Revision as of 21:05, 13 October 2022 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,846 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Vancouver/Archive 3. (BOT)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:02, 23 October 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,846 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Vancouver/Archive 3. (BOT) | ||
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} | {{Skip to talk}} | ||
{{talk header|wp=yes|WT:VANCOUVER |
{{talk header|wp=yes|WT:VANCOUVER}} | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | ||
{{WikiProject Canada|community=yes|bc=yes|Vancouver=yes}} | {{WikiProject Canada|community=yes|bc=yes|Vancouver=yes}} | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== Recent edits at Statue of John Deighton == | |||
== Peer review page update == | |||
I have no idea what to think about all the recent changes to ]. Are any project members able to take a look? ---] <sub>(])</sub> 03:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
Hi all, I've boldly updated your project's peer review page (]) by updating the instructions and archiving old reviews. | |||
== Discussion at ] == | |||
The new instructions use Misplaced Pages's general peer review process (]) to list peer reviews. Your project's reviews are still able to be listed on your local page too. | |||
] You are invited to join the discussion at ], which is within the scope of this WikiProject.  This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Misplaced Pages (]), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! <span class="nowrap">—''']'''</span> <sup class="nowrap">(] • {]•]})</sup> 07:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)<!--Template:WikiProject please see--> | |||
== Requested move at ] == | |||
The benefits of this change is that review requests will get seen by a wider audience and are likely to be attended to in a more timely way (many WikiProject peer reviews remain unanswered after years). The Misplaced Pages peer review process is also more maintained than most WikiProjects, and this may help save time for your active members. | |||
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 12:25, 25 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Request for images related to last weekend’s atmospheric river == | |||
I've done this boldly as it seems your peer review page is pretty inactive and I am working through around 90 such similar peer review pages. Please feel free to discuss below - please ping me ({{tlp|u|2=Tom (LT)}}) in your response. | |||
Hello all, | |||
Cheers and hope you are well, ] (]) 23:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Tom (LT)}}, Thanks. What does peer review entail? And, are GA reviews a subset of peer reviews? If there is appetite for a GA review -- I would like to request one for ]. ] (]) 02:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for the ping. Anyone can request a peer review of any article at any time and you can go to ] to learn more about that. A GA review is like a "step" in the development of an article where it has to meet certain criteria to get to that point. To learn more about that process, the criteria and how to nominate your article, see ]. --] (]) 02:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
I have been working on ] and am seeking pictures from the October 18-20 atmospheric river to be uploaded to Commons for inclusion in the article. All pictures are welcome, including flooding and landslides but also general rain pictures. | |||
== User script to detect unreliable sources == | |||
I created at Commons for this event and posted a similar request to ] as well as one to ] for satellite imagery. | |||
{{Main|User:Headbomb/unreliable}} | |||
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to ] and ]s. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the ]. The idea is that it takes something like | |||
*John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. (<code><nowiki>John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.</nowiki></code>) | |||
and turns it into something like | |||
* John Smith "{{highlight||pink}}" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. | |||
Thank you. <span style="color:#006400">''']''' <sub>''(he/him)''</sub></span> (]) 00:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{tl|cite web}}, {{tl|cite journal}} and {{tl|doi}}. | |||
The script is mostly based on ], ] and ] and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed. | |||
Do note that this is '''not a script to be mindlessly used''', and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at ]. Questions, comments and requests can be made at ]. | |||
-  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> | |||
<span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: ] (]) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 --> | |||
== New land acknowledgement userbox == | |||
Hi, | |||
I created the ] below and thought some project members might be interested in using it. Cheers, ] (] <nowiki>|</nowiki> ]) 00:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
{{User:Clayoquot/Vancouver land acknowledgement}} | |||
== Request review of Absolute Software Corporation edits == | |||
I work for Absolute Software Corporation, and in the past year I have been trying to gradually improve this article, adhering to Misplaced Pages's own quality standards. I have tried to use a light touch, removing low-quality references, adding new higher-quality references, and removing statements that are poorly referenced, focus on small details that are years out of date, and the like. | |||
I have hoped and expected that uninvolved Misplaced Pages editors would review my work, but there has been little substantive review to date. I of course appreciate the efforts of Misplaced Pages volunteers, and that there are many articles to work on besides this one. But I hope one or more editors can take a look now that I have proposed (on ]) a replacement for the existing "Products and services" section, which at present has only two footnotes, and which does not accurately express the range of products offered, focusing exclusively on the "Persistence" technology. I proposed a replacement with stronger sourcing on the talk page. | |||
I also hope to propose changes to the "Partnerships" section, which (appropriately) has a quality banner. It is also thinly sourced, and it is not an accurate reflection of the role partnerships have played in Absolute's business model. | |||
I hope someone would be willing to review the proposed "Products" section, and consider my proposed changes to the "Partnerships" section when I post them. -] (]) 18:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:02, 23 October 2024
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Vancouver and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Recent edits at Statue of John Deighton
I have no idea what to think about all the recent changes to Statue of John Deighton. Are any project members able to take a look? ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Discussion at Misplaced Pages:Content assessment
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Misplaced Pages (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! —CX Zoom 07:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Gordon Campbell#Requested move 18 September 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Gordon Campbell#Requested move 18 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe 12:25, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Request for images related to last weekend’s atmospheric river
Hello all,
I have been working on 2024 British Columbia floods and am seeking pictures from the October 18-20 atmospheric river to be uploaded to Commons for inclusion in the article. All pictures are welcome, including flooding and landslides but also general rain pictures.
I created Category:2024 British Columbia floods at Commons for this event and posted a similar request to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject British Columbia as well as one to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Weather for satellite imagery.
Thank you. DJ Cane (he/him) (Talk) 00:13, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- Project-Class Canada-related pages
- NA-importance Canada-related pages
- Project-Class British Columbia pages
- NA-importance British Columbia pages
- Project-Class Vancouver pages
- NA-importance Vancouver pages
- Project-Class Canadian communities pages
- NA-importance Canadian communities pages
- All WikiProject Canada pages