Revision as of 01:36, 12 February 2009 view sourceRachel.Greenberg (talk | contribs)89 edits →admin. request← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 22:37, 14 October 2024 view source Jonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors375,838 edits Fix Linter errors. Fix misused inline markup. |
(46 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Not around|3=November 2011}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|algo = old(7d) |
|
|
|archive = User talk:Kylu/bot-archive |
|
⚫ |
}}{{User talk:Kylu/talkheader}}{{bots|allow=MiszaBot,ShadowBot}} |
|
|
*To-dos, ], ] |
|
⚫ |
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE, THANK YOU --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__NOINDEX__ |
|
== admin. request == |
|
|
|
{{nobots}} |
|
⚫ |
<!-- {{User talk:Kylu/talkheader}} --> |
|
|
{{wikibreak|Kylu|once Tartarus cools sufficiently.}} |
|
|
<span style="display:none;"></span> |
|
|
<!-- |
|
|
******************************************* |
|
|
* * |
|
|
* Hello, Editor! * |
|
|
* * |
|
|
* I'm not active on Wikimedia projects * |
|
|
* so please don't leave any messages * |
|
|
* here. Please contact someone else * |
|
|
* instead. * |
|
|
* * |
|
|
* Personal question? Use the * |
|
|
* Special:EmailUser link instead. * |
|
|
* * |
|
|
* Have a nice day. * |
|
|
* * |
|
|
******************************************* |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT EDIT ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE, THANK YOU. ACTUALLY, DON'T EDIT BELOW EITHER. --> |
|
Hi! I am administrator ko.wikia. and want to be admin. for wikipedia also. do yo have any procedure to promote. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == |
|
user:PauloHelene |
|
|
|
{{User QAIbox |
|
|
|
|
|
| title = Awesome |
|
Retrieved from "http://meta.wikimedia.org/User_talk:Kylu" |
|
|
|
| image = Cscr-featured.svg |
|
:You want to ask at ] instead. ] (]) 05:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| image_upright = 0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
| bold = ] |
|
== Repeated removal of the section I wrote for Dead Sea Scrolls article == |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
--] (]) 06:37, 25 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
Hello, I would like to know what I should do with respect to IsraelXKV8R's repeated removal of the section I added to the Dead Sea Scrolls article, dealing with an important ongoing controversy involving the Scrolls in which he happens to be involved. |
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that if I continue to put the section back in, I will be blocked, and if he keeps removing the section, he will be blocked. |
|
|
|
|
|
I have tried discussing the matter with him, but he simply repeats his claims (which are not true) that I'm connected with some sockpuppet thing here at NYU apparently dating from two years ago and that the section is "tangential." |
|
|
|
|
|
Therefore, it seems to me that he is simply exercising a veto over my section, because if I put it back in he will immediately take it out and then we will be blocked, which seems to be all very fine with him as long as the section isn't in the article, because he instantly removes it as soon as I put it back in. |
|
|
|
|
|
I wish to protest against this outright nullification of the section I wrote, by a single individual who is involved in this controversy. By this token, no information about a controversy can be included in a wikipedia article, because someone involved can always simply remove it over and over again. |
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to know if the section I added can be included in the article and blocked, which would at least oblige IsraelXKV8R to have a civil discussion of the section's contents and of its claimed "tangential" nature. I am not an irrational person; if he is right he should be able to convince me and others, or at least come to a compromise about how the section should read (rather than tyrannically eliminating it altogether as he keeps doing). |
|
|
|
|
|
This is very frustrating for me, as I added this section in good faith and tried to write it in a proper way, without "promoting" anyone's views. I don't see how anyone can be allowed to simply remove information of this sort without any rational discussion of its contents. If IsraelXKV8R isn't happy with the section, he should suggest changes to make, rather than remove what I've written without any further ado. |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Yours truly, ] (]) 01:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC) |
|