Misplaced Pages

Property is theft!: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:13, 29 December 2005 editCadr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,444 edits I don't think this necessarily follows; if it's what he thought it needs a cite← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:39, 6 August 2024 edit undoCzar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,517 edits remove the primary sources, per cleanup tag, and there's no substance left in the article apart from a description of the concept along the lines of what's already in the Proudhon article · Join the anarchism cleanup driveTag: New redirect 
(390 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ] {{R from related topic}}
'''Property is theft!''' is a slogan coined by the ] ] ] in his book '']''.

Taken at face value, "Property is theft!" appears to be an ], because theft, by definition, means depriving someone of his property. However, Proudhon had his own specialized definition of property in ''What is Property''. By property, he was referring to government-granted title to idle and unoccupied land. Proudhon opposed the idea of an individual owning land that he was not using, as this would enable him to charge rent to others and thereby be paid without laboring. In addition to opposing individual ownership of idle land, he opposed the idea of social ownership as well: "instead of inferring from this that property should be shared by all, I demand, as a measure of general security, its entire abolition." For Proudhon, individuals may rightfully "occupy and use" land, but not restrict others from using land or charge rent to use land that they are not themselves putting to use.

Proudhon did not oppose property in the sense of individual ownership of the product of one's labor. He used the term ] to describe his vision of a society where individuals and democratic workers associations could trade their produce on the market. In this system, he supposes exchange value to be determined by the amount of labor required to produce a commodity, in line with the ].

==See also==

* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
]

Latest revision as of 12:39, 6 August 2024

Redirect to:

  • To a related topic: This is a redirect to an article about a similar topic.
    • Redirects from related topics are different than redirects from related words, because a related topic is more likely to warrant a full and detailed description in the target article. If this redirect's subject is notable, then also tag it with {{R with possibilities}} and {{R printworthy}}.