Revision as of 01:28, 7 July 2008 editJanderVK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,093 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:15, 25 August 2024 edit undoXfansd (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,391 edits Reverted 1 edit by UnikeElite02 (talk): WP:ENGLISHPLEASETags: Twinkle Undo | ||
(67 intermediate revisions by 37 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Talk header}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Japan|importance=high|music=yes|culture=y}} | ||
{{WikiProject Music|class= |
{{WikiProject Music/Music genres task force|class=c}} | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject Fashion|class=c|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject LGBT studies}} | |||
{{WPRock|class=start|nested=yes}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Archive box|]}} | |||
{{Archive box|]}} | |||
__TOC__ | |||
== Rewrite == | |||
{{Clear}} | |||
== Facts - I will rewrite it == | |||
The article has been rewritten to better conform with ]. The notion of visual kei being a music genre, along with the corresponding infobox and category inclusions has been removed, the reasoning being that bands with visual kei aesthetics do not necessarily share any stylistic traits in regards of their music and that occurrences of such looks also appear in other media. - ] 11:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
It's more than obvious, this article is one lost step to reality of visual kei and is talking only about X Japan, what in reality weren't that note as visual kei (because their more normal style). Father of real visual kei who were note about costumes, performance and scene all around, were now-defunct ] (their singer, ] called ''prince of visual kei''). Today ] and ], is VISUAL KEI (VISUAL STYLE) what should be more note. X Japan, Luna Sea, Dir en Grey and younger bands "had" Visual Kei but with years became more suit for mainstream that just J-rock or Visual Kei in general. (for example, look at ] history) There is different story behind it.. and Japan isn't just rock and pop there are many views to talk about it. | |||
:Should there be a blurb about X Japan sort of bringing the VK movement to the attention of the Japanese mainstream? I guess I don't have any evidence at the moment, but my impression was that they had brought attention to the VK movement when they released Blue Blood and became famous. Incidentilly, they (or at least Yoshiki) also produced many of the other notable VK bands that followed (Glay, Luna Sea, Dir en Grey), with I think the exception of Malice Mizer. I'm pretty sure I can find a source on that, but I don't have one yet. Should it go up, or would my effort be wasted? ] 05:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
While regarding Japanese pops section; '''J-POP is Japanese popular music''', anything and everthing that exist on musical scene. Other "genre or styles" aren't officially confirmed, but they are (in this case of visual kei and J-rock) style of the musician. | |||
*While I agree the article needs a re-write, I'm not sure if wiping the whole thing clean was the way to go. I would argue that Visual is a musical genre, but its such a long established genre that it has a lot of diversity. Look at an article on punk or metal. If you knew nothing about those styles of music, and listened to random sampling of bands that are considered "punk"... you would be unable to determine what punk is (don't even get into all the "core" subcategories there!). Visual is much the same. There have been different "movements" within visual that have different styles of playing. Also many bands begin as a "visual" band, but change styles along the way. ] 05:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
But, J-Rock never gain in popularity only because, in Japan is more popular a catchy-one week song than a rock song. People there never totaly looked at rockers as real artists (in comparation from USA who are just posers), but as entertainers. Is different place, world and how things are, J-Rock will be always more than a third thing, - behind Enka and big number of J-POP singers. | |||
But either, there are rock bands-boybands who aren't count as J-Rock, but are popular. Either overseas never heared.. | |||
Samurai left a great impact of self-peace, while Rock is something different (or just mis-understanding) and I think neither 29% like it. In other hand, a great importance is in what region this band is playing, it's history, label house etc. In political way, their lyrics are (again, from USA non-sense) something* they don't want to be listen. Type of living is more slow but fast, and must work. For some company man, musicians are just entertainers without a school, paper. He is like "nothing", but is "something" (for example Yoshiki, who has respect). It is very complicated thing to talk about. | |||
::You might be right about everything you wrote but while the punk rock article offers reliable sources for its content, the old one about visual kei did not have any of that sort. Verifiability is one of the key principles of an encyclopedia, which should not be a place to collect personal views, preconceptions, or widespread rumors and hearsay. Hence this request goes out to you, Vespertilio and anyone else interested: Go out and look for references, with ] and ] in mind, because this subject isn't any less deserving of a decent article than all the others on Misplaced Pages. - ] 07:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
One of worst written articles on Misplaced Pages. I will re-write it as soon as possible. | |||
:::I've located an article from Billboard(magazine?), dated september 5th, 1992, that discusses Warner Bros., MMG, and Atlantic Records' plans to launch X Japan (called "X from Japan" in the article) worldwide. This seems like a pretty good indication of their popularity, I'd say they're easily the first visual kei band to receive this kind of recognition. I could not however, locate an internet copy of this article, just a scanned image of it. Would that be sufficient enough evidence? I'm not sure how much else we'd be able to find >_>... ] 17:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Do NOT change anything because page will be '''RE-WRITTEN'''.--] (]) 10:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
(deindent) I rephrased and expanded the new paragraph, as the Billboard article does not quite address the seminal influence X Japan might have had on visual kei. But it's still a the best place to start when it comes to international efforts by these bands. - ] 21:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Genre Discussion == | |||
:Thanks for the edit, I like it better this way. ] 02:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
This dispute of whether visual kei is a music genre or not has been going on for a number of years now, and it seems like people have edited everything to claim it is both: a genre and a fashion movement. But as stated above, in the old genre discussions, it is not a music (sound) genre as there are no '''musical (sound) characteristics''' that '''every''' visual kei band has. For example: ]'s (]), ]'s (]) and ]'s (]) music are nothing alike, yet everyone would agree that they were/are all visual kei bands. | |||
This is not a definite decision, someone please try to provide '''reliable''' sources that give these '''necessary defining musical (sound) characteristics''' of the visual kei music genre. Sources that claim "visual kei is a music genre" or "a specific band is visual kei, therefore that band's genre is one of visual kei's many", but do not provide the whole genre's defining '''musical characteristics''', are useless. If, in a reasonable amount of time, no one has provided these, then it is clear and settled that visual kei is not a music genre and the article, and every related one, will be edited to display this. Or, if need be, a part in the main article, not the beginning, describing how a number of fans believe it is a music genre contrary to the facts, can be added. ] (]) 20:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
::How much does Visual Kei owe to ] paint styles? That might be a useful comparison. Another way of saying that is, did Kumadori infludence Visual Kei? ] 19:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
:What you have suggested violates the Misplaced Pages policy "No original research" ]. We cannot decide if visual rock is a genre or not. Instead, we have to find third party sources, and report on what they state. The issue above was resolved by this statement: | |||
== Inspired by Kiss == | |||
:''However, other sources state that the term refers primarily to a style of dress or fashion, or sub-culture, and not to a genre of music, and some sources use the term in both ways. '' | |||
:It was eventually removed as no reliable source stating visual is not a genre could be found. ] (]) 22:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
I've heard that fashion and music in Japan seems to follow trends in the U.S., delayed about 10 to 20 years. Looking the the picture in the article, I can't help but think that ] and 80's ] inspired this "visual kei" movement. Surely there was some influence? ~]]] 20:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
::I don't know which of my suggestions exactly you are referring to with the ] remark. But you have dodged the genre dispute entirely and are changing the discussion to something else. Before you can write an article with proper research and under a proper format you must decide on what the topic is (is it a genre or a fashion?), this effects how the article will be written and how others can edit to improve it. | |||
Obviously, Kiss was ”the first Visual Kei band”, and as a visual kei fan, I will always admire them for that. But visual kei arose at a time when Kiss was a jeans-and-leather-jacket band with basically no image at all, and I honestly don’t think any visual kei bands care about Kiss. Putting something like that in the article is sure to attract a flurry of "" ... (Of course I agree about the hair bands as well, that’s even more obvious; visual kei invented itself exactly when hair bands were all the rage.) ] (]) 17:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
::"Some sources state that Visual Kei refers to a music genre, or to a sub-genre of J-rock with its own particular sound, related to glam-rock, punk and metal." This sentence, one of the few that refers to actual music, says "its own particular sound" but there is nothing to describe what this unique sound is. How is it different than glam metal and punk? With this vagueness one is forced to assume that visual kei's '''sound''' is all these combined all the time and that every band has this sound, which we know isn't true. Again, sources that describe how the '''sound''' is unique are needed to prove it is its own genre and not everything combined, but none are supplied. However sources that claim it is not a unique music genre are not needed since there is no proof that it is one, so nothing needs to be disproved. Therefore the article should be changed and focused on to what is clearly proven and agreed upon, "visual kei is a fashion movement among Japanese musicians, characterized by the use of make-up, elaborate hair styles and flamboyant costumes". We know the '''fashion''' is different than that of glam, because of "influences from Western phenomena, such as goth and cyberpunk" which glam didn't have, this makes the visual kei '''fashion''' unique and worthy of its own article. Please keep the discussion to: whether it is or is not a music genre. ] (]) 01:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
== X Japan related text removed == | |||
:::''Before you can write an article with proper research and under a proper format you must decide on what the topic is.'' | |||
As ] says in an interview on his webiste, X Japan never was visual kei so it's pointless to talk about X Japan here since they were just "visual", not visual kei. | |||
:::This is incorrect. Misplaced Pages editors do not decide if visual kei is a genre or something else. Instead they find sources and report on what they say. If an editor decides "what it is" and pushes that "point of view," that would be against Misplaced Pages guidelines ]. To then write about a point of view without resources would violate original research ] and Verifiability ]. These concepts are so important that they are called the "Pillars" of Misplaced Pages. Ideas that can't be backed up with references can't be incorporated into Misplaced Pages. You have an opinion that visual kei is not a genre, but neither my opinion or your opinion matters to the discussion of the content of this article. ] (]) 01:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote> | |||
::::It is not simply my opinion that it is not a genre but a fashion, you yourself have proven it in the article with proper sources. However you fail to completely prove it is also a genre by not providing the unique musical characteristics of the genre. It is not a music genre as there are no musical characteristics that every visual kei band has. Is this simple and straightforward enough for you to finally focus on the actual discussion that I created this section of the talk page for, which you suggested I do? ] (]) 18:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
That's bullshit, look around for news footage for hide's funeral and death. You can hear the news reporters saying "Visual kei band X-Japan". | |||
:::::Editors provide ''verifiable resources'', not "proof". We have verifiable resources to confirm visual is a genre. I am unaware of any policies stating that "proof" is required for music genres in the manner you describe. Please provide the links to those policies. ] (]) 23:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Although I played rock music and was a visual rock singer... | |||
</blockquote> | |||
{|style="border-top:solid thin lightgrey;background:transparent;padding:4px;" | |||
<blockquote> | |||
|] '''Response to ]''': | |||
and we were at the summit of so-called "visuals" | |||
|- | |||
</blockquote> | |||
|style="padding-left:0.6cm"|Firstly, remember that Misplaced Pages's focus is on verifiability, not truth. What the majority of reliable sources state should generally be accepted at value, though if there are sufficient sources dissenting then there should be some mention in the article of all points of view, for balance. | |||
] 12:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
In the context of this article, I see Visual Kei as a similar concept to ], in which the genre is defined by a distinct visual style, spread across a diverse range of musical styles. I think you'd be hard-pressed to prove a common musical element across all glam rock bands, but nevertheless it is considered a genre and appears in the infobox of various artists, such as ]. | |||
:This distinction between "visual rock"/"visuals" and visual kei is semantic nonsense. - ] 14:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
::More than that, it's the same thing. What's the statement in Japanese? It's probably "something-something vijuaru", which is the same thing as visual kei. ] 21:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
My opinion on this matter is that there's no need to 'prove' a common musical component to Visual Kei bands, and there should be no problem with including Visual Kei in the genre field of their infoboxes. If the sources imply controversy over whether or not the genre actually exists from a musical perspective, include the sourced dissenting views in the article. As it stands, the sourcing for Visual Kei strikes me as very similar to glam rock, which is fairly broadly treated as a genre.—] (]) 02:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
I've seen japanese press and publications also refer to Marilyn Manson as VK, as well as AFI. Although they aren't considered part of the japanese VK canon as X still is. I think that Toshi may have a different perception of what visual kei was/is supposed to be, rather than that of many of the bands or fans that proceeded them. ] <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
|} | |||
== Fashion style == | |||
== REWRITE the page of VISUAL KEI!!!! == | |||
1. What was the drastic change in appearance that accompanied the successes of X Japan, Luna Sea, and Glay? Didn't those three bands' appearances change very little if at all between their last indies releases and first few major label releases? I don't remember any of these bands having a moment of drastic change (more of an evolution over time) other than when X Japan members cut their hair, which was well after they were already successful. | |||
I think this page about visual kei needs to rewrite!!!!I have no malice about visual kei(I love X JAPAN and Dir En Grey)But I think Visual Kei is only a japanese name of glam rock,as their characteristics Are same!!!Some of the "faithful" fans may argue that glam rock clothing sucks while visual kei clothing is cool,so visual kei is totally different from glam rock!!!My opinion:But glam rock was a Genre arose in 70s,So THOSE CLOTHINGS suck are reasonable!!!yet in 1970,japanese were worse than England and America!!!If u've seen the video of the Blue Blood tour of X japan,you will find that X japan's dressing was similar to Kiss!!!!If someone still said that visual kei was arose by japan,it's actually a "cultural aggression"to glam rock!!!Also so,I know that there are lots of people think that visual kei and glam rock are actually the same thing,so I think that this page about Visual kei needs to rewrite!!!! ] 15:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)RPOON | |||
2. I see a lot of debate regarding whether visual kei is a real musical genre. Along the same lines: is it a real fashion style? What defines it? For example, caligari looked nothing like Malice Mizer and X Japan in its early days didn't look like either of them. As a fashion style it is even less cohesive than it is as a musical genre. I would say it's a broad musical genre and a scene more than it is a specific fashion style. I think the current first paragraph of this article describes it as well as can be hoped. ] (]) 23:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
:I think visual kei may have it's roots in glam rock, perhaps it started as even an extension of the genre, but I think it's evolved into something quite separate. The current visual scene doesn't seem similar to bands like KISS musically ''or'' visually, really. ] 22:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
== "Musical genre" sources vs. "fashion style" sources in lead paragraph == | |||
: It does not similar to band like KISS because those bands like kiss are the band from 1970s!!!] 14:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)RPOON | |||
After taking a closer look at the citations for the lead paragraph, I am somewhat confused as to their usage. The three citations for the last sentence do all emphasize visual kei bands' costuming, but they also all explicitly use the word "genre" to describe visual kei. Shouldn't these then also be used to cite the "genre" statement? Two of them also explicitly support the statement that the sound of visual kei is related to glam rock, punk, and metal. Conversely, three of the sources used to support the "glam rock, punk, and metal" statement could also be used to support the statement about the emphasis on costuming and presentation. | |||
::That's a tautology. You might as well call Thomas Edison the American version of Archimedes, and claim that they're not the same because Archimedes is from the 3rd century BC.] 07:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
In other words: the language in the lead implies that the sources used are in disagreement as to what "visual kei" means, when in fact the sources all seem to be in agreement that visual kei is a musical genre related to glam rock, punk, and metal, in which costuming and makeup play a key role. Have I misunderstood something about why each source was chosen for each statement, or do all these sources say a version of the same thing? I don't see any of these sources saying either "it's A not B" or "it's B not A". ] (]) 21:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
: (Kiss is not really a good example of glam rock either ... for most of their history, their image was too dark, black & white instead of colourful, masculine (well ... :P) rather than feminine. The people who took Kiss's image to the next level were instead black-metal bands like ] with their elaborate corpse paint and spikes. ] (]) 17:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC) ) | |||
== machine translation of Japanese Page == | |||
== Oshare kei == | |||
Summary | |||
Given that the ] article has for some time been lacking ] to establish any unique characteristics of this supposed visual kei subset, I suggest to merge (or delete/redirect) it into this page, per ] and ]. - ] 14:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Calling it "visual kei" is often a catch copy of X JAPAN HIDE was invented called "PSYCHEDELIC VIOLENCE CRIME OF VISUAL SHOCK" s yuan is . Aside from the music level, as the word refers to the band issued a hits by flashy makeup, belonging to the "word-new word epidemic" in 1997 along with the terminology and "complex systems" and "Calm system" . After that, came to be used for male but not limited to the field of music. In "Encyclopedia of Japan slang" In addition, the quoted text of the "curse the darkness" is the work of the Hang Seng valley, which is an example of using the girl for not a man . It should be noted that this language has become a word-class in the "Visual Kei" even outside the territory of France, such as . | |||
:I will second that merge, as Oshare Kei, as well as most other "____ Kei" genres and styles, lack enough concrete information to have their own page at this time. It will also contribute to the Visual Kei article in giving it more credibility. --] 18:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
In the example above glossary-Japanese dictionary is represented as "visual system" either. However for the notation of this page is, "SHOXX" "FOOL'S MATE" "Cure" "Zy music magazine the visual system as of March 2008 that using" visual kei "according to the notation of newspapers" . | |||
:When the article was created, there was a Visual Kei article, not the stub there is now. Calling deletion of an article a "merger" and then not actually merging the article is not following Wiki's deletion procedures. ] 02:45, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Yes, you keep saying that, though without providing links to the relevant guidelines, or providing insight why the sources you keep re-inserting to the Oshare kei article are to be considered reliable per ]. Take a look at ] and ]; any information that is not backed by reliable sources may be removed by any editor at any time, which of course will come into consideration with this merge. - ] 09:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Trends and features | |||
::: "The policy of Verifiability advises that editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged." Please read carefully - "likely to be challenged". In order to challenge material that is on a page, it should be something that you have knowledge of or spend time researching yourself. You will note that the page on ] does not site any references. However, people have not removed the information there because it is "not likely to be challenged." If I went in there, I would challenge MANY things on it - if I didn't take time to do some research and realize that most of it is accurate. If you are not knowledgable about a subject, it is not a good idea to go tearing through it with a hack saw. Now, you are not removing MATERIAL from pages. You are DELETING pages - that is completely different! Fancruft, which you have used before, is not a policy or guildeline for wikipedia. Do a search on Oshare Kei, you will recieve 73,300 hits on google. Original Research - you remove any resources anyone provides so of course there are no resources - you remove them all. Visunavi is one of the BEST resources for Visual Kei on the web. Per WP:RS "Reliable sources are authors or publications regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand." It is a commercial (not a fan) site that posts interviews and news releases. It is an authoritative site in relation to the subject at hand and is not a fan creation. It has been around consistantly since at least 2004. Hopefully with English language magazines like Purple Sky we will have more reliable sources in English. Please note that all your concerns have been adressed. ] 15:12, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Musical features | |||
::::Precedents of other flawed articles rarely make for good arguments when dealing with a user-edited encyclopedia. Also note: | |||
::::* ]: "''Do not leave unsourced information in articles for too long Jimmy Wales, founder of Misplaced Pages, has said of this: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced.''"<br />The Oshare kei article has been tagged for its lack of citations sources since December 2006. That's been quite enough time for knowledgeable editors to find and add references on the subject. And even the sources you provided only name the supposed founding fathers of this supposed sub-genre; all general characteristics of the subject have not a shred of verifiability on them. A lot of Google hits do ''not'' replace proper citations. | |||
::::* Kindly spare us the "''you are no expert''" = "''you are unfit to edit''" rhetoric. It is based on circular logic, that would (ideally) keep skeptics out of the loop forever, conveniently freeing fans of little publicized subjects of the burden of evidence, ] puts such a strong emphasize on. See also: ] | |||
::::* As mentioned before, the Visunavi source does not deal with general aspects of the article's subject. Additionally, online shops that also happen to host band profiles can hardly be considered authoritative sources for genre developments. There is a distinct conflict of interest, as referring to a band under a more novel or specific genre moniker is an apt means to increase sales. | |||
::::- ] 16:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Basically a rock band which also, pop rock and heavy metal of the underlying hard rock J-pop is mainstream. Tend to prefer the ones carrying the flowing melody of minor adjustment to the overall dark intense melody is strong. | |||
:::::You insist that Visual Kei is not a musical genre - even though the article you reference states "Since it formed in the mid-1980's, X Japan went from playing loud, fast thrash-metal to stadium-shaking pop ballads, in the process pioneering its own genre, a Japanese equivalent of glam rock known as ''visual kei.''" There is the resource to show that "Visual Kei" and X are intertwined. The second resource I linked did give a description of Oshare Kei, and it was used because the site is well ordered and informative - therefore the article DOES have references. You seem more interested in promoting your agenda against Visual Kei then contibuting to the article. ] 18:31, 23 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
The early band, LUNA SEA and X JAPAN of system ecstasy, ZI: and put the band that sings lyrics in decadent aestheticism often to the foundation, such as Goth and New Romantic KILL, a hard rock and heavy metal, was kept constant and the respective power of punk, including anti-social lyrics are rebellious COLOR with a focus on things like a rock beat D'ERLANGER, the system label Free Will, and Kamaitachi. | |||
::::::Why, thanks for ]. - ] 01:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
The band has exploded in the late 1990s, many who were affected by the black dreams and from LUNA SEA, then, since the beginning of the 21st century music styles, including elements such as mood songs and rock mixture The epidemic is. | |||
::::::: Can you please provide your reference for arguing that visual kei is not regarded as a musical genre? The references for this article do state it is a musical genre, therefore, unless you can find better sources that indicate it is not, there is no reason to remove the statement. ] 17:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Many things were "aggressive" "masochistic" "introspective" As the trend of the lyrics. And the most familiar and tragic love song backlash against outside claims and criticisms facing more political, less is the main, basic dark insidious thing has been interpreted as a royal road. However, the recognition that the visual system with the general public by SHAZNA hit on the cover of popular song in 1997 and was seen as the traditional image of a population far removed from Dark Colours. Has created a lot of followers later in the year 2001, a band and a unique melody and lyrics of a song play on words, such as Showa cali ? gari appeared, but did not lead to big sales. Trend in 2006 was said royal road to both lyrics and music are concealing shadow. In addition, visual-kei bands in the 1990s when the epidemic, there was also called "ban jokes" as tacit consent for some reason, this is also about the person who pointed out the differences with the band as the visual system of the early days not a few. However, the band was also incorporated into the theme of music as the functional beauty of DIR EN GREY. Janne Da Arc, etc. There are expressions that use some sensual music, with lyrics from a female perspective, that is does not sound like vulgar only. | |||
(deindent) I don't have to. In the absence of any defining musical characteristics, there is no point in denoting the subject as a music genre. And one has to consider the circumstances of the ''New York Times'' article, as it mentions visual kei to illustrate a notable current event in a foreign country, at a time where Japanese rock music had only a fraction of the international fanbase it achieved after the advent of mainstream Internet. As such, the comparison with glam rock was an apt point of reference and the article still only offers visual/fashion related traits of visual kei, along with the several music genres X Japan happened to pertain to. Genres like glam, new wave and punk on the other hand, while arguably putting a strong emphasize on visuals, do also have certain musical properties and subsequently limitations, something that visual kei lacks, given the diversity of music genres picked up by the artists that are associated with it. - ] 18:26, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
According to Marty Friedman, the visual system in Japan is that they have a width of music very broad in fact that by the achievement of X JAPAN, is widely recognized in general, while the cornerstone the heavy metal is also about the melody. Pleased to announce the beautiful ballads such as "Say Anything" from the music of ultra-high speed ultra-aggressive, such as "Silent Jealousy" is the original X JAPAN, melody, but prefer one person should fit into a certain width We, the fans have accepted it. And that it is evidence of X JAPAN has been established as a brand appearance along with the sound . | |||
: "given the diversity of music genres picked up by the artists that are associated with it." <-- My point is that phrases like that fail ]. I'm currently researching to find more information on the person who wrote this article http://home.gwu.edu/~kizyr/thesis-ia/Kaiser%20Farooque%20-%20In%20the%20Local%20Image.pdf which seems pretty good. While I have seen many articles that call Visual Kei a music genre, I have never seen an article or review that claimed visual kei was not a music genre. We already have one verifiable resource, and I am sure it will not take long to find more. ] 20:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Features an appearance | |||
At the very least, that thesis makes for an interesting read, thanks. Note though, that it refers to visual kei as an "image". Also, please do not confuse on which sides of ]'s "burden of evidence" we are both on; I don't have to prove the absence of unifying musical traits in visual kei, as reliable sources need to be presented that they exist and what they are in the first place. | |||
Visual-kei band costume play (MALICE MIZER) | |||
Your efforts in this discussion appear to be motivated by the idea that referring to visual kei as a fashion genre, or more general, an art movement is in some way disrespectful or derogatory, at least that's what I gather from your agenda-comment earlier. Just to clarify: I am merely trying to keep Misplaced Pages as informative for its readers as possible, which precludes presenting them a "music genre" that transports no information on the music at all, as it can be anything from light-hearted pop rock, over fast-paced heavy metal to electro and industrial. - ] 23:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Visual-kei band fashion has changed dramatically increase in line with the times. | |||
:Your comment that Visual Kei is an art movement, and not a musical genre, is ]. It is not sourced anywhere - not in articles, not in general fan pages, it is something you made up completely. That is what I do not understand - you have been "controlling" this page, and ignoring ] for many months. Even though there are more editors that consider this a musical genre then those who consider it an art movement, AND they have verifiable sources (The article you say is acceptable, and then backtrack say is not acceptable), it is your agenda that continues to be pushed in this article. Not verifiablity. Where in the articles quoted does it state Visual kei is "light-hearted pop rock, over fast-paced heavy metal to electro and industrial." More ]? ] 01:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Until the early 1990s from the early days of the late 1980s, such as in dark makeup and ornate hairstyle that erect them with the colors gold and red flashy, such as long hair is up to about the waist, and flourished in the United States in the late 1980s were many things to extremes, such as those rock and traditional fashion of "hair metal" such as Poison and U~orento. It was vertically total wound a bandana parted in the middle DEAD END, the hair was to stand the total sink next to COLOR, the hair was then vertically total dyed your hair red and blue for the first time was Kamaitachi. | |||
This is getting tedious not to mention going in circles. I already explained that the ''New York Times'' article, while offering some insight, only mentions visual kei in connection with a single band and then still relies on commonly accepted genre handles to actually describe the group's music. So instead of weakening your argument by resorting to further ] and ], I'd very much welcome it if you eventually addressed the glaring absence of unifying musical traits, or produce reliable sources that actually name them. While you are at it, be a sport and treat yourself to some D'espairsRay, Malice Mizer and Schwarz Stein (or any of its follow-up projects), as the discographies of these groups alone should about cover all music genres I mentioned earlier. - ] 01:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
From that contained in the age 1990, YOSHIKI of X JAPAN was wearing a dress feminine at the same time as incorporating the piano in the band, which is a perversion of the mental image of aesthetic and cosmetic medieval women to penetrate begin. Because it was exposed to criticism and social accident that killed a fan due to stampede in the concert COLOR was engaged in a live Violence is masculine in the same period, also did not appear followers of them, the visual system was going to accelerate it to a women. | |||
::I can't listen to those bands and draw a conclusion - you just told me I could not draw any conculsion by listening to bands as that is ]. Any statement has to be given by a secondary source per ] as you stated above. Therefore, since your information is not sourced it is not valid for consideration. (I could write a very long article that does explain the evolution of sound for Visual Kei over the past 20 years, based on a review on the music, however, that would be original research which is why I have not.). If you note, the changes I have made to this article over the past year have been very minor, to allow ] (How many different editors worked on this article before you decided to wipe it and re-write it?). How is it that you can make statements to me (This is ] and ]), which are ok, but I make the same statements to you, and that is not ok? I am simply repeating the same statements you have made before. I am showing - using your own terms - that what you are doing to this article is the same thing you have been "acusing" me of. Please allow ] to continue for this article, and I encourage any editors who come across it to ]. The article as it stands now isn't even well sourced. ] 02:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Later, also appeared from the forces of positive influence from punk or gothic, dark image of what is aesthetic, but more diverse things pop, such as those of Dark Colours On the contrary, their derivatives also other Deattari order to reduce discrimination and was conspicuous for what purpose, such as. However, the values that appeared then by MALICE MIZER, rather than a role as a fashion, that express the view of the world simply with that band was born. In addition to a wide variety of late style is derived in the 1990s that was popular in the general visual system. And, in a band that is attached to the back office is great and will this time, no longer uncommon to come wearing a costume custom made to order. | |||
Listening to a couple of records (as sources of their own) that are supposed to belong into the same genre and then noticing that they sound nothing alike is hardly original research. The application of a little common sense and maybe the ] would have resolved this "discussion" a long time ago and I'm putting the word into quotes, because we have long ceased to discuss anything. I keep asking for the musical traits of (God forbid) a music genre and you keep declaring that I am on a personal mission to dance on the grave of visual kei. Sad. - ] 08:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Become epidemic of the 21st century and beyond visual system has left its diversity is also faded away, just like in the scene of fashionable rather than for self-assertion, and many of them. Although popular in fashion and Psycho le Cemu cali ? gari was exceptionally prominent, followed by bands such as is not out. There is also the rise of the band to be active in the costume and fashionable as pop baroque, a style that became fashionable period, then a band of like make-up fuel a sense of fear of those who see the rise was. | |||
:I was the one who said that it was reasonable to call Oshare Kei "Pop Punk" because listening to ANY Oshare Kei band would prove that, so no source was needed as this is a "reasonable statement". You, however said that was not a reasonable statement and must be sourced. If you study humanities you will find the "why" of something is just as important as the sound. If you go back and listen to the original Visual Kei bands, you will find they all sound alike. It wasn't until later that the sound started diverging. There was definately critisism that bands like Shazna "watered down" visual kei. The bands you mentioned are very modern and in different "sub" categories of Visual Kei. If you listen to an early ] band like ] and any "current" emo band, you'll find they don't sound like the same genre. See that this has been addressed by the Emo (music) entry. ] 12:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Was often displease an opportunity that you did break and major debut, no less band make-up becomes thin after that, continue to change to something rough costumes, from the fans that "flattery in general" by it was. To have a band, "says order to have listened without prejudice to more people" for this was, it's often easiest to or changed the music you want to do simply, Or was kinda burdensome, in order to concentrate on the music more was often told in the motive was to interfere with. | |||
== A music genre without musical characteristics == | |||
In line is shifted to punk pop is far from black like a dream, if you also increase the male fans, and collaboration or another unit of the genre, success in the royal road of catchy rock songs like GLAY then, such as form a is supported from the fan base broad, or transformed into a band of people from the category of the visual system, from gaining popularity in certain as DIR EN GREY, goes forward the route a maniac in the deep single-mindedly, band was also going to earn more core fans. ZIGZO had been referred to as the visual system because it was not serious, then the makeup from the beginning. Staging is also a genre very important, do not move the band to play while standing in place in the concert all the members is negligible. Was also in the band with dance music does not have a musical instrument as MALICE MIZER to incorporate skits like whitewashed system. | |||
] has recently cited a ] feature about Japanese rock music as a source to deem visual kei a music genre. The feature consists entirely of statements by musicians and fans involved in the scene, during which visual kei is referred to as a genre at one point and a movement at another. The short video also spends about a third of its length to elaborate on the stylistic ambiguity of Japanese rock music in general. | |||
Characteristic of the fan | |||
Band because there are a lot of emphasis is the configuration of the only men in the looks, the fans are young women in their early 20s have the majority from the die 10. In the fan, the person who dressed the unique atmosphere of the band along (such as cosplay punk, Gothic, Lolita, Gothic Lolita, Decora, the band members) are often found. | |||
While this source may signify the ties of visual kei to the Japanese music scene (which this article has pointed out at all times), it does not answer the question of defining musical traits of visual kei. A music genre without — to quote Peter van der Merwe's book ''Origins of the Popular Style: The Antecedents of Twentieth-Century Popular Music'' — a "basic musical language" of its own is nothing short of being a paradox and hardly encyclopedic. | |||
Visual system at the time the 1980s the word was not born yet, more than a few bands were present Yosuru the male fans. Fashion of those bands, and the current fashion of the visual system, unlike some Western influence from the band was seen. Currently, the typical fashion of the time age 80 is already recognized as obsolete. Fashion of the current visual kei bands, ranging from young mogul, from the 80's at that time was greatly transformed. It is not an acceptable thing for male music fans, as a result, the visual system has lost a large number of male fans. | |||
Hence the previous wording of the subject's nature has been restored, along with some of the content Denaar . I'll leave it to others to decide whether this was a genuine effort to improve Misplaced Pages or an imitation of the policy-oriented content removal that has previously happened on the article, to illustrate detrimental effects of that MO (in other words ]). - ] 14:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Well, we got a problem, and that is that independent sources are nonexistent. It definitely has musical characteristics, but the problem is that visual has changed in stages throughout its history. It's not consistently the same, but it is consistent on a phase-by-phase basis. ] 16:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
::We have two sources - both the NY times article as well as the feed that descibe it as a "genre". I will keep looking, because there are many more sources that say the same thing. As I said before: If you take into account the the changes over time, the conflict over "style" goes away. (PS: I have never been to a concert, or seen a concert recorded in a live video, where a Visual Kei drummer did not use Taiko drumming styles incorporated into the music. That kind of drumming is one of the reasons I like Visual Kei. Go to a Taiko drumming event and then start watching the VK drummers. I would have to hunt to find a bass player that did not use running bass lines. Ideal song lenghth for the radio is 3 - 3:30 mins, most visual bands are 4 mins and up. Most bands have a "theme" or "mission" statement - which goes in the "why" behind the music which is just as important as the sound. Check out Antic Cafe's interviews, they were constantly being asked "what is your theme" and they didn't have one (I believe recently they have finally given in and made something up to answer this question). Most other interviews with bands will be asked what the "theme" is, and many list it on their site (check out Undercode's site - every band has a theme listed). In a way, all visual bands are "theme bands". These bands are removed from American and Western rock music. I was at Oni-con when Kisaki spoke about how he tends to make a choice on which cd to buy based on the album covers. The kind of detailed information we have about rock and roll styles is not easy to access in Japan. Therefore bands may use styles we consider 'separate' that they do not realize are separate because they are located all in one place in the record store under 'foreign rock' like the Third Stage does (they just have a "overseas" section) . The bands tend to have 5 members instead of 4 as most American bands do. Bands tend to do a combination of "rush" songs and "ballads" - even bands like Dir en Grey, X, Luna Sea (visual period), Gazette, Antic Cafe - they all do/did it. There are a lot of other conventions that are more style specific. Music is usually done in a style that encourages dancing - during old X Japan concerts the fans would make an "X" over their head and jump in the air. Then they switch it up with ballads to let the fans rest. The best description I have heard of Visual was from Ryohei from Ayabie, he called his band's sound "dance metal" in a GAB magazine interview). <-- A lot of the information in the () counts as original research which is why I haven't added it. ] 17:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Bangyaru gear that man, a woman a man of an avid fan of visual kei bands. | |||
== Verifiability and win-win solutions == | |||
It seems to me like the two sides of the argument are: | |||
* '''Pro-genre''': There are articles that say it's a genre | |||
* '''Anti-genre''': There are no defining musical characteristics cited | |||
The history of the visual system | |||
Fortunately, someone has already resolved this, but no-one has been carefully reading this talk page. The section "Confusion in Definition", above, notes that Visual Kei has ''two meanings'': | |||
# A Japanese band who focuses on an elaborate image. | |||
# A style of music originating in the early-mid 90's which was unique among Visual-type bands. | |||
The dawn of the visual system | |||
This will appear self-evident once you've read about Visual Kei, including (but not limited to) the link I am about to provide. | |||
Between mid-term from the early 1980s, the basis of the visual system began to establish positive punk by the band of Gothic-AUTO-MOD, Madame Edowaruda, et al. PHAIDIA. In hard rock / heavy metal scene of the indies, and common sense X JAPAN, such as COLOR, of rock band until it is far removed from that band of style and began conspicuously significant activity in the Kanto and Kansai and about the same time. Their activities, as at that time very innovative and established his own independent label, and to expand the promotion of innovative advertising ads such as free distribution of sound gig, to the media, in the indie scene after the conduct that has built the foundations ahead than anyone else, the strategy become mainstream. | |||
Ark~Magic provided a link. Unfortunately, it's dead, but fortunately, the Wayback Machine has kept a copy for us. It's available at: | |||
Both of these bands, but very deep exchange, representation of fact was contrary to the spirit and emphasis of metal and punk, music and emphasis. At the time was said to Dynamite Tommy "YOSHIKI of the East" merged with "COLOR X of east and west", west of this phenomenon. From now on, referring to their activities, a variety of musicians would like to established his own label. | |||
The end of the band and boom, the rise of the visual system | |||
In the early 1990s, on the other hand of the end of the boom band, visual-kei rock band of fans that had emerged, such as black and LUNA SEA has been a dream debut. SHOXX magazine will be launched at the same time. | |||
If you read that, you will be able to see what the musical characteristics of the genre are. | |||
Also what had been active as a band beat and rock hard rock, heavy metal, at that time popular will subside in the form of these genres is pushed to the rise of the visual system, and the intention of the person according to the epidemic, or In some cases, were seen as been forced to circumstances due to factors such as the record company offices and sales strategy by affiliation, such as requests for commercial, including its music, not forced to migrate in the form. Then and became the band's most commercial element becomes stronger, spirituality as a lock is to be diluted. Or been affected by that area, appearance of male fans was rarely seen in visual-kei bands from this period. | |||
I suggest the following moves to come to consensus on the article: | |||
# Divide it into two sections, one for each of the meanings provided by Ark~Magic in the "Confusion in Definition" section | |||
# Using the link I provided, discuss the defining characteristics of the genre (without just copy/pasting, of course) | |||
About the band also in the band was hit on the other hand, increases or the popular and well known, and enough high evaluation of music, has been recognized world wide, then is characterized as the visual system, such as depth of makeup has faded ~Tsu many things. There is a rock band regression, such as a metal band to a pure original, to change direction, such as punk, because of a change in direction of rock music, such as to issue a stronger color is common. | |||
Just in case this hasn't solved everything, allow me to also point out that the articles which say it's a genre don't prove that it's a genre, just that some people say it's a genre. That would certainly be an acceptable statement to put in the article. | |||
Anyway, if this doesn't enable you to come to a conclusion, feel free to contact me for more help, because I'm not going to be watching the article. | |||
Epidemic and decline | |||
-- ] 10:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Around 1997 the word visual system is used extensively, was established as a genre, due to intense push, such as "Break Out" program TV, said MALICE MIZER, La'cryma Christi, FANATIC ? CRISIS, and SHAZNA, after Led by four bands will be called Devas to visual, leading to a number of major bands debut. MALICE MIZER, and the other emits a conspicuous band makes a clear distinction, SHAZNA debut single was a big hit in it. In addition, fires a hit PENICILLIN already had a debut. Then he made his debut in the same period La'cryma Christi, and FANATIC ? CRISIS, which made its debut and then persists, PIERROT, DIR EN GREY, and Janne Da Arc. One-man band also appeared live at the venue of the Arena class, PIERROT will update the shortest record leading up to the one-man live at Budokan from major debut, DIR EN GREY had set a record from the period a number of indies in particular. However, the epidemic that also lasted a long time, momentum in the late 1990s the genre called "visual kei" in the major scene is said to decline rapidly. | |||
:I appreciate your effort to negotiate in this dispute, but the document you provided just does not conform to Misplaced Pages's standards for ]. It was self-published on a personal website, not by a distinguished journalist or academic, but a Japanese major with a lack of ambition towards a Japanese-based career. The document itself, while aiming to be comprehensive is heavily opinionated throughout, offers no sources of its own and closes with a file-sharing offer of questionable legality. I'm really sorry, but this site does get us anywhere. - ] 14:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Relapse of the boom | |||
:Judging by a quick look through it is not a genre. To me it names a fashion. ] 16:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
From around the year 2000, the visual system from the public and the music industry had been treated as already obsolete. In the indie and underground scene of countless bands had been milling around, however. At that time, the visual system, there will be more geeky compared with bygone days, was supported by an enthusiastic fan of the part. Moreover, the trend shows the appearance and deeper view of the world which is built to be preference. | |||
More articles that state Visual Kei is a Genre - we still don't have any well researched articles that say it is not one - I think the quote by Kaoru sums it up nicely: | |||
When I entered in 2002, and Visual-kei indie scene is full of change that the band name and CD title Tera~tsu Hiragana Katakana, the odd happened. This epidemic has spread rapidly to the emergence of baroque border is called "fashionable system" from its fashion, it is corruption, calling it "Osare system," said the well-established. | |||
*1. New York Times | |||
*2. Sociology Thesis paper | |||
*3. The Carillon (student newspaper): | |||
*4. Big Take Over.com (music site): http://www.bigtakeover.com/news/japanese-rock-on-npr | |||
*5. The Grammy's website: | |||
*6. J-Music Ignited Japanese Music Site, possible fan site | |||
*7. Asian Pacific Arts Magazine | |||
*8. Punk News.org (Online Magazine) | |||
*9. Fashionline.com (Online Magazine) | |||
*10. Tokyo a la Mode (appears professional, potential fan site) | |||
*11. Blistering (Online Magazine w/ Interview) http://www.blistering.com/fastpage/fpengine.php/link/1/templateid/12842/tempidx/5/menuid/3 "Blistering: Originally you guys were part of the visual kei movement in Japan. Would that be comparable to U.S. glam rock? What did the movement bring to the music scene? Kaoru: When we were growing up around late '80s and early '90s, visual kei was influenced by glam music. When visual kei became a huge hit, people started seeing it as a form of entertainment and not as being rock. The darker, more extreme image from before is lost, and now people see it as being a genre that appeals to teenage girls." | |||
*12. International Music Feed - interveiw with bands that call it a Genre: http://www.imf.com/link_player.html?video_id=2283 | |||
By the time new bands and artists in 2003 to win many Yuku Nightmare,-miyavi-Ya, and the GazettE, a young fan appeared. | |||
Other good ref's for the article - don't mention genre: | |||
*http://home.gwu.edu/~kizyr/thesis-ia/Kaiser%20Farooque%20-%20In%20the%20Local%20Image.pdf | |||
*http://nippop.com/features/ | |||
In 2005, formed the jealkb is Atsushi Tamura of stand-up comedian. Many popular media from the height of the popularity of Tamura, do not deal with the visual system is reported mainly in the activities of the jealkb Tamura, jealkb has contributed greatly to the publicity of the scene as a result of the visual system. | |||
I can start pulling out the Japanese references next - they are probably the best. ] 19:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
In 2006 and reunited the band with the world by storm in the 1990s, such as SHAZNA, 2007 is the year, 2009 LUNA SEA and SIAM SHADE is limited to one day such a dream black, the band was (stop activity) or dissolution already reinstated in, that provided the many topics. | |||
:If they also fail describe inherent musical traits of the "genre", don't bother, as the argument of aforementioned paradox still stands and won't be swayed by mere semantics. - ] 22:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Artists such as increased visual-kei band to release a major label is more than work, to do live abroad, were signs of return of visual-kei boom. | |||
::The word "genre" is defined by American Heritage Dictionary as 1. A type or class: Emaciated famine victims ... on television focused a new genre of attention on the continent" (Helen Kitchen). 2. A category of artistic composition, as in music or literature, marked by a distinctive '''style, form, or content''': "his six String Quartets ... the most important works in the genre since Beethoven's" (Time). AKA - not just "inherent musical traits" - the lyrics, the instruments, etc all come together. Per Kaoru: "When we were growing up around late '80s and early '90s, visual kei was influenced by glam music." It had a style in the late 80's and early 90's that would fit your request for "inherent musical traits ." ] 23:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Epidemic of neo-visual system | |||
In June 2006, Oricon, defined as "system neo-visual" refers to band young and driving force of the boom who relapse, following the interview to "SHOXX" magazine, the current status of the system Neo-visual was reported as . | |||
:::Here's an honest word or two: While trying to push your self-professed point of view on the subject onto this article, you've been grasping for straws ever since, toying with semantics and repeatedly dodging the main argument against your proposed edits, along with the authoritative academic view (van der Merwe's definition of music genres) and the simple logic (no musical characteristics, no music genre) attached to it. You have introduced and re-introduced inconsistencies within this short article, to the point of downright contradiction. Knee-jerk reverts involving the removal of simple navigational elements and assumptions of a sinister agenda against the subject on part of the party that happened to oppose your efforts did not help matters either. | |||
Should be called (the visual system emerged from around 2004) these system neo-visual in recent years, the emergence of new artists is booming at the store each specialized magazines, CD shop, live house. Picked up early artists of the system Neo-visual mentioned here, in the latest issue and listen to the editorial department of "SHOXX" monthly magazine are greeted on the cover the Gazette, in the first: the goodness of "looks, some thing with the "mass upsurge is similar to the way in the sense of idol. "You are also noticeable live, even stronger band of entertainment, incorporating the elements of the play, the fans seem to enjoy the atmosphere of such live." | |||
:::Considering similar '''' on your part to the ] article, that included miniscule sections, redundant images, content that was not covered by the citations you presented it with and a "source" that was actually a copy of an older revision of the same Misplaced Pages article (and it said so, plainly at the bottom), there is the hardening impression of you being eager to jump the gun to ], with little consideration of the quality of the resulting article. I do not enjoy cleaning up after you and I certainly don't appreciate your little game of reverting edits on the sole grounds of not having courtly replied to your talk page musings, completely ignoring whatever rationale has been provided in previous edit summaries. | |||
As for the sound of the bottom line is, until something catchy from a hard, it has been subdivided as in a word is not constricted, although there is also an important factor surface sound such, more of whether like in the point of visual The fan seems to have the emphasis is. | |||
- Oricon Style | |||
:::This discussion is over, until reliable sources that elaborate on the specific musical traits of visual kei turn up. And once they do, you will find that little to no actual discussion will be necessary. - ] 17:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
According to the report of the Oricon, sound itself can be discussed from the perspective of neo-visual system suggests it is barren. If you explore the characteristics of the sound still, from the effects of visual-kei band X JAPAN and LUNA SEA, such as who was active in the 1990s is neither seen without. | |||
::::I responded to your concerns about ] on the appropriate page. As for this article, I am using the word “Genre” for two reasons: 1. Musical Style redirects to ]. 2. All the sources we have state “Genre” so it appears to be the most appropriate tag, my opinions aside. Now, the source you are referencing is a pre-] source (which is something that would take a very long time to explain – post modernism really changed the way we perceive genre and art movements). Also try ] (In all art forms, genres are vague categories with no fixed boundaries.) and ]. All we need is an art/music student with textbooks to resource those. Genre is a tricky and controversial thing – and definitely the articles I have mentioned here need more sources. My disagreement is the choice in calling it a “popular culture movement.” As I have said before, there is nothing, out side of music/bands/musicians that you can call “visual kei”. The ] scene is closely associated with VK – but it not restricted to VK. Just as VK is associated to the Harajuku scene, but not limited to the Harajuku scene. Do you have good, reliable sources that describe Visual Kei to being anything other than “music related?” The reason I use the word genre as opposed to ] is simply because all our references describe it as a genre. If we find better references later, it should be changed. For right now we need to follow what is verifiable ] and avoid our own opinions as to what is “true”. (The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth). I am sorry if I have not made this clear - but this is the point I am trying to express. ] 20:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
However, neo-visual system as pointed out why the barrel of Oricon, of neo-visual system that looks good is the first destination is needless to say that again. Band young the GazettE was called the system Neo-visual swept the top of the charts, Nightmare, Alice Nine, such as Sid, (photo artist) costume makeup and fashionable aware of the upsurge of idle more It was popular in. There are commercial strategy was conscious of the fan to thoroughly whether it be like at the point of this shows that visual. | |||
::::: Ok, what if we were to insert the following text into the body of the article. | |||
Had been suffering from depression as well as CD music scene and other scenes are also neo-visual system. Record companies around the budget of ¥ 100 million, including production costs and advertising expenses and for general master, to produce a single CD. Must spend a great deal of effort to get the profit to recover the production costs 1,500 yen 1,000 yen sold in a single-sheet CD, and spent. In contrast, young band that is around, we have developed a new powerful sources of revenue to compensate for sluggish sales of tickets, as well as goods such as live CD and Neo-visual system and self-produced. It began selling in the selling price is about 1,000 yen a piece of Polaroid photos taken with camera-Cheki instant. True cost of goods manufactured according to the sheet is less than 100 yen a Cheki, and to build a good business model Yohodo profitable than sales to record companies simply produce a CD. Supply and demand situation the results are matched by stunning, selling goods in the band's neo-visual system of Polaroid photos that sell better than the CD has been produced. | |||
:::::: There are many sources which claim that, as well as a style of dress, the term "Visual Kei" can refer to a genre. Unfortunately, these sources either fail to mention any musical characteristics such a genre might have, are unreliable, or are not in English. | |||
In addition, as Oricon have pointed out, relapse of the boom by the band Neo-visual system is localized in the house and live expert called (child Iba parts) of the visual system specializes in media, specialty record store, box V can not be ruled out that was not preoccupied with such movement, to broaden our horizons to the general audience. | |||
::::: That would seem to cover things. I'd suggest that and should refer to some of the links selected above, whereas should refer to the unreliable source quoted above. could refer to a Japanese article sourced by Denaar (This would appear to comply with NPOV, NOR, and all those sorts of things, while covering material for which the sources are unavailable due to Misplaced Pages's ]. | |||
::::: Does that cover it? | |||
::::: Incidentally, just on the point of "What is a genre", I think even Cyrus would agree that Visual Kei is a genre in the broadest sense of point #2 as quoted from the American Heritage dictionary; as defined by the current Misplaced Pages page, it is a genre of the artform "fashion". The argument is whether it is a ''musical'' genre. I hope we can all agree that genre traits don't just refer to music in the narrow sense (tone/rhythm), but includes lyrics and selection of instruments. | |||
::::: Part of the problem here, of course is that Denaar seems to be an ], whereas Cyrus seems to be an ] or ] (more details at ]). There may also be a certain amount of conflict along ] vs. ] lines. | |||
::::: -- ] 07:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
(←) Your proposed change would imply controversy and I was never a fan of making articles reflect talk page disputes. A few bickering editors (that would include me) are just not the same as a notable dispute among press or scholars. The sources we have either use "movement" or "genre" and as nobody writing or being interviewed in those sources takes offense at either wording, it makes sense for us to simply chose the more general term, as the narrower one immediately raises the question "genre of what?". The answer can't be "genre of music", for reasons previously stated, plus the article already covers that; artists associated with visual kei may pertain to about any music genre and we have several sources that explicitly point out this ambiguity. | |||
The Decline of Neo-visual system | |||
As far as compromises go, the fairly general "pop culture" phrasing has been removed, so the subject's predominant association with musicians is as clear as it gets now and I have at all times refrained from calling visual kei a fashion genre, as this wording would probably be the total opposite of what Denaar would like the article to convey. - ] 10:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Boom of neo-visual system from fetal movement after 2002, a relapse from the year 2004, from the band was led by young, went into decline again and the road to the border the Fall of 2009. | |||
::A movement and a genre are the same thing, when we are talking about music - I think you are confusing style with genre. ] 13:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Sony Music is among the three companies of Japan's largest record company, Avex, Universal Music, Avex is from Megamasso and D, and D'espairsRay is from Universal Music Sentai NOIZ universe, Neo-visual decline boom system The major one after another in time began to debut. | |||
== Visual Kei == | |||
This is due to the common problems of the record industry for a major record company to debut the artists, for the convenience of production and organization, that it takes time for well over a year or more. By the time since the debut of the band contemplated a major record companies at the height of the boom, a major debut is actually fulfilled boom was already on one's knees. | |||
My reverts to your edits on Visual Kei should be explained, as to avoid another fiasco involving multiple editors and any controversy. | |||
D is lowered to 37. Second album "7th ROSE" from 11th of the first album "Genetic World" the highest ranking of Oricon chart, Megamasso is a highest ranking of the first album "M of Beauty" is now ranked 76, NOIZ Sentai universe (single "BRAND NEW WORLD" of the highest rank then # 117) to bear, D'espairsRay is the first album "REDEEMER # 158 in the highest rank yet first album is a greatest hits album" GREAT ROCK'N 'ROLL HEROES " "# 39 was the highest ranking. Sentai NOIZ the universe, has been moved to indie label again. | |||
1. A quotation isn't exactly a suitable definition, as that is taken from only one source, and is the viewpoint of the person who wrote the article. | |||
In late October 2009 is the first visual-kei rock festival "V-ROCK FESTIVAL '09" was held at Makuhari Messe. Held rock festivals such large-scale is, for scene visual system at the time, 2009 was exhausted is a good news Notably, the band visual system of many, who appeared as early a system Neo-visual. In addition, securing the degree of expected box office for the purpose of revitalization of the scene, and it is possible also held the following year is expected to greatly . | |||
2. You replaced multiple sources, in favor of a singular source, which could be discussed to add, but not to override everything. | |||
However, there was no V-ROCK FESTIVAL that held for the following year will not be any announcement, which will be held in 2010. In addition, LOUD PARK was held at the same venue at about the same time in 2009, was held as usual in 2010. (Production back stage project) V-ROCK FESTIVAL '09 is, that get them used to be diverted most of the stage setting of (produced by Creative Man Productions) LOUD PARK in 2009, had been saving the cost of production stage . In addition, the sponsor of V-ROCK FESTIVAL '09, cooperation, sponsored by, any of the sponsorship, the visual system in the scene name of publisher has issued a noteworthy music magazine was not published in . | |||
3. The wording you used from the article is rough and not very encyclopedic, it's better suited for journalism. | |||
Was reported even under such circumstances, Sid , the GazettE are performances each at Tokyo Dome in December 2010, and to mobilize an audience of 40,000 people, respectively . | |||
I hope everything is clear, and I would like to eventually work that source into more parts of the article, but it doesn't really change anything for now concerning the main points. --] 21:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Reality and illegal downloads of "popular" Overseas | |||
, "apparently very popular in foreign countries seems to" recognize that the press had been established through a number of media, that the visual system popular in foreign countries has been made in Japan so far. However, the reality is that, with the image that has been unilaterally from the media coverage that was different though, has been clear from the several sources of information. | |||
:The above comment was accidently left on my talk page, instead of here. As stated in our sources, we have clear musical characteristics that define this genre: | |||
Nathan is representative of the site Rivun "HearJapan" music to sell Hogaku towards overseas, for visual kei fans overseas, especially acrimonious letter posted on its website . To quote the abridged below. | |||
:Since it formed in the mid-1980's, X Japan went from playing loud, fast thrash-metal to stadium-shaking pop ballads, in the process pioneering its own genre, a Japanese equivalent of glam rock known as ''visual kei.'' "The Pop Life: End of a Life, End of an Era" | |||
Letter to the fans for the visual system | |||
:Visual kei is a "genre that pulls in elements of goth, glam and cyberpunk" "Kabuki Rock " | |||
Began to act outside the territory of Japan (Omitted), of Japanese music fan base is rapidly expanding, looks like a band finally go abroad, try to source local ties with the fan. Because this flow was more pronounced in the visual system in particular, I aim to enhance the visual system (per the establishment of the HearJapan). However, sales of any genre other than the visual system, it was five times by a large margin compared to the visual system. This does not impact Tsukuse beyond description. Fan that is attached to each visual kei bands Despite the fact that countless sales of the album of the visual system is not performing like it or why, I asked myself. (Omitted) | |||
:"Kaoru: When we were growing up around late '80s and early '90s, visual kei was influenced by glam music. When visual kei became a huge hit, people started seeing it as a form of entertainment and not as being rock. The darker, more extreme image from before is lost, and now people see it as being a genre that appeals to teenage girls." Dir en grey feature interview | |||
After all, the only way to sell the music of the visual system, we found that it is not until just before the release date other than the arm-twisting (and as a result of purchase of reservation). After the release date is, but we would not sell it immediately. Nothing more nor less than a clear reason for this is that, without the permission of the officials who have invested time and money to making music band, or label, music files from being uploaded to the net. Many users on the net, has a pride and joy that to download music for free to fan the visual system of other, more importantly, the right holder (artist, music production, record label it, It is a copyright management organization that has been done without permission, etc.) photographer. This is why after the release date is no longer selling the visual system. (Omitted) | |||
:Since the actual references being used in the article confirm it is a genre, and describe the sound of the genre, it should be included. Anything else is Original Research. ] 22:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Is not a problem only in download sales HearJapan. Although I did you I see your data export CD of some of the visual kei band, but unfortunately, there is a correlation was seen download sales and similar sad HearJapan. This letter is not to tell you about HearJapan loss is suffered. Sales of non-visual-kei genre, but because it is something more than make up for the slump in sales of the visual system. That you want to convey in this letter, it is a problem that it is the act of illegally distribute the sound source on the net, to be brought as a result of their own fans and not only for artists, hopping around. | |||
Are you aware of a passage in ] that concerns syntheses of individual sources to advance a position? Your recent edits did just that. The article still did not offer any insight into the supposed musical characteristics of visual kei, it merely took the likening of it to a selection of other genres and concluded that it has to be a music genre of its own. | |||
I've tried to talk among (not being delivered in HearJapan) and many visual kei bands and labels, I've heard the same story with one voice. From that access from abroad have rushed to the MySpace and official site, they just made an effort to try to sell music to fans overseas inflated expectations, it is a and had suffered a huge loss. (Omitted) | |||
So visual kei "pulls in elements of goth, glam and cyberpunk"? Those terms are only in part or indirectly connected to music (one being a whole cultural movement, the other indeed a music genre, the last a genre of science-fiction) and the first and foremost characteristic they all have in common is the use of extreme visuals. It stands to reason, that western press has to use at least some points of reference when describing a foreign and relatively obscure cultural movement to its readers at home. And still, none of the sources brought forward so far mentions which (if any) musical traits visual kei adopted from those western phenomena. | |||
To translate accurately the information of the band, and Just You take the encoding of music files, the page of the site must wear a tag, advertising, a phone call for confirmation to the band and there are no problems with this everything based on the request of the band I also multiplied many times, was subject to losses. Compared to the band has suffered loss, are insignificant such as the loss of me. You, even as the storm drew praise from the world a million people released something with all the force of one's being, was produced by using time and money, and finally saw a really stupid to not get a penny Now that you have and I just, want to continue such a thing again. To me, so I do not think so. (Omitted) | |||
Another example of synthetic information ending up in the article would be the use of the term "glam metal", cited through a source that just individually mentions the genres glam rock and thrash metal. Strangely enough, the information that visual kei may actually be connected to music from just about any genre remained in the article at all times, rendering your revision patently contradictory. And also at times somewhat careless, at least I for one would welcome it, if you refrained from leaving your revisions with . - ] 13:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
However, the biggest excuse, "I am making are introduced to the many fans of the band further. A lot of fans (make out from the user is illegally on the Internet to distribute music files without permission of the copyright holder) is the claim that there is no problem from "the band has helped me with. This is true also include a piece of certainly. I've seen download (illegally) is any, had been turned to J and J rock fans from rock fans, however. Now that you share files and music from J to J rock fan rock fans, the band will not help one bit. That the new fan is produced because there is no sound. Speaking can be brought in illegally uploaded to the net, that is about to kill all of the profits they would be obtained from the band album was produced by the disastrous struggle (even financially). Fan, and I will pay money to the music will be provided for free does not. To say that over ten thousand fans outside of Japan already, reason to be distributed free of charge there is no music anywhere. I, we are well Zonji of the visual system that the fan base, have been greatly enhanced by these illegal activities. However, I have also noticed the fact that sales have not increased at all of the album of the visual system. | |||
::Please read the above comments - we have ample references that show visual kei the music genre was influnced by glam rock (another genre). Usually journalists do refer to one genre by describing another - that is normal. Also arging "you cannot use one source" and "you cannot show multiple sources that say the same thing" is contradiction. It isn't synthesis unless you come up with a new idea, combining two different sources. If two sources say the same thing, that isn't synthesis. Frankly, word games do not change what the sources say. Also please refrain from blanketing phrases with resources that do not cover what is said in that statement of phrase - I haven't reviewed the current article in detail but you have done this previously, so please do a double check. ] 15:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
"''please refrain from blanketing phrases with resources that do not cover what is said in that statement of phrase you have done this previously''" | |||
] (]) 19:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Care to provide a few diffs for that accusation? Your constant bad faith assumptions are becoming just a tiny bit unnerving. - ] 16:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Translation from Russian wikipedia == | |||
:: Bishonen aethetics? The way this was quoted, it appeared the article mentioned the word Bishonen (not a common english word, and not a encyclopedic word either, which was why it was removed). This is the kind of edit I mean. By having resources that "appear" to valid the language, without actually supporting what is being said, it makes what is written appear more reliable than it is. Most the article was OR at that time - yet you stanchly defended any changes to it. Making changes to an article shouldn't end up being a "war" or a "fight" - but that is what this page has been for a long time now. | |||
I'm going to take a stab at incorporating information from the Russian version of this article into the English version. Is there any particular information I should incorprate? | |||
One other thing on a personal note, "when linking to policies or guidelines, do so in whole phrases, not wiki shorthand" - it will really help clarify why you are reverting things. When you first began discussing with me, I could not see how any of your changes related to the guidelines you linked to (I'm still not sure on many of your changes) - and I mean this in good faith. ] 16:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 21:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Request for comment == | |||
== External links modified == | |||
Disagreement over the question whether the Japanese phenomenon visual kei should be defined as a genre of music, a genre of fashion, or, in a wider sense, an artistic/cultural movement. 00:26, 5 September 2007 (UTC | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
;Statements by editors previously involved in the dispute | |||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: | |||
* Of all the reliable sources on the subject that have surfaced so far, not a single one describes any defining musical characteristics of visual kei. They merely discuss matters of appearance, some likening it to certain Western phenomena, all of which sport very distinct, visual themes of their own. Hence it would be ill advised to present readers with a so-called "music genre" that apparently has no inherent musical traits at all and this would also contradict several sources which explicitly state, that artists associated with visual kei may pertain to just about any music genre.<br />Conversely, while the "visual kei" moniker (lit. "visual style") and all verifiable characteristics suggest a phenomenon that is limited to looks alone and therefore a genre of fashion, this might be too narrow a denomination as well, given that there are arguably close ties between the subject and Japanese music scene after all. Hence phrasing the article in a more general way, referring to a cultural phenomenon or art movement, appears to be an apt compromise, sufficient in accuracy and encyclopedic style. - ] 01:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928204954/http://www.grammylive.com/Latin/News/Default.aspx?newsID=2278 to http://www.grammylive.com/Latin/News/Default.aspx?newsID=2278 | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' to let others know. | |||
* The ambiguity of the defining musical terms does not justify adding genre related tags to th article. Each article only seems to mention it as a musical genre to avoid a lengthy explanation as to what Visual Kei is, and how it varies. Adding all the different descriptors would make the article read like journalism, as it would be a POV of the article's most recent editor. The sources given in the article do mention some stylistic similarities already within the article, and go further to accentuate the visual aspect, rather than the auditory. The stress added here should be enough to consider the topic a "style" or, as Cyrus said, an "art movement", to encompass the musical ties of the visual genre. The word genre does not have to be avoided, but it should be used with caution, as the word is most commonly associated with music, rather than fashion or art. Some sources on the non-musical culture surrounding Visual Kei would assist, as the style spreads into the underground fashion industry, and does not strictly pertain to music. --] <sup>'']''</sup> 01:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}} | |||
* I am going to comment at the bottom, since I'm running a little late in joining the commentary. Please note - this is not meant to be a definitive answer to what Visual Kei is, but to help provoke thought and discussion. | |||
Cheers. —]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 04:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
:As I read about Visual kei I keep coming across Japanese sources that state things like "Cali Gari is a band that does not sound like typical visual kei." It leads me to ask... what does typical visual kei sound like? | |||
== External links modified == | |||
:The argument we have here is over the definition of two terms, so this is where we should begin: | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
:1. What is a music genre? | |||
:2. Is glam rock a music genre or a fashion style? | |||
:3. Is Visual Kei a music genre? If so, what does "typical visual kei" sound like? | |||
I have just modified 6 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
:1. If look to our own ] page: "A music genre is a category (or genre) of pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language" (Peter van der Merwe 1989, p.3). Music may also be categorized by non-musical criteria such as geographical origin, though a single geographical category will normally include a wide variety of sub-genres. A music genre (or sub-genre) could be defined by the techniques, the styles, the context and the themes (content, spirit)." | |||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imf.com/link_player.html?video_id=2283 | |||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.grammylive.com/Latin/News/Default.aspx?newsID=2278 | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011140930/http://asiaarts.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=7936 to http://www.asiaarts.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=7936 | |||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://jrockrevolution.com/2008/11/webzine/interview-with-angelo-250 | |||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bounce.com/article/article.php/3419/ | |||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.blistering.com/fastpage/fpengine.php/link/1/templateid/12842/tempidx/5/menuid/3/ | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
:Some have suggested that we go only by Peter van Der's description - but that conflicts directly with the descriptions of "genre" that the All Music Guide - which is well respected - uses. One example: "Rock & Roll is often used as a generic term, but its sound is rarely predictable. From the outset, when the early rockers merged country and blues, rock has been defined by its energy, rebellion and catchy hooks, but as the genre aged, it began to shed those very characteristics, placing equal emphasis on craftmanship(sic) and pushing the boundaries of the music. As a result, everything from Chuck Berry's pounding, three-chord rockers and the sweet harmonies of the Beatles to the jarring, atonal white noise of Sonic Youth has been categorized as "rock." That's accurate -- rock & roll had a specific sound and image for only a handful of years. For most of its life, rock has been fragmented, spinning off new styles and variations every few years, from Brill Building Pop and heavy metal to dance-pop and grunge. And that's only natural for a genre that began its life as a fusion of styles." | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
:2. Is Glam rock a music genre? | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 11:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
:Again, a link to the all music guide - showing it is most definitely a genre: | |||
== The word Movement == | |||
:3. Visual kei is described as a "genre" by many sources, and I do not think this is lazyness. The descriptions that decribe it as "influnced by glam" are describing the sound of early visual kei bands. From ]: | |||
The word "Movement" has always stuck me as a words you would use differently in Japanese then English - in English, it can mean "a group of people working together to advance their shared political, social, or artistic ideas" or "a campaign undertaken by a group of people working together.. The thing is - Visual Kei was coined by a critic that was critical of the bands he was describing; the bands adopted it. I changed it to "label used" which is accurate and sounds natural in English, and I hope that's not controversial among editors here. In English, "Movement" tends be used for Art, Politics, Social Groups. In music, a "movement" is a section of music, so that word isn't really used as it has another meaning. Generally we say "Music Scene" instead of "Music Movement". ] (]) 19:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
:"In the West, nearly all music except Traditional music has a fusional(sic) origin. A fusion genre is a music genre that combines two or more genres. For example, rock and roll originally developed as a fusion of blues, gospel and country music." | |||
== Visual kei or not visual kei == | |||
:Therefore, if a source describes the sound as a fusion of several different styles or genres, that doesn't mean "it cannot be a genre". | |||
], were Glay and L'Arc-en-Ciel visual kei or considered as visual kei between 2000-2009? Was it Hyde or someone else individually? It can be read they were "originally visual kei", "have not had any association with the movement since their major label debut" and so on. Their visual appearance and performance wasn't shocking anymore since the 90s. Seems like people are confusing visual kei acts with general Japanese rock scene. | |||
:Since my definition of genre is of a broad scope of music, as opposed to a sub-genre or specific style, I certainly allow for the long term development of sound - how many rock genres elsewhere stay exactly the same for 20 years?* (Assuming we consider the late 80's and X Japan the start of Visual Kei). | |||
Gackt always emphasized visuals, performance and shock effect, also stating his connection to visual kei or being a VK-singer. He also had toned down appearance in comparison to his MM days, but it is a rare example of a VK act/person that has reached such "pop" mainstream. Hence, it is a bit strange, apart of Gackt's sales and Tokyo Dome etc., what other big & mainstream name, sales or event happened 2000-2009? It almost looks like Gackt carried alone the visual kei's mainstream for almost 10 years. ] (]) 08:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:It is also interesting to note that Glam Rock was very successful in Japan in the 80's, ] and ] being examples. (Yang Jeff, Dina Can, Terry Hong, (1997) Eastern Standard Time pg 264 New York: Mariner Books ISBN 0-395-76341-X). Why not continue to call these bands "Glam" (as this book in 1997 called X Japan along with all other Japanese rock of the 90s). Why should a different term emerge? (Among fans of Japanese music in the late 90's, I commonly heard "Japanese rock is stuck in the 80's, it is all Glam rock".) | |||
:Without a reliable source, what you're saying is ]. I know it's not easy to find sources for Japanese acts (especially older stuff), but even if I were to agree with your assessment on Gackt being the only one (which I don't), in this specific instance I have to say claiming that a single person was the top act or carried an entire scene for a decade might even fall under ]. If you find one reliable source saying something like he was the best-selling VK act of the 2000s, then I personally would be OK with adding that specifically, even though it would be false in my opinion. | |||
:As for whether or not Glay, L'Arc-en-Ciel or any other act should be considered visual kei for only a specific time period or if they ever stopped being VK entirely, that's a huge can of worms. In your personal opinion Glay's visuals weren't crazy enough to be VK in 2000–2009, but then they were a headliner of the Visual Japan Summit in 2016. So you're suggesting we can mention Glay in this article in the 1993–2000 and 2009–present sections, but not the 2000–2009 one? You're talking about dissecting every single band's visuals for every single year. Every rock band has an image to some degree, who gets to decide what the minimum requirements for VK are and what's "shocking" or not? (] is one that never made sense to me). Your suggestion of excluding bands for specific time periods is just way too intricate and circumstantial for me to support. I'm perfectly fine with going by an "if they were VK at one point then they can be mentioned in this article" criteria. ] (]) 19:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:Good examples of early 90's Visual kei would be the song "Celebration" by X Japan or "Rosier" by Luna Sea (both readidly available on youtube). | |||
::Agree, the addition about Gackt was rushed and mostly based on general information without citing secondary RS, but I do recall reading something along the lines in secondary RS in Japanese language, but considering how bothersome would be searching it is fine. | |||
::Agree, said it well. My commentary about Glay and L'Arc wasn't only based on my personal opinion but secondary sources - saying they only originally were visual kei. I did not suggest something like that neither have a clear opinion about mentioning them or not in specific decades - please don't put ideas and words I didn't say. What are reliable sources and context claiming and/or showing Glay and L'Arc being self-reported and perceived as visual kei after 2000 and before 2016? L'Arc isn't even part of the .--] (]) 19:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:Visual Kei does have many "sub-genres" which can be sourced as well. A sub-genre that cropped up in the late 90's is known as Kotekei (Kote means thick and syrupy - used to describe bands like early Dir en Grey). Some current bands that are described as Kotekei are here: , . Also - this is just for fun - an advertisement of a band looking for members for a "kotekei" band: If you read much English fan writing circa early 2001 about Visual kei you'll hear about "Matina Clones" and "Dir en Grey copies" and how "all these bands sound the same". (Side Note: There are 10 subgenres listed on the Japanese wikipedia page, and it lists visual kei as a genre.) | |||
::To be frank, it is really not clear enough what makes somebody visual kei or not, also, personally, seeing almost no "visual kei" in X Japan and Luna Sea post-2000 as well yet are still kinda perceived/reported as such. It is almost like visual kei became just a brand-marketing name without clear meaning and reference to cultural trend (similar to ]).--] (]) 19:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::I wasn't suggesting it was only your opinion that they weren't VK at that time. I am aware that there are sources stating that both bands have toned-down their appearances and that there is question whether or not they can ''currently'' be considered VK. I wasn't denying that. But weren't you suggesting that Glay and L'Arc's success from 2000–2009, which surpasses Gackt's and therefore would mean he was not the "top act", is irrelevant because they weren't VK at that point? And you just now asked for sources confirming they were VK between 2000 and 2016. What I said at the end of my previous reply was that I view the idea of requiring sources to support a band to be VK for their entire career, or for any specific periods of time, to be excessive and not feasible. | |||
:::"To be frank, it is really not clear enough what makes somebody visual kei or not". That's kind of exactly what I'm saying. There is no definition of VK, neither musically nor visually. Everyone, including journalists, are gonna have different opinions on what qualifies as "elaborate hairstyles and costumes". I am of the opinion that as long as they were considered VK at one point in time, then is doesn't matter if they stopped putting their hair up, and anything they accomplished in their career is relevant to this article. This article mentions how some acts toned-down their appearances over the years. That's good enough, it doesn't need to detail each one. ] (]) 21:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::I agree, that is good enough, but it is a legitimate question whether and when a music act "was" visual kei. It is something factual, also needed considering NPOV because otherwise some acts could be included/excluded although were/weren't visual kei anymore. It possibly gives the readers wrong impression. I won't be discussing further this issue. Thanks for the feedback, all the best.--] (]) 00:49, 3 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
:From sources I've read, the "extreme diversity" of Visual Kei didn't start being written about in English sources until after ] made their first trip to the United States. I admit this blows me away after spending years arguing that "not all visual kei sounds exactly the same." | |||
Is there any sort of consensus or precedent for why this article isn't italicizing "''kei''"? it seems like it should pretty straightforward outside of a few specific edge-cases like "]" or "]". ] (]) 01:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
:As for assertions of a fashion style surrounding Visual kei, it is generally refered to as "Gothic and Lolita" in Japan - terms which have little reference to the english equivalents. (NHK Tv show on Gothic and Lolita - not sure how to source that one - Japanese news report). Gothloli when used by fans tends to mean something specific, but when used by the Japanese media or general Japanese public, it tends to describe a wide range of clothing styles. | |||
:Visual kei is a term only used to describe bands, which are described as wearing costumes, not fashion styles. | |||
:I would suggest that the first move toward expanding this stub is to block out a few different topic areas (maybe one being history, as suggested by the "good articles" page). | |||
:My main point is that we start shaking things up and let the stub become an article; start finding sources and fleshing it out. If we encourage people to dig for sources and bring them all together, then the page will be fleshed out and sourced. | |||
:As suggested reading: | |||
:*''Visual Kei no Jitai - Rock. Kesho. Gender'' ISBN 4787232169 | |||
:*''Watashiwa "Visual Kei" Data Goro.'' ISBN 4812421918 | |||
:*''Watashimo "Visual Kei" Data Goro.'' ISBN 481242643X | |||
:First book is from a analytical perspective. Last two books are by Ichikawa Tetsushi - the "Godmother" of Visual kei - a respected journalist who worked for the magazine "Rockin On" and ], and has a slew of other books under her belt as well. ] 03:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:*I have to make this brief, as I am departing soon. With the thorough research and sourcing you've done, maybe a musical genre label could be applied to the page, but in a broader sense. Maybe not to say that visual kei is strictly a genre of music, but (as was mentioned earlier) a genre of art in general. The musical aspect could be brought into a section, "Visual Kei as a musical genre". As I think few equivalents can be found (explaining the difficulty in classification in the aforementioned English articles), maybe a mention of some of the characteristics of music applied to visual kei culture should be added. I'm going to stick with the idea that it should not be introduced as a "musical genre", but as an all around art, as the bounds of visual kei are so endless. More to be added later. --] <sup>'']''</sup> 21:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::As this is a discussion page, I am interested in your thoughts about the "non-musical" aspect(s) of visual kei. ] 04:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:* I agree that it would be great to see the article being expanded in scope and detail, yet I do hold a few concerns regarding aforementioned "research". First of all, our own article on the subject of music genres is probably not the best place to look for suggestions right now, has it has severe verifiability issues and incidentally, the only part of the lead that is referenced through an authoritative source is the bit about the "basic musical language". Thus the notion that a music genre may be defined through non-musical properties remains in ] and in that regard, it is noteworthy, that while the All Music Guide's brief summary of rock and roll history illustrates the development and broadening of a genre, it does not fail to mention musical traits that were characteristic for certain periods.<br />On the other hand, most sources on visual kei stop short of doing just that, while others not just don't describe any original/pure form of "visual kei music", but explicitly state that music associated with visual kei may ''be'' (not just draw influences from) any genre. Josephine Yun, author of one of the few English books on Japanese rock music is quoted, for an article published on Grammy.com no less. A good indication, that we are dealing with at least somewhat informed writing, or in other words, a reliable source, which should certainly be preferred over anecdotal evidence, based on certain bands or songs. Again, nothing wrong with expanding the article, as long as verifiability is not relinquished. But as editors, it is still not in our place to correlate individual sources and draw circumstantial conclusions from them, since this would constitute ]. - ] 23:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::While I disagree with your reading of the All Music Guide's description of the Genre of Rock, I agree that further information on Genre is needed. I have made some initial research into this issue, and will report back when I have more sources (so far I have one really good source, many sources talk about genre but do not define what they mean by the term). Now, Josephine Yun is a journalist and I am sure that the facts that are listed in her book are very accurate, and I am interested in reading what she has to say. I do admit i have reservations on her opinions, as she claims in her book that ] is one of the . ] 15:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
;Comments | |||
* The article itself says, "The music performed encompasses a large variety of genres." The sources (the ones I could read) tend to treat is as a visual and not musical style. It appears that it would be a conclusion of Misplaced Pages editors to treat it as a musical genre rather than a presentation style. ] 02:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
* It seems a very vague term that seems to just mean costumed musicians, therefore not really tied to any particular style. --] 00:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
* It appears the term began as a form of music and does have sources using it in that way. From there, it appears the term became used more generally to refer to a sub-culture or fashion movement. Since there is more than one dimension to the meaning, all the aspects should be addressed in the article. For example, this article should be part of both the music genre and fashion Wikiprojects. That's not a conflict, it's a valid combination of cultural influences, just as it is also part of Wikiproject Japan. I've made a few edits to the article, with references, and written more about this in . --] ] 01:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
== What is Visual Kei == | |||
Many of you don't seem to know what Visual Kei is, please learn Japanese and read about Visual Kei history (The Japanese article is a good place to start) It is much more creditable than this English version. (It has been updated to be more precise, but is likely to be undone by someone) As for the meaning of Kei, a reference to a Japanese dictionary has been provided to show it means System, and not Style. It is a type of rock music, the same way that Shibuya-Kei is a type of Pop music. Go to Japan, learn Japanese, and learn about Visual Kei from there. Stop posting rubbish! {{unsignedIP|219.90.146.98}} | |||
:I believe, I already provided you with most of these pages on ], but just in case you missed that: | |||
:* ] | |||
:* ] | |||
:* ] | |||
:* ] | |||
:* ] | |||
:* ] | |||
:* ] | |||
:* ] | |||
:* ] | |||
:* And one of my personal favorites: ] | |||
:These should help putting your recent editing here and on the ] article into perspective and show you in what ways they were inappropriate. - ] 12:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Reliable sources were provided and recently updated to include fools mate articles, you just ignore them. As for this article, sources have been provided about what Visual Kei means, and from Oricon. | |||
You have no basis for your statements, if you edit this article in major way, it is vandalism. I will notify admins and request a protection be placed. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::Before someone wipes the history section - most of it seems to be confirmed in the articles 219.90.146.98 just linked, so I'm requesting that section be left for a day or two, if people are ok with me going back and making sure we have a source for everything, line by line. It does agree with information I have read in magazines about the history of Visual kei before. ] 14:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC) EDIT: Nevermind - It looks like everything in this article is listed in the references provided, I'm working on explaining. ] 15:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
I will provide an explanation on what Visual Kei means in Japanese. Visual System is correct, but more correct meaning is "Visual Group". History of Visual Kei from bounce.com is good source. {{unsigned|Jun kaneko}} | |||
== Semi Protected == | |||
I vaguely recall another ip revert warring on this article. Lets see how a 3 week semi-protection goes. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 14:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
This page was recently vandalised by user Cyrus X111. | |||
He removed sources for the history on the subject, replaced it with none. Moreover the correct meaning of the word was removed (there was a source to a Japanese dictionary confirming it) This user, along with a few others, continue to vandalise this article, along with others to suit their opinon on subjects. Providing no reliable sources for their information, and simply stating their personal opinon. They do not understand the Japanese language, and have provided the wrong meaning to the word. Here is a Japanese dictionary confirming my allegations for this word. http://eow.alc.co.jp/系/UTF-8/ | |||
Is this not against wikipedia rules? it is vandalism, is it not? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:06, 8 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== What is Genre, Part II == | |||
"A genre is a set of rules for generating musical works." ... "Genres are, however, more intersubjective than subjective phenomena. In each temporal and spacial context, there are certain genre definitions that are relevant and used by the most important groups of actors in the musical field: musicians, producers, marketers and audiences." | |||
The following article is probably the best source I've read about style and genre. The use of "genre" comes from journalists with "film, cultural, and literary studies" backgrounds. (This is why "classical" or "art" music is described in "movements," while "popular" music is described in genres). Style is the type of sound, genre takes other factors into account such as lyrics and subject matter. | |||
Now, this source linked by Jun Kaneko Is number 13 series of articles to "teach" about different music types. It does say that Visual Kei can be defined bands that use makeup, costumes, and a sense of presentation, as well as presenting a unique/pecuiliar view of the world. It does not have "one single music style" you can point to, however, it is considered a genre like in the same mannar as "Shibuya Kei" which there is no "cohesive" sound to. (Check out: ). It says "Basically the foundation is New Roma and LA Metal sense of gender neutrality, along with the image of goth etc, emulating all of the following - Lolita, Psycopath, and Occult interests, grotesque and taboo topics, with a radical sent of taste and individual sensibility. It started with a hard rock and heavy metal sound, as well as being influnced by ]'s beat rock and punk. Classical music and Industrial have also been big influences. | |||
Then, it goes on to talk about the history, labels, important bands, and a suggestion of albums to listen to. My translation was done way to quickly just as a way to get it down on this page, but this is definately a source that explains the genre in terms of substance (Lyrics and motivations) as well as describing the influences on the sound. ] 17:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:They simply refuse to understand, and I believe those users can't speak Japanese. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::I do actually speak a fair amount of Japanese, and I can assure you that although you view the Japanese article as being "correct", not all of its content is up to standard, the non-English wikis will never be a source for one another, and I don't see a single source within the Japanese article, implying that it could all be original research. The exernal links on the page (if those are to be sources) do not include the vast amount of information on the Japanese article. --] <sup>'']''</sup> 20:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::To clarify: By article you mean the Japanese wikipedia article? I was stating that the reference that I linked to in my comments covers most/all of the the information on the page that he modified here, I wasn't speaking about the Japanese wikipedia article. ] 01:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::I'm sorry, none of that was directed at you, but rather "Jun Kaneko". Some of the material I was replying to has been removed or relocated though. Sorry for the confusion. --] <sup>'']''</sup> 05:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
You see, he is blindly looking over it. The new external links and references have nothing to do with the Japanese article. It has to do with the history of Visuak Kei, provided by a reliable source within the Japanese music community!! Furthermore, there was a dictionary reference provided to explain the correct meaning of kei, and another link from Oricon explaining the rise of neo-visual kei. The Japanese article simply reflects these sources! | |||
Denaar's translation is not too bad at all. It is a sub-genre of music. you can argue all you like, but we provided reliable sources within the Japanese music community. {{unsigned|Jun kaneko}} | |||
From music superstore HMV Japan. http://www.hmv.co.jp/bestsellers/index.asp?category=1&genre=100&style=102&theme=102006 | |||
They list Visual Kei as a sub-genre, along with other rock sub-genres, such as rockabilly, and metal. The following is said about Visual Kei "Rock bands, whose appearances are as important as their musical expressions" and refer to X Japan, and Luna Sea as key bands in that genre. ] 01:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
References that need to be incorporated into this article (as well as some information from the 12 references I listed above): and . If no one objects, I am going to add a History section back to this article, as it is not a part of the current RfC ] 03:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:No objection to the addtion of a History section, but please maintain consistency with the current article in style and content. - ] 03:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
The previous version did, prehabs you should of read it. ] 03:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Moreover, in the current version, there is a link to a Dir en grey interview (which really has little to do with this article) apart from this sentence "When we were growing up around late '80s and early '90s, visual kei was influenced by glam music. When visual kei became a huge hit, people started seeing it as a form of entertainment and not as being rock. The darker, more extreme image from before is lost, and now people see it as being a genre that appeals to teenage girls." | |||
It states the history of Visual Kei, which was influenced by glam music (Japanese bands such as, X Japan, Colour, and Dead end) and it says people started to view it as entertainment, and a '''genre''' aimed at teenage girls, and not as rock music. Since rock music in Japan is associated with bands like Blankey Jet City. ] 05:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
==a term with more than one dimension== | |||
I'm new to this page and made a few edits on the article today. While I have not been participating in the talk page discussions so far, I have read the whole page and many of the references. | |||
I am aware that a Request for Comments is pending and am interested in seeing what new viewpoints are brought from that. In the meantime, I based my edit on the suggestion put forth by ]; I've seen his excellent work on other music genre articles, and it seemed to me he had the right idea so I implemented it. | |||
Many music-related articles have long disputes over details of definitions. I've found that often the best way to proceed is to just find whatever sources can be found, and relate what they have stated, according to ]. If that means relating that there are multiple definitions for something, that's OK. Someone mentioned above that they would prefer that the talk page conflict not enter the article text. Unfortunately, sometimes that can't be avoided. It's always more pleasant to have an article that's clear and direct with no confusion, but when there are differences in the actual sources we are reporting, we can't make our own decision about which is correct - we need to report the various views as they are stated in the sources. | |||
Most important is to avoid ] and ] where separate sections of the article go with each direction. Instead it's better to let the conflicting viewpoints intertwine within the text of the article and wherever there is a conflict expressed in the text, make sure to include references. When peer-reviewed journals or scholarly works are not available, or even books or mainstream magazines or newspapers, we have to use whatever sources we can find. With a topic like this one, there is no question it's ], so the issue becomes one of confirming each conflicted statement is ]. | |||
In researching the references for the sentence I added, I was able to find sources that use the term as a music genre, and sources that use the term for both a music genre and a style of fashion - or a subculture identity in a way. But I was not able to find any sources that stated it is specifically a fashion style unrelated to music. There may be some sources like that, but I couldn't find them. However, since I had read the talk page and saw that was one of the big concerns, to keep the article NPOV, I included that aspect in my edit as well, and placed a citation needed tag there in hopes that someone can find the needed reference to support that part of the content. --] ] 01:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Indeed, I used to be opposed to having the article reflect our little dilemma here, but after reading your revision and above rationale, the idea of "forwarding" any sort of decision making on the disputed matter to our readers is rapidly gaining in appeal. And given the recent state of this discussion, this approach may even be quite straightforward in its own way. I have given the article another quick rewrite, in order to more fully integrate the definition issue into the whole text. | |||
:As you may have noticed, the genre infobox, as well as the respecitve categories and WikiProject entries are no longer present, since their employ would constitute a decision on our part after all, kind of defeating the purpose of providing readers with aforementioned open phrasing in the first place. The extensive quotes/paraphrasings in the references are gone as well (as least for now); the sheer length of them seemed somewhat impractical for an article this short (though that might be a matter of taste) and also complicate matters when certain sources are cited multiple times. - ] 04:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for concurring that the best way to address the controversy is to let the readers see for themselves how the term is used. But your "''quick rewrite, in order to more fully integrate the definition issue into the whole text.''" seems to have inadvertantly removed most of the references I added. Since I'm sure that was not intentional, I've reverted your change. | |||
::You changed so much of the article in one edit, it was difficult to see what you did, that's why a revert was needed. It seemed like your rewrite of the text may have been good, but I couldn't tell because so many references were removed at the same time. | |||
::If you would edit the text to make the improvements you're suggesting, and do so without removing the valid references, then it's quite possible I and others would concense your edit. But please do not remove valid references that are valuable to the article. | |||
::Regarding the Wikiprojects, including those on the talk page does not do anything at all to change the content of the article. It does not make the article say anything other than what the text of the article says. Wikiproject templates simply allow the members to notice the article and join in the discussion. Since this topic is related to both rock music and music genres, those projects are interested in this page. While there might be some sources that consider Visual kei to be fashion rather than music, there is no doubt at all that it started within the realm of music and that the related Wikiprojects are appropriate to be listed. | |||
::What you called ''"extensive quotes/paraphrasings"'' are exact quotes, not paraphrases. They are valid sources and there is no reason to remove them. The purpose of including the quotes in the footnotes is to make it easier for readers to see how the footnotes apply, without having to load the references pages and search for the information. I did not modify any of the text in the quotes, other than in one or two, use ellipses ... to omit intervening information that was not relevant. There is nothing impractical about the length of the quotes. If someone wants to read them, they can, and if they prefer not to, they can skip them. | |||
::I invite you to improve the article by better integrating the statements as you mentioned in your edit summary. If you don't like the way the references are listed, you may be able to improve their formatting as well. But please do not remove them. If nothing else, this article needs more sources, not less, per core policy ]. --] ] 05:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::Actually the only sources you added, that did not make into my recent revision are the student newspaper (due to ] concerns) and the Josephine Yun interview excerpt (as Yun is already quoted extensively in the Grammy article). Arguably, that is less clear without the quotes (not paraphrasings, my mistake there), I will look around a few featured articles later today and see, if I can find any footnote/citation model that would satisfy the previous and the new model. In the meantime, the sources from Grammy.com, UCLA Asia Institute, the New York Times and Fashions Online are in the article and will remain there, I also added back the interview excerpt, one of the Japanese sources that Denaar discussed earlier, as well as the apparently most prevalent translation for "kei". - ] 10:22, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
On a side note, I would appreciate it if further editing was not hindered by vaguely descriptive edit summaries (without talk page posts to further elaborate on them) or reverts that occur without attempts to address rationales provided by previous editors. A consensus that supports either end of the spectrum exists neither on talk page nor reference level and the article currently reflects that diversity among sources and subsequently includes information either side in this discussion considers vital. Lastly, quotes for the second paragraph references have again been added, albeit in a shorter form, addressing previous length concerns and also following the formatting consensus that ] appear to reflect. Thanks to the most recent source provided by Denaar, that paragraph now also fully complies with ]. - ] 16:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Please do not call other editor's work as "disruptive" when it is trying to reach a neutral ground. Your edits, specifically "while others primarily define it through its looks" and the associated quotes below, ''remove further context'' from those sources. You make it appear, by taking the quotes out of context, that they confirm your statement. However, if you take the articles as a whole, they do not confirm your statement. This is what I mean by your changes "not having a Neutral POV." ] 16:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
I don't recall referring to your recent, or for that matter any of Parcifal's edits as "disruptive". Regarding the phrase you mentioned and the citations provided with it: The defining characteristics of visual kei, that these sources care to actually describe are indeed limited to visuals. We already discussed some of them in that regard and it's that "stopping short of actually describing a musical style" issue again, that has previously led several editors (not just me, mind you) to consider visual kei either solely a form of presentation or a wider artistic concept. Hence the phrase "primarily defined through its looks" is an entirely valid way to represent what these sources have to say and it adequately forms the middle ground between "visual kei has these specific musical characteristics" and "musically, it can be anything". ] 17:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
*"while others primarily define it through its looks" | |||
:Resource 7:"Most GothLolis cite that they are merely imitating their favorite bands from the visual rock genre, known as "Visual Kei"... "Music is a major force in its creation. Visual Kei is exactly as it sounds: Rock music that incorporates visual effects and elaborate costumes to heighten the experience of the music and the show." | |||
:This reference is stating that it is a genre of Music, and how that music genre influences Gothic Lolita fashion. It does not describe Visual Kei's music, however, it is an article on fashion and the Gothic Lolita subculture, not visual kei. Therefore it does not agree with the statement above - it point blank says it is a music genre. You can find similar influences between "Punk" and "Goth" the music genres, and "Punk" and "Goth" from a fashion or subculture point of view. I would say based on this reference, we need a "Gothic and Lolita" subsection, that would link to the main subculture article, Gothic Lolita. | |||
:Resource 8: "It’s a very diverse genre and, of course, Japan also now has its own sub-genre called “Visual Kei” and I tried to include some bands from that genre as well." | |||
:Again, this source confirms it is a sub-genre of Japanese rock (a genre confirmed by the All Music Guide). | |||
:Resource 3: "Since it formed in the mid-1980's, X Japan went from playing loud, fast thrash-metal to stadium-shaking pop ballads, in the process pioneering its own genre, a Japanese equivalent of glam rock known as ''visual kei.'" | |||
:Once again, this source calls Visual kei a genre, and this one specifically defines a sound "Loud, fast thrash-metail combined with stadium-shaking pop ballads" - a combinataion used by bands like Dir en Grey. | |||
:By writing "some consider it a genre, why others only define it through its looks" (implying that these sources do NOT consider it a genre) you are presenting information that does not agree with the sources. I think we should avoid vauge language that implies things the sources do not confirm. ] 18:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::I concur with Denaar's comments above. | |||
::Also, I concur with this idea Denaar mentioned: ''we need a "Gothic and Lolita" subsection, that would link to the main subculture article, Gothic Lolita.'' I welcome editors to add that new section when convenient. --] ] 18:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Nonsense== | |||
This article contains so much nonsense, many of you have been proven wrong so many times, yet you still argue without a case. Where are the reliable sources that state that Visual Kei is NOT a genre. Japanese sources were provided, and now others have provided reliable English sources. Where are the sources that state Visual Kei has mainstream popularity in Japan? A dictionary source was also given to show that Kei does NOT mean style, or refer to it in anyway. ] 05:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks for your comment - please add new comments at the end of the page so they appear in chronological sequence. | |||
:I've taken your advice and removed the designation of "high" popularity in Japan since we don't have a reference for how popular it is. --] ] 05:44, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:About the meaning of the word kei | |||
:http://eow.alc.co.jp/系/UTF-8/ | |||
:http://jisho.org/kanji/details/系 | |||
:http://linear.mv.com/cgi-bin/j-e/jis/dosearch?sDict=on&H=PS&L=J&T=%1B%24B7O%1B%28B&WC=none | |||
:Input 系 to search http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/cgi-bin/wwwjdic.cgi?1C | |||
:Input 系 to translate http://nifty.amikai.com/amitext/indexUTF8.jsp | |||
:Input 系 to translate http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en | |||
:Are anymore sources required? ] 06:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::I appreciate your help, and it appears that we are in agreement that there are no sources (so far) that state "Visual kei" is not a genre. Unfortunately I don't understand what those pages are showing. I have no experience with the Japanese language. The work I've done here has been based on sources I could find in English. According to ], we need sources in English, or we need translations of other language sources along with their original text so the content can be verified by people who speak both languages. | |||
::Also, is this question really about the meaning of the word "Kei"? It seems that the term "Visual kei" applies to a genre or style of music, and/or the way the musicians dress and perform. That has been verified in sources in English that we can use without translation. | |||
:Yes that is correct, but it does not mean Visual Style, it means '''Visual System''' ] 07:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::The unverified question is the part that refers to "visual kei" being anything "other" than a genre. I have not found any sources to indicate that; I only left that in the text out of respect to other editors who have argued it is not a music genre. My personal impression after reading the references is that it is indeed a music genre and the other uses of the term should be removed. Currently, those other uses do not have sources, so unless someone can find and add those sources, that text should be removed and the article should clearly state that "Visual kei is a music genre, with an associated style of fashion" or something similar to that. --] ] 07:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::: Visual Kei is often described as J-Rock bands that concentrate on fashion. The problem is the misunderstanding of the term genre. Many people wrongly believe that a music genre simply defines differences in style of music. It doesnt it can be any definition, in this case the defintion is the fashion and not necessarily the style of music. Also there are bands considered Visual Kei that dont fit the J-Rock genre or dont fit in with the style of other bands but simply use the fashion. This creates some confusion as seen here. --] 01:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:This article was updated many times to include that information, but certain users continued to revert it back to the previous version. Removing reliable sources, and replacing it with nothing but their own personal opinion. ] 07:52, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::OK, I understand. I have edited the first line of the article to remove the word "style" from the translation as you described. The dictionary defintions I found were "system; lineage; group", so that's what I used, and I added two supporting references. If you advise that the words "lineage and group" should be removed, we would need a dictionary entry or other reference that shows they do not apply, because they were included in the two references I found. Thanks for your help with this. --] ] 08:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::I don't believe "lineage; group" should be in there simply because it makes no sense in this context and "system" is what is obviously meant here. 系 as "lineage" refers to family lineage, something incompatible with the topic. <font color="blue">-]] <small>]] ]]</small></font> 05:45, 14 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::I agree with you, but I don't speak Japanese, and the references I was able to find included all of those words. I think it's clear from the way the article reads that "system" is the correct word, so it doesn't seem like a problem. If we could find a reference that specifically defines "Visual kei" as "Visual system" that would be cool. But if you want to change it to leave out the other two words, I would not revert... though if someone argues about it, we might have to let those other words back in because that's what the references provide. So, at this point, I'll leave it to you to decide if you want to make the edit or not. The word that was there previously was "style"; that word is not supported by references at all, so whether or not you make the edit, we should not use "style" as the translation. --] ] 06:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::::Well, I do, and there's a lot of ambiguity in these sort of cases (although you could make a case for any sort of language being this way, I suppose). I'll make the edit, if someone argues go ahead and revert and we'll go from there. <font color="blue">-]] <small>]] ]]</small></font> 09:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
"Wooty is correct, I did post about it before, but I did not know if my English explanation was good, so I deleted my post. ] 07:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
===Previous Version=== | |||
This version, 14:14, 8 September 2007 219.90.146.98 | |||
:It included everything, in a more detailed and professional manner, and should of been updated with the newer sources provided by Parsifal. As the current version still lacks vital information. {{unsigned|Jun kaneko|09:32, 10 September 2007 UTC}} | |||
::Good idea, I've restored that section. --] ] 18:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:There are some little errors with the history section I wrote. Nothing important, but this line "The band Colour is often regarded as influencing much of the femininity associated with modern Visual Kei, along with the bands D'erlanger, and Dead End." could be edited to be more precise, such as "The bands D'erlanger, X Japan, Colour, and Dead End are regarded as influencing the fashion and music associated with Visual Kei bands." | |||
:This line "the band X Japan is credited with inventing the term "Visual Kei", which drummer Yoshiki Hayashi described as "Visual Shock" can be edited to more precise, such as "The band X Japan invented the term "Visual Kei" when drummer Yoshiki Hayashi, used the term to describe the bands slogan "Psychedelic Violence Crime of Visual Shock" | |||
:This line "the death of lead guitarist Hideto Matsumoto in 1998 had signaled what many called the end of Visual Kei" needs to be changed, as my English describtion was not good. This is more precise "the death of lead guitarist Hideto Matsumoto in 1998, denied fans a possible reunion" | |||
:This line "It was not until 2007, when annoucements that X Japan, and Luna Sea would reunite, that Visual Kei bands would see a boost in popularity again, which has been labeled as "Neo-Visual Kei" needs to be more precise, such as "It was not until 2007, when the accouncements that X Japan would perform a tribute concert to Hideo Matsumoto, and Luna Sea would reunite, that Visual Kei bands would again see a boost in public awareness. Which has been described by the media as "Neo-Visual Kei" | |||
:If my English does not make sense, please correct it. | |||
:Moreover, in the section "See Also" Zoku has nothing to do with Visual Kei, and should be removed. ] 07:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you for this good information. I am willing to make these changes, but I feel it would be better if you do the edits yourself. That way, when someone looks at the history of the article, it will be clear that several people are collaborating, and it is not just me writing the article myself. | |||
::Your English is good enough, you don't need to worry that it might be confusing. After you make the changes, I would be happy to review them and smooth over any small problems that might turn up. | |||
::If you would rather not do the edits yourself, let me know and I will do them. But please feel comfortable making changes when you see they are needed. You have valuable knowledge and I welcome you to improve the article. | |||
::Also, I would like you to know that your suggestions have made the article much better. And the history section added a lot of value. Thank you for your contributions. --] ] 07:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::I am unable to make the edits myself, as I have recently joined. I also thank you, and Denaar for the help in making this article more correct, and providing reliable English sources. ] 08:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::OK, no problem. I've made the edits according to your notes. Please review what I wrote to confirm it is correct. --] ] 08:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
I have used the English version for the word "Colour" but the band did use the USA version "Color" that should be updated. Anyway, thank you. ] 09:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
== The meaning of "-kei" == | |||
:"{{nihongo|'''Visual kei'''|ヴィジュアル系|vijuaru kei|lit. "visual system"}}" | |||
''System''? This is nonsense. You could possibly come up with this word browsing through the literal meaning of the kanji itself, but that's a misguided approach to any language's hip speak. Saying ''visual kei'' means "visual system" is a bit like saying ''rock concert'' means "a plan, devised by two or more big lumps of mineral". "-kei" in this use (and several similar others) simply means "connected to", "in connection with", "with an emphasis on" etc. ] 19:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Which is what the word "system" means! ] 23:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Also "style", which might be appropriate here. System is too technical a term to apply here, because it implies a level of formal organization that doesn't really exist; otherwise the genre could never change, which it did. ] 00:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)\ system | |||
Not in the Japanese language. Furthermore, your comment about systems being unable to change is silly.] 00:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:These sayings ゲーム系、アイドル系、アニメ系、 クラブ系、 ストリート系 do not refer to style. (game style? idol style?) For someone who has a "masters degree" in the Japanese language, you should know this, and these terms. ] 00:45, 16 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Well, attacks aside, I did some searching, because I've never come across kei in any other usages besides music terms. In context, ゲーム系フラッシュ is not "game system flash" or "game-style flash", but rather "game-related flash", which might be a better translation. Being a long-time Japanese speaker, I'm sure you would agree that the language is contextually dependent. "Visually-related" would certainly fit the bill here. ] 00:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Those terms are colloquial. In Japanese, it is referring to a "group" and the combination of everything that creates that group (a system) | |||
:When you travel to Japan, you will notice many "kei" as it is a very common affix in Japan. ] 03:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
=== Japanese pops === | |||
The term J-pop (Japanese pops) is used to denote any Japanese musician, it does not solely refer to the genre of pop music. There is not such term as "J-rock" and it is a foreign fan-made term. To understand, please travel to Japan, and browse Japanese music shops. ] 13:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:I'm sorry, but you've really got a lousy attitude here, being a foreigner yourself, so cut it out. You're not the absolute authority on this by any means just because you live in Japan. | |||
:The fact of the matter is that this is an English-language encyclopedia, and if the term is used and verifiable in English (which is very clearly is), it is perfectly valid to use and be referenced. There are CD shops based in Japan that use it because they cater to international customers, for example. | |||
:I'd also point out that I've done exactly what you require, and the classification system varies ''in Japanese'' depending on where you go. I've seen stores use the following terms ''in Japan'': J-pop, Rock, domestic and international (both in English and Japanese), and visual, all for the same types of things in varying degrees. Don't assume that no one else has your experience. ] 15:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
I never said no one else has any experience, Denaar has clearly shown experience regarding this article. There is only a lousy attitude towards those that deserve it. You have been to Japan, but you argue there is J-rock, is rock music from Germany, France, England, known as G-rock, F-rock, E-rock? J-pop is used to describe musicians from Japan, not the genre "pop music" - Jun Kaneko | |||
::No one is ever going to like this page 100% - what is important is we try to comprise to the best of our ability. Usually the best thing is just to stick to what the sources say; we might not like it but it is usually better than someone else's opinion we don't agree with. ] 03:43, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Since it is an article relating to Japanese culture, it should reflect what is actually true in Japan. I don't care anymore, most of you need to visit Japan, where you will receive a rude-awakening. - Jun Kaneko. | |||
Since personal credentials such as Japanese skills and first-hand Japan experience keep coming up on this page, I'd like to remind everyone of the ]. Personally, I would not bank on ] actually making a living as a musician in Japan. His editorial and talk page conduct have repeatedly revealed an aggressive the-ends-justify-the-means attitude and strangely enough, all his IP based edits made before and after registering his Misplaced Pages account were consistently made from Adelaide, South-Australia. WHOIS is a wonder of technology. - ] 03:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Family life is a wondrous thing, sometimes, people like to visit their family, for many months! An aggressive attitude is necessary towards morons like you, that bastardize the Japanese language, and culture. - Jun Kaneko | |||
:Credentials aren't provable unless I start scanning my credentials (which I'm not going to do), but I'm not going to try to win an argument based on personal experience. However, as far as the dictionary goes, most "kei" usage is in music, fashion, or nations, it seems, and I simply don't think "system" is an appropriate translation. Very few, if any, Japanese words boil down to the same thing in all contexts, which is why it is a very hard language to learn. ] 04:47, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Did you not visit Tokyo? every major district has a "Kei" affix, and in those districts are lots of other "kei" it is not related to the context, and it was explained before. Furthermore, I would like you to write in Japanese, why you think "Kei" should be known as style, and why system does not apply - Jun Kaneko | |||
:Reminder to you both - we are looking at the LITERAL translation (as it says lit.) and not a measure of context. I believe it's 'system', but you are welcome to your opinion. <font color="blue">-]] <small>]] ]]</small></font> 10:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
::I would say in this context it is likely "group" as in group of people - but definately system, group, and linage are all real definitions of the kanji. ] 12:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
=== new edit === | |||
I've just came across this page and I've changed the "literal" translation at the very top from the cryptic "visual system, lineage, group" to simply "visual style". I see that there has been a somewhat baffling debate here, not much of which seemed to revolve around the meaning of -kei. For the purists who may push this point, the absolute literal meaning of 系 is "string"; and system, linage, group and any other meanings you can come up with were all extended meanings from the abstraction of "string". The problem with East Asian language is that you can hardly ever translate anything literally, because it would just turn into pure nonsense. I've chosen the word "style" here because, much like the term -kei, it is quite vague and overused, and could fit in most context i could think of. ] (]) 04:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Use of non-english sources == | |||
use of non-english sources for an english article is discouraged unless there is a translation or as a very last resort. --] 02:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Actually, that's not what the policy says: ] - If English sources aren't of the same quality, non-English sources can be used. It doesn't state to provide a translation, however if one is provided, the original Japanese text should be available as well. Most the English sources we have are not extensively researched and tend to have a narrow focus (such as only current bands or only one band). The consensus on this page early on was that we needed Japanese sources. Only two are used for the article. ] 02:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
==X-Japan and Popularity== | |||
"In 1992, X Japan launched an attempt to enter the European and American markets, but it would take another 8 years until popularity and awareness of Visual Kei bands would extend worldwide." | |||
Although that is true, it might want to be noted that X-Japan themselves did gain some popularity in the U.S. towards the later part of their career (93-94) when they were first around, although not from the Visual scene. They had a following from Power and Progressive Metal fans, and have had videos on the original Headbangers Ball.] (]) 01:28, 7 July 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:15, 25 August 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Visual kei article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives |
Facts - I will rewrite it
It's more than obvious, this article is one lost step to reality of visual kei and is talking only about X Japan, what in reality weren't that note as visual kei (because their more normal style). Father of real visual kei who were note about costumes, performance and scene all around, were now-defunct Malice Mizer (their singer, Gackt called prince of visual kei). Today Versailles and Moi dix Mois, is VISUAL KEI (VISUAL STYLE) what should be more note. X Japan, Luna Sea, Dir en Grey and younger bands "had" Visual Kei but with years became more suit for mainstream that just J-rock or Visual Kei in general. (for example, look at the GazettE history) There is different story behind it.. and Japan isn't just rock and pop there are many views to talk about it.
While regarding Japanese pops section; J-POP is Japanese popular music, anything and everthing that exist on musical scene. Other "genre or styles" aren't officially confirmed, but they are (in this case of visual kei and J-rock) style of the musician. But, J-Rock never gain in popularity only because, in Japan is more popular a catchy-one week song than a rock song. People there never totaly looked at rockers as real artists (in comparation from USA who are just posers), but as entertainers. Is different place, world and how things are, J-Rock will be always more than a third thing, - behind Enka and big number of J-POP singers. But either, there are rock bands-boybands who aren't count as J-Rock, but are popular. Either overseas never heared..
Samurai left a great impact of self-peace, while Rock is something different (or just mis-understanding) and I think neither 29% like it. In other hand, a great importance is in what region this band is playing, it's history, label house etc. In political way, their lyrics are (again, from USA non-sense) something* they don't want to be listen. Type of living is more slow but fast, and must work. For some company man, musicians are just entertainers without a school, paper. He is like "nothing", but is "something" (for example Yoshiki, who has respect). It is very complicated thing to talk about.
One of worst written articles on Misplaced Pages. I will re-write it as soon as possible.
Do NOT change anything because page will be RE-WRITTEN.--GreyWolfy (talk) 10:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Genre Discussion
This dispute of whether visual kei is a music genre or not has been going on for a number of years now, and it seems like people have edited everything to claim it is both: a genre and a fashion movement. But as stated above, in the old genre discussions, it is not a music (sound) genre as there are no musical (sound) characteristics that every visual kei band has. For example: Kaya's (Electronic music), Anti Feminism's (Hardcore) and Kagrra's (Traditional Japanese music) music are nothing alike, yet everyone would agree that they were/are all visual kei bands.
This is not a definite decision, someone please try to provide reliable sources that give these necessary defining musical (sound) characteristics of the visual kei music genre. Sources that claim "visual kei is a music genre" or "a specific band is visual kei, therefore that band's genre is one of visual kei's many", but do not provide the whole genre's defining musical characteristics, are useless. If, in a reasonable amount of time, no one has provided these, then it is clear and settled that visual kei is not a music genre and the article, and every related one, will be edited to display this. Or, if need be, a part in the main article, not the beginning, describing how a number of fans believe it is a music genre contrary to the facts, can be added. Xfansd (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- What you have suggested violates the Misplaced Pages policy "No original research" WP:OR. We cannot decide if visual rock is a genre or not. Instead, we have to find third party sources, and report on what they state. The issue above was resolved by this statement:
- However, other sources state that the term refers primarily to a style of dress or fashion, or sub-culture, and not to a genre of music, and some sources use the term in both ways.
- It was eventually removed as no reliable source stating visual is not a genre could be found. Denaar (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know which of my suggestions exactly you are referring to with the WP:OP remark. But you have dodged the genre dispute entirely and are changing the discussion to something else. Before you can write an article with proper research and under a proper format you must decide on what the topic is (is it a genre or a fashion?), this effects how the article will be written and how others can edit to improve it.
- "Some sources state that Visual Kei refers to a music genre, or to a sub-genre of J-rock with its own particular sound, related to glam-rock, punk and metal." This sentence, one of the few that refers to actual music, says "its own particular sound" but there is nothing to describe what this unique sound is. How is it different than glam metal and punk? With this vagueness one is forced to assume that visual kei's sound is all these combined all the time and that every band has this sound, which we know isn't true. Again, sources that describe how the sound is unique are needed to prove it is its own genre and not everything combined, but none are supplied. However sources that claim it is not a unique music genre are not needed since there is no proof that it is one, so nothing needs to be disproved. Therefore the article should be changed and focused on to what is clearly proven and agreed upon, "visual kei is a fashion movement among Japanese musicians, characterized by the use of make-up, elaborate hair styles and flamboyant costumes". We know the fashion is different than that of glam, because of "influences from Western phenomena, such as goth and cyberpunk" which glam didn't have, this makes the visual kei fashion unique and worthy of its own article. Please keep the discussion to: whether it is or is not a music genre. Xfansd (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Before you can write an article with proper research and under a proper format you must decide on what the topic is.
- This is incorrect. Misplaced Pages editors do not decide if visual kei is a genre or something else. Instead they find sources and report on what they say. If an editor decides "what it is" and pushes that "point of view," that would be against Misplaced Pages guidelines WP:NPOV. To then write about a point of view without resources would violate original research WP:OR and Verifiability WP:V. These concepts are so important that they are called the "Pillars" of Misplaced Pages. Ideas that can't be backed up with references can't be incorporated into Misplaced Pages. You have an opinion that visual kei is not a genre, but neither my opinion or your opinion matters to the discussion of the content of this article. Denaar (talk) 01:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is not simply my opinion that it is not a genre but a fashion, you yourself have proven it in the article with proper sources. However you fail to completely prove it is also a genre by not providing the unique musical characteristics of the genre. It is not a music genre as there are no musical characteristics that every visual kei band has. Is this simple and straightforward enough for you to finally focus on the actual discussion that I created this section of the talk page for, which you suggested I do? Xfansd (talk) 18:09, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Editors provide verifiable resources, not "proof". We have verifiable resources to confirm visual is a genre. I am unaware of any policies stating that "proof" is required for music genres in the manner you describe. Please provide the links to those policies. Denaar (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
Firstly, remember that Misplaced Pages's focus is on verifiability, not truth. What the majority of reliable sources state should generally be accepted at value, though if there are sufficient sources dissenting then there should be some mention in the article of all points of view, for balance.
In the context of this article, I see Visual Kei as a similar concept to Glam Rock, in which the genre is defined by a distinct visual style, spread across a diverse range of musical styles. I think you'd be hard-pressed to prove a common musical element across all glam rock bands, but nevertheless it is considered a genre and appears in the infobox of various artists, such as Iggy Pop. My opinion on this matter is that there's no need to 'prove' a common musical component to Visual Kei bands, and there should be no problem with including Visual Kei in the genre field of their infoboxes. If the sources imply controversy over whether or not the genre actually exists from a musical perspective, include the sourced dissenting views in the article. As it stands, the sourcing for Visual Kei strikes me as very similar to glam rock, which is fairly broadly treated as a genre.—TechnoSymbiosis (talk) 02:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC) |
Fashion style
1. What was the drastic change in appearance that accompanied the successes of X Japan, Luna Sea, and Glay? Didn't those three bands' appearances change very little if at all between their last indies releases and first few major label releases? I don't remember any of these bands having a moment of drastic change (more of an evolution over time) other than when X Japan members cut their hair, which was well after they were already successful.
2. I see a lot of debate regarding whether visual kei is a real musical genre. Along the same lines: is it a real fashion style? What defines it? For example, caligari looked nothing like Malice Mizer and X Japan in its early days didn't look like either of them. As a fashion style it is even less cohesive than it is as a musical genre. I would say it's a broad musical genre and a scene more than it is a specific fashion style. I think the current first paragraph of this article describes it as well as can be hoped. Ibanez100 (talk) 23:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
"Musical genre" sources vs. "fashion style" sources in lead paragraph
After taking a closer look at the citations for the lead paragraph, I am somewhat confused as to their usage. The three citations for the last sentence do all emphasize visual kei bands' costuming, but they also all explicitly use the word "genre" to describe visual kei. Shouldn't these then also be used to cite the "genre" statement? Two of them also explicitly support the statement that the sound of visual kei is related to glam rock, punk, and metal. Conversely, three of the sources used to support the "glam rock, punk, and metal" statement could also be used to support the statement about the emphasis on costuming and presentation.
In other words: the language in the lead implies that the sources used are in disagreement as to what "visual kei" means, when in fact the sources all seem to be in agreement that visual kei is a musical genre related to glam rock, punk, and metal, in which costuming and makeup play a key role. Have I misunderstood something about why each source was chosen for each statement, or do all these sources say a version of the same thing? I don't see any of these sources saying either "it's A not B" or "it's B not A". Ibanez100 (talk) 21:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
machine translation of Japanese Page
Summary
Calling it "visual kei" is often a catch copy of X JAPAN HIDE was invented called "PSYCHEDELIC VIOLENCE CRIME OF VISUAL SHOCK" s yuan is . Aside from the music level, as the word refers to the band issued a hits by flashy makeup, belonging to the "word-new word epidemic" in 1997 along with the terminology and "complex systems" and "Calm system" . After that, came to be used for male but not limited to the field of music. In "Encyclopedia of Japan slang" In addition, the quoted text of the "curse the darkness" is the work of the Hang Seng valley, which is an example of using the girl for not a man . It should be noted that this language has become a word-class in the "Visual Kei" even outside the territory of France, such as .
In the example above glossary-Japanese dictionary is represented as "visual system" either. However for the notation of this page is, "SHOXX" "FOOL'S MATE" "Cure" "Zy music magazine the visual system as of March 2008 that using" visual kei "according to the notation of newspapers" .
Trends and features
Musical features
Basically a rock band which also, pop rock and heavy metal of the underlying hard rock J-pop is mainstream. Tend to prefer the ones carrying the flowing melody of minor adjustment to the overall dark intense melody is strong.
The early band, LUNA SEA and X JAPAN of system ecstasy, ZI: and put the band that sings lyrics in decadent aestheticism often to the foundation, such as Goth and New Romantic KILL, a hard rock and heavy metal, was kept constant and the respective power of punk, including anti-social lyrics are rebellious COLOR with a focus on things like a rock beat D'ERLANGER, the system label Free Will, and Kamaitachi.
The band has exploded in the late 1990s, many who were affected by the black dreams and from LUNA SEA, then, since the beginning of the 21st century music styles, including elements such as mood songs and rock mixture The epidemic is.
Many things were "aggressive" "masochistic" "introspective" As the trend of the lyrics. And the most familiar and tragic love song backlash against outside claims and criticisms facing more political, less is the main, basic dark insidious thing has been interpreted as a royal road. However, the recognition that the visual system with the general public by SHAZNA hit on the cover of popular song in 1997 and was seen as the traditional image of a population far removed from Dark Colours. Has created a lot of followers later in the year 2001, a band and a unique melody and lyrics of a song play on words, such as Showa cali ? gari appeared, but did not lead to big sales. Trend in 2006 was said royal road to both lyrics and music are concealing shadow. In addition, visual-kei bands in the 1990s when the epidemic, there was also called "ban jokes" as tacit consent for some reason, this is also about the person who pointed out the differences with the band as the visual system of the early days not a few. However, the band was also incorporated into the theme of music as the functional beauty of DIR EN GREY. Janne Da Arc, etc. There are expressions that use some sensual music, with lyrics from a female perspective, that is does not sound like vulgar only.
According to Marty Friedman, the visual system in Japan is that they have a width of music very broad in fact that by the achievement of X JAPAN, is widely recognized in general, while the cornerstone the heavy metal is also about the melody. Pleased to announce the beautiful ballads such as "Say Anything" from the music of ultra-high speed ultra-aggressive, such as "Silent Jealousy" is the original X JAPAN, melody, but prefer one person should fit into a certain width We, the fans have accepted it. And that it is evidence of X JAPAN has been established as a brand appearance along with the sound .
Features an appearance
Visual-kei band costume play (MALICE MIZER)
Visual-kei band fashion has changed dramatically increase in line with the times.
Until the early 1990s from the early days of the late 1980s, such as in dark makeup and ornate hairstyle that erect them with the colors gold and red flashy, such as long hair is up to about the waist, and flourished in the United States in the late 1980s were many things to extremes, such as those rock and traditional fashion of "hair metal" such as Poison and U~orento. It was vertically total wound a bandana parted in the middle DEAD END, the hair was to stand the total sink next to COLOR, the hair was then vertically total dyed your hair red and blue for the first time was Kamaitachi.
From that contained in the age 1990, YOSHIKI of X JAPAN was wearing a dress feminine at the same time as incorporating the piano in the band, which is a perversion of the mental image of aesthetic and cosmetic medieval women to penetrate begin. Because it was exposed to criticism and social accident that killed a fan due to stampede in the concert COLOR was engaged in a live Violence is masculine in the same period, also did not appear followers of them, the visual system was going to accelerate it to a women.
Later, also appeared from the forces of positive influence from punk or gothic, dark image of what is aesthetic, but more diverse things pop, such as those of Dark Colours On the contrary, their derivatives also other Deattari order to reduce discrimination and was conspicuous for what purpose, such as. However, the values that appeared then by MALICE MIZER, rather than a role as a fashion, that express the view of the world simply with that band was born. In addition to a wide variety of late style is derived in the 1990s that was popular in the general visual system. And, in a band that is attached to the back office is great and will this time, no longer uncommon to come wearing a costume custom made to order.
Become epidemic of the 21st century and beyond visual system has left its diversity is also faded away, just like in the scene of fashionable rather than for self-assertion, and many of them. Although popular in fashion and Psycho le Cemu cali ? gari was exceptionally prominent, followed by bands such as is not out. There is also the rise of the band to be active in the costume and fashionable as pop baroque, a style that became fashionable period, then a band of like make-up fuel a sense of fear of those who see the rise was.
Was often displease an opportunity that you did break and major debut, no less band make-up becomes thin after that, continue to change to something rough costumes, from the fans that "flattery in general" by it was. To have a band, "says order to have listened without prejudice to more people" for this was, it's often easiest to or changed the music you want to do simply, Or was kinda burdensome, in order to concentrate on the music more was often told in the motive was to interfere with.
In line is shifted to punk pop is far from black like a dream, if you also increase the male fans, and collaboration or another unit of the genre, success in the royal road of catchy rock songs like GLAY then, such as form a is supported from the fan base broad, or transformed into a band of people from the category of the visual system, from gaining popularity in certain as DIR EN GREY, goes forward the route a maniac in the deep single-mindedly, band was also going to earn more core fans. ZIGZO had been referred to as the visual system because it was not serious, then the makeup from the beginning. Staging is also a genre very important, do not move the band to play while standing in place in the concert all the members is negligible. Was also in the band with dance music does not have a musical instrument as MALICE MIZER to incorporate skits like whitewashed system. Characteristic of the fan
Band because there are a lot of emphasis is the configuration of the only men in the looks, the fans are young women in their early 20s have the majority from the die 10. In the fan, the person who dressed the unique atmosphere of the band along (such as cosplay punk, Gothic, Lolita, Gothic Lolita, Decora, the band members) are often found.
Visual system at the time the 1980s the word was not born yet, more than a few bands were present Yosuru the male fans. Fashion of those bands, and the current fashion of the visual system, unlike some Western influence from the band was seen. Currently, the typical fashion of the time age 80 is already recognized as obsolete. Fashion of the current visual kei bands, ranging from young mogul, from the 80's at that time was greatly transformed. It is not an acceptable thing for male music fans, as a result, the visual system has lost a large number of male fans.
Bangyaru gear that man, a woman a man of an avid fan of visual kei bands.
The history of the visual system
The dawn of the visual system
Between mid-term from the early 1980s, the basis of the visual system began to establish positive punk by the band of Gothic-AUTO-MOD, Madame Edowaruda, et al. PHAIDIA. In hard rock / heavy metal scene of the indies, and common sense X JAPAN, such as COLOR, of rock band until it is far removed from that band of style and began conspicuously significant activity in the Kanto and Kansai and about the same time. Their activities, as at that time very innovative and established his own independent label, and to expand the promotion of innovative advertising ads such as free distribution of sound gig, to the media, in the indie scene after the conduct that has built the foundations ahead than anyone else, the strategy become mainstream.
Both of these bands, but very deep exchange, representation of fact was contrary to the spirit and emphasis of metal and punk, music and emphasis. At the time was said to Dynamite Tommy "YOSHIKI of the East" merged with "COLOR X of east and west", west of this phenomenon. From now on, referring to their activities, a variety of musicians would like to established his own label. The end of the band and boom, the rise of the visual system
In the early 1990s, on the other hand of the end of the boom band, visual-kei rock band of fans that had emerged, such as black and LUNA SEA has been a dream debut. SHOXX magazine will be launched at the same time.
Also what had been active as a band beat and rock hard rock, heavy metal, at that time popular will subside in the form of these genres is pushed to the rise of the visual system, and the intention of the person according to the epidemic, or In some cases, were seen as been forced to circumstances due to factors such as the record company offices and sales strategy by affiliation, such as requests for commercial, including its music, not forced to migrate in the form. Then and became the band's most commercial element becomes stronger, spirituality as a lock is to be diluted. Or been affected by that area, appearance of male fans was rarely seen in visual-kei bands from this period.
About the band also in the band was hit on the other hand, increases or the popular and well known, and enough high evaluation of music, has been recognized world wide, then is characterized as the visual system, such as depth of makeup has faded ~Tsu many things. There is a rock band regression, such as a metal band to a pure original, to change direction, such as punk, because of a change in direction of rock music, such as to issue a stronger color is common.
Epidemic and decline
Around 1997 the word visual system is used extensively, was established as a genre, due to intense push, such as "Break Out" program TV, said MALICE MIZER, La'cryma Christi, FANATIC ? CRISIS, and SHAZNA, after Led by four bands will be called Devas to visual, leading to a number of major bands debut. MALICE MIZER, and the other emits a conspicuous band makes a clear distinction, SHAZNA debut single was a big hit in it. In addition, fires a hit PENICILLIN already had a debut. Then he made his debut in the same period La'cryma Christi, and FANATIC ? CRISIS, which made its debut and then persists, PIERROT, DIR EN GREY, and Janne Da Arc. One-man band also appeared live at the venue of the Arena class, PIERROT will update the shortest record leading up to the one-man live at Budokan from major debut, DIR EN GREY had set a record from the period a number of indies in particular. However, the epidemic that also lasted a long time, momentum in the late 1990s the genre called "visual kei" in the major scene is said to decline rapidly. Relapse of the boom
From around the year 2000, the visual system from the public and the music industry had been treated as already obsolete. In the indie and underground scene of countless bands had been milling around, however. At that time, the visual system, there will be more geeky compared with bygone days, was supported by an enthusiastic fan of the part. Moreover, the trend shows the appearance and deeper view of the world which is built to be preference.
When I entered in 2002, and Visual-kei indie scene is full of change that the band name and CD title Tera~tsu Hiragana Katakana, the odd happened. This epidemic has spread rapidly to the emergence of baroque border is called "fashionable system" from its fashion, it is corruption, calling it "Osare system," said the well-established.
By the time new bands and artists in 2003 to win many Yuku Nightmare,-miyavi-Ya, and the GazettE, a young fan appeared.
In 2005, formed the jealkb is Atsushi Tamura of stand-up comedian. Many popular media from the height of the popularity of Tamura, do not deal with the visual system is reported mainly in the activities of the jealkb Tamura, jealkb has contributed greatly to the publicity of the scene as a result of the visual system.
In 2006 and reunited the band with the world by storm in the 1990s, such as SHAZNA, 2007 is the year, 2009 LUNA SEA and SIAM SHADE is limited to one day such a dream black, the band was (stop activity) or dissolution already reinstated in, that provided the many topics.
Artists such as increased visual-kei band to release a major label is more than work, to do live abroad, were signs of return of visual-kei boom. Epidemic of neo-visual system
In June 2006, Oricon, defined as "system neo-visual" refers to band young and driving force of the boom who relapse, following the interview to "SHOXX" magazine, the current status of the system Neo-visual was reported as .
Should be called (the visual system emerged from around 2004) these system neo-visual in recent years, the emergence of new artists is booming at the store each specialized magazines, CD shop, live house. Picked up early artists of the system Neo-visual mentioned here, in the latest issue and listen to the editorial department of "SHOXX" monthly magazine are greeted on the cover the Gazette, in the first: the goodness of "looks, some thing with the "mass upsurge is similar to the way in the sense of idol. "You are also noticeable live, even stronger band of entertainment, incorporating the elements of the play, the fans seem to enjoy the atmosphere of such live." As for the sound of the bottom line is, until something catchy from a hard, it has been subdivided as in a word is not constricted, although there is also an important factor surface sound such, more of whether like in the point of visual The fan seems to have the emphasis is.
- Oricon Style
According to the report of the Oricon, sound itself can be discussed from the perspective of neo-visual system suggests it is barren. If you explore the characteristics of the sound still, from the effects of visual-kei band X JAPAN and LUNA SEA, such as who was active in the 1990s is neither seen without.
However, neo-visual system as pointed out why the barrel of Oricon, of neo-visual system that looks good is the first destination is needless to say that again. Band young the GazettE was called the system Neo-visual swept the top of the charts, Nightmare, Alice Nine, such as Sid, (photo artist) costume makeup and fashionable aware of the upsurge of idle more It was popular in. There are commercial strategy was conscious of the fan to thoroughly whether it be like at the point of this shows that visual.
Had been suffering from depression as well as CD music scene and other scenes are also neo-visual system. Record companies around the budget of ¥ 100 million, including production costs and advertising expenses and for general master, to produce a single CD. Must spend a great deal of effort to get the profit to recover the production costs 1,500 yen 1,000 yen sold in a single-sheet CD, and spent. In contrast, young band that is around, we have developed a new powerful sources of revenue to compensate for sluggish sales of tickets, as well as goods such as live CD and Neo-visual system and self-produced. It began selling in the selling price is about 1,000 yen a piece of Polaroid photos taken with camera-Cheki instant. True cost of goods manufactured according to the sheet is less than 100 yen a Cheki, and to build a good business model Yohodo profitable than sales to record companies simply produce a CD. Supply and demand situation the results are matched by stunning, selling goods in the band's neo-visual system of Polaroid photos that sell better than the CD has been produced.
In addition, as Oricon have pointed out, relapse of the boom by the band Neo-visual system is localized in the house and live expert called (child Iba parts) of the visual system specializes in media, specialty record store, box V can not be ruled out that was not preoccupied with such movement, to broaden our horizons to the general audience.
The Decline of Neo-visual system
Boom of neo-visual system from fetal movement after 2002, a relapse from the year 2004, from the band was led by young, went into decline again and the road to the border the Fall of 2009.
Sony Music is among the three companies of Japan's largest record company, Avex, Universal Music, Avex is from Megamasso and D, and D'espairsRay is from Universal Music Sentai NOIZ universe, Neo-visual decline boom system The major one after another in time began to debut.
This is due to the common problems of the record industry for a major record company to debut the artists, for the convenience of production and organization, that it takes time for well over a year or more. By the time since the debut of the band contemplated a major record companies at the height of the boom, a major debut is actually fulfilled boom was already on one's knees.
D is lowered to 37. Second album "7th ROSE" from 11th of the first album "Genetic World" the highest ranking of Oricon chart, Megamasso is a highest ranking of the first album "M of Beauty" is now ranked 76, NOIZ Sentai universe (single "BRAND NEW WORLD" of the highest rank then # 117) to bear, D'espairsRay is the first album "REDEEMER # 158 in the highest rank yet first album is a greatest hits album" GREAT ROCK'N 'ROLL HEROES " "# 39 was the highest ranking. Sentai NOIZ the universe, has been moved to indie label again.
In late October 2009 is the first visual-kei rock festival "V-ROCK FESTIVAL '09" was held at Makuhari Messe. Held rock festivals such large-scale is, for scene visual system at the time, 2009 was exhausted is a good news Notably, the band visual system of many, who appeared as early a system Neo-visual. In addition, securing the degree of expected box office for the purpose of revitalization of the scene, and it is possible also held the following year is expected to greatly .
However, there was no V-ROCK FESTIVAL that held for the following year will not be any announcement, which will be held in 2010. In addition, LOUD PARK was held at the same venue at about the same time in 2009, was held as usual in 2010. (Production back stage project) V-ROCK FESTIVAL '09 is, that get them used to be diverted most of the stage setting of (produced by Creative Man Productions) LOUD PARK in 2009, had been saving the cost of production stage . In addition, the sponsor of V-ROCK FESTIVAL '09, cooperation, sponsored by, any of the sponsorship, the visual system in the scene name of publisher has issued a noteworthy music magazine was not published in .
Was reported even under such circumstances, Sid , the GazettE are performances each at Tokyo Dome in December 2010, and to mobilize an audience of 40,000 people, respectively . Reality and illegal downloads of "popular" Overseas
, "apparently very popular in foreign countries seems to" recognize that the press had been established through a number of media, that the visual system popular in foreign countries has been made in Japan so far. However, the reality is that, with the image that has been unilaterally from the media coverage that was different though, has been clear from the several sources of information.
Nathan is representative of the site Rivun "HearJapan" music to sell Hogaku towards overseas, for visual kei fans overseas, especially acrimonious letter posted on its website . To quote the abridged below.
Letter to the fans for the visual system
Began to act outside the territory of Japan (Omitted), of Japanese music fan base is rapidly expanding, looks like a band finally go abroad, try to source local ties with the fan. Because this flow was more pronounced in the visual system in particular, I aim to enhance the visual system (per the establishment of the HearJapan). However, sales of any genre other than the visual system, it was five times by a large margin compared to the visual system. This does not impact Tsukuse beyond description. Fan that is attached to each visual kei bands Despite the fact that countless sales of the album of the visual system is not performing like it or why, I asked myself. (Omitted)
After all, the only way to sell the music of the visual system, we found that it is not until just before the release date other than the arm-twisting (and as a result of purchase of reservation). After the release date is, but we would not sell it immediately. Nothing more nor less than a clear reason for this is that, without the permission of the officials who have invested time and money to making music band, or label, music files from being uploaded to the net. Many users on the net, has a pride and joy that to download music for free to fan the visual system of other, more importantly, the right holder (artist, music production, record label it, It is a copyright management organization that has been done without permission, etc.) photographer. This is why after the release date is no longer selling the visual system. (Omitted)
Is not a problem only in download sales HearJapan. Although I did you I see your data export CD of some of the visual kei band, but unfortunately, there is a correlation was seen download sales and similar sad HearJapan. This letter is not to tell you about HearJapan loss is suffered. Sales of non-visual-kei genre, but because it is something more than make up for the slump in sales of the visual system. That you want to convey in this letter, it is a problem that it is the act of illegally distribute the sound source on the net, to be brought as a result of their own fans and not only for artists, hopping around.
I've tried to talk among (not being delivered in HearJapan) and many visual kei bands and labels, I've heard the same story with one voice. From that access from abroad have rushed to the MySpace and official site, they just made an effort to try to sell music to fans overseas inflated expectations, it is a and had suffered a huge loss. (Omitted)
To translate accurately the information of the band, and Just You take the encoding of music files, the page of the site must wear a tag, advertising, a phone call for confirmation to the band and there are no problems with this everything based on the request of the band I also multiplied many times, was subject to losses. Compared to the band has suffered loss, are insignificant such as the loss of me. You, even as the storm drew praise from the world a million people released something with all the force of one's being, was produced by using time and money, and finally saw a really stupid to not get a penny Now that you have and I just, want to continue such a thing again. To me, so I do not think so. (Omitted)
However, the biggest excuse, "I am making are introduced to the many fans of the band further. A lot of fans (make out from the user is illegally on the Internet to distribute music files without permission of the copyright holder) is the claim that there is no problem from "the band has helped me with. This is true also include a piece of certainly. I've seen download (illegally) is any, had been turned to J and J rock fans from rock fans, however. Now that you share files and music from J to J rock fan rock fans, the band will not help one bit. That the new fan is produced because there is no sound. Speaking can be brought in illegally uploaded to the net, that is about to kill all of the profits they would be obtained from the band album was produced by the disastrous struggle (even financially). Fan, and I will pay money to the music will be provided for free does not. To say that over ten thousand fans outside of Japan already, reason to be distributed free of charge there is no music anywhere. I, we are well Zonji of the visual system that the fan base, have been greatly enhanced by these illegal activities. However, I have also noticed the fact that sales have not increased at all of the album of the visual system.
68.183.228.220 (talk) 19:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Translation from Russian wikipedia
I'm going to take a stab at incorporating information from the Russian version of this article into the English version. Is there any particular information I should incorprate?
Zdorovo (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Visual kei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928204954/http://www.grammylive.com/Latin/News/Default.aspx?newsID=2278 to http://www.grammylive.com/Latin/News/Default.aspx?newsID=2278
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —Talk to my owner:Online 04:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Visual kei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imf.com/link_player.html?video_id=2283
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.grammylive.com/Latin/News/Default.aspx?newsID=2278
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011140930/http://asiaarts.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=7936 to http://www.asiaarts.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=7936
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://jrockrevolution.com/2008/11/webzine/interview-with-angelo-250
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bounce.com/article/article.php/3419/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.blistering.com/fastpage/fpengine.php/link/1/templateid/12842/tempidx/5/menuid/3/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The word Movement
The word "Movement" has always stuck me as a words you would use differently in Japanese then English - in English, it can mean "a group of people working together to advance their shared political, social, or artistic ideas" or "a campaign undertaken by a group of people working together.. The thing is - Visual Kei was coined by a critic that was critical of the bands he was describing; the bands adopted it. I changed it to "label used" which is accurate and sounds natural in English, and I hope that's not controversial among editors here. In English, "Movement" tends be used for Art, Politics, Social Groups. In music, a "movement" is a section of music, so that word isn't really used as it has another meaning. Generally we say "Music Scene" instead of "Music Movement". Denaar (talk) 19:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Visual kei or not visual kei
User:Xfansd, were Glay and L'Arc-en-Ciel visual kei or considered as visual kei between 2000-2009? Was it Hyde or someone else individually? It can be read they were "originally visual kei", "have not had any association with the movement since their major label debut" and so on. Their visual appearance and performance wasn't shocking anymore since the 90s. Seems like people are confusing visual kei acts with general Japanese rock scene.
Gackt always emphasized visuals, performance and shock effect, also stating his connection to visual kei or being a VK-singer. He also had toned down appearance in comparison to his MM days, but it is a rare example of a VK act/person that has reached such "pop" mainstream. Hence, it is a bit strange, apart of Gackt's sales and Tokyo Dome etc., what other big & mainstream name, sales or event happened 2000-2009? It almost looks like Gackt carried alone the visual kei's mainstream for almost 10 years. Miki Filigranski (talk) 08:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Without a reliable source, what you're saying is WP:OR. I know it's not easy to find sources for Japanese acts (especially older stuff), but even if I were to agree with your assessment on Gackt being the only one (which I don't), in this specific instance I have to say claiming that a single person was the top act or carried an entire scene for a decade might even fall under WP:EXTRAORDINARY. If you find one reliable source saying something like he was the best-selling VK act of the 2000s, then I personally would be OK with adding that specifically, even though it would be false in my opinion.
- As for whether or not Glay, L'Arc-en-Ciel or any other act should be considered visual kei for only a specific time period or if they ever stopped being VK entirely, that's a huge can of worms. In your personal opinion Glay's visuals weren't crazy enough to be VK in 2000–2009, but then they were a headliner of the Visual Japan Summit in 2016. So you're suggesting we can mention Glay in this article in the 1993–2000 and 2009–present sections, but not the 2000–2009 one? You're talking about dissecting every single band's visuals for every single year. Every rock band has an image to some degree, who gets to decide what the minimum requirements for VK are and what's "shocking" or not? (Sophia is one that never made sense to me). Your suggestion of excluding bands for specific time periods is just way too intricate and circumstantial for me to support. I'm perfectly fine with going by an "if they were VK at one point then they can be mentioned in this article" criteria. Xfansd (talk) 19:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Agree, the addition about Gackt was rushed and mostly based on general information without citing secondary RS, but I do recall reading something along the lines in secondary RS in Japanese language, but considering how bothersome would be searching it is fine.
- Agree, said it well. My commentary about Glay and L'Arc wasn't only based on my personal opinion but secondary sources - saying they only originally were visual kei. I did not suggest something like that neither have a clear opinion about mentioning them or not in specific decades - please don't put ideas and words I didn't say. What are reliable sources and context claiming and/or showing Glay and L'Arc being self-reported and perceived as visual kei after 2000 and before 2016? L'Arc isn't even part of the '90s Visual Kei Cover Album.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 19:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- To be frank, it is really not clear enough what makes somebody visual kei or not, also, personally, seeing almost no "visual kei" in X Japan and Luna Sea post-2000 as well yet are still kinda perceived/reported as such. It is almost like visual kei became just a brand-marketing name without clear meaning and reference to cultural trend (similar to New-age music).--Miki Filigranski (talk) 19:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- I wasn't suggesting it was only your opinion that they weren't VK at that time. I am aware that there are sources stating that both bands have toned-down their appearances and that there is question whether or not they can currently be considered VK. I wasn't denying that. But weren't you suggesting that Glay and L'Arc's success from 2000–2009, which surpasses Gackt's and therefore would mean he was not the "top act", is irrelevant because they weren't VK at that point? And you just now asked for sources confirming they were VK between 2000 and 2016. What I said at the end of my previous reply was that I view the idea of requiring sources to support a band to be VK for their entire career, or for any specific periods of time, to be excessive and not feasible.
- "To be frank, it is really not clear enough what makes somebody visual kei or not". That's kind of exactly what I'm saying. There is no definition of VK, neither musically nor visually. Everyone, including journalists, are gonna have different opinions on what qualifies as "elaborate hairstyles and costumes". I am of the opinion that as long as they were considered VK at one point in time, then is doesn't matter if they stopped putting their hair up, and anything they accomplished in their career is relevant to this article. This article mentions how some acts toned-down their appearances over the years. That's good enough, it doesn't need to detail each one. Xfansd (talk) 21:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, that is good enough, but it is a legitimate question whether and when a music act "was" visual kei. It is something factual, also needed considering NPOV because otherwise some acts could be included/excluded although were/weren't visual kei anymore. It possibly gives the readers wrong impression. I won't be discussing further this issue. Thanks for the feedback, all the best.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 00:49, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
MOS:FOREIGNITALICS
Is there any sort of consensus or precedent for why this article isn't italicizing "kei"? it seems like it should pretty straightforward outside of a few specific edge-cases like "kitch" or "ancien regime". Orchastrattor (talk) 01:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- B-Class Japan-related articles
- High-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class music genre articles
- Music genres task force articles
- C-Class fashion articles
- Mid-importance fashion articles
- B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles