Revision as of 06:32, 23 April 2022 edit2001:1530:1018:fb57:8400:ae90:c29c:7124 (talk) →Kodeiin: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:11, 6 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,649 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Codeine/Archive 1) (bot | ||
(16 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header}} | {{talk header}} | ||
{{Reliable sources for medical articles}} | {{Reliable sources for medical articles}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= | |||
{{Vital article|topic=Biology|subpage=Health|level=5|class=B}} | |||
{{WikiProject Pharmacology |importance=high}} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Chemicals |importance=high}} | ||
{{WikiProject Medicine |importance=mid}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Archives}} | {{Archives}} | ||
== Non-existent reference == | |||
As far as I can tell, "The December 2008 issue of The Bulletin of the National Codeine OTC Lobby (Vol. XVIII, No. 4)" is a false reference - this organization does not seem to actually exist beyond Misplaced Pages and other websites that only seem to copy/paste what is in this paragraph regarding OTC access to Codeine. I've had a professional literature search done and come back with absolutely nothing. | |||
That, alas, is true for quite a few "references" on medical a/or 'recreational' drugs... -a form or error propagation typical for the digital age. | |||
Also: "Evidence does not support its use for acute cough suppression in children or adults. In Europe, it is not recommended as a cough medicine in those under 12 years of age. Some tentative evidence shows it can reduce a chronic cough in adults." can only be regarded as spurious at best, resp. methodologically questionable. - As _anyone_ who has suffered from a severe cough and thus been administered codeine will readily confirm . <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==Missing Antecedent== | |||
Under pharmacokinetics it reads: "Srinivasan, Wielbo and Tebbett speculate that codeine-6-glucuronide is responsible for a large percentage of the analgesia of codeine, and, thus, these patients should experience some analgesia." But there is no reference to patients anywhere in the preceding paragraph. Who are these patients? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Prescription drug driving impairment and legal penalties. == | == Prescription drug driving impairment and legal penalties. == | ||
Line 31: | Line 20: | ||
Laws have recently been introduced in this area in the UK. There is no information on the subject in this article about this anywhere in the world. Should the ignorance of the possibility of driving impairment due to 'normal' use of prescription codeine and the possible legal penalties be included in this article? This is complicated by the fact the the UK legal limit is in metabolised opium per litre of blood, which will vary due to genetic differences. | Laws have recently been introduced in this area in the UK. There is no information on the subject in this article about this anywhere in the world. Should the ignorance of the possibility of driving impairment due to 'normal' use of prescription codeine and the possible legal penalties be included in this article? This is complicated by the fact the the UK legal limit is in metabolised opium per litre of blood, which will vary due to genetic differences. | ||
== |
== Codeine and allergic cough == | ||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030729104518/http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/674narcotic.html to http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/674narcotic.html | |||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121016064430/http://www.legislation.gov.hk/eng/home.htm to http://www.legislation.gov.hk/eng/home.htm | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. | |||
Codeine definitely helps allergic cough too, as well as cough caused by mucus, in the throat, and so on. I dont see that explicitly stated anywhere in the article, so I was thinking it should be added. Also, chronic cough it definitely helps with. | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} | |||
About the side effects, it can cause vomiting too, but this is not stated. At high doses, it can even cause Gastritis, inflammation of the stomach. ] (]) 03:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 04:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Codeine and barbiturates == | |||
== ±? == | |||
In the History section, the article talks about "codeine-based barbiturates" and then goes on to list a number of different barbiturate drugs. However, the connection between these and codeine is not expanded upon in any way. Even clicking the links to the articles about the specific barbiturates doesn't yield any information, as none of those articles make any mention of codeine. I think the problem is with the phrase "codeine-based barbiturates" which would seem to indicate that a codeine molecule is connected to a barbiturate molecule, when that does not appear to be the case for any of these. Is it talking about preparations where codeine is combined with a barbiturate? If so, none of the specific articles on the barbiturates themselves mention formulations containing codeine, so I'm left wondering where this phrase came from. ] (]) 17:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
What does {{tq|including such mixtures as aspirin + paracetamol + codeine ± caffeine ± antihistamines and other agents}} mean? How can you have negative caffeine or antihistamines? If this is a medical notation, is there a less ]y way to say this? --] (]) 00:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Isn`t 'Legal status' unduly long? == | |||
== Kodeiin == | |||
I`m a lamer, I don`t undestand wikipedia`s hiden universe and etc, I`m terribly sorry for this invasion. | |||
Kodeiin on hea ravim olin sõltuvuses sellest neelasin päevast päeva peo täite kaupa neid tablette . ] (]) 06:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
But why does this chapter exist in that exact way? | |||
I don't think the data on time-to-time changing local laws should be there. | |||
In fact, it`s useles - I cheked for Latvia (cus I`m patriot) and Co-Codamol is now only sold by prescription and 30mg. | |||
If they need that data for purpose, they still can`t relate without doublechecking - no sense found. | |||
And I also can`t just delete, it will be "-1000 & undo" | |||
P.S. I know rules about spam and questioning newbies, but I realy don`t know is this topic spam one or not - will pray for my IP not to be blocked. ] (]) 07:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:11, 6 October 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Codeine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Ideal sources for Misplaced Pages's health content are defined in the guideline Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Codeine.
|
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives | |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Prescription drug driving impairment and legal penalties.
Laws have recently been introduced in this area in the UK. There is no information on the subject in this article about this anywhere in the world. Should the ignorance of the possibility of driving impairment due to 'normal' use of prescription codeine and the possible legal penalties be included in this article? This is complicated by the fact the the UK legal limit is in metabolised opium per litre of blood, which will vary due to genetic differences.
Codeine and allergic cough
Codeine definitely helps allergic cough too, as well as cough caused by mucus, in the throat, and so on. I dont see that explicitly stated anywhere in the article, so I was thinking it should be added. Also, chronic cough it definitely helps with.
About the side effects, it can cause vomiting too, but this is not stated. At high doses, it can even cause Gastritis, inflammation of the stomach. Noam111g (talk) 03:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Codeine and barbiturates
In the History section, the article talks about "codeine-based barbiturates" and then goes on to list a number of different barbiturate drugs. However, the connection between these and codeine is not expanded upon in any way. Even clicking the links to the articles about the specific barbiturates doesn't yield any information, as none of those articles make any mention of codeine. I think the problem is with the phrase "codeine-based barbiturates" which would seem to indicate that a codeine molecule is connected to a barbiturate molecule, when that does not appear to be the case for any of these. Is it talking about preparations where codeine is combined with a barbiturate? If so, none of the specific articles on the barbiturates themselves mention formulations containing codeine, so I'm left wondering where this phrase came from. Lumberjane Lilly (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Isn`t 'Legal status' unduly long?
I`m a lamer, I don`t undestand wikipedia`s hiden universe and etc, I`m terribly sorry for this invasion. But why does this chapter exist in that exact way? I don't think the data on time-to-time changing local laws should be there. In fact, it`s useles - I cheked for Latvia (cus I`m patriot) and Co-Codamol is now only sold by prescription and 30mg. If they need that data for purpose, they still can`t relate without doublechecking - no sense found. And I also can`t just delete, it will be "-1000 & undo" P.S. I know rules about spam and questioning newbies, but I realy don`t know is this topic spam one or not - will pray for my IP not to be blocked. 83.99.184.149 (talk) 07:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class pharmacology articles
- High-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- B-Class chemicals articles
- High-importance chemicals articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages