Revision as of 08:26, 7 March 2018 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,050 editsm Signing comment by 2A02:A446:3B7F:1:4903:8AF2:C1BC:C891 - "→Difference in people killed and injured: new section"← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:31, 23 August 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,661 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Rodney King/Archive 2) (bot |
(46 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
⚫ |
{{On this day|date1=2009-04-29|oldid1=286836816|date2=2010-03-03|oldid2=347407003|date3=2012-03-03|oldid3=479921414|date4=2018-03-03|oldid4=828459134|date5=2021-03-03|oldid5=1010076621|date6=2024-03-03|oldid6=1211564524}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=C|listas=King, Rodney}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|living=no|listas=King, Rodney|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Criminal Biography|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject African diaspora|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject California|class=C|importance=Low|socal=y|la=y}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject California|importance=Low|socal=y|la=y}} |
|
{{WikiProject African diaspora|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=Mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{Top 25 Report|May 31 2020}} |
|
{{Image requested|judicial and penal systems people}} |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{OnThisDay|date1=2009-04-29|oldid1=286836816|date2=2010-03-03|oldid2=347407003|date3=2012-03-03|oldid3=479921414|date4=2018-03-03|oldid4=828459134}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
Line 19: |
Line 20: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Likely typo reverses the intended meaning? == |
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the section "Aftermath": |
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Blood and urine samples were taken from King five hours after his arrest. The ] (BAC) from King's test samples was ''0.075%'', indicating he would not have been legally intoxicated under California law, BAC legal limit ''0.08%'', at the time of his arrest." |
|
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090224201645/http://laist.com/2009/02/22/rodney_king_forgives.php to http://laist.com/2009/02/22/rodney_king_forgives.php |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090502084012/http://laist.com/2009/04/29/meet_rodney_king.php to http://laist.com/2009/04/29/meet_rodney_king.php |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As it stands, it's nonsense, because a blood alcohol content of 0.075% five hours '''after''' arrest would mean a blood alcohol content far over 0.08% '''at the time of''' arrest. I can't correct this because I don't know whether it's the "five hours" that is wrong, or the "not" in "not have been intoxicated", or the numbers. Someone who has this info please fix. ] (]) 14:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
: {{u|Longitude2}}: ] introducing the "not" was made on November 10, 2022, with the editor apparently acting in good faith but missing this implication. I checked the source cited earlier in the sentence, which says: "Blood and urine samples taken from King five hours after his arrest showed that his blood-alcohol level was 0.075%, indicating that at the time of his arrest, he was over the level (0.08%) at which one can be presumed intoxicated under California law." Accordingly, I removed the "not." <span style="font-weight:bold">]]</span> 07:43, 28 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== archive == |
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 08:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{u|Wafflewombat}}, sorry if I'm misunderstanding - why do we ] the archive bot? ] (]) 21:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821042730/http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/top-stories/121687/how-citizen-journalism-has-changed-since-george-hollidays-rodney-king-video/ to http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/top-stories/121687/how-citizen-journalism-has-changed-since-george-hollidays-rodney-king-video/ |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110410153212/http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_17540843 to http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_17540843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:There is very little activity on the talk page, so there's no need to automatically archive. I would say it's better to let the content build up naturally and then manually archive when it feels right to do so, instead of when the bot is programmed to do so. But if you disagree and want to restore the bot, that is 100% okay. It's not very important 🙂 ] (]) 21:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
::Yeah, I feel like if a bot can do it, why should we do it manually. I don't think removing these bots is a good thing. I think if your only objection is that it can be done manually, you should either stop or get consensus that it's a good idea. ] (]) 21:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::No problem. In the future I'll seek consensus about this type of edit. ] (]) 22:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 11:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Difference in people killed and injured == |
|
|
|
|
|
In the 2nd paragraph the Rodney King acticle states that "The rioting lasted six days, during which 53 people were killed and 2,373 were injured;", referring to the 1992 Los Angeles riots. It provides no link for evidence. The wikipedia article on the 1992 Los Angeles riots states that 63 people died and 2383 people were injured and it does provide a reference to support it. Should the number of deaths and injured be changed to match that of the 1992 Los Angeles riots article? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:25, 7 March 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
As it stands, it's nonsense, because a blood alcohol content of 0.075% five hours after arrest would mean a blood alcohol content far over 0.08% at the time of arrest. I can't correct this because I don't know whether it's the "five hours" that is wrong, or the "not" in "not have been intoxicated", or the numbers. Someone who has this info please fix. Longitude2 (talk) 14:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)