| Revision as of 02:22, 3 November 2010 editLing.Nut (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,803 edits thanks spam using AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:47, 30 October 2024 edit undoBaranBOT (talk | contribs)Bots, Extended confirmed users16,951 editsm Fix mass message error per WP:AWBREQTag: paws [2.2] | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 7 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Hans Adler/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Hans Adler/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} | {{archive box|auto=yes|search=yes}} | ||
| '''In the near future I may not read my talk page as frequently and reliably as I used to do. For urgent or important matters, it may be better to use email. <s>I am actually completely inactive nowadays. If you leave a message here, don't rely on getting an answer in less than a couple of years.</s>''' | |||
| ] If I left a message on your talk page, then I will be watching it for a while. So you can simply reply there, and the discussion will be in one place. Similarly, when an experienced editor comments here I will usually respond here. I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates. | |||
| ] I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.<br/>] I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.<br/>] I do not fancy non-consensual ]. | |||
| == Mediation Case == | |||
| == Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
| A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning ''Genesis Creation Myth'' has been filed with the ] (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at ] and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not. | |||
| {{User QAIbox | |||
| | title = Awesome | |||
| Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at ]; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at ]; further information on Misplaced Pages's policy on resolving disagreements is at ]. | |||
| | image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| | image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an ] of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list (] for details). | |||
| | bold = ] | |||
| ⚫ | }} | ||
| Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission. | |||
| --] (]) 07:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| Thank you, ] (]) | |||
| ] | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Thank you very much for your help.] (]) 07:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC | |||
| == FYI == | |||
| ]] (]) 19:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. | |||
| == Article Names for English places == | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 21:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| I am on your side about having English places disambiguated by the county when possible as I have proposed ] to be moved to ] and ] to ] there is ] and ]. There is also a ]. ] (]) 12:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I think you misunderstood my position. It's absurd to disambiguate a locality that is not an independent village with a county rather than the city whose mayor the inhabitants of the locality help to elect. It's particularly absurd in a case such as Beeston, which is geographically quite clearly a part of the settlement Leeds. | |||
| :While I was under the impression that there was a guideline that intentionally prescribed this absurdity, and that there was strong support for this guideline, I was prepared to support the move on consistency grounds. But it is now clear to me that that is not the case. ] ] 13:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == Well put == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under ]. | |||
| I thought your statement here summed things up nicely. ] (]) 23:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 08:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Request == | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Hello Hans: In case you are having a bit of unfamiliarity with sockpuppetry allegations, you might consider reading this once , specifically this quote ''"The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute."''<br /> | |||
| Your allegations, baseless at best, suggest that you are trying to put unnecessary pressure on me. ''']</font>'''<sup>]</font></sup> 05:31, 30 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == Brown Lady == | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| Hi, thanks for your message. I dispute the allegation that the article is a copyvio. While I accept that I did paste material from a website (which was wrong) and got a Copyvio message from a bot, I removed the tag not because "I was disguising my edits" but because I entirely rewrote the content. ] (]) 10:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :You did not entirely rewrite the content. You presented the same ideas in the same order, only changing some inconsequential words and superficial sentence structure. Original: | |||
| ::The Pons Neronianus or Bridge of Nero (54-68) was built to connect the westernmost part of the Field of Mars with the Campus Vaticanus ("Vatican Field"), where the imperial family owned land along the Via Cornelia. | |||
| ::Caligula had built a circus on the right bank of the Tiber and Nero used this park to entertain the Romans after the great fire of 64. | |||
| ::The gardens were also the place where –according to Tacitus– Nero tortured the Christians to death (text), and we can imagine that the Romans who went out to see the executions of the arsonists, crossed this bridge. | |||
| :Your first version, correctly tagged by CorenSearchBot for copy and paste: | |||
| ::The Pons Neronianus or Bridge of Nero was an ancient bridge in Rome built to connect the westernmost part of the Field of Mars with the Campus Vaticanus ("Vatican Fields"), where the imperial family owned land along the Via Cornelia. | |||
| ::The Emperor Caligula had built a circus on the right bank of the ] and ] used this park to entertain the Roman crowds after the great fire of 64. | |||
| ::The gardens were also the place where, according to Tacitus, Nero tortured to death the Christians who were accused of causing the fire. | |||
| :Your 'entirely rewritten' version: | |||
| ::The Pons Neronianus or Bridge of Nero was an ancient bridge in Rome built during the reign of the emperors Caligula or Nero to connect the western part of the Campus Martius with the Campus Vaticanus ("Vatican Fields"), where the Imperial Family owned land along the Via Cornelia. | |||
| ::The Emperor Caligula had built a circus on the right bank of the Tiber and Nero later used this park, renamed the Circus of Nero, to entertain the Roman crowds after the Great Fire of Rome of 64 AD. | |||
| ::It was in these gardens, according to Tacitus, that Nero tortured to death the Christians who were accused of causing the Great Fire. | |||
| :This is not just blatant plagiarism, it is also a very obvious case of a derived text, subject to the copyright restrictions of the original. You have nothing to win by lying about blatantly obvious facts. ] ] 11:22, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| *Three sentences in the entire article? Plus I do not appreciate being called a liar, which is not assuming good faith. I may be mistaken, but I am not a liar. Carry on in that tone and I will report you for your lack of civility. ] (]) 11:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| **In addition, I was referring to my 'Brown Lady' article. ] (]) 11:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ***Then you're on user talk page. ] (]) 11:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ****No, I'm on the user talk page. ] (]) 12:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ***CorenSearchBot did ''not'' detect your copyvio on the Brown Lady article. Unless you have a much longer and more recent history of reverting CorenSearchBot than is apparent from the contribution history of the account Jack1956, it simply makes no sense for you to claim that you were referring to the Brown Lady article (which has no bot edits in its history ) when you wrote the following: "While I accept that I did and got a Copyvio message from a bot, I removed the tag not because 'I was disguising my edits' but because ." Perhaps I wasn't clear when I said it for the first time: It is not in your best interest to lie about easily verifiable facts. | |||
| ***Additionally, if you want to lie without being called to account for it in ], you are indeed on the wrong talk page. I do not believe in making it easy for dishonest editors to deceive themselves about their character. You are very welcome to draw additional attention on yourself by reporting me for my "lack of civility". We will need all the eyes we can get to clean up your copyvios, some of which are probably from offline sources and thus very hard to detect. ] ] 12:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *My mistake in referring to the CorenSearchBoot finding a copyvio on 'Brown Lady' - I thought that was what we were discussing and I wrongly assumed it had put a message on the article. I am not a liar or dishonest and I am reporting you for your rudeness and incivility. You are the sort of editor who makes working here unpleasant and you seriously need to look at the way you interact with other editors! ] (]) 12:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| * Hans: May I enquire what is your rationale for evaluating Jack1956's contributions to this article as a copyvio? You say that his edits are plagiarised from an offline source; if that is so, then what text(s) specifically? Disclosure: My attention with regards to this copyvio has been solicited directly by Jack, on my talk page—though this is my first involvement in this matter. ] 20:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| **I didn't say there ''were'' any offline sources, I brought this up as a possibility that would make things much harder to check. What do you mean by "this article"? The Brown Lady article was pulled from the main page (by Future Perfect at Sunrise) before I even got involved. In my first post to this very section you can see my analysis of a copyvio in ]. The source from which Jack1956 copied was pointed out in the page history by CorenSearchBot, but for your convenience, it's . There is also ], which includes an obvious copyvio from (which of course might be a copyvio itself, but predates the Misplaced Pages article, as I have verified). I checked three of Jack1959's over 80 DYK articles and found copyvios in two of them. Obviously that's where the idea of offline sources came from. ] ] 20:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| **PS: There is also ], which Uncle G has identified as <s>a copyvio</s> plagiarism from a book by Oxford University Press. See ] (not my section title). ] ] 20:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ***It is not an OUP copyvio - it was taken from Answers.com . My point is that making genuine mistakes does not make me a liar or a dishonest editor. See discussion . ] (]) 20:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ****OK, Uncle G has identified it as plagiarism from that OUP book (via the web page), not as a copyvio. That would make it slightly better but still not OK at all. But I am not sure he is right. This depends on relatively fine points of American (Californian) copyright law, with which I am obviously not familiar. The fact that you didn't rephrase the extremely odd construction "was demolished in the late 1960s, and, like the Hotel Russell, stood in Russell Square" certainly gives reason to serious concern. ] ] 22:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | {{#if: {{ifequal|{{{2}}}|alt}}|]|]}} | |||
| ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For thinking of a way to use WikiStalk to identify repeat copyright infringers that will make my life better. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| :Seriously. Sometimes what may seem like a straightforward suggestion to you can revolutionize somebody else's work! I have always slowly scanned for notices in people's talk page histories before. is going to save me a ton of time! Bless you. :D --] <sup>]</sup> 14:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::Does that mean you will be able to do even more work while the rest of us stays lazy? :) Let me know if you need further ideas. :) ] ] 16:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::LOL! We're all busy in our own ways. :D I can't think of any specific ideas to ask for at the moment, but if any spontaneously present feel free to let me know about them! --] <sup>]</sup> 17:40, 2 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| ==It's raining thanks spam!== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 --> | |||
| * Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum. | |||
| * There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (], ], ], and ]). You can also consider becoming a ]. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for ] yourself! | |||
| * If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • ] (]) 02:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:47, 30 October 2024
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
In the near future I may not read my talk page as frequently and reliably as I used to do. For urgent or important matters, it may be better to use email. I am actually completely inactive nowadays. If you leave a message here, don't rely on getting an answer in less than a couple of years.
I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.
I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.
I do not fancy non-consensual templated "WikiLove".
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jass
A tag has been placed on Category:Jass indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 21:20, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Apothecaries' system
Apothecaries' system has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:West Balkans card games
A tag has been placed on Category:West Balkans card games indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz 08:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,