Misplaced Pages

Talk:Evolutionary biology: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:52, 1 September 2018 editCommunity Tech bot (talk | contribs)Bots268,310 edits File(s) used on this page are up for deletion← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:41, 6 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,516 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Evolutionary biology/Archive 2) (bot 
(24 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Vital article|topic=Biology|subpage=General|level=5|class=C}}
{{British English}} {{British English}}
⚫ {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|vital=yes|1=
⚫ {{WikiProject Evolutionary biology |importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Biology |importance=top}}
}}
{{Copied|from=Evolutionary biology |from_oldid=585951715 |to=Life sciences |diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Life_sciences&diff=prev&oldid=594466268 }} {{Copied|from=Evolutionary biology |from_oldid=585951715 |to=Life sciences |diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Life_sciences&diff=prev&oldid=594466268 }}
⚫ {{WikiProject Evolutionary biology |class=C |importance=top}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Biology |class=C |importance=top}}


{{summary in|evolution}} {{summary in|evolution}}


{{User:MiszaBot/config|maxarchivesize = 75K|counter = 1|minthreadsleft = 3|algo = old(90d)|archive =Talk:ARTICLE'S NAME/Archive %(counter)d }}{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}}
{{clear}}
=="Impenetrable" science?==


{{User:MiszaBot/config
Editors may have seen ] which named Evolutionary biology articles as examples of "impenetrable science" here on Misplaced Pages. Certainly the first few lines of the current article are not specially inviting; words like "evolution" and "biology" are repeated without much explanation. Perhaps John Timmer had at least some sort of a point when he wrote that "Misplaced Pages fails as an encyclopedia, to science's detriment". Perhaps this is easily fixable here with a little friendly explanation, at least in the leads of a few key articles. ] (]) 10:11, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
|maxarchivesize = 75K
|counter = 2
|minthreadsleft = 3
|algo = old(90d)
|archive =Talk:Evolutionary biology/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{Archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}}


:: I've drafted a new lead and added some image captions with links and dates; I hope this is acceptable as a starting point. I'm sure much more can be done to improve comprehensibility here and in related articles. ] (]) 12:48, 16 January 2016 (UTC)


==Geodakyan's evolutionary theory of sex==
Help required with ]: the article of apparently fringe theory is based almost exclusively on primary sources and edited by a people with strong connection to the subject. ] (]) 17:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


== Lead Section ==
== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion ==

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
The lead section is clear and concise, not overly detailed, but grasping the main points of the article in an easy to understand manner.] (]) 22:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2018-09-01T12:52:01.612170 | R. A. Fischer.jpg -->

Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 12:52, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
== Further sections ==

Would adding a section about key papers (ie. Galapagos finch work done by the Grants) be beneficial? --] (]) 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

== Citation change ==

Is there a better source for a definition of evolutionary biology, such as a peer reviewed paper or textbook? ] (]) 01:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:41, 6 September 2024

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconEvolutionary biology Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Misplaced Pages:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiology Top‑importance
WikiProject iconEvolutionary biology is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Misplaced Pages. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Evolutionary biology was copied or moved into Life sciences with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
A summary of this article appears in evolution.


Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.


Lead Section

The lead section is clear and concise, not overly detailed, but grasping the main points of the article in an easy to understand manner.Kacasti6 (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Further sections

Would adding a section about key papers (ie. Galapagos finch work done by the Grants) be beneficial? --AccidentalHerpetologist (talk) 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Citation change

Is there a better source for a definition of evolutionary biology, such as a peer reviewed paper or textbook? Biochem2 (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Categories: