucus are asked to send email to me (click the Chinese character in my sig) or to any other member. — Xiong熊talk 03:28, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)
meta-templates
please put the discussion page back. - Omegatron 01:06, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
- It is not "gone". Like so many Talk pages, it grew so large it would no longer load easily. I archived it to history, and there is a link to old discussion. I summarized the old discussion, too. I also preserved the comment you made during the archival process. — Xiong熊talk 01:10, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)
I'll say it stronger than Omegatron - stop screwing around with the talk page. Your "summary" does not make up for the fact that you removed a substantial amount of recent discussion, replacing it with your own skewed interpretation of the discussion. -- Netoholic @ 05:40, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)