| Revision as of 20:22, 14 October 2024 editLightburst (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,841 edits →October 2024← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:32, 14 October 2024 edit undoLightburst (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,841 edits →October 2024: the revertsNext edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
| This edit goes against the consensus here: . Please note that this had a neutral close. You can take it to close review, but you cannot just ignore the consensus. See ]. I shall revert to the consensus now. ] (]) 20:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | This edit goes against the consensus here: . Please note that this had a neutral close. You can take it to close review, but you cannot just ignore the consensus. See ]. I shall revert to the consensus now. ] (]) 20:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :{{ping|Sirfurboy}} It is controversial and needs uninvolved ] (]) 20:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | :{{ping|Sirfurboy}} It is controversial and needs uninvolved ] (]) 20:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::It had an uninvolved close. Now this: is edit warring and disruptive. Again, you can challenge a close with a close review but you ''must not'' simply revert a close. Please self revert. I'll give you 10 minutes, and then, if you haven't reverted, I am off to ANI. ] (]) 20:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::I will not self revert. We need am experienced closer. There is not a consensus and you have been pursuing some way to delete, merge redirect for a while now. ]. I hope you do not go to ANI but I cannot stop you. Regular editors should not perform contoversil or close closures. ] (]) 20:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:32, 14 October 2024
DYK for Dan Erlewine
On 13 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dan Erlewine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the magazine Acoustic Guitar said that Dan Erlewine "might be the most famous guitar repairperson on earth"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dan Erlewine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dan Erlewine), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
/Rational 00:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
RfA debrief
Hi Lightburst. I mentioned you by name in my RfA debrief. Though I do not think I said anything objectionable, as a matter of fairness I wanted to let you know. Comments are of course welcome on the talk page. Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 00:59, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks HouseBlaster. I hope you go on to prove me wrong like many others have. Lightburst (talk) 03:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Five years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note @Gerda Arendt:. In a place that can be stormy, you bring the sunshine. Lightburst (talk) 15:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! If you look at my "places", however, you can find stormy weather ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Some of the food looked amazing. Lightburst (talk) 00:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! If you look at my "places", however, you can find stormy weather ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
| New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review
Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
You're old school, which I totally respect. Even though we seem to have a difference of opinion on absolutely everything else! 🤪 SerialNumber54129 11:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC) |
October 2024
This edit goes against the consensus here: . Please note that this had a neutral close. You can take it to close review, but you cannot just ignore the consensus. See WP:CONLEVEL. I shall revert to the consensus now. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Sirfurboy: It is controversial and needs uninvolved Lightburst (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- It had an uninvolved close. Now this: is edit warring and disruptive. Again, you can challenge a close with a close review but you must not simply revert a close. Please self revert. I'll give you 10 minutes, and then, if you haven't reverted, I am off to ANI. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I will not self revert. We need am experienced closer. There is not a consensus and you have been pursuing some way to delete, merge redirect for a while now. WP:NORUSH. I hope you do not go to ANI but I cannot stop you. Regular editors should not perform contoversil or close closures. Lightburst (talk) 20:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- It had an uninvolved close. Now this: is edit warring and disruptive. Again, you can challenge a close with a close review but you must not simply revert a close. Please self revert. I'll give you 10 minutes, and then, if you haven't reverted, I am off to ANI. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)