Misplaced Pages

Fast ForWord: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:39, 9 December 2021 edit2600:8800:7a85:500:ddc2:23ad:f71d:c8f9 (talk) Adjusted language and added details to achieve a more objective and unbiased perspective. Removed factual errors. Corrected errors of capitalization and grammar.Tags: Reverted Visual edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:43, 7 August 2024 edit undoPacificTech (talk | contribs)1 editm HistoryTag: Visual edit 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Fast ForWord''' is a computer-based reading program intended to help students develop and strengthen the cognitive skills necessary for successful reading and learning by . '''Fast ForWord''' is a computer-based reading program with limited evidence of effectiveness, created by Scientific Learning Corporation. It is based on a theory about the cognitive abilities of children with language and literacy learning difficulties.


== Research == == Research ==
A systematic review which focused on high quality randomised controlled trials did not find any positive benefit of the intervention.<ref name="Strong2011rev">{{cite journal|vauthors=Strong GK, Torgerson CJ, Torgerson D, Hulme C|date=March 2011|title=A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the 'Fast ForWord' language intervention program|journal=J Child Psychol Psychiatry|volume=52|issue=3|pages=224–35|doi=10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02329.x|pmc=3061204|pmid=20950285}}</ref> A more general review of "Brain Training" programs noted:<ref name="Simons2016rev">{{cite journal|last1=Simons|first1=DJ|last2=Boot|first2=WR|last3=Charness|first3=N|last4=Gathercole|first4=SE|last5=Chabris|first5=CF|last6=Hambrick|first6=DZ|last7=Stine-Morrow|first7=EA|title=Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work?|journal=Psychological Science in the Public Interest |date=October 2016|volume=17|issue=3|pages=103–86|pmid=27697851|doi=10.1177/1529100616661983}}</ref>
The research literature on Fast ForWord was reviewed by ], an initiative of the U.S. Department of Education’s ]. Positive effectiveness ratings and improvement indices were found for alphabetics, reading fluency, comprehension, and English language development.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite web|date=August 2010|title=What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report Adolescent Literacy Fast ForWord|url=https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_fastfw_083110.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=September 28, 2006|title=What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report English Language Learners Fast ForWord Language|url=https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/WWC_Fast_ForWord_092806.pdf}}</ref> However, the quality of evidence included in these reviews has come under criticism, as it included reports that had not undergone peer review and that were produced by the company marketing the intervention.<ref name="McArthur2008">{{cite journal|last1=McArthur|first1=GM|date=2018|title=Does What Works Clearinghouse Work? A Brief Review of Fast ForWord®|journal=Australasian Journal of Special Education|volume=32|issue=1|pages=101–107|doi=10.1080/10300110701845953}}</ref>

A 2011 systematic review that focused on high-quality randomized controlled trials did not find any positive benefit of the intervention.<ref name="Strong2011rev">{{cite journal|vauthors=Strong GK, Torgerson CJ, Torgerson D, Hulme C|date=March 2011|title=A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the 'Fast ForWord' language intervention program|journal=J Child Psychol Psychiatry|volume=52|issue=3|pages=224–35|doi=10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02329.x|pmc=3061204|pmid=20950285}}</ref> However, an official response by Scientific Learning Corporation pointed out that the five studies included in the review only examined cases where Fast ForWord was poorly implemented and cited other peer-reviewed research studies that found that when properly implemented, Fast ForWord does produce significant impacts on student learning.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Scientific Learning Corporation|date=2011|title=In Response to a Meta-Analysis by Strong et al.|url=https://www.scilearn.com/wp-content/uploads/30484StrongetalResponse.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref>

Fast ForWord's claims of rewiring the brain have also been scrutinized, alongside other brain training programs, for their veracity. One criticism was published in a 2016 article, which questions brain training programs in general. It noted:<ref name="Simons2016rev">{{cite journal|last1=Simons|first1=DJ|last2=Boot|first2=WR|last3=Charness|first3=N|last4=Gathercole|first4=SE|last5=Chabris|first5=CF|last6=Hambrick|first6=DZ|last7=Stine-Morrow|first7=EA|title=Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work?|journal=Psychological Science in the Public Interest |date=October 2016|volume=17|issue=3|pages=103–86|pmid=27697851|doi=10.1177/1529100616661983}}</ref>


{{blockquote|In summary, the evidence cited by Scientific Learning Corporation provides little compelling evidence for the effectiveness of Fast ForWord as a tool to improve language processing or other aspects of cognition. Studies showing benefits typically included interventions that lacked any control group, and those with a control comparison group generally showed little evidence for differential improvements. The only randomized controlled trial provided no evidence for differential improvements, even on measures tapping similar aspects of auditory language processing.}} {{blockquote|In summary, the evidence cited by Scientific Learning Corporation provides little compelling evidence for the effectiveness of Fast ForWord as a tool to improve language processing or other aspects of cognition. Studies showing benefits typically included interventions that lacked any control group, and those with a control comparison group generally showed little evidence for differential improvements. The only randomized controlled trial provided no evidence for differential improvements, even on measures tapping similar aspects of auditory language processing.}}


The research literature on Fast ForWord was reviewed by ], an initiative of the U.S. Department of Education’s ]. Positive effectiveness ratings and improvement indices were found for alphabetics, reading fluency, comprehension, and English language development.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite web|date=August 2010|title=What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report Adolescent Literacy Fast ForWord|url=https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_fastfw_083110.pdf}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=September 28, 2006|title=What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report English Language Learners Fast ForWord Language|url=https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/WWC_Fast_ForWord_092806.pdf}}</ref> However, the quality of evidence included in these reviews has come under criticism, as it included reports that had not undergone peer review and that were produced by the company marketing the intervention.<ref name="McArthur2008">{{cite journal|last1=McArthur|first1=GM|date=2018|title=Does What Works Clearinghouse Work? A Brief Review of Fast ForWord®|journal=Australasian Journal of Special Education|volume=32|issue=1|pages=101–107|doi=10.1080/10300110701845953}}</ref>
In response, Dr. Henry Mahncke (one of the authors of a study that the 2016 article cited) pointed out many issues with the article, including basic factual errors, author bias, and problematic methodologies.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2016-10-03|title=Brain Training and Its Critics|url=https://www.brainhq.com/blog/brain-training-critics/|access-date=2021-12-09|website=BrainHQ from Posit Science|language=en-US}}</ref> The scientific community continues to research and debate the efficacy of various approaches to ]-based brain training.


== History == == History ==
The Fast ForWord products evolved from the theory of a number of scientists, including ], Bill Jenkins, ], and Steven Miller. This team started the Scientific Learning Corporation in 1996. The company created Fast ForWord.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_ffw_031913.pdf|title=What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report Beginning Reading Fast ForWord|date=March 2013}}</ref> The theory was that some children who have language and literacy learning difficulties may have problems rapidly processing sounds, a following theory that cognitive training can improve auditory processing, and a final theory that this training will generalize to improve learning skills beyond those in the training tasks. The Fast ForWord products evolved from the theory of a number of scientists, including ], Bill Jenkins, ], and Steven L Miller. This team started the Scientific Learning Corporation in 1996. The company created Fast ForWord.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_ffw_031913.pdf|title=What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report Beginning Reading Fast ForWord|date=March 2013}}</ref> The theory was that some children who have language and literacy learning difficulties may have problems rapidly processing sounds, a following theory that cognitive training can improve auditory processing, and a final theory that this training will generalize to improve learning skills beyond those in the training tasks. Despite this, the program has not demonstrated an ability to improve learning skills.<ref name="Simons2016rev"/>


==References== ==References==

Latest revision as of 19:43, 7 August 2024

Fast ForWord is a computer-based reading program with limited evidence of effectiveness, created by Scientific Learning Corporation. It is based on a theory about the cognitive abilities of children with language and literacy learning difficulties.

Research

A systematic review which focused on high quality randomised controlled trials did not find any positive benefit of the intervention. A more general review of "Brain Training" programs noted:

In summary, the evidence cited by Scientific Learning Corporation provides little compelling evidence for the effectiveness of Fast ForWord as a tool to improve language processing or other aspects of cognition. Studies showing benefits typically included interventions that lacked any control group, and those with a control comparison group generally showed little evidence for differential improvements. The only randomized controlled trial provided no evidence for differential improvements, even on measures tapping similar aspects of auditory language processing.

The research literature on Fast ForWord was reviewed by What Works Clearinghouse, an initiative of the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences. Positive effectiveness ratings and improvement indices were found for alphabetics, reading fluency, comprehension, and English language development. However, the quality of evidence included in these reviews has come under criticism, as it included reports that had not undergone peer review and that were produced by the company marketing the intervention.

History

The Fast ForWord products evolved from the theory of a number of scientists, including Michael Merzenich, Bill Jenkins, Paula Tallal, and Steven L Miller. This team started the Scientific Learning Corporation in 1996. The company created Fast ForWord. The theory was that some children who have language and literacy learning difficulties may have problems rapidly processing sounds, a following theory that cognitive training can improve auditory processing, and a final theory that this training will generalize to improve learning skills beyond those in the training tasks. Despite this, the program has not demonstrated an ability to improve learning skills.

References

  1. Strong GK, Torgerson CJ, Torgerson D, Hulme C (March 2011). "A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the 'Fast ForWord' language intervention program". J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 52 (3): 224–35. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02329.x. PMC 3061204. PMID 20950285.
  2. ^ Simons, DJ; Boot, WR; Charness, N; Gathercole, SE; Chabris, CF; Hambrick, DZ; Stine-Morrow, EA (October 2016). "Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work?". Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 17 (3): 103–86. doi:10.1177/1529100616661983. PMID 27697851.
  3. ^ "What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report Beginning Reading Fast ForWord" (PDF). March 2013.
  4. "What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report Adolescent Literacy Fast ForWord" (PDF). August 2010.
  5. "What Works Clearinghouse Intervention Report English Language Learners Fast ForWord Language" (PDF). September 28, 2006.
  6. McArthur, GM (2018). "Does What Works Clearinghouse Work? A Brief Review of Fast ForWord®". Australasian Journal of Special Education. 32 (1): 101–107. doi:10.1080/10300110701845953.

External links

Brain training programs
Categories: