Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pound (mass): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:49, 2 January 2021 editDondervogel 2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,441 editsm London pound: clarify← Previous edit Latest revision as of 14:12, 3 November 2024 edit undoMonkbot (talk | contribs)Bots3,695,952 editsm Task 20: replace {lang-??} templates with {langx|??} ‹See Tfd› (Replaced 1);Tag: AWB 
(27 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Science|class=B|subpage=Physics}}
{{WikiProject Measurement |importance=Top
{{WikiProjectBannerShell |1=
{{WP1.0 |class=B |category=category |VA=yes }}
{{WikiProject Measurement |class=B |importance=Top
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes | b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes
| b2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> = yes | b2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> = yes
Line 11: Line 9:
}} }}
}} }}

{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |archiveheader = {{aan}}
Line 24: Line 23:
}} }}


== Dutch pound == == Lead Section ==


The "citation needed" on the # being used to mean pound as mass is by a link to another page with the citation<ref>{{cite book |last1=Houston |first1=Keith |title=The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols, and Other Typographical Marks. |date=20 October 2014 |publisher=W W Norton & Company.}}</ref>. Does anyone have access to a copy of this book to see it it has this info in it?
Is there a source for the claim that the modern Dutch pound is a kilogram rather than half a kilogram? I disbelieve the current assertion. The article titled ] says it's half a kilogram. ] (]) 18:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
--] (]) 04:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)


{{reflist-talk}}
:There are plenty of sources for just the opposite ''']]''' 20:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
:Perhaps the confusion comes from 10 ''ons'' = 1.0 kg ''']]''' 20:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
:: In modern usage the Dutch 'pond' is equal to 500 g. ] (]) 19:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


==Ounces and pounds of mass== == London pound ==


A recent ] changed the following bold 16 to 15, from:
On the ] article, one or more anons (several different IPs, but they seem to act as the same person) is insisting on defining an ] as a unit of ] (force) rather than ]. Since the customary units are defined in terms of the metric units of mass, they too must be units of mass. Could others please contribute? Thanks, --] (]) 03:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
:A London pound was equal to 7,200 troy grains ('''16''' troy ounces) or, equivalently, 10,240 tower grains (16 tower ounces).
:I understand your confusion, however the existing statements that ounces and pounds are weights is accurate, and should remain. In Imperial and U.S. Customary unit systems, the pound (and thus ounce) were defined before the difference between weight and mass was clearly understood, and are thus measurements of weight, even though additional engineering units for force were later grafted onto the system(s). Among measurement systems that Americans an British are familiar with, only the metric/SI system clearly defines these separately. So while the '''value''' of the International Pound (and ounce) is defined by the SI unit for mass, that does not make the ounce a unit of mass after the fact of its original definition (I view the metric definition of the pound as a refinement/official conversion, not as the original definition, which is of course 7000 grains. But that's another article. (And I might add that your question is a good one, which exposes the problems of continuing to use customary units. Metric is sooooo much simpler. ] (]) () 04:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
to:
::If you had an ounce of gold in your pocket, would you still have an ounce of gold if you climbed to the top of a mountain? How about if you took an international flight or visited the international space station? Does the amount of gold in your pocket change as you move between these different places? By the way, ] says a signature should not have an external link. ] (]) 06:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
:A London pound was equal to 7,200 troy grains ('''15''' troy ounces) or, equivalently, 10,240 tower grains (16 tower ounces).
:::I feel that PetesGuide has it semi-right. The question is not whether 'ounce' is a unit of mass or a unit of force; it is obviously a unit of mass, in the context of scientific discussion. The question really is: What is the English word for mass in the context of an ordinary ("non-scientific") discussion? I last lived in England in the 1980s, so I can be accused of being out of date, but the answer until then was quite clearly "weight". In a "Guess the weight of the cake" competition, or when it says "Weight 8 oz" on a bag of sugar, these clearly refer to the amount (mass) of cake or sugar present. The usage is justified by the "historical conflation of mass and weight", which is in turn justified in non-precision contexts by the fact that gravity is a constant. (In modern Britain, for example, does anyone really say "Give your height and mass"??) This conflation is also justified in practice by terms like "Kitchen scales" which conflate the nonexistent terms "massometer" (a balance) and "weightometer" (a spring or piezoelectric force measuring device). I do not see that the metric system makes any difference at all. The ordinary word for "how much stuff there is" is "weight", as in "my weight in kilos", in contrast with "how much space the stuff takes up", which is volume. ] (]) 07:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The edit was reverted by {{u|Jc3s5h}}. I think the IP's edit might be correct. According to :
:1 London pound = 15 ounces of 450 grains = 6750 grains (437.4 grams)
:1 troy pound = 12 ounces each of 480 grains = 5760 grains (about 373.2 grams)
:16 tower ounces = 15 troy ounces exactly
I gather that the ''grain'' above is the same unit in each case. This is just a jumble of numbers to me but if there are 480 troy grains in a troy ounce, 7,200 troy grains = 15 troy ounces (not 16). Thoughts? ] (]) 03:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
: I'm not vouching for it, but says the London pound (aka commercial pound or ''liber mercatoria'') is "15 ounces of 450 grains each". ] (]) 08:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC) <small>I just realised that's the same link as posted by ]. I just focused on a different part.</small> ] (]) 13:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
:: seems relevant. ] (]) 12:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
:::Doing a search with those arguments, the first hit was on the ''London Quarterly Review'' which said "The commercial pound , by which wine and most other articles were weighed , was then of fifteen ounces . ... And the ounce shall weigh twenty pence ; and twelve ounces make the London pound ; and eight pounds of wheat make a gallon ..." so 15 for the Commercial Pound and 12 for the London Pound. Sigh. --] (]) 12:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


I took another look, and also referred to (2020, pp. C-6, C-7). ''Handbook 44'' has been adopted by all the US states in their measurement laws; a merchant who violates it risks seizure of improperly labeled goods, seizure of inaccurate measurement devices, fines, and if the merchant is really stubborn, jail.
== External links modified ==


That handbook states the avoirdupois grain, the troy grain, and the apothecaries grain are all equal; an avdp. pound is 7000 grains (numbers are exact unless otherwise stated). A troy or apothecaries pound is 5760 grains. An avdp ounce is exactly 437.5 grains. A troy or apothecaries ounce is 480 grains.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


The article contains the following line:
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090118111241/http://www.physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP447/app8.pdf to http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP447/app8.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070821180228/http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/h130-04.cfm to http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/h130-04.cfm


<blockquote>1 London ounce (20 dwt) = 1 tower (or troy) ounce = 640 tower grains = 450 troy grains</blockquote>
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


A person who, in US commerce, treats 1 troy ounce as equivalent to 450 troy grains commits a criminal offense. The article is clearly wrong. I will put an appropriate template in the article. ] (]) 17:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
:That is the "London ounce", does it define a London Pound?
::The 20 dwt (20 penny-weights, ] being the historic abbreviation for penny, {{langx|la|Denarius}}) measure is consistent with the old British definition, meaning that 12 London ounces = 240 ] silver pennies = the original ], which in turn defined the original pound mass - literally the weight of a £'s worth of silver. Which is very little indeed nowadays! But that would mean 12 ounces to the pound, not 15 or 16? --] (]) 19:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


== Bible as evidence of translation of ==
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 20:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


I deleted the following statement because the citation not only doesn't support it, it says something completely different:
== What about lbs? ==
{{quote|The Greek {{lang|grc|μνᾶ}} ({{transl|grc|mna}}) was about one pound (see ]), and the word is translated as "pound" in some translations of the Bible.<nowiki><ref>For example the ], Luke, chapter 19</ref></nowiki> }}{{bibleverse|Luke|19:15|KJV}} clearly states that the reference is to money, not mass{{snd}} ], not ]. Furthermore, the citation gives no information about the corresponding Greek text. If it is to be reinstated, a far better case is needed here first. --] (]) 00:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


== Pounds as measurement of force, not mass ==
Maybe add info also for the lbs?
And differences between pound/lb/lbs (if there are any )?


In the article, multiple times the “pound” is referred to as a way to measure mass. This is incorrect as the pound is a measurement of force which will change based on gravitational force. Mass will not change due to gravitational force. ] (]) 01:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
: This article is about a unit of mass. For the unit of force see ]. ] (]) 04:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)


== Redefinition in terms of the kilogram ==
--] (]) 19:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


I'm interested in knowing how the exact number was chosen for the redefinition of the avoirdupois pound in terms of the kilogram. Was it based on weighing the physical prototype of the pound? Just one, or were there several prototypes weighed? If so, who did it, and when, and how? And so on. &mdash; ] (]) 09:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
== Lead Section ==


:''Update:'' it was all in the article, just not easy to find. I've refactored things so that it's clearer, including linking the ] article. &mdash; ] (]) 10:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The "citation needed" on the # being used to mean pound as mass is by a link to another page with the citation<ref>{{cite book |last1=Houston |first1=Keith |title=The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols, and Other Typographical Marks. |date=20 October 2014 |publisher=W W Norton & Company.}}</ref>. Does anyone have access to a copy of this book to see it it has this info in it?
--] (]) 04:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)


I agree, the metric equivalent of the various historical (and for that matter their modern counterparts) weights need to be more clearly tabulated.] (]) 12:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
== London pound ==


== Blockquote of British law ==
A recent ] changed the following bold 16 to 15, from:

:A London pound was equal to 7,200 troy grains ('''16''' troy ounces) or, equivalently, 10,240 tower grains (16 tower ounces).
In ], the text of a British law is included. It is lengthy and unnecessary as part of main article. As a reference, a citation to the source is all that is required. Perhaps move it elsewhere down at end of article? <span style="font-family:Futura,'Century Gothic','Trebuchet MS',serif;">]&nbsp;]</span> 23:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
to:
:A London pound was equal to 7,200 troy grains ('''15''' troy ounces) or, equivalently, 10,240 tower grains (16 tower ounces).
The edit was reverted by {{u|Jc3s5h}}. I think the IP's edit might be correct. According to :
:1 London pound = 15 ounces of 450 grains = 6750 grains (437.4 grams)
:1 troy pound = 12 ounces each of 480 grains = 5760 grains (about 373.2 grams)
:16 tower ounces = 15 troy ounces exactly
I gather that the ''grain'' above is the same unit in each case. This is just a jumble of numbers to me but if there are 480 troy grains in a troy ounce, 7,200 troy grains = 15 troy ounces (not 16). Thoughts? ] (]) 03:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
: I'm not vouching for it, but says the London pound (aka commercial pound or ''liber mercatoria'') is "15 ounces of 450 grains each". ] (]) 08:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:12, 3 November 2024

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMeasurement (defunct)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement

Archiving icon
Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.


Lead Section

The "citation needed" on the # being used to mean pound as mass is by a link to another page with the citation. Does anyone have access to a copy of this book to see it it has this info in it? --154.5.81.243 (talk) 04:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

References

  1. Houston, Keith (20 October 2014). The Secret Life of Punctuation, Symbols, and Other Typographical Marks. W W Norton & Company.

London pound

A recent IP edit changed the following bold 16 to 15, from:

A London pound was equal to 7,200 troy grains (16 troy ounces) or, equivalently, 10,240 tower grains (16 tower ounces).

to:

A London pound was equal to 7,200 troy grains (15 troy ounces) or, equivalently, 10,240 tower grains (16 tower ounces).

The edit was reverted by Jc3s5h. I think the IP's edit might be correct. According to sizes: pound avoirdupois:

1 London pound = 15 ounces of 450 grains = 6750 grains (437.4 grams)
1 troy pound = 12 ounces each of 480 grains = 5760 grains (about 373.2 grams)
16 tower ounces = 15 troy ounces exactly

I gather that the grain above is the same unit in each case. This is just a jumble of numbers to me but if there are 480 troy grains in a troy ounce, 7,200 troy grains = 15 troy ounces (not 16). Thoughts? Johnuniq (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm not vouching for it, but sizes.com says the London pound (aka commercial pound or liber mercatoria) is "15 ounces of 450 grains each". Dondervogel 2 (talk) 08:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC) I just realised that's the same link as posted by Johnuniq. I just focused on a different part. Dondervogel 2 (talk) 13:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
This seems relevant. Dondervogel 2 (talk) 12:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Doing a search with those arguments, the first hit was on the London Quarterly Review which said "The commercial pound , by which wine and most other articles were weighed , was then of fifteen ounces . ... And the ounce shall weigh twenty pence ; and twelve ounces make the London pound ; and eight pounds of wheat make a gallon ..." so 15 for the Commercial Pound and 12 for the London Pound. Sigh. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

I took another look, and also referred to NIST Handbook 44 (2020, pp. C-6, C-7). Handbook 44 has been adopted by all the US states in their measurement laws; a merchant who violates it risks seizure of improperly labeled goods, seizure of inaccurate measurement devices, fines, and if the merchant is really stubborn, jail.

That handbook states the avoirdupois grain, the troy grain, and the apothecaries grain are all equal; an avdp. pound is 7000 grains (numbers are exact unless otherwise stated). A troy or apothecaries pound is 5760 grains. An avdp ounce is exactly 437.5 grains. A troy or apothecaries ounce is 480 grains.

The article contains the following line:

1 London ounce (20 dwt) = 1 tower (or troy) ounce = 640 tower grains = 450 troy grains

A person who, in US commerce, treats 1 troy ounce as equivalent to 450 troy grains commits a criminal offense. The article is clearly wrong. I will put an appropriate template in the article. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

That is the "London ounce", does it define a London Pound?
The 20 dwt (20 penny-weights, d being the historic abbreviation for penny, Latin: Denarius) measure is consistent with the old British definition, meaning that 12 London ounces = 240 sterling silver pennies = the original pound sterling, which in turn defined the original pound mass - literally the weight of a £'s worth of silver. Which is very little indeed nowadays! But that would mean 12 ounces to the pound, not 15 or 16? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Bible as evidence of translation of

I deleted the following statement because the citation not only doesn't support it, it says something completely different:

The Greek μνᾶ (mna) was about one pound (see Mina (unit)), and the word is translated as "pound" in some translations of the Bible.<ref>For example the ], Luke, chapter 19</ref>

Luke 19:15 clearly states that the reference is to money, not mass – pound (currency), not pound (mass). Furthermore, the citation gives no information about the corresponding Greek text. If it is to be reinstated, a far better case is needed here first. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 00:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Pounds as measurement of force, not mass

In the article, multiple times the “pound” is referred to as a way to measure mass. This is incorrect as the pound is a measurement of force which will change based on gravitational force. Mass will not change due to gravitational force. 69.5.125.147 (talk) 01:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

This article is about a unit of mass. For the unit of force see Pound (force). Dondervogel 2 (talk) 04:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Redefinition in terms of the kilogram

I'm interested in knowing how the exact number was chosen for the redefinition of the avoirdupois pound in terms of the kilogram. Was it based on weighing the physical prototype of the pound? Just one, or were there several prototypes weighed? If so, who did it, and when, and how? And so on. — The Anome (talk) 09:37, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Update: it was all in the article, just not easy to find. I've refactored things so that it's clearer, including linking the International Yard and Pound article. — The Anome (talk) 10:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

I agree, the metric equivalent of the various historical (and for that matter their modern counterparts) weights need to be more clearly tabulated.150.227.15.253 (talk) 12:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Blockquote of British law

In Pound (mass)#Current use, the text of a British law is included. It is lengthy and unnecessary as part of main article. As a reference, a citation to the source is all that is required. Perhaps move it elsewhere down at end of article? Senator2029 【talk】 23:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Categories: