| Revision as of 11:31, 8 September 2006 editJeff3000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers44,952 edits Remove link to dab page Analysis using popups← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:01, 30 October 2024 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);Tag: AWB | ||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Short description|Concept in Lacanian thought}} | |||
| The '''matheme''' is a concept introduced in the work of the ] ] ] ]. They are ]e, designed as ]ic ]s of his ]s and analyses. | |||
| The '''matheme''' (from {{langx|el|μάθημα}} "lesson") is a concept introduced in the work of the 20th century ] ] ]. The term matheme "occurred for the first time in the lecture Lacan delivered on November 4th, 1971 Between 1972 and 1973 he gave several definitions of it, passing from the use of the singular to the use of the plural and back again".<ref>Ėlisabeth Roudinesco, ''Jacques Lacan'' (1997) p. 360</ref> | |||
| ==Characteristics== | |||
| They were intended to introduce some degree of technical rigour in philosophical and psychological writing, replacing the often hard-to-understand verbal descriptions with formulae resembling those used in the ]s, and as an easy way to hold, remember, and rehearse some of the core ideas of both ] and Lacan. For example: $ <> a is the matheme for fantasy in the Freudian-Lacanian sense. | |||
| ] writes in his introduction to the translation of Lacan's '']'' that "Lacan saw his "matheme" as something that would ensure the integral transmission of his teachings ... proof against the "noise" or interference inherent in any process of communication".<ref>], "Introduction", Jacques Lacan, ''The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis'' (1994) p. xxxii</ref> They are ]e, designed as ]ic ] of his ]s and analyses. They were intended to introduce some degree of technical rigour in philosophical and psychological writing, replacing the often hard-to-understand verbal descriptions with formulae resembling those used in the ]s, and as an easy way to hold, remember, and rehearse some of the core ideas of both ] and Lacan. For example: "$<>a" is the matheme for fantasy in the Lacanian sense, in which "$" refers to the subject as split into the subject of utterance and uttered subject (hence the matheme is a barred S), "]" stands for the object-cause of desire, and "<>" stands for the relationship between the two. | |||
| "Matheme", for Lacan, was not simply the imitation of science by philosophy, but the ideal of a perfect means for the integral transmission of knowledge. Natural language, with its constant "metonymic slide", fails here, where mathematics succeeds. Contemporary philosopher ] identifies "matheme" with the scientific procedure. | |||
| A more complex set of mathemes are Lacan's "formulae of sexuation" which he outlined in the March 13, 1973, session of his '']''.<ref>{{Cite book|title = The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge, Book XX, Encore, 1972–1973|last = Lacan|first = Jacques|publisher = W. W. Norton & Company|year = 1998|isbn = 978-0393319163|location = New York|pages = 78–89}}</ref> Composed of two pairs of propositions written in a unique logico-mathematical shorthand inspired by ], one pair was dubbed 'masculine' and the other 'feminine.' These formulae Lacan originally constructed from ] over the course of an entire year of study. The "matheme", for Lacan, is not simply the imitation of science by philosophy, but the ideal of a perfect means for the integral transmission of knowledge. Natural language, with its constant "metonymic slide", fails here, where mathematics succeeds. Contemporary philosopher ] identifies "matheme" with the scientific procedure. | |||
| Though sometimes disparaged as a case of "physics envy" or accused of introducing false rigor into a discpline that is more literary theory than hard science, there is also something of a sense of humor in Lacan's mathemes. | |||
| ==Criticism== | |||
| Though sometimes disparaged as a case of "]" or accused of introducing false rigor into a discipline that is more literary theory than hard science, there is also something of a sense of humor in Lacan's formulas: of one 'sigla which I have introduced in the form of an algorithm', Lacan himself has declared that 'it is created to allow for a hundred and one different readings, a multiplicity that is admissible as long as the spoken remains caught in its algebra'.<ref>Jacques Lacan, ''Écrits: A Selection'' (London 1997) p. 313</ref> | |||
| ], who is one of the most respected and distinguished of all French analysts, remarked in 1975, for example, that whilst the mathemes might have a certain pedagogic utility, they were basically no more than "graffiti"'.<ref>Macey, p. xxxii</ref> | |||
| ==References== | |||
| {{Reflist}} | |||
| == External links == | == External links == | ||
| * provided by the ] | * provided by the ] | ||
| * ] by Jack W. Stone. | * by Jack W. Stone. | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:01, 30 October 2024
Concept in Lacanian thoughtThe matheme (from Greek: μάθημα "lesson") is a concept introduced in the work of the 20th century French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. The term matheme "occurred for the first time in the lecture Lacan delivered on November 4th, 1971 Between 1972 and 1973 he gave several definitions of it, passing from the use of the singular to the use of the plural and back again".
Characteristics
David Macey writes in his introduction to the translation of Lacan's The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis that "Lacan saw his "matheme" as something that would ensure the integral transmission of his teachings ... proof against the "noise" or interference inherent in any process of communication". They are formulae, designed as symbolic representations of his ideas and analyses. They were intended to introduce some degree of technical rigour in philosophical and psychological writing, replacing the often hard-to-understand verbal descriptions with formulae resembling those used in the hard sciences, and as an easy way to hold, remember, and rehearse some of the core ideas of both Freud and Lacan. For example: "$<>a" is the matheme for fantasy in the Lacanian sense, in which "$" refers to the subject as split into the subject of utterance and uttered subject (hence the matheme is a barred S), "a" stands for the object-cause of desire, and "<>" stands for the relationship between the two.
A more complex set of mathemes are Lacan's "formulae of sexuation" which he outlined in the March 13, 1973, session of his Seminar XX. Composed of two pairs of propositions written in a unique logico-mathematical shorthand inspired by Gottlob Frege, one pair was dubbed 'masculine' and the other 'feminine.' These formulae Lacan originally constructed from Aristotelian logic over the course of an entire year of study. The "matheme", for Lacan, is not simply the imitation of science by philosophy, but the ideal of a perfect means for the integral transmission of knowledge. Natural language, with its constant "metonymic slide", fails here, where mathematics succeeds. Contemporary philosopher Alain Badiou identifies "matheme" with the scientific procedure.
Criticism
Though sometimes disparaged as a case of "physics envy" or accused of introducing false rigor into a discipline that is more literary theory than hard science, there is also something of a sense of humor in Lacan's formulas: of one 'sigla which I have introduced in the form of an algorithm', Lacan himself has declared that 'it is created to allow for a hundred and one different readings, a multiplicity that is admissible as long as the spoken remains caught in its algebra'.
Serge Leclaire, who is one of the most respected and distinguished of all French analysts, remarked in 1975, for example, that whilst the mathemes might have a certain pedagogic utility, they were basically no more than "graffiti"'.
References
- Ėlisabeth Roudinesco, Jacques Lacan (1997) p. 360
- David Macey, "Introduction", Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis (1994) p. xxxii
- Lacan, Jacques (1998). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge, Book XX, Encore, 1972–1973. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. pp. 78–89. ISBN 978-0393319163.
- Jacques Lacan, Écrits: A Selection (London 1997) p. 313
- Macey, p. xxxii
External links
- Lacanian Matheme Fonts provided by the Australian Centre for Psychoanalysis
- Lacan's Sexuation Formulas by Jack W. Stone.