Revision as of 23:30, 4 August 2009 editAndrewRT (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,839 edits →POV much?← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 02:40, 21 October 2024 edit undoPrimeBOT (talk | contribs)Bots2,066,063 editsm →top: Task 30: banner adjustment following a discussionTag: AWB |
(604 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Africa|Nigeria=yes|class=stub}} |
|
|
|
{{afd-merged-from|June 2015 Monguno bombing|June 2015 Monguno bombing|29 November 2023}} |
|
|
{{ITN talk|5 February|2015}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Africa|importance=high|Cameroon=yes|Cameroon-importance=High|Chad=yes|Chad-importance=High|Niger=yes|Niger-importance=High|Nigeria=yes|Nigeria-importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|terrorism=yes|terrorism-imp=High|importance=High|organizedcrime=yes|organizedcrime-imp=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=High|Islam-and-Controversy=y|Salaf=y|Sunni=y}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Military history |
|
|
| class = C |
|
|
| b1 <!-- Referencing and citations --> = n |
|
|
| b2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> = y |
|
|
| b3 <!-- Structure --> = y |
|
|
| b4 <!-- Grammar and style --> = y |
|
|
| b5 <!-- Supporting materials --> = y |
|
|
| African = y |
|
|
| Post-Cold-War = y}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Nigeria|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Organizations|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Mid|Interfaith=y}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Copied |from=Boko Haram |from_oldid=660475018 |to=Boko Haram insurgency |diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Boko_Haram_insurgency&diff=660482895&oldid=660429305 }} |
|
|
{{merged-from|June 2015 Monguno bombing|16 July 2024}} |
|
|
{{Nigerian English}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Archive basics |
|
== POV much? == |
|
|
|
|archive = Talk:Boko Haram/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
|counter = 2 |
|
|
|headerlevel = 2 |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 120K |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{Aan}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
<!-- 22:57 January 14, 2015 (UTC), Legacypac added ] --> |
|
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
|
{{Top 25 Report|May 4 2014 (14th)|Jan 11 2015 (17th)}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|
|counter = 4 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
|
|algo = old(336d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Boko Haram/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== References == |
|
This article is in serious need of attention from an expert on the subject matter, especially considering what recently happened involving the group. The second paragraph cites only one source (the link of which is broken) despite its claims. Perhaps a current events tag is also in order? ] (]) 22:49, 28 July 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
<references/> |
|
:Tag added. I don't understand the POV concern - which statement are you concerned about? All news sources I've read seem to be pretty consistent, from CNN to Al Jazeera and This Day. ](]) 23:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== I've read this sentence like 10 times and I still don't know what it's trying to say == |
|
== Accuracy? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this sentence at the end of the fifth paragraph grammatically incorrect or am I just a fool - "However, attacks by Boko Haram have a separate investigation conducted by The Wall Street Journal backed recent claims that Shekau was dead.". If the sentence is there to bring up additional evidence of Shekau's death, I don't know why it starts with 'however, attacks by Boko Haram', which just sounds like the WSJ report has questionable authority and Shekau is in fact alive. I only made this topic because as the last sentence of the introduction, it gave me more questions about the status of Boko Haram than the previous four paragraphs answered. ] (]) 04:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC) |
|
The BBC is reporting that Yusuf is still alive: 17:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Graphic Images == |
|
:That report states that he was alive when arrested; has been killed since. ] (]) 02:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am new to the community, but the use of graphic images embedded in this article seems inappropriate. I don't think they add any value, and they make the article less accessible to people with trauma/phobias. Consider removing them or replacing them with less graphic images. This will not diminish the gravity of the topic, I believe. ] (]) 17:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC) |
Is this sentence at the end of the fifth paragraph grammatically incorrect or am I just a fool - "However, attacks by Boko Haram have a separate investigation conducted by The Wall Street Journal backed recent claims that Shekau was dead.". If the sentence is there to bring up additional evidence of Shekau's death, I don't know why it starts with 'however, attacks by Boko Haram', which just sounds like the WSJ report has questionable authority and Shekau is in fact alive. I only made this topic because as the last sentence of the introduction, it gave me more questions about the status of Boko Haram than the previous four paragraphs answered. Whatsgoingonwiththelackof (talk) 04:00, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
I am new to the community, but the use of graphic images embedded in this article seems inappropriate. I don't think they add any value, and they make the article less accessible to people with trauma/phobias. Consider removing them or replacing them with less graphic images. This will not diminish the gravity of the topic, I believe. Bovianchovy (talk) 17:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)