| Revision as of 21:00, 8 July 2021 editQwerfjkl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Rollbackers212,906 editsm Removed 'a(n)' from the beginning of the short description per WP:SDFORMAT, from a request at Misplaced Pages:Reward board. (via WP:JWB)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:54, 8 September 2024 edit undoInternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,387,806 edits Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5 | ||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|Parody of intelligent design}} | {{short description|Parody of intelligent design}} | ||
| '''Intelligent falling''' ('''IF''') is a ] of the ] (ID) movement. It is a ] ] explanation of the effects of ]. The joke originated on ], and has appeared in several online parodies. An article about Intelligent Falling in '']'' described free fall as being caused by "the hand of God".<ref name=theonion /> | '''Intelligent falling''' ('''IF''') is a ] of the ] (ID) movement. It is a deliberately ] ] explanation of the effects of ]. The joke originated on ], and has appeared in several online parodies. An article about Intelligent Falling in '']'' described free fall as being caused by "the hand of God".<ref name=theonion /> | ||
| Intelligent falling proposes that the scientific explanation of ] cannot explain all aspects of the phenomenon, so credence should be given to the idea that things fall because a higher intelligence is moving them. Furthermore, IF asserts that theories explaining gravity are not internally consistent nor mathematically reconcilable with ], making gravity a "theory in crisis". IF also makes the claim that gravity is "only a theory", parodying the claims made by ] regarding the ]. IF apologists jokingly advocate that IF should be taught in school along with the theory of gravity so that students can make "an informed decision" on the subject, in a parody of the demands to "]".<ref name=theonion /> | Intelligent falling proposes that the scientific explanation of ] cannot explain all aspects of the phenomenon, so credence should be given to the idea that things fall because a higher intelligence is moving them. Furthermore, IF asserts that theories explaining gravity are not internally consistent nor mathematically reconcilable with ], making gravity a "theory in crisis". IF also makes the claim that gravity is "only a theory", parodying the claims made by ] regarding the ]. IF apologists jokingly advocate that IF should be taught in school along with the theory of gravity so that students can make "an informed decision" on the subject, in a parody of the demands to "]".<ref name=theonion /> | ||
| ==History== | ==History== | ||
| In June 2002 a user named Jeff Stubbs posted a draft of a letter to the editor that mentions "intelligent grappling" to the alt.atheism and talk.origins usenet groups.<ref>{{Cite newsgroup |url=https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.atheism/NNW8exUOu7Y/EoBKW2xuw5IJ |title=letter to editor (was Greensburg Salem curriculum) |last=Jeff Stubbs |date=14 June 2002 |newsgroup=alt.atheism |message-id=140620021018451922%mandos5@lycos.com}}</ref> He commented that "I don't like the theory of gravity, I feel personally insulted that engineers design structures only considering physical mass. What about our souls? I propose that science classes also teach the theory of 'Intelligent Grappling'. There's no way a weak force such as gravity can possibly hold everything onto the planet. It must be God, using our souls, to hold everything together." This was followed by ] posting a "FAQ on intelligent grappling" on the sci.skeptic usenet group.<ref>{{Cite newsgroup |url=https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/28ebb87902c8ecba?dmode=source&hl=en |title=Gravity is God given |last=Elf Sternberg |newsgroup=sci.skeptic |message-id=1024441816.691379@yasure}}</ref> ] published, in May 2005, an '']'' comic strip titled "Teaching Gravity".<ref name="idrewthis">{{Cite web |last=Simpson, D.C. |date=May 16, 2005 |title=Teaching Gravity |url=http://www.glasswings.com/comics/idrewthis/d/20050516.html |access-date=2012-07-07 |website=] |publisher=]}}</ref> |
In June 2002 a user named Jeff Stubbs posted a draft of a letter to the editor that mentions "intelligent grappling" to the alt.atheism and talk.origins usenet groups.<ref>{{Cite newsgroup |url=https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.atheism/NNW8exUOu7Y/EoBKW2xuw5IJ |title=letter to editor (was Greensburg Salem curriculum) |last=Jeff Stubbs |date=14 June 2002 |newsgroup=alt.atheism |message-id=140620021018451922%mandos5@lycos.com}}</ref> He commented that "I don't like the theory of gravity, I feel personally insulted that engineers design structures only considering physical mass. What about our souls? I propose that science classes also teach the theory of 'Intelligent Grappling'. There's no way a weak force such as gravity can possibly hold everything onto the planet. It must be God, using our souls, to hold everything together." This was followed by ] posting a "FAQ on intelligent grappling" on the sci.skeptic usenet group.<ref>{{Cite newsgroup |url=https://groups.google.com/group/sci.skeptic/msg/28ebb87902c8ecba?dmode=source&hl=en |title=Gravity is God given |last=Elf Sternberg |newsgroup=sci.skeptic |message-id=1024441816.691379@yasure}}</ref> ] published, in May 2005, an '']'' comic strip titled "Teaching Gravity".<ref name="idrewthis">{{Cite web |last=Simpson, D.C. |date=May 16, 2005 |title=Teaching Gravity |url=http://www.glasswings.com/comics/idrewthis/d/20050516.html |access-date=2012-07-07 |website=] |publisher=]}}</ref> | ||
| Intelligent falling was the subject of an article in '']'' in August 2005.<ref name=theonion>{{Cite news |date=Aug 17, 2005 |title=Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory |work=The Onion |url=http://www.theonion.com/articles/evangelical-scientists-refute-gravity-with-new-int,1778/ |access-date=2 November 2012 |quote=Traditional scientists admit that they cannot explain how gravitation is supposed to work,' Carson said. 'What the gravity-agenda scientists need to realize is that gravity waves and gravitons are just secular words for God can do whatever He wants. |archive-date=31 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121031163017/http://www.theonion.com/articles/evangelical-scientists-refute-gravity-with-new-int,1778/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> In the ''Dictionary of Contemporary Mythology'' (2011), author ] suggested that while originally "hypothesized in a satirical magazine, it is no more incompetent than any other Intelligent Design theory".<ref>{{cite book | title = Dictionary of Contemporary Mythology: Third Edition | date = 2011 | first = William | last = Harwood | publisher = World Audience Inc | isbn = 9781544601403 | pages = 245, 246}}</ref> | |||
| Writing in 2008, science journalist Seth Shulman stated that the "pitch-perfect spoof" exemplified the issues with the basis of intelligent design, and with the inadequate response to it by the ].<ref name="Shulman 2008 p. 143">{{cite book | last=Shulman | first=S. | title=Undermining Science: Suppression and Distortion in the Bush Administration | publisher=University of California Press | year=2008 | isbn=978-0-520-25626-2 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cy72HYeP-GAC&pg=PA143 | access-date=29 September 2021 | page=143}}</ref> | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 25: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:54, 8 September 2024
Parody of intelligent designIntelligent falling (IF) is a parody of the intelligent design (ID) movement. It is a deliberately pseudoscientific supernatural explanation of the effects of gravity. The joke originated on Usenet, and has appeared in several online parodies. An article about Intelligent Falling in The Onion described free fall as being caused by "the hand of God".
Intelligent falling proposes that the scientific explanation of gravitational force cannot explain all aspects of the phenomenon, so credence should be given to the idea that things fall because a higher intelligence is moving them. Furthermore, IF asserts that theories explaining gravity are not internally consistent nor mathematically reconcilable with quantum mechanics, making gravity a "theory in crisis". IF also makes the claim that gravity is "only a theory", parodying the claims made by creationists regarding the theoretical status of evolution. IF apologists jokingly advocate that IF should be taught in school along with the theory of gravity so that students can make "an informed decision" on the subject, in a parody of the demands to "teach the controversy".
History
In June 2002 a user named Jeff Stubbs posted a draft of a letter to the editor that mentions "intelligent grappling" to the alt.atheism and talk.origins usenet groups. He commented that "I don't like the theory of gravity, I feel personally insulted that engineers design structures only considering physical mass. What about our souls? I propose that science classes also teach the theory of 'Intelligent Grappling'. There's no way a weak force such as gravity can possibly hold everything onto the planet. It must be God, using our souls, to hold everything together." This was followed by Elf Sternberg posting a "FAQ on intelligent grappling" on the sci.skeptic usenet group. D. C. Simpson published, in May 2005, an I Drew This comic strip titled "Teaching Gravity".
Intelligent falling was the subject of an article in The Onion in August 2005. In the Dictionary of Contemporary Mythology (2011), author William R. Harwood suggested that while originally "hypothesized in a satirical magazine, it is no more incompetent than any other Intelligent Design theory".
Writing in 2008, science journalist Seth Shulman stated that the "pitch-perfect spoof" exemplified the issues with the basis of intelligent design, and with the inadequate response to it by the G. W. Bush administration.
See also
References
- ^ "Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory". The Onion. Aug 17, 2005. Archived from the original on 31 October 2012. Retrieved 2 November 2012.
Traditional scientists admit that they cannot explain how gravitation is supposed to work,' Carson said. 'What the gravity-agenda scientists need to realize is that gravity waves and gravitons are just secular words for God can do whatever He wants.
- Jeff Stubbs (14 June 2002). "letter to editor (was Greensburg Salem curriculum)". Newsgroup: alt.atheism. Usenet: 140620021018451922%mandos5@lycos.com.
- Elf Sternberg. "Gravity is God given". Newsgroup: sci.skeptic. Usenet: 1024441816.691379@yasure.
- Simpson, D.C. (May 16, 2005). "Teaching Gravity". I Drew This. Keenspot. Retrieved 2012-07-07.
- Harwood, William (2011). Dictionary of Contemporary Mythology: Third Edition. World Audience Inc. pp. 245, 246. ISBN 9781544601403.
- Shulman, S. (2008). Undermining Science: Suppression and Distortion in the Bush Administration. University of California Press. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-520-25626-2. Retrieved 29 September 2021.