Misplaced Pages

Talk:East–West Schism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:07, 2 September 2020 editPeter010101 (talk | contribs)62 edits Mis-placed sentence?: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:19, 26 September 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,793 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:East–West Schism/Archive 8) (bot 
(35 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{Not a forum}}
{{Vital article|topic=History |level=4 |class=B}}
{{On this day|date1=2005-12-07|oldid1=30302760 }}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WP1.0|class=B|category=category|VA=yes|WPCD=yes|b1=yes|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|b6=yes}}{{WikiProject Christianity|class=B |importance=Top
|theology-work-group=yes |theology-importance=Top {{WikiProject Christianity|importance=Top |theology-work-group=yes |theology-importance=Top |catholicism=yes |catholicism-importance=Top |eastern-orthodoxy=yes |eastern-orthodoxy-importance=Top }}
|catholicism=yes |catholicism-importance=Top {{WikiProject European history|importance=high }}
|eastern-orthodoxy=yes |eastern-orthodoxy-importance=Top {{WikiProject Middle Ages|importance=High }}
{{WikiProject Greece|importance=mid|topic=history|byzantine-task-force=yes}}
|core-topics-work-group = yes |core-topics-importance=Top
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=mid|Interfaith=yes}}
}} }}
{{WikiProject European history|class=B |importance=high }}
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|class=B |importance=High }}
{{WikiProject Greece|class=B|importance=mid|topic=history|byzantine-task-force=yes|b1=yes|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|b6=yes}}
{{WikiProject Religion|class=B|importance=mid|Interfaith=yes|InterfaithImp=Top}}
}}
{{On this day|date1=2005-12-07|oldid1=30302760 }}
{{Copied {{Copied
|from1 = East–West Schism |from1 = East–West Schism
Line 28: Line 23:


}} }}
{{Off topic warning}}
{{Archive box|search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=1 |units=month |index=/Archive index | {{Archive box|search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=1 |units=month |index=/Archive index |
* ] <small>(Dec 2004 – Jan 2009)</small> * ] <small>(Dec 2004 – Jan 2009)</small>
Line 51: Line 45:
}} }}


== Lead section == == Section on Hell ==

Greetings, Per MOS, the lead section should be a maximum of 4 paragraphs, and this article has 6. I added the "lead too long" notice and am asking for help to condense the lead. Regards, <span class="plainlinks" style="background: rgba(0,0,0,.05);">— ] • (])</span> 14:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified {{plural:10|one external link|10 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100510123826/http://www.patriarchate.org/patriarchate/history to http://www.patriarchate.org/patriarchate/history
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761573998/Church_and_State.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761573998/Church_and_State.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://faculty.cua.edu/pennington/churchhistory220/lectureeight/13thCenturyPopes.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.romfea.gr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1932
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0221/__PT.HTM
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130306113628/http://www.vatican.va:80/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/trvalentine/orthodox/vatican_clar_images.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gocanada.org/catechism/catorsin.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140906031754/http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).

{{sourcecheck|checked=true}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 08:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)


I significantly modified this section as it relates to Eastern Orthodoxy, since it contained blatant errors such as claiming that the Orthodox believe there "is no hell," and made sweeping generalizations and universal, doctrinal claims on behalf of Orthodoxy as a whole, when even the Misplaced Pages article on hell, in the Orthodox subsection, clearly states and explains the variety of opinion in this area, and the lack of a single, official doctrine, as is found in Catholicism.
== External links modified ==


] (]) 10:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


: There is no reference to Hell in the Orthodox Liturgy or the Latin Mass, unlike with the Lutheran Liturgy and Eucharist of the Church of England. I am also uncertain as to whether there is a concept of eternal punishment in the Orthodox Church as God is stated in the Liturgy to be all loving, merciful and forgiving. Perhaps a reference is needed or possibly a different wording where it is presently stated that "there is damnation or punishment in eternity for the rejection of God's grace". Not being graced by the presence of God does not necessarily imply one is punished or damned by God. There is a good presentation in the Orthodox wiki: https://el.orthodoxwiki.org/Κόλαση - that the distancing from God's grace is a voluntary choice and not a punishment imposed by God as is made clear by a cited quote from St John of Damascus: "Και τούτο ειδέναι δει, ότι ο Θεός ου κολάζει τινά εν τω μελλόντι αλλ' έκαστος εαυτόν δεκτικόν ποιεί της μετοχής του Θεού. Εστίν η μεν μετοχή του Θεού τρυφή, η δε αμεθεξία αυτού κόλασις" - God does not punish but each one decides on his receiving of God, whose reception is joy and his absence a Hell. I am inclined to slightly change the current text to better reflect the Orthodox Christian view that God does not punish. ] (]) 17:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
I have just modified {{plural:19|one external link|19 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110914171457/http://www.ctlibrary.com/ch/1997/issue54/54h010.html to http://www.ctlibrary.com/ch/1997/issue54/54h010.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120114151752/http://www.orthodox.org.ph/content/view/211/50/ to http://www.orthodox.org.ph/content/view/211/50/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140208192705/http://www.vatican.va:80/holy_father/paul_vi/speeches/1965/documents/hf_p-vi_spe_19651207_common-declaration_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/speeches/1965/documents/hf_p-vi_spe_19651207_common-declaration_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031223144638/http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/ch_orthodox_docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_19930624_lebanon_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/ch_orthodox_docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_19930624_lebanon_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100816040600/http://www.vatican.va:80/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/general-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_19930325_directory_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/general-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_19930325_directory_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100816040600/http://www.vatican.va:80/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/general-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_19930325_directory_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/general-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_19930325_directory_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130303003725/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P17.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P17.HTM
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225105941/http://www.pelagia.org/htm/b02.en.orthodox_psychotherapy.03.htm#in to http://www.pelagia.org/htm/b02.en.orthodox_psychotherapy.03.htm#in
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090113180247/http://www.stmaryorthodoxchurch.org/orthodoxy/articles/2004-hughes-sin.php to http://www.stmaryorthodoxchurch.org/orthodoxy/articles/2004-hughes-sin.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110712214225/http://store.holycrossbookstore.com/970730314.html to http://store.holycrossbookstore.com/970730314.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120904224955/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1C.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1C.HTM
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120904224955/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1C.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1C.HTM
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120904224955/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1C.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1C.HTM
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090219210756/http://www.pelagia.org/htm/b24.en.life_after_death.05.htm#pu2 to http://www.pelagia.org/htm/b24.en.life_after_death.05.htm#pu2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201132350/http://www.pelagia.org/htm/b24.en.life_after_death.07.htm to http://www.pelagia.org/htm/b24.en.life_after_death.07.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120609122435/http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P2O.HTM to http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P2O.HTM
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140906031754/http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140208192705/http://www.vatican.va:80/holy_father/paul_vi/speeches/1965/documents/hf_p-vi_spe_19651207_common-declaration_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/speeches/1965/documents/hf_p-vi_spe_19651207_common-declaration_en.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120114151752/http://www.orthodox.org.ph/content/view/211/50/ to http://www.orthodox.org.ph/content/view/211/50/


::My comments on Hell which were backed up by references, were reverted by another editor, even though I had added this comment in the talk section several weeks before making the change and the change had remained for a year without discussion in the talk section. Unless I receive a good explanation I will refer the issue to the arbitration committee. Please explain.] (]) 18:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).


== Reason and Orthodoxy ==
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
The statement that "Eastern Orthodox theologians argue that the mind (reason, rationality) is the focus of Western theology, whereas, in Eastern theology, the mind must be put in the heart, so they are united into what is called nous; this unity as heart is the focus of Eastern Orthodox Christianity" is based on a reference by the American Romanian Carpathian Church. I am not sure this interpretation (and the entire paragraph that follows it) is representative. Of course, it is in the nature of the Orthodox tradition that there are differences in interpretation of the sacred texts because their meaning depends somewhat on the education and understanding of the individual. However, the contrary position has many defendants: The opening of the Gospel of St John quotes Heraclitus: In the arche (first principle) there was Logos ... Through it everything came to be". Heraclitus by Logos meant Reason (in fact that is what the word means in Greek). The translation into Latin as "In the beginning was the Word" certainly does not reflect Heraclitus accurately and rather detracts from the position of Logos (Reason) in Christian thought. St John the Evangelist lived in Ephesus, the city where Heraclitus had lived, and the reference to Heraclitus could not have been accidental. See also https://orthodoxwiki.org/Logos and https://www.orthodox-theology.com/media/PDF/IJOT1-2010/12-popescu-trinity.pdf ] (]) 12:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


:{{ping|Skamnelis}} OrthodoxWiki is a ] so it cannot be used as a source on Misplaced Pages articles. If you have a good source more authoritative than the current one to support the change you want (e.g. Kallistos Ware's ''The Orthodox Church'' or ''The Encyclopedia of Eastern Orthodox Christianity''), feel free to use it. ] (]) 19:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 10:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
::After the response that OrthodoxWiki is a WP:SPS so it cannot be used as a source on Misplaced Pages articles, I had added a reference from Kallistos Ware that seems to have been lost in favour of a statement from a publication attributed to the Romanian Carpathian Church. I do not see why the latter is more representative. At the very least the editor should have opted for presenting the range of views. Unless I have a good explanation, I will refer this issue to the arbitration committee. ] (]) 18:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)


== External links modified == == Move discussion in progress ==


There is a move discussion in progress on ] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:2018 Moscow–Constantinople schism#Requested move 25 April 2024 crosspost --> —] 15:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


== Council of Constantinople of 1170 ==
I have just modified 11 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761573998/Church_and_State.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761573998/Church_and_State.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/speeches/1965/documents/hf_p-vi_spe_19651207_common-declaration_en.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/trvalentine/orthodox/romanides_filioque.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/trvalentine/orthodox/romanides_filioque.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110126005944/http://www.ninesaintsethiopianorthodoxmonastery.org/id18.html to http://www.ninesaintsethiopianorthodoxmonastery.org/id18.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206021635/http://www.presbyterian.org.nz/3368.0.html to http://www.presbyterian.org.nz/3368.0.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Atrium/8410/filioque.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/trvalentine/orthodox/romanides_filioque.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/speeches/1965/documents/hf_p-vi_spe_19651207_common-declaration_en.html


I am asking here if this page could mention, even briefly the 1170 synod held at Constantinople. It is listed in John McClintock and James Strong's Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature (where it is listed as a council of 1168 or 1170). According to them, the synod was "attended by many Eastern and Western bishops on the reunion of the Eastern and Latin Churches" (Volume 2, 1883, p. 491), and elsewhere they list this same council as being that at which "the Greek Church was entirely separated from the Roman" (Supplement Volume 2, 1887, p. 89). Horace Kinder Mann, quotes Macarius of Ancyra as saying the following about the council:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


"The emperor, the council, and the whole senate gave their vote in favour of a total separation from the Pope... But it was not thought proper to consign (the Latins) a great and distinguished nation, to formal anathema, like other heresies, even while repudiating union and communion with them." (Nicholas Breakspear (Hadrian IV.) A.D. 1154-1159 The Only English Pope, p. 88)
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}


I had added a brief entry on it, but it was deleted. I am sincerely wondering why it was deleted.
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 22:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


The Council was called by the Emperor Manuel and envoys of Pope Alexander III met in Constantinople along with Patriarch Michael III Anchialus. The Pope required that in all matters the Greeks adopt Latin practices and consent to the papal primacy, and so the Patriarch broke communion with Rome. Further information can easily be found online.
== Vanity press detected ==


You can verify the quote by Macarius of Ancyra here:
While we appreciate which cleaned up the citation style, it tripped the edit filter which claims "Content sourced to ]", which is highly undesirable. Therefore I have tagged the article as possibly having unreliable sources. ] (]) 09:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Nicholas_Breakspear/xLY-AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=horace+kinder+mann+nicholas+breakspear&printsec=frontcover <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Mis-placed sentence? == == The Map is Wrong ==


The map at the top of the article shows many areas Catholic that were not in 1045. Lithuania, for example, was not, nor was Pomerania, nor what later became East Prussia. ] (]) 18:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
In lead paragraph 1:
> ... culmination of theological and political differences
> which had developed during the preceding centuries
That is absolutely fine. Also fine is the start of lead paragraph 3:
> In 1053, the first step in the process which led to a formal schism was taken
In contrast, however, lead paragraph 3 closes thus:
> ... only the first act in a centuries-long process
> that eventually became a complete schism.
This makes no sense at the close of a paragraph narrating the 1053-1054 events. Such a sentence might belong further down, in connection with something much earlier; but its presence at the end of lead paragraph 3 is clearly accidental: I am therefore deleting the sentence. --] (]) 16:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:19, 26 September 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the East–West Schism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This page is not a forum for general discussion about East–West Schism. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about East–West Schism at the Reference desk.
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on December 7, 2005.
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconChristianity: Theology / Catholicism / Eastern O. Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as Top-importance).
WikiProject iconEuropean history High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMiddle Ages High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGreece: Byzantine Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.
WikiProject iconReligion: Interfaith Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
Archiving icon
Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.


Section on Hell

I significantly modified this section as it relates to Eastern Orthodoxy, since it contained blatant errors such as claiming that the Orthodox believe there "is no hell," and made sweeping generalizations and universal, doctrinal claims on behalf of Orthodoxy as a whole, when even the Misplaced Pages article on hell, in the Orthodox subsection, clearly states and explains the variety of opinion in this area, and the lack of a single, official doctrine, as is found in Catholicism.

67.42.97.177 (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

There is no reference to Hell in the Orthodox Liturgy or the Latin Mass, unlike with the Lutheran Liturgy and Eucharist of the Church of England. I am also uncertain as to whether there is a concept of eternal punishment in the Orthodox Church as God is stated in the Liturgy to be all loving, merciful and forgiving. Perhaps a reference is needed or possibly a different wording where it is presently stated that "there is damnation or punishment in eternity for the rejection of God's grace". Not being graced by the presence of God does not necessarily imply one is punished or damned by God. There is a good presentation in the Orthodox wiki: https://el.orthodoxwiki.org/Κόλαση - that the distancing from God's grace is a voluntary choice and not a punishment imposed by God as is made clear by a cited quote from St John of Damascus: "Και τούτο ειδέναι δει, ότι ο Θεός ου κολάζει τινά εν τω μελλόντι αλλ' έκαστος εαυτόν δεκτικόν ποιεί της μετοχής του Θεού. Εστίν η μεν μετοχή του Θεού τρυφή, η δε αμεθεξία αυτού κόλασις" - God does not punish but each one decides on his receiving of God, whose reception is joy and his absence a Hell. I am inclined to slightly change the current text to better reflect the Orthodox Christian view that God does not punish. Skamnelis (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
My comments on Hell which were backed up by references, were reverted by another editor, even though I had added this comment in the talk section several weeks before making the change and the change had remained for a year without discussion in the talk section. Unless I receive a good explanation I will refer the issue to the arbitration committee. Please explain.Skamnelis (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Reason and Orthodoxy

The statement that "Eastern Orthodox theologians argue that the mind (reason, rationality) is the focus of Western theology, whereas, in Eastern theology, the mind must be put in the heart, so they are united into what is called nous; this unity as heart is the focus of Eastern Orthodox Christianity" is based on a reference by the American Romanian Carpathian Church. I am not sure this interpretation (and the entire paragraph that follows it) is representative. Of course, it is in the nature of the Orthodox tradition that there are differences in interpretation of the sacred texts because their meaning depends somewhat on the education and understanding of the individual. However, the contrary position has many defendants: The opening of the Gospel of St John quotes Heraclitus: In the arche (first principle) there was Logos ... Through it everything came to be". Heraclitus by Logos meant Reason (in fact that is what the word means in Greek). The translation into Latin as "In the beginning was the Word" certainly does not reflect Heraclitus accurately and rather detracts from the position of Logos (Reason) in Christian thought. St John the Evangelist lived in Ephesus, the city where Heraclitus had lived, and the reference to Heraclitus could not have been accidental. See also https://orthodoxwiki.org/Logos and https://www.orthodox-theology.com/media/PDF/IJOT1-2010/12-popescu-trinity.pdf Skamnelis (talk) 12:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

@Skamnelis: OrthodoxWiki is a WP:SPS so it cannot be used as a source on Misplaced Pages articles. If you have a good source more authoritative than the current one to support the change you want (e.g. Kallistos Ware's The Orthodox Church or The Encyclopedia of Eastern Orthodox Christianity), feel free to use it. Veverve (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
After the response that OrthodoxWiki is a WP:SPS so it cannot be used as a source on Misplaced Pages articles, I had added a reference from Kallistos Ware that seems to have been lost in favour of a statement from a publication attributed to the Romanian Carpathian Church. I do not see why the latter is more representative. At the very least the editor should have opted for presenting the range of views. Unless I have a good explanation, I will refer this issue to the arbitration committee. Skamnelis (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2018 Moscow–Constantinople schism which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Council of Constantinople of 1170

I am asking here if this page could mention, even briefly the 1170 synod held at Constantinople. It is listed in John McClintock and James Strong's Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature (where it is listed as a council of 1168 or 1170). According to them, the synod was "attended by many Eastern and Western bishops on the reunion of the Eastern and Latin Churches" (Volume 2, 1883, p. 491), and elsewhere they list this same council as being that at which "the Greek Church was entirely separated from the Roman" (Supplement Volume 2, 1887, p. 89). Horace Kinder Mann, quotes Macarius of Ancyra as saying the following about the council:

"The emperor, the council, and the whole senate gave their vote in favour of a total separation from the Pope... But it was not thought proper to consign (the Latins) a great and distinguished nation, to formal anathema, like other heresies, even while repudiating union and communion with them." (Nicholas Breakspear (Hadrian IV.) A.D. 1154-1159 The Only English Pope, p. 88)

I had added a brief entry on it, but it was deleted. I am sincerely wondering why it was deleted.

The Council was called by the Emperor Manuel and envoys of Pope Alexander III met in Constantinople along with Patriarch Michael III Anchialus. The Pope required that in all matters the Greeks adopt Latin practices and consent to the papal primacy, and so the Patriarch broke communion with Rome. Further information can easily be found online.

You can verify the quote by Macarius of Ancyra here: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Nicholas_Breakspear/xLY-AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=horace+kinder+mann+nicholas+breakspear&printsec=frontcover — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:201:8E80:A9E0:129C:633E:6D7B:96FC (talk) 11:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

The Map is Wrong

The map at the top of the article shows many areas Catholic that were not in 1045. Lithuania, for example, was not, nor was Pomerania, nor what later became East Prussia. 2604:3D09:2181:BCD0:A8A9:85A7:47C0:2C6F (talk) 18:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Categories: