| Revision as of 05:37, 12 January 2008 editDurova (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,685 edits →Podcast: request withdawal← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:21, 18 October 2024 edit undoZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators30,065 edits I'm Just Wild About Harry listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|3=May 2017}} | |||
| ''Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''' at the end. I'll reply here if you post here.<br > | |||
| {{User:Durova/templates|pagetop}} | |||
| '' | |||
| ].]] | |||
| ] | |||
| ---- | |||
| Interested in potentially featurable images? Help improve existing material from the Misplaced Pages/Commons archives at ]. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 18:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| </div > | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #333 ; padding: 5px; width: 495px;">'''Archived talk ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]'''</div> | |||
| == Triple Crowns == | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #333 ; padding: 5px; width: 495px;">'''Archived talk ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]'''</div> | |||
| I just saw your Triple Crown awards. What a great idea. I believe I qualify for your ''Napoleonic'' one. Have a look at my user page to confirm. | |||
| ---- | |||
| * DYK:], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| * GA:], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| * FC:], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| Thanks. - ] <sup>]</sup> 09:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ''The Bugle'': Issue CXVIII, January 2016 == | |||
| Nomination for ]: | |||
| * FA ] | |||
| * GA ] | |||
| * DYK ] ] 01:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="width: 100%;" | |||
| ==Royal abdication== | |||
| | valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | | |||
| {| | |||
| | ] | |||
| | width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> | |||
| <div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| * Project news: '']'' | |||
| * Articles: '']'' | |||
| * Book review: '']'' | |||
| * Op-ed: '']'' | |||
| * Timeline: '']'' | |||
| </div> | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
| |} | |||
| <div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> | |||
| ''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=701440818 --> | |||
| == ''The Bugle'': Issue CXIX, February 2016 == | |||
| Hi ], and Happy New Year! | |||
| {| style="width: 100%;" | |||
| I was really touched by your and ] coronation, but I don't think that I deserve it. :( To be sure, I've helped out with a few ] and I earned one DYK very early in my Wiki-career (the funny story about ]'s blood-protein purification demonstration). But I don't really have any Good Articles to my credit. I feel that I did help ] become a Good Article, but my contributions were paltry and trivial compared to the amazing work of ], who deserves all the credit for that article. I hope to earn a Good Article someday, perhaps for ] or ] or ], but so far it's eluded me. | |||
| | valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | | |||
| {| | |||
| So I have to lay your three-fold crowns back at your feet until I do earn them. Much as I admire ], I can't wear a cloak of borrowed feathers. :) | |||
| | ] | |||
| | width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div> | |||
| If you have any tips for me, that'd be great! I've been a little despondent at how seldom my articles are awarded a DYK. :( I've started about 4000 referenced articles by now and only 1 has ever gotten a DYK; I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Admittedly, they're usually on pretty technical subjects that a general reader would probably find boring. :( ] (]) 20:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;"> | |||
| * Project news: '']'' | |||
| :Before we start the interregnum, please remember that the standard threshold for qualification is 10 line citations. You don't have to be the principal contributor to achieve that. Would you double check and confirm before I downgrade the award? | |||
| * Articles: '']'' | |||
| * Book review: '']'' | |||
| :And regarding DYKs, nearly all of my submissions have been accepted. You're welcome to show me your new work and I'll see what I can do about helping you draft a good hook. Best wishes, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 20:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| * Op-ed: '']'' | |||
| * Timeline: '']'' | |||
| Hi, thanks for your speedy reply and offer of help! I'm a little embarrassed to admit that I didn't know that we're supposed to submit our own work for DYK; the Edwin Cohn DYK just happened without me doing anything. Unfortunately, I think I'm done creating new articles for the time being; I've already started too many articles that need improvement desperately. | |||
| </div> | |||
| I'm not sure what you mean by "line citations" — is that the same as "inline citations"? However, I just reviewed my work at ] and I can safely say that I didn't contribute any references. My main contributions were minor re-wordings and re-arrangements of the prose to improve the flow and to make the article pithier and more easily intelligible to lay-people. The ''content'' of the article derives entirely from ]. ] (]) 21:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, inline citations. All right; I'll see what I can do. I got pretty lucky with DYK: one of the first articles I ever started was a collaboration with ] who's an old hand at this. I was surprised to get a DYK nod for it, then looked around and figured out how it works. Probably I could have earned several other DYKs that I didn't try for. Lately I've been rebuilding ] so I've been writing more DYKs to bring attention to the project. Regards, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Yes, I ''really'' appreciate all your work there! :D I started the TA WikiProject, but after making its main page and article assessment system, I got pulled away by a bazillion people asking me to work on other things. :( I feel awful about abandoning ], ] and the others, and I get mad at myself for getting distracted every day by something new — blah. I'll try to make your crochet symbols tonight, though. :) ] (]) 21:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I joined that last summer when the project was pretty healthy and did some low key work, not noticing how participation was dropping off. After I handed in my bit and had more time for mainspace work I realized how much attention was needed. Spam had even crept into the templates! Most of the work I've done since then is very unglamorous (stub sorting, despamification, template updates) so I threw in a few DYKs because nobody much notices a brilliant new stub category. ;) <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Great and gracious lady, ]. :) | |||
| I used the following book as my reference | |||
| * {{cite book | author = Pauline Turner | date = 2001 | title = How to crochet | publisher = Collins and Brown | location = London | isbn = 1-85585-827-4 | pages = p. 150}} | |||
| but then I noticed that a slightly newer book in my library has more and slightly different symbols (the crossbars are at right angles, instead of beveled) | |||
| * {{cite book | author = Donna Kooler | date = 2002 | title = Donna Kooler's Encyclopedia of Crochet | publisher = Leisure Arts | location = Little Rock, AR | isbn = 1-57486-282-0 | pages = p. 23}} | |||
| Do you have a preference? It wouldn't take much more work to add the other symbols, although I'd have to do it tomorrow night, when I'm better rested. I'm a little under the weather at the moment. :P ] (]) 07:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| PS. I really need to shed that Freya cloak, I'm feeling really uncomfortable; please forgive me. | |||
| ]. You're one of the few Wikipedians who can appreciate how much work was behind this photo.]] | |||
| :Gorgeous, thank you! London and Little Rock, eh? I'll have to check this against Debbie Stoller to make sure whether you've chosen American or British terminology. I'm a southpaw myself, which means I look at the books just long enough to imagine geometric inversions and then create my own designs. I've just finished a Kleenex box cover in scallop stitching (four American double stitches into a single stitch, skip one, anchor with a flat stitch, repeat ad nauseam). Think you could do a schematic for that? I managed a DYK for ] and maybe an article for scallop stitches could get there too. | |||
| :The advantage of this habit is that I can upload photos of everything I crochet to Commons because I own all the underlying creative copyrights. The downside is that I don't read crochet patterns. I'm like the musician who creates songs without knowing how to read music. Someday some poor right hander is going to try to duplicate my illustrations and she'll be in for a nasty surprise. ;) | |||
| :I'm a better embroiderer and can duplicate any stitch or schematic I see. And where stitch orientation is an issue I just rotate the piece and work upside down. But not much of that is uploadable because I tend to follow patterns. I keep eyeing a piece on my wall and wishing I could use it to illustrate the ] article, but durnit the thing is someone else's copyrighted design. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 07:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| What a fun letter! :) I can't tell you how wonderful it is to meet another crafter here; I was awfully lonesome when I first got here. :( My main love is knitting, which I'm pretty good at; but as I'm sure you know, knitting and crochet are as close as cousins, and I do crochet for fun and to make presents and vase-doilies. I love the way you can go in any direction with crochet, and also how its easy shaping and stiffness are wonderful for making little two- and three-dimensional figures like angels. I also use crochet doilies to illustrate the principles of curvature to my knitting students: too few increases = a cup, too many = a frill, just right = flat circle. I wonder that mathematicians don't do likewise! I'm pretty lame at embroidery, although I use it as duplicate stitch (Swiss darning) in knitting, to make flowers and leaves and to give the illusion that I can knit in a perfect circle, each stitch suspended from the next; it's wonderfully mystifying (and instructive) for some students. ;) | |||
| I'm pretty flexible about instructions vs. charts, but I usually use them only at the beginning; once I figure out the pattern by doing a swatch, I rarely look at them, because you can see from the stitches themselves where you are on the pattern. It's a lot safer than trying to follow written instructions exactly (which sometimes have mistakes in them!), and it lets you adjust the pattern to fit your gauge. I'm not like some people who can watch television and knit; I have to look, but my fingers do develop a pattern memory of their own, so that I'm usually not thinking about the knitting as I do it; my mind wanders off to happy, sunny fields populated by friends and kind words. :) ] (]) 08:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| PS. I'm pretty sure that I used the American terminology throughout, but please correct me if I'm mistaken; two heads are better than one! :) | |||
| :So you teach knitting? That's far more advanced than me. I've made a few sweaters that way and occasionally even follow patterns. One of the tests I set for myself in the German language was to get a sweater pattern. The thing was actually wearable when I finished, so I passed the exam. :) But it's so much slower than crochet. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 08:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I'm not that good — I wouldn't want to excite your anticipation, only to disappoint. :( But I do love teaching and gabbing with fellow knitters in a circle. :) I used to go to a spinning circle every week, which was a lot of fun too, but I'm running out of time these days. | |||
| I'll be happy to make you a diagram for the scallop stitch, but I know it a little differently? I'm guessing you mean a solid shell stitch, which I would do as "* 5 dc's into previous sc, sk 2 dc's, sc into middle dc, sk 2 dc *" and half-stagger on the next row? Please let me know exactly what you'd like and I'll try to draw that. | |||
| As it turned out, I didn't get a camera for Christmas, but by good fortune, I have a friend visiting who loaned me hers. So I dashed off a series of pictures for knitting that I've been thinking about for some time, although they didn't turn out too well. :( But maybe they'll inspire someone to do them better? I'll crop them and upload them later tonight. I also took two crochet pictures that I thought you might enjoy for articles on filet and scallop stitch — well, really, fan stitch, but you know it's almost the same. Right now, though, I have to finish typing in some things for ], who's been far more patient with me than I deserve. :) ] (]) 23:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, I'll upload the pic later tonight. Right now I'm finishing up ] for DYK before I head out to a party. I actually created a smocking sampler for that page. What an undertaking! Stitching the thing wasn't half as much work as marking it and stabilizing the pleats. For the crochet piece, what I did was almost the standard solid shell stitch. It was too lumpy at 5dc so I worked it in 4dc. And only skipped 1dc between them. I worked the half-stagger and everything else you wrote looks right. Your help with schematics would be ''so wonderful''. The whole crochet area was hamstrung without it. Cheers! <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Reply to MartinPhi == | |||
| Hi Durova, your reply to MartinPhi on the AC RfC page should probably go on talk, not underneath their view. ] (]) 18:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I had already posted a similar elaboration on talk before he directly challenged me in his opinion, which gives passersby a misleading impression. If he alters his statement accordingly I'll be glad to remove my reply. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 01:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Query of Concern regarding the private forwarding of emails when an ArbCom is involved == | |||
| Durova... On several pages, I have seemed to detect a plan for Z to forward you a quantity of private emails of mine to her (or to others) through-out a period of time --- which may or may not prelim any knowledge I had of her posting here at WP. I would like you to please clarify what it is that is expected to be delivered to you and what it will seek to prove. Do realize that emails taken out of context over nearly 10 years can present a distorted perspective, drawing only upon those that would support certain contentions. | |||
| Durova, if this is what is to be considered,I request a chance to forward private emails from her to several of my addresses, JUST since the time when I had publicly established, after her mentorship began, of full and consistent support and defense of her on WP... and, also found on WP, will be a consistent pattern of my withdrawing from each and every conflict that ever threatened to develop. | |||
| Durova, since this is something that is obviously going on off-Wiki, yet is being used by you to judge me, I think it important for this to be addressed publicly on the appropriate ArbCom topic and discussion pages of the evidence and workpage topics. | |||
| Thank you for your openness and clarification of what is going on so that all can understand what your judgments are being drawn upon. | |||
| A_Kiwi, TRCourage ] (]) 03:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Could you link me to these assertions? I have made no offer to review any private correspondence between Z and anybody else. Your post comes as a complete surprise to me; I know nothing about such a thing. And I promise, if any e-mail of yours gets forwarded to my inbox by a third party, I will delete it without reading it as soon as I recognize it comes from you. Of course you may e-mail me directly if you wish. But please, don't forward me anything. I don't want to play monkey in the middle. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 04:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I had been puzzled by a question left on a talk page, asking for an AOL addy available only via a search by an admin (apparently was deleted). The question asked the party in question to send you a link to the relevant topic page. http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Zeraeph#AOL_E-mail_address | |||
| ::And while I did not start searching for "AOL email", I later found on one of the ArbCom pages where a discussion was how I had once posted my private email address on a talk page (later deleted from history), and she suggested the article she thought it occurred in and she asked if you could track down the deleted post for her as she was ill. | |||
| ::The comment that struck me was that if the email address matched the letters Z had, you would readily accept them as they might be of importance. | |||
| ::These are, of course, scanty bits of scattered bits of conversation, but when one says that once wishes to receive emails, as long as they are sure they come from a particular person who has self revealed her online address, it puzzles me. | |||
| ::Don't worry. I did write Jeff of my concerns of course. | |||
| ::If the two identical TRCourage email searches in deleted material are not related, I am sure it will soon be seen as completely innocent. | |||
| :: ] (]) 04:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm watching my favorite TV show and uninterested in the swapping of out of context "interpreted for you" emails, but what was actually said was not that you wished to receive them, but that ArbCom would find them of considerable usefulness. Whatever. Fact and fiction are interesting things, are they not? ] (]) 05:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Ah, I see how the misunderstanding started. I wasn't suggesting Z send ''me'' anything; I was suggesting she ask an administrator to match an e-mail address from her own files against her recollection of a deleted post. If the addresses matched then she might forward those e-mails directly to ArbCom with the belief that they came from you. I've never seen the e-mails in question; are you confirming that you sent them? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Durova, I apologize for not checking for a response, being busy going thru my own caches of emails. Yes, of COURSE, Durova. I fully admit that I, A_Kiwi, am the SAME PERSON as alleged stalker aka TR Courage, aka Cricket Courage, aka Cricket's Courage. When Z threatened on Wiki last year to reveal the association between my two screen names, I went public at that time. ] (]) 04:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Needed to add, Durova... The reason I did not reveal who -I- was prior to the blackmail attempt was that I knew she wanted her real identity to remain unknown, private, so I fully respected that and anyone can see that I have a continuous history of avoiding edit warring and if anything, once or twice tried to help her see that discussing things on the talk page, using it to teach rather than humiliate and demoralize new editors would be helpful and useful. However when she was writing me frequent sweet friendly emails during the Asperger/SG riot, I heard from wiki friends that she was working against my reputation on two fronts on WP, one of these being that she was going to get me banned for having two accounts by publicly linking the two. When faced with blackmail, the only recourse you have is to remove the secret. Unfortunately, her exposing me instantly exposed her, for tens of thousands of people on the web have witnessed her behaviors through the past 11 years on the internet, for my names and her identity are paired in web history via thousands of her posts on scores of forums, lists and discussion boards, depicting me (along with the occasional others) as one kind of person or another, being dangerous for one reason or another - the reasons changed as months and years passed. Why she wanted to lose her privacy on Wiki was beyond me, but she had made her choice and thus had left me no choice. ] (]) 07:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == BB == | |||
| That's a really nice tribute to the lady - good stuff! Hope you had a good Christmas. ] (]) 10:37, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you, same to you! I've been reviving the ]. Have something in the works right now that I'll be uploading soon. :) Best regards, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 10:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Cuerden== | |||
| I think I got a bit more of what you were saying. I responded there. ——''']'''</span> ] Ψ ]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 21:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I'll go catch up with you. I've been expanding an article for DYK and the biggest part of the work has been offline. Sometimes there's no adequate image on either Misplaced Pages or Commons and I make my own. For this one I actually created and labeled a sampler of ten different embroidery stitches. If that sounds like a lot of work, it is. So I'll head over and help clean things up at the RFC in a sec. Best regards, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Non-administrator_rollback == | |||
| ] we would like your input with regards to the creating of consesus of ]. To me the way it is being presented now looks like a violation of ] and ]. The way it is now it is now it is a candidate for ]. Thank you, ] (]) 23:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you very much for soliciting my opinion. I'm in a hurry but I'll run over there right away. Cheers, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I am being told by creater of the article to ] ]. Can sure use some advise. Thanx, ] (]) 00:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Posted. Now I have to run and get ready for a party. Have a great weekend! <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 00:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Enjoy, we all need a break here! ] (]) 00:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I'm passing this case over to ArbCom. I know you had a go at trying to sort things with the ] article, so you might want to comment on whether they should accept or reject the case. <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 04:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Curiousity == | |||
| Hi, I noticed that you recommended WikiMedia projects as a less intense atmosphere than this one. Would you explain what those might be? Or where they are? I know about Wiki Commons, the news and books projects. Are there others? Regards, ] 21:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Wikiversity, Wikisource, Wikitionary, other language editions of Misplaced Pages, etc. WMF actually runs several hundred sites. Just about anyone who's fluent enough to contribute here could head over to the Simple English Misplaced Pages. I've done a little work for them and they were very welcoming. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for the info! ] 17:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I understand what you are doing, but I think that borderline notability articles should be deleted regardless of the subject's opinion on the matter. It is incumbent upon the proposer and supporter of the article to demonstrate notability; failure to do so ends the story and requires deletion. BLP or not. We are encyclopedia not people magazine or the gossip column of their favorite rag; once people who submit articles here understand it by having borderline or unsourced crap articles deleted as fast as they are submitted we will be a better encyclopedia. Does any other encyclopedia take the position that its articles' subjects can dictate whether they should get an article or not or what its contents should be? No. To do so makes a mockery of the NPOV guidelines under which we purport to operation. Because if someone, the subject's, POV is given preferential treatment then we'll only have articles on people who want them and they'll only say what those people want them to. When Ollie North calls up WP and says, he loves having an article but all that messy Iran-Contra stuff is a problem - just remove it; or OJ Simpson doesn't want the unpleseantness of his various court cases mentioned in his bio - after all there is enough football stuff to merit inclusion here, just drop the contraversial stuff... etc. You get the point. The best way to handle this in an NPOV manner is to raise the bar to bios here at WP so that everyone meets the definition of "public figure" per US libel law (that's where WP is headquartered). As public figures deserve little to no privacy and have limited rights to pursue libel claims we should seriously cut back these no-names who manage to get to get articles here - mostly self-seving ones and welcomed, but this class of low notability people are really the problem. ] (]) 21:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I respect that opinion. ''Borderline notability'' is an ambiguous term and I'm not particularly comfortable with it because there's no clearly defined boundary. I'm willing to keep the biographies on the lower end of the notability scale unless the subject actively requests deletion. Then, up to the point where the person is famous enough to appear in some paper-and-ink specialty encyclopedia, I'd honor that person's request. | |||
| :Your concern about censorship resonates with me and I worked very hard to find a principle that doesn't open that door. Oliver North and O.J. Simpson are too famous for deletion; their absence would affect the encyclopedia's completeness. They certainly don't get a line item veto on properly documented information. Courtesy deletion is all-or-nothing: either the article stays online or it doesn't. You might like to glance at the ] biography and its talk page. The dispute is in RFAR now. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Help with image == | |||
| I hope you dont mind that I approach you, but I see that you are active working with photos on WP, and I am totally clueless on that subject. I have a small problem: I use this beautiful in the ] article, as the dress on the left, and the black/red shawl on the wall in the background are from Bayt Jibrin. However, the dress on the right is from BerSheba. Is it possible to "cut away" the Bersheba dress for this article? The picture is also used in the ], and there we ofcourse would like to keep the whole picture. Is this possible? Regards, ] (]) 23:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 01:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)]] | |||
| ::Wonderful! I have already put it into the ] article; it looks sooo much better! Thanks again, it was very kind of you! Regards, ] (]) 02:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::You're welcome. Really, this was a very simple edit. I'm glad it helps. Cheers, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 02:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::ah, a small step for you, a giant leap for me! ;-) ] (]) 05:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| BTW I've added a category and put the Textile Arts project template onto the talk page. Looks quite good; are you shooting for GA? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 02:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, I have zero experience with the GA process..I just started the "costumes" articles because I really love some of those costumes..and there are quite a few books about the subject. (And it is very nice to work on a Palestinian subject without having to be edit-warring all the time!) Then ] came along and expanded it...some added the fine pictures..and now we have been paid a great compliment; we have been plagiarised! See :-) Do you think there is a lot needed for it to get to GA status? I have just got hold of Weir´s: "Palestinian Costume" book (one of the "Bibles" on the topic), so I thought I would be doing some updating in any case. | |||
| :Btw; are you familiar with the collection? I understand we can use them here on WP? There are lots and lots of interesting pictures there, I just have no clue about how to upload them. (I *am* clueless..) E.g. the ] article has no picture, but search for: Magnes Hebrew....and you get two very, very nice pictures, which would have been great in the article. Likewise; if you search for: Jibrin...you get lots of pictures ..partly of daily life in ], partly of mosaics and other antiquties, now in Istanbul(!). I would love to have those in, say a gallery in the article. Regards, ] (]) 05:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm no expert on Palestinian costumes and I very much doubt there's much to be found at my local libraries. Maybe I'll get lucky there, but for now I can only promise to help with images and copyediting and general advice. When I clicked on your link for the Matson collection all I got was a Library of Congress search form. Which keywords get me to the collection you mentioned? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Roughe Criminal Admin sysopsoc 65.188.38.31 == | |||
