| Revision as of 19:39, 3 November 2024 editSelfstudier (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers41,171 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Misplaced Pages and antisemitism.Tag: Twinkle | Revision as of 20:11, 3 November 2024 edit undoBoynamedsue (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,083 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :({{Find sources AFD|title=Misplaced Pages and antisemitism}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|title=Misplaced Pages and antisemitism}}) | ||
| A consensus to merge exists at the talk page, this AfD to confirm that it should be carried out. ] (]) 19:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | A consensus to merge exists at the talk page, this AfD to confirm that it should be carried out. ] (]) 19:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Support merge''' While I respect and appreciate the efforts to improve the article and make it more neutral, I don't feel the article has the coherence to exist on its own. I don't feel many/any sources deal with the topic as a whole so as to give it notability so ] is a problem here, to quote the essay {{tq|An article about some phenomenon might include multiple subsections, each of which is supposedly an example of the article's subject. If there is good sourcing that unifies all of these examples under one general topic, then that can be appropriate.}} I don't see the good sourcing unifying these examples, so inclusion in other articles such as ] or ]. | |||
| :In addition, the Holocaust Related Bias section, gives extremely extensive coverage to two papers which are actually not about antisemitism, but instead focus on the use of the holocaust by modern wikipedians of different nationalities. This is really interesting, but is not about antisemitism, it is about the way antisemitic atrocities of the past are framed to fit nationalist agendas in Poland, Israel, Ukraine and Russia. Is this really within the scope of an article on antisemitism in wikipedia?] (]) 20:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:11, 3 November 2024
Misplaced Pages and antisemitism
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Misplaced Pages and antisemitism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A consensus to merge exists at the talk page, this AfD to confirm that it should be carried out. Selfstudier (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support merge While I respect and appreciate the efforts to improve the article and make it more neutral, I don't feel the article has the coherence to exist on its own. I don't feel many/any sources deal with the topic as a whole so as to give it notability so WP:COATRACK is a problem here, to quote the essay
An article about some phenomenon might include multiple subsections, each of which is supposedly an example of the article's subject. If there is good sourcing that unifies all of these examples under one general topic, then that can be appropriate.
I don't see the good sourcing unifying these examples, so inclusion in other articles such as Criticism of wikipedia or Misplaced Pages and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.
- In addition, the Holocaust Related Bias section, gives extremely extensive coverage to two papers which are actually not about antisemitism, but instead focus on the use of the holocaust by modern wikipedians of different nationalities. This is really interesting, but is not about antisemitism, it is about the way antisemitic atrocities of the past are framed to fit nationalist agendas in Poland, Israel, Ukraine and Russia. Is this really within the scope of an article on antisemitism in wikipedia?Boynamedsue (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)