| ] please take a look at this. ] sysopsoc ]. I am going out for a bit. All this security investigation forensics tired me out a bit. Maybe go have a beer or someting to relax. If you need anything let me know. Regards, ] (]) 16:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Triple crown request == | |||
| ] | |||
| * DYK: ] | |||
| * GA: ] <small>(Yeah, that's right. I didn't think it would make it either. Just goes to show.)</small> | |||
| * FC: ], ] <small>(It got there by way of GA, so I guess I could have asked for this earlier, but so did most FAs; using one article for two parts sort of seemed like cheating.)</small> | |||
| --] <sup>]</sup> 16:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Hello? --] <sup>]</sup> 15:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == User:Cwiki == | |||
| I'm a little disturbed by the way you're presenting the Cwiki unblock situation, especially at ]. You fail to mention that Cwiki was blocked on the basis of evidence provided by yourself, a fact unknown by me at the time I reviewed the unblock request. Whilst I am disappointed with the way I handled it myself, I did withdraw my review since it became clear that I was in over my head. I'm not entirely sure how I was supposed to know I was supposed to contact you, which is a fundamental point in your evidencve. I reviewed the block based on Guy's request at ]. There is no mention of you made in that request. I too am disappointed in the way the Cwiki block was handled, but I'm also disappointed in the way it is being presented. I '''withdrew''' my review. ] <small>] </small> 16:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :It was unknown to me also; I hadn't been informed of every block that had been made, nor was I notified of the unblock requests. If I'd gotten a heads up we could have resolved things much sooner. When the editor evaded his block to appeal to me on an IP a month later, I was really stunned to see that things had dragged out so far without anyone consulting the principal investigator. But I don't mean to be unfair; if you can suggest a way to amend that statement and make it better I'll be glad to update it. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm confused. I really don't understand the process at all here. My understanding is that Cwiki was blocked on your say so. Is that correct or not? If that's correct, why were you not aware that Cwiki was blocked? My point is that yes, I made a mistake, but my mistake was based on the error of others. Guy should have come to you, and you should have been aware of what was happening to the information you were passing on. No? I just don't like seeing my name on an arbitration case I have nothing to do with and within a summary I do not agree with and which does not reflect the chain of events properly. If your intention is to show that admins make mistakes, then I think you have used the wrong piece of evidence, or used the evidence in the wrong way. That evidence to me demonstrates what happens when admins are misinformed. I was severely misinformed. ] <small>] </small> 14:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm pretty sure multiple people were checking the histories and I know there was some confusion about the borderline cases . The Joan of Arc vandal changed tactics enough times that he was very hard to track (19 registered socks plus tons of AOL IP shenanigans). I really wished I had been brought into the loop on that particular block appeal. Good faith miscommunication and unlikely to boomerang on anybody after this much time, but worth pointing out as an illustration of how standards were shifting in an IMHO untenable direction at the time the case opened. If there's a particular amendment you'd like me to make to my statement, please advise. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 11:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::nah, never mind. I'm being overly sensitive. I've said my piece. I still don't get why Guy's post at ] makes no mention of all of this, but I guess it's an IRC cabal thing. There's not much harm done, it just feels a little off to me. I can't think of a way of amending your statement which doesn't open a whole can of worms for someone if arb-com want to, so let it be. ] <small>] </small> 21:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==You have mail== | |||
| Please check your email. Thank you. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 17:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Re. FPC == | |||
| ] | |||
| Hello Durova and thank you for contacting me. Hmm, I'm not so sure about a picture taken on an overcast day, it would likely fail to provide enough light and the picture would be too dark (I took pictures of other rooms in the palace that were not being hit by direct sunlight that day, and they didn't turn out that well). Anyway, I may try your suggestion some other time (not sure when though coz I'll be moving to another country soon and won't be returning to Portugal for quite a few months). Thank you for your feedback. Best regards, <strong><font style="color: #082567">]</font>]<font style="color: #082567">]</font></strong> 17:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Tough call. I'd aim the camera away from those outdoor windows. The problem I anticipate is that there are probably mirrors on those opposite walls, which will still cause smaller blown whites unless you're careful about choosing your lighting conditions. You might get the right effect on a day with light cirrus or altocumulus cloud cover, or perhaps at a time of day when the sunlight doesn't strike that room quite so directly. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK == | |||
| {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |- | ||
| |} | |||
| |] | |||
| |} | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:{{{4|}}}|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:{{{4|}}}|s|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:{{{4|}}}|{{#if:{{{5|}}}|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| <div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;"> | |||
| }}{{#if:{{{5|}}}|{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| ''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| }}{{#if:{{{6|}}}|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| </div> | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> --] (]) 21:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=705057126 --> | |||
| :Thank you! <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Since you are completely inactive, I have removed your name from ] so as to not continue cluttering up your talk page with newsletters you probably aren't reading. ···] · <small>] · ] · ]!</small> 22:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == POTD notification == | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ]]] | |||
| An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| Hi Lise, | |||
| Just to let you know, the Featured Picture ] is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on July 17, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at ]. Thank you for all of your contributions! — ] (]) 00:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 22:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| == Interest In Learning Restoration Practices == | |||
| ==another DYK!== | |||
| I saw your hook on DYK, an area where I help out often. It's good to see your name again! Someday, I might ask for your advice on policy, blocking, or investigation. Happy New Year! ] (]) 22:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Ah, thank you. Yes for about the last month I've beeen writing DYKs to raise the profile of the textile arts project. Been getting very good feedback from the DYK folks: I can almost always provide an image that isn't a human head or a building. ;) Cheers, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Durova, per your userpage I am reaching out to see what I can assist with in re: restoration of images or other documents that can be uploaded to Misplaced Pages/Wikimedia. I have no knowledge of this subject at the moment and am a fledgling user, so any information you have will be beneficial—necessary programs, practices and all the rest. Cheers! ] (]) 17:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Shell stitch == | |||
| == POTD notification == | |||
| The length of prose on my check was 1559 characters, which is just enough for DYK. An expansion would be nice in case anyone calls you on it, but it does pass the requirement. ] 22:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ]]] | |||
| :Thank you very much. I'll see if I can add a little more in the next few days. Another project member may be creating a schematic diagram. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Lise, | |||
| Just to let you know, the Featured Picture ] is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 24, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at ]. Thank you for all of your contributions! — ] (]) 01:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == The ] Newsletter — Issue XXII (December 2007) == | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| == Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity == | |||
| {| style="width: 100%; padding-right: 1em;" | |||
| | colspan="3" valign="middle" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; background: lightsteelblue;" | | |||
| ] <big>'''The ] Newsletter'''</big><br/> Issue XXII (December 2007) <br/> | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 65%; " | | |||
| ; Project news | |||
| * The ] has been created. | |||
| * The ] has completed its ninth month of competition. The top scorer this month is ], with 22 points, followed by ], with 8 points, and ], with 6 points. Blnguyen also remains the overall leader, with 162 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries. | |||
| * ] is needed; any assistance is welcome! | |||
| * {{tl|WPMILHIST}} now supports an explicit tag (class=DAB) for marking disambiguation pages. | |||
| Hello! There is currently a ] of a bot to manage the ] ] by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the ]. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be ''uncontroversially'' removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! ] (]) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| | valign="top" rowspan="3" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em; width: 34%;" | | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:MusikAnimal@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:MusikBot_II/Inactive_MMS_targets&oldid=748573976 --> | |||
| ; Articles of note | |||
| ==wikisleuths== | |||
| I am a computer guy and think I would fine this very interesting, please let me know ] (]) 13:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. <!-- User:FastilyBot/Task12Note --> | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">ATTENTION</span>: This is an automated, ]-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details. Thanks, ] (]) 23:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| New ]: | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Durova. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| New ]: | |||
| # ] | |||
| # ] | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | | |||
| ; Current proposals and discussions | |||
| * A ] has begun. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| | valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=813406725 --> | |||
| ; Awards and honors | |||
| * ] has been awarded the ] in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles. | |||
| * ] has been awarded the ] in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic. | |||
| * For their outstanding efforts as part of ], ], ], and ] have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively. | |||
| == User group for Military Historians == | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" colspan="2" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" | | |||
| ; ''Tag & Assess 2007'' | |||
| ] is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows: | |||
| Greetings, | |||
| {{div col|cols=2}} | |||
| :1. ] — 7,600 | |||
| :2. ] — 5,500 | |||
| :3. ] — 5,200 | |||
| :4. ] — 3,500 | |||
| :5. ] — 3,000 | |||
| :6. ] — 2600 | |||
| :7. ] — 2250 | |||
| :8. ] — 2,200 | |||
| :9. ] — 2000 | |||
| :9. ] — 2,000 | |||
| :9. ] — 2,000 | |||
| :12. ] — 1,340 | |||
| :13. ] — 1,250 | |||
| :14. ] — 1100 | |||
| :15. ] — 1000 | |||
| :15. ] — 1000 | |||
| :15. ] — 1000 | |||
| :15. ]1000 | |||
| :15. ] — 1000 | |||
| :15. ] — 1000 | |||
| :15. ] — 1000 | |||
| {{div col end}} | |||
| Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. | |||
| We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a ]. Comments and feedback from participants and non-participants | |||
| alike are very welcome and appreciated. | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; text-align: right; font-size: 85%; " | | |||
| To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section ]. | |||
| |} <br/><small>'''Note:''' This newsletter was automatically delivered. Regards from the automated, ] (]) 23:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Triple Crown-related question == | |||
| I still await the day that I earn one of these. But I have a question that I want to ask you that I've wanted to for some time now. In order to qualify for a Triple Crown, do the DYK, GA, and FC articles all have to have something in common? Do they all have to be about a similar topic? ''']'''<small>]</small> 23:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :The articles could be on any topic. If you'd like to get there on a team effort, you're welcome to join me on a couple of undertakings. At ] I've got a workshop to raise historic photographs to ]. I've also been busy with ]. So far I've expanded ] from a three paragraph stub to B-class and am aiming for GA. Plus I've sounded out the military history project about a joint effort to raise ] to FA. More hands are welcome. Best regards, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 00:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Saying hi== | |||
| Hi Durova. Though we have interacted a tiny bit in the last year (I note that you gave me a 3 hour time out last March when I was having a bad day, and we worked together a bit on spam link deletion in November), I've never really stopped to say much to you. I just wanted to let you know how impressed I've been with your contribution to the Zeraeph arbitration, and how much I appreciated it. you have been very calming and the points you've made were quite apt. It really helped a lot. | |||
| If I can ever do anything to assist you in the future, please do not hesitate to call on me. I know how important this project is to you, and I feel the same way. Take care, ] (]) 00:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you very much. You can see from my contribution history where I've been active. If any of that interests you then feel free to join in. :) Best regards, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 00:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <!-- comment to force linebreak --> | |||
| {| align=center border=0 cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4 style="border: 1px solid #CC9; background-color: #cfc" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |<center>'''Your ] has been promoted'''</center> Your nomination for ] status, ''']''', gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at ]. ] 02:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Thank you! <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 02:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| "Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Misplaced Pages. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at ]. | |||
| ==Thank you== | |||
| Thank you for the triple crown award. Its nice to know that work here is apreciated. ] (]) 04:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Very much appreciated. Keep up the good work! <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 04:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Is this a new thing? == | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members&oldid=545621623 --> | |||
| == April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive == | |||
| I read that you are<blockquote> | |||
| a past victim of harassment and attacks, and is also very keen on preventing abuse of the project. She knows (as most of us do) some of the signs of the returning user . . . | |||
| Durova enjoys the whole business of tracking down such accounts. She calls it "sleuthing". | |||
| </blockquote> | |||
| How would you track down a returning user who is unregistered and uses constantly changing WiFi connections to make his edits impossible to track down?] (]) 04:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Um, where does that blockquote come from? And how does that relate to the specific problem you're trying to solve? Less vague analogy and more facts would be helpful. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 04:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the ] is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas: | |||
| == ] and ] == | |||
| * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope | |||
| ], I do not know if you remember the Mood Ring, but it would be great if the ] would reflect the mood of our community. The colour would change from one spectrum of the gama to another and would return to neutrality for ]! ] (]) 05:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| * adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages | |||
| :Um, redlinks? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| * updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages | |||
| ::Red blood, red cells! Blue republic, white peace! Red, white, and blue, for which we stand, under God, we the people of WikiPedia preserve naturality. ] (]) 16:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles. | |||
| :::Igor, I'm not really sure I follow you. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 18:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Will expalin a bit later. Thank you, ] (]) 18:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement. | |||
| == Triple Crown request == | |||
| The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of ], and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone. | |||
| Hopefully the first of many. :) | |||
| The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up ]. | |||
| * DYK: ] | |||
| * GA: ] or ] | |||
| * FA: ] | |||
| For the Milhist co-ordinators, ] and ] (]) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks Durova! <span style="font-variant:small-caps"><font color="#800080">]</font></span> 07:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:AustralianRupert@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Military_history/Members/Active&oldid=831112019 --> | |||
| == |
== goat == | ||
| ] | |||
| ] genetic engineering. ] (]) 08:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC}<br> research ] (]) 23:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| goat | |||
| ] (]) 02:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Clarification on The great triple crown race of 2008 == | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Can you clarify the rules for "The great triple crown race of 2008". Do the GA & FA have to be nominated after 1st Jan as the rules say "Do qualifying editing work between 1 January and 14 February"? What about articles nominated before 1st Jan which then took (a lot) of editing to achieve promotion (eg ] & hopefully ] which were both nominated in Dec 07). If not I will have to wait & see what happens to ] and ] which were both nominated on 1st Jan.— ] <sup>]</sup> 10:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Show me specific diffs of "a lot" of editing during 2008. Normally that means 10 or more citations. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 11:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Doing diffs for all the edits would take ages - can you look at the history of ] since 1st Jan as an example - it made GA last night. Examples (picking out the citations) since 1st Jan include: , , , , but there have been loads of others not specifically adding citations. | |||
| ::Somerset hasn't made FA (?yet) but ] is currently in the DYK section on the main page.— ] <sup>]</sup> 11:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Well, if you can find a simpler way to verify the work I'd accept that. Such as, if you were primary editor then a single combined diff would do. Does that sound fair? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 18:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ], a featured picture ], has been proposed for replacement with ]. Your comments are welcome at ]. ] 20:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Triple Crown Request == | |||
| == ] nominated for replacement == | |||
| What a cool idea. :) | |||
| * ] | |||
| **DYK: ] | |||
| **GA: ] | |||
| **FC: ] | |||
| Thanks! --] <b><font color="#000000">♫</font></b> <small><font color="#6666FF">]</font></small> 23:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ], a featured picture you nominated, has been ] with a ]. Your comments are welcome. ] 17:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] name change recommended == | |||
| *The same applies for ] - see ] and ]. ] 18:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious == | |||
| This sockpuppet is turning into a which will grow up to be a popuppetier! Looks like the indentity is being engineered unaturally! I could be wrong by the editing profile does not corespond logically. Just heads up, but I do recommend a name change for the user, same like other editor has done! With a name like ] could become a very big problem if and when involved in an editor war! ] (]) 01:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{user precious|header=Nadezhda Durova images|thanks=for quality articles such as ], ] and ], for taking excellent care of countless historic photographs, in fine galleries, for service from 2005, - Lise, repeating from ten years ago:}} | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| }} | |||
| Miss you --] (]) 22:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ] --] (]) 08:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
| The are no Ninja Turtles at WikiPedia..:) | |||
| :Um, is this your sense of humor? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Sort of tongue and chick! But you never know what is hiding under the mattress and in the closet. There is a lot to learn from video games and cartoon carachters! The subculture is very alert and children are very bright! ] (]) 07:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::]. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 09:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Before the ]? ] (]) 23:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you today for what you did for ]! --] (]) 04:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
| == RfArb comment by G-dett == | |||
| A year ago, you were recipient no. ] of Precious, a prize of QAI! --] (]) 10:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I think you mis-read his comment, what he said was that ideally, there woould be established BY the ArbCom a group (he calls it, humorously, i think is the intent) a mini-cabal, and he suggested that because of traits you posess which he admires, you should be a part of said 'cabal', which would then monitor the relevant articles and behaviors. It's like saying, I think Durova OUGHT to be the referee for our game of kick the article. He was most definitely NOT taking a swipe at you. ] (]) 01:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks ThuranX. Durova, I just became aware of the misunderstanding through a note from HG, and have posted a clarification.--] (]) 01:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ah, thanks. You mean as in a mediation cabal? I doubt I know the underlying dispute in sufficient depth to be particularly useful. My role is limited to wiki policies and generally reducing the heat on a pretty hot dispute. I'll go ahead and strikethrough my response since I misunderstood the intent. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Glad y'all patched things up. I read G-Dett's comment as straight forward at first, but second guessed when I saw your reply. She is known to be clever like that but always in good fun, and I know you've had quite the cabal experience lately -- ]? Anyway, I hope we can avoid arbitration here. Jaak is pushy, if not tendentious, but I rather imagine certain other editors would ''metaphorically'' throw him under a bus if it meant an opportunity to, once again, poor over every nick and cranny of ]'s edit history and try and take him off the project too, fairly or not. As PR's supposed mentor -- though ] I guess more or less muscled himself in to the job too -- I'm rather concerned at that prospect. We could certainly have an interesting ] though! -- ]<sup>]</sup> 07:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Have you seen the roast I played upon myself? ] <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 08:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Lol, those are creative! Maybe you could auction them off to the highest bid donation to the Foundation? (Well, maybe we should scrounge around for other donated items...) Take care, ] | ] 10:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hm, I could actually make more sockpuppets if I really needed to. And then sell them on eBay? Dear heavens, the implications... <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 10:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Oh, I was thinking more like an internal Misplaced Pages . (Though I see that is set up to host charity auctions.) Maybe Mr. Wales would donate a pair of autographed socks... ]s with the WP logo... Could be fun. ] | ] 12:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg== | |||
| == Jaakobou mentorship == | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by ]. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from ] is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an ]; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. | |||
| If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with ]. If you have any questions, please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-disputed fair use rationale-notice --> | |||
| Hello Durova. I see you've taken on the mentorship of ]. | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| It's not very clear why you've taken this on now, somehow I'd have expected the time to arrange mentoring was after the proposed arbitration where he is a prime involved party, not before. Are you in favour of the community pressing on and detailing any alleged issues you might feel they've spotted in his participation? | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| I'd like to mention that mentors (and other "semi-impartial mediators") in similar cases have sometimes/often suffered harassment and time-wasting demands to explain themselves, with the apparent intention to drive them off (and I've repeatedly seen it succeed!). I can assure you this is not my purpose in speaking to you now (or ever). ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 11:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> | |||
| :Thank you. Really my role is simple: to be a sounding board and a stabilizing influence on matters of conduct and site policy. And as much as is possible, to help turn down the heat on hot discussions and find areas of agreement and cooperation. Mentorship is a good thing for anyone who's part of a tough dispute and wants a little help being their best self. Best regards, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 11:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm still not very sure about the parameters - for instance, I have three questions for Jaakobou which bear on the progress of the RfA we're increasingly expecting - do you think it is right and proper that I ask them now and that he respond? | |||
| ::I would like to avoid a position where these apparently puzzling discrepancies might appear in the Arbitration later and look very much like accusations. It would undoubtedly poison the atmosphere if it turns out that they're all silly misunderstandings. I think it's important that I not be seen to "harass him" by, for instance, going to his TalkPage and demanding answers, because I know he doesn't like that and, no matter how significant the question, will possibly refuse to answer and could even get quite upset. | |||
| ::Please note that Jaakobou himself considers it perfectly proper to approach other people's mentors, as . (Actually, he considers it perfectly proper to make quite direct and personal accusations against them, but I can assure you that that is totally against my nature!). | |||
| ::I feel confident that many other people will want to know the answers to these questions, especially to the first one: | |||
| ::*: Have you ever operated any other Misplaced Pages (English version) editing-accounts, and, if so, have they been operated in ways that would attract censure? | |||
| ::*: In your statement , you say ''"I also believe there is a serious need for formal mediation on ] and ]"''. Now I (PR) have seen it suggested that you never agree to compromises. Please provide examples where you've compromised constructively. (I simply don't know the answer to this question, though I think I once noticed you refusing to join mediation at a favorite article of yours, the ]). | |||
| ::*: There was an RfC on the ] status of . Eventually (after a great deal of uncalled for participation by involved editors, into which I allowed myself to be sucked in, sorry), I summarised the conclusions as being two to none against CAMERA (or likely three to one, if we included someone who'd been only slightly involved, offering to mediate). You don't appear to have exactly rejected that conclusion (I cannot understand what you're trying to say ), but just one day later, you were encouraging other people to ignore the conclusion, eg . I'm sure you'll understand that this could look very much like both tendentious editing (concealing the reasonably clear nature of the result at the RfC) and disruptive editing, encouraging disrespect for WP:Policy. Would you care to explain yourself? ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Next time I catch him online I'll ask him to look at your questions. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thankyou. Mentorship is not supposed to be a trial, least of all for the mentor. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 21:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Do you feel that these are questions I'm not entitled to have answers to? I should point out that (some?) of my mentors were subject to a barrage of demands, right up to seeing problems where there appeared to be none - if you feel I'm off track wanting some of these answers, please tell me. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 09:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Well, it's really up to Jaakobou to decide how to respond. My own suggestion is posted to RFAR talk: namely, I'd like to reduce tension by finding uncontroversial areas to collaborate. I'm willing to Photoshop images of Israeli or Palestinian culture and give a little bit of help improving ]. A 103-year-old image I worked on is at FPC right now. I doubt I can solve all of Misplaced Pages's disputes in this area (let alone the world's), but maybe I can help turn down the heat a little. Does that sound good to you? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 10:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I'm afraid I find your response worrying (in fact, knowing one of your specialities, very worrying indeed). However, it was not my intention to "troll" you personally with behavior that might be worrying. Please accept my apology. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 09:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Why would my response worry you? I explained the scope of this mentorship and have been doing what I said I would do. At any rate, thank you for changing your evidence. Maybe we can work together on something. Over at ] I've posted an invitation for examples of Palestinian embroidery. If we get enough material I'll start an image category on Commons for it. In particular I'm looking for close-ups. The current article text discusses styles of work and motifs, but not much about actual stitches. I could identify some of that if we get some good images to work from. Best regards, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 20:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == Imperial Napleonic Triple Crown == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Hello, I believe I qualify for this award now. | |||
| *] | |||
| **DYK: ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| **GA: ], '']'', ], ], '']'' | |||
| **FC: '']'', ], ], ], ] | |||
| Cheers, <font face="Verdana">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></font> 04:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==rollback== | |||
| has been turned on for you, now live for non-admins ]. Cheers, ] 19:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm uncomfortable about this: it's a controversial op, I haven't requested it, nobody asked me whether I wanted it toggled, and I don't really need it. What I ''do'' really need is to avoid any appearance of back door dealings and insider back scratching because people construe the weirdest things when they see my name. I appreciate the gesture because I suppose it's kindly meant, but please turn it off. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Done. If you ever want it back, you know where to go. :) ] 21:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::No problem, For the benefit of anyone interested, I have been looking at all users with previous rollback privileges enabled, and there is no back channel contact involved here, as Durova has indicated. Cheers, ] 21:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thank you. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> | |||
| ==Triple crown request== | |||
| Hello, someone alerted me to apply for this award. Hopefully I'll be contributing a lot more in the future :) | |||
| <span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the ] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, ] (]) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
| *] | |||
| **DYK: ] | |||
| **GA: ] | |||
| **FC: ] <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| ==]== | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Two}} --] (]) 10:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located ]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. | |||
| == FAR for Joan of Arc == | |||
| On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 22:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 18:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Triple Crown request == | |||
| === Featured Article Save Award for ] === | |||
| I guess I qualify for the Imperial triple crown jewel, having created three featured articles, three good articles, and a whole bunch of DYKs. I should note that of the FA articles listed below, two were almost totally written by me while the other (William Shakespeare) has 350 of my edits. Thanks for the consideration.--] (]) 02:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| There is a ] nomination at ]. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. ] (]) 14:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ==File source problem with File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif== | |||
| Self-nomination for ]: | |||
| ] | |||
| Thank you for uploading ''']'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the ] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the ]. | |||
| If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a ] and ask for a chance to fix the problem.<!-- Template:You can request undeletion --> | |||
| * DYK: ], ], ] | |||
| * GA: ], ], ] | |||
| * FC: ], ], ] | |||
| Please refer to the ''']''' to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a . If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> ]] 07:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:FPC == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Durova,<br> | |||
| Yeah I understand that and congratulate you on the work you're doing (great job!) but I think there needs to be a limit to the weight we place on historic images. I think, especially after looking through those gettyimages books, that we over estimate the limitations on photography 50, 60, 80 or even a hundred years ago. Especially since the photos we're getting are from trained professionals who are often using what was top of the line equipment in that day. Sure we can give a little leniency, but unless the photo was taken in exceptional historic circumstances where the photo captures a spontaneous and unrepeatable moment (circumstances which would allow similar allowances in modern photographs) I think we can demand composition, lighting and subject matter from historic photos. | |||
| As an example, I think ] is great as in certainly captures a near unrepeatable moment, ] would be just as spectacular taken today, whereas ] with it's forced backdrop is not so great. Would it fare much different to ] if it was a modern photo? I don't know. The first two examples also show that quality was attainable even in those days. | |||
| Hello {{u|Durova}}, | |||
| So I respect your work and hope you'll gone on with it, but I certainly feel that the "historical" line is overused as a reason for featuring. As you seem quite interested in history, I thought I might link to a few of my favourites from getty images 1920s: | |||
| As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current ]. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it. | |||
| Regards, --] 07:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Beautiful. If only they weren't copyrighted... <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 08:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Best regards,<br>] (]) 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == I need a vacation..:) == | |||
| == Arbitration motion regarding Durova == | |||
| I think my security work is coming to an end. Cleaned up a lot of stuff and taught the community about Black Hat SEO and how to deal with it. I will be going skiing to Austria next monht! Maybe will meet some Trolls on the slops..:) | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
| Will try to contribute to WikiPedia how I can but do not know if I want to get political. Regards, ] (]) 08:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{ivmbox|Principle 2 of ], ''Private correspondence'', is changed from<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence) <s>or their lapse into public domain</s>, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. <s>See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.</s>}}<br>to<br>{{tqq|2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.}}}} | |||
| :Wow, I even made it on the front page of WikiPropaganda news paper.<br> Wish I had more time to play..:) ] (]) 08:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, | |||
| ::Don't take it personally. Enjoy your break. :) <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 08:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] ] 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks. I never take it personaly. I have too much history for that! I even find it entertaining..:) ] (]) 09:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motion regarding Durova}}''' | |||
| == Best wishes == | |||
| ==Releasing IP addresses of registered users: the Video Professor incident== | |||
| You commented on this issue at ]. It was stated there that it was not an appropriate discussion forum for the topic of how hard the Foundation should and did fight to prevent revealing the IP addresses of registered users to parties who had been criticized in a Misplaced Pages article and who subpoenaed the user information. I have started a discussion at the Village Pump policy page at ]. Your comments are welcome. Thanks.] (]) 15:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Done. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I miss Durova. I hope she is doing well. ] (]) 01:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Podcast == | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| I looked at that link you posted, but did not listen to any audio that may have been associated with that blog. I'm wondering how it is evidence in the Matthew Hoffman case, but I'm not sure if you think it is very much worth listening to first. —] (''']''') 05:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Listen to the audio. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sorry if I shouldn't have edited to make it clear that this was part of your evidence. I started to listen to it but it seemed to be a right wing talk show of some kind, I do not know if "Right March" or Bill Greene are notable however. —] (''']''') 05:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::That's all right. You've seen the rest of my evidence? The Discovery Institute is notable, I'd wager. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, but perhaps not in depth. I have not gotten involved in the intelligent design issues, but I'm also not really understanding the point of bringing up non-notable podcasters' opinions. I understand we are all contending with partisans of all kinds in our lives, and I have my own blog for dealing with that kind of thing, but that's not how I see Misplaced Pages. I see this as being the place where we put aside our differences and work together to make an encyclopedia. My opinions have nothing to do with Matthew Hoffman of course but with the blocking of users based apparently on their POV. I expect to be added to the ArbCom case based on the RfC, if the ArbCom won't object. —] (''']''') 05:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::My evidence sets this forth in greater breadth and depth. Yes, I agree we should put our differences aside and work together. That's not how some people view this site. Whether I agree with a POV or disagree with it, when I see a campaign to skew Misplaced Pages content to favor any given ideology I oppose that drive. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Yes, well I think you may have concealed biases of your own. I believe you are in absolutely good faith Durova and I have not had much opportunity to converse with you before, but I have read much of what you've said in various cases. I simply think you've decided that there is such a thing as an objective POV. I don't think that's what NPOV means. —] (''']''') 05:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I request you withdraw that insinuation. At ], for instance, I was the sole supporter of a young earth creationist. My evidence in the Matthew Cuerden case is about a long term partisan effort to recruit meatpuppets and skew site content. Debates about "objective POV" are beside the point when that happens. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 05:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:21, 18 October 2024
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Durova has not edited Misplaced Pages since May 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Since you are completely inactive, I have removed your name from this page so as to not continue cluttering up your talk page with newsletters you probably aren't reading. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
POTD notification
Hi Lise,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Ty Cobb sliding2-edit1.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on July 17, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-07-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:49, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Interest In Learning Restoration Practices
Durova, per your userpage I am reaching out to see what I can assist with in re: restoration of images or other documents that can be uploaded to Misplaced Pages/Wikimedia. I have no knowledge of this subject at the moment and am a fledgling user, so any information you have will be beneficial—necessary programs, practices and all the rest. Cheers! Finktron (talk) 17:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
POTD notification
Hi Lise,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:MonroeStreetBridgea.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 24, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-09-24. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:24, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
wikisleuths
I am a computer guy and think I would fine this very interesting, please let me know BernardZ (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Wappen Rdecraon.jpg listed for discussion
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Durova. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
User group for Military Historians
Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Misplaced Pages. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Misplaced Pages Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
goat
.jpg)
goat
Programmer520 (talk) 02:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Duck And Cover (1951) Bert The Turtle.webm
File:Duck And Cover (1951) Bert The Turtle.webm, a featured picture you nominated, has been proposed for replacement with a higher resolution version. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/delist/Duck and Cover. MER-C 20:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
File:The Anatomy Lesson.jpg nominated for replacement
File:The Anatomy Lesson.jpg, a featured picture you nominated, has been nominated for replacement with a higher resolution version. Your comments are welcome. MER-C 17:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- The same applies for File:Under the horse chestnut tree2.jpg - see File:Mary Cassatt - Under the Horse-Chestnut Tree - Google Art Project.jpg and Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/delist/Under the horse chestnut tree. MER-C 18:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Precious
Nadezhda Durova images
Thank you for quality articles such as Nadezhda Durova, Cultural depictions of Joan of Arc and Congress of Arras, for taking excellent care of countless historic photographs, in fine galleries, for service from 2005, - Lise, repeating from ten years ago: you are an awesome Wikipedian!
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
Miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Ten years again! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you today for what you did for State Route 74 (New York – Vermont)! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
A year ago, you were recipient no. 2121 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Hearst and Morgan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Jousting helmet.jpg
The file File:Jousting helmet.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
FAR for Joan of Arc
I have nominated Joan of Arc for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 18:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for Joan of Arc
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review/Joan of Arc/archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Clapboard farmhouse in Florida 1911.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 07:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Amendment request: Durova
Hello Durova,
As one of the original parties to the "Durova" arbitration case, you may be interested in the current amendment request about the Durova case. A motion has been proposed to modify principle 2 by removing copyright-related wording from it.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Durova
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Principle 2 of Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Durova, Private correspondence, is changed from2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence)
or their lapse into public domain, the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki. See Misplaced Pages:Copyrights.
to2) In the absence of permission from the author (including of any included prior correspondence), the contents of private correspondence, including e-mails, should not be posted on-wiki.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Durova
Best wishes
I miss Durova. I hope she is doing well. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:53, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for I'm Just Wild About Harry
I'm Just Wild About Harry has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories: