Misplaced Pages

Talk:2006 Lebanon War: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:07, 9 February 2020 editSteel1943 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors197,091 edits fix← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:30, 4 November 2024 edit undoVice regent (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,257 edits Add Lebanese Armed Forces to infobox? 
(97 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|noarchive=yes|search=yes}}
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{Article history|action1=GAN
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}}
{{Article history
|action1=GAN
|action1date=5 January 2007 |action1date=5 January 2007
|action1result=failed |action1result=failed
Line 27: Line 30:
|currentstatus=DGA |currentstatus=DGA
|topic=War |topic=War
|otd1date=2009-08-14|otd1oldid=307751039
|otd2date=2010-08-14|otd2oldid=378896574
|otd3date=2013-08-14|otd3oldid=568558146
}} }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|
{{On this day|date1=2009-08-14|oldid1=307751039|date2=2010-08-14|oldid2=378896574|date3=2013-08-14|oldid3=568558146}}
{{WikiProject Military history|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Middle-Eastern-task-force=yes|Post-Cold-War=y}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Israel|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Military history|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Middle-Eastern-task-force=yes|Post-Cold-War=y}}
{{WikiProject Israel|class=b|importance=High}} {{WikiProject Lebanon|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Lebanon|class=b|importance=High}}
}} }}

<!-- Do not remove the sanction template -->
{{Arab-Israeli Arbitration Enforcement}}
{{Controversial-issues}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:2006 Lebanon War/Archive index |target=Talk:2006 Lebanon War/Archive index
Line 43: Line 46:
|leading_zeros=0 |leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes}} |indexhere=yes}}
{{Archive box|
"'''2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict'''" archives:
* ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
* ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
* ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
* ], ], ], ], ], ]
* ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
* ], ], ]
* ], ], ]
}}
{{Archives|bot=MiszaBot I |age=90 |index=/Archive index}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |archiveheader = {{aan}}
Line 63: Line 55:
}} }}


== Lars Adaktusson as a neutral source ==
== IDF Materiel Lost ==

Please User:Avaya1 stop reverting the content placed in the Battlebox of the Article. The fact that IDF Materiel is listed in the Article its because they operate this equiptement and lost it. Since Hezbollah dont use Aircraft, Tanks and Ships and/or dont lost anyone at this war it cant be placed. But is not based on reliability not to consider the materiel lost in the Battlebox. Dont call my edit a one sided edit. Keep the Battlebox as it was, unless you want to imporve something in it.] (]) 18:50, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

::The equipment losses in the infobox - which was added by me originally, and done through discussion at the time - was informative when it included the context. Now you have removed the context (why did you do this?),* but re-added them in a biased way. It's a neutral context simply to put it in the body of the article, as the equipment losses are not even listed for the other side. You seem to have simply removed the context (claiming to be saving space), and then re-added them. If you want to remove the context, then they belong in the body of the text. ] (]) 19:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

:: Please stop reverting my edits or other editors edits in the Article unless it improves the content of the article. Avoid adding duplicated info. See the Casualties and Damage section for your. This page is under 1RR. This is my last word in this topic.] (]) 18:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

::: Please stop reverting edits made by me or other editor that improve the article.] (]) 21:50, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
:::: To adhered to NPOV - we should be consistent with material losses - if we present Israeli material, we should present Lebanese material losses as well. Furthermore, the information inserted was highly inaccurate and relied on OR / mis-citations (e.g. the F-16 crash was reffed to an Haaretz article which describes a 2010 F-16I crash (IDF jets, as other air forces, crash regularly during routine operations). Israeli losses in combat were 1 helicopter. In addition a single F-16 crashed during takeoff due to a landing gear fault, and 3 AH-64 were lost in accidents. Presenting accidents as combat losses is not generally how things are done.] (]) 15:26, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

The only aircraft shot down was a CH-53 Yasur(]) but this was shot down at low altitude as it was taking off after deploying troops. <ref name=lessons>{{cite book| url=https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/120720_Cordesman_LessonsIsraeliHezbollah.pdf| page=157 | title=Lessons of the 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah War |first1= Anthony H. |last1=Cordesman | publisher=Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University |access-date=May 7, 2019 |ISBN=978-0-89206-505-9 |year=2007}}</ref>

the page ] gives a reference that states 20 vehicles were lost in the battle. <ref name=YnetTanks>{{cite news | url= http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3290860,00.html | title =Ceasefire begins; firing incidents in Lebanon | publisher = Yedioth Achronoth| author= Hanan Greenberg | date=August 14, 2006 | accessdate= Nov 8, 2012}}</ref> later analysis suggests it was 20 tanks during the entire war.<ref name=lessons/> another study suggest one tank hit an IED during the operation and 11 tanks were hit by anti-tank missiles but not necessarily destroyed or severely damaged.<ref>{{cite web| url=https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/uploads/Documents/pubs/PolicyFocus63.pdf |title=Hizballah at War: A Military Assessment| first=Andrew|last=Exum|publisher= The Washington Institute|date=December 1, 2006| page=11}}</ref> Ultimately there's no solid evidence regarding how many tanks were decommissioned as they were towed back to bases in Israel by Caterpillar D9s and possibly repaired.

one ship was crippled but returned to port under its own power.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.jpost.com/Israel/Panel-Hanit-attack-was-preventable| title=PANEL: 'HANIT' ATTACK WAS PREVENTABLE |first=JOSH| last=BRANNON |date=November 7, 2006 | publisher=The Jerusalem Post}}</ref>

technically no materiel losses were experienced because all the vehicles were recovered. Comparing the article to ] which lists ships damaged but later re-floated and repaired there might be some merit to listing damaged vehicles that haven't been confirmed to have been destroyed.
] (]) 22:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

There is no consensus for POV. Nowhere an aircraft accident in one country is counted as war lose in the conflict in another country.] (]) 15:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

{{talkref}}

==Aircraft losses==
The source being used (Cordesman) explictly says only one helicopter was lost in combat. Strop inserting false information into the article. ] (]) 15:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
The Full quote from that source is "...the IAF lost only 1 aircraft in combat , and four in accidents" . Given that, it is doubtful if even the helicopter losses should be reported as currently in the article. ] (]) 16:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
:: It seems you dont care to read the Book, you simply revert by revert. Please take a look and read the given page in the Link. 1 lost in combat, the rest to accidents. 1 aircarft, 4 helicopters.] (]) 17:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
::: https://books.google.com/books?id=Ela6DjyEBQwC&pg=PA122 ] (]) 17:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
:: ] - Second paragraph. ] (]) 17:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

:::I did read that source, and quoted what it says, above : "...the IAF lost only 1 aircraft in combat , and four in accidents". Later down in that same page it says "The only combat loss was a CH-53 transport helicopter " . Thanks for pointing out that the article body itself suffers from the same issue, sourced to the same book. I will be fixing that, too. ] (]) 22:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
::: There is nothing to fix.] (]) 16:22, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
::::non-combat losses, which are described in the sources as training accidents, do not belong in the infobox, or the article section on casualties. Multiple editors have stated this (Avaya1, Icewhiz, Tritomex and יניב הורון). Do not restore it until you have clear consensus for it, per ]. ] (]) 02:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
::::::two of whom are banned lol. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 18:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)</small>
:::::::they weren't banned when they objected to the content, not that his ''ad hominem'' argument carries any weight. ] (]) 18:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
::::::::They are banned now, otherwise they would have answered the canvassing call. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 02:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)</small>
:::::The book that Mr.User200 quoted says "accident", but does not mention "training". Do you have sources that classify these losses as training accidents? ]]] 08:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
::: WarKosign could a investigation on Sockpuppetry could be made on those Users, i remember at leat one of those at least being banned for that reason. Maybe Here comes the Suns could be inestigated too??] (]) 18:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
::::{{re|Mr.User200}} You seem to be under impression that I'm an administrator. I'm not. If you suspect sockpuppetry, see ]. ]]] 18:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

==New information has been revealed by ]==
Yesterday, ] has revealed new information about Iran's understanding and role in this war. Almost all Iranian press has covered it.--<samp>](]-])</samp> 05:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)


In the Media coverage section, there's a section where Lars Adaktusson is used a source with him only being described as a journalist. Adaktusson is in fact the current chairman of the ] and was previously the chair of pro-Israel lobby organisation . I feel this information should be included if he is used as a source. ] (]) 20:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
== augustine bielonwu august 2006 casualty ==


== End date ==
augustine bielonwu august 2006 casualty


Ceasefire was August 14, but the war officially ended on September 8 just saying that info box should include that. ] (]) 06:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
he is one of many innocent un observers killed by israeli's (american in reality) "precision" laser guided bombs, this man is forgotten:


== Misspelling of hezbollah under "hezbullah prisoners" ==
news.un.org/en/story/2006/08/190532-un-mourns-lebanon-force-staff-member-killed-during-israel-hizbollah-conflict <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


title says it all ] (]) 08:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 December 2019 ==


== Add Lebanese Armed Forces to infobox? ==
{{edit extended-protected|2006 Lebanon War|answered=yes}}
The IRGC death/presence is denied by Iran so maybe we should add (denied by Iran) after the IGRC casualties
Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20161117152200/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/15/AR2006071500189.html#
"Iran denied that it had any troops in Lebanon." ] (]) 17:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
:] '''Done'''<!-- Template:EEp --> ] ] ] 19:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


There seemed to have been several confrontations between Israeli army and Lebanon army during the war:
== Protected edit request on 8 February 2020 ==
*Israel attacked Lebanese Army Barracks.
*Israel attacked Lebanese Air Force base
*Lebanese army opened fire on Israeli helicopters trying to land
*According to this , supposedly 49 Lebanese soldiers were killed.
''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 05:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)


:As far as I'm aware, neither Israel nor Lebanon said they were at war with eachother. If they were, surely there would've been a lot more attacks than these few incidents. There were similar incidents between Israeli and ] soldiers, but we don't name UNIFIL as a belligerent. Your source for the airbase strike says that it "'''could '''draw the Lebanese army into Israel's war with Hizbullah guerrillas". We'd need something from Israeli or Lebanese officials, or from mainstream news outlets, saying that they were actually at war with eachother. – ] <sup>(])</sup> 09:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
{{edit fully-protected|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|answered=no}}
::The above sources are all reliable as far as I can tell, so I'm not sure what you mean by "mainstream outlets". Secondly, many times in history countries often participate in a conflict without declaring they are. No one is saying that Lebanon declared war on Israel but rather, the Lebanese forces participated in the conflict as a belligerent. In fact, the infobox currently lists Iran as a belligerent even though Iran did not explicity declare war on Israel, nor vice versa. Finally, 43 dead Lebanese soldiers is too large an amount to simply ignore.''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 16:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Please replace the text on {{No redirect|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict}}:
:::It is really unfortunate that this discussion is being spread across several talk pages simultaneously. ] (]) 22:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
:::: No need for a long discussion. Take the tag and put the sources in its place.] (]) 10:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)


::::: It is original research to suggest that the LAF was a belligerent over a few isolated incidents. Do we add UNIFIL as a belligerent in the ] too, for good measure? ] (]) 12:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
<code><nowiki>#REDIRECT ]</nowiki></code>
::::::Can we take that conversation to ]? ''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 23:43, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
::::::Also, what exactly does the word "]" mean to you? If it implies being engaged in combat, then RS support that. Or are you suggesting that ] must always be a requirement for being included in the infobox? Finally, can you also comment on the fact that the infobox also includes ], ] and even ] as combatants? The Lebanese Army lost more soldiers than all three of these parties combined. ''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 00:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::::<s>Agree with @]. If there are no sources supporting the claim that Lebanon's army was a belligerent, adding it based on personal opinion or analysis would violate WP:SYNTH and be a own research. I'm removing it. ] (]) 08:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)</s> Sockpuppet.
*I looked into the ] investigation, which concluded that "Insofar as Israel was a war with Lebanon, Lebanese army soldiers are combatants under international humanitarian law."<ref>{{cite news |title=Why They Died |url=https://www.hrw.org/report/2007/09/05/why-they-died/civilian-casualties-lebanon-during-2006-war |work=Human Rights Watch |date=5 September 2007 |language=en}}</ref> In fact, I'm not aware of anyone who has considered Israel's killing of Lebanese soldiers to be a war crime.''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 04:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)


== POV tag ==
...with the following text:


The lede has major POV issues. It gives only six lone sentences to the Israeli role in attacking Hezbollah, Lebanon and Lebanese civilian infrastructure, and dedicates the entirety of the last lede paragraph (which should focus on legacy of that war) on how -repetitively- no one disarmed Hezbollah. There is also POV language how "Israel responded" and "Hezbollah then launched." Nine sentences are dedicated to highlight how the war started with Hezbollah's actions. These are the actionable things that needs to be addressed for now. ] (]) 12:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
<code><nowiki>#REDIRECT ]</nowiki><br>
<br>
<nowiki>((Redirect category shell|</nowiki><br>
<nowiki>{{R from move}}</nowiki><br>
<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>


:I agree the article has issues and is a pretty wideranging edit by {{u|Galamore}} without much of an explanation. It should be reverted. ''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 13:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
...in order to add the proper Rcat to this redirect. Thank you! ] (]) 00:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
::It seems like they just went ahead and reverted several users' edits perhaps because they didn't like one or two things, which seems disruptive to me.''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 13:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
:::I think we can restore the previous second lede paragraph as more neutral, at least relatively speaking. ] (]) 20:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
::::Ok, I've undone that change and restored the second lede paragraph. I agree its more neutral.''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 00:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::I reverted the second lead paragraph to the long-standing version because the new one introduced POV issues and odd framing. Hezbollah's aims since 2000 based on one analysis aren't lead-worthy in an article on a war. This paragraph should focus on events immediately leading to the start of the war, not interpretations of Hezbollah's strategy since 2000. ] (]) 08:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
::::::Why would Hezbollah's military objectives not be relevant? It sure feels more relevant than mentioning the brand of vehicle Israeli soldiers were in (]) that you added. I already gave one scholarly source:
::::::*{{Cite book |last=Wahab |first=Hadi |title=Hezbollah:A Regional Armed Non-State Actor |publisher=] |year=2022 |pages=69}}
::::::Here are some more scholarly sources:
::::::*"After 2000, Hezbollah entertained this legitimation by pointing to issues relating to the Israeli-Lebanese conflict that remain unresolved—namely, the area designated as Shebaa Farms and Kfarshuba Heights, occupied since 1967; the Lebanese prisoners detained by Israel...The party’s prestige was enhanced by the prisoner deal that took place in January 2004, through which Hezbollah obtained from Israel the liberation of 435 Lebanese and Palestinian prisoners, as well as the mortal remains of close to 60 militants, in exchange for 1 Israeli hostage and the bodies of 3 soldiers. This operation confirmed the party’s conviction that the only way to obtain the liberation of the Lebanese prisoners still held in Israel—among them Samir Kuntar, detained since 1979 as a result of his participation in a commando attack by the Palestine Liberation Front—is to exchange them for Israeli hostages. (p28)" "The hostage Taking of July 12, 2006: Keen on defending the Lebanese legitimacy of its ar- mament, Hezbollah raised its voice over two issues in particular: the Shebaa Farms and the Lebanese pris- oners held in Israel. In a speech delivered on April 24, 2006, at a ceremony marking the twenty-eighth anniversary of Samir Kuntar’s detention, Hassan Nasrallah pledged publicly to act for the liberation of the detainee, announcing that it would take place “very very very soon” and hinting at an imminent “resistance action” toward this end. (p31-32)"
::::::**{{cite book |last1=Achcar |first1=Gilbert |last2=Warschawski |first2=Michel |title=The 33-day war: Israel's war on Hezbollah in Lebanon and its consequences |date=2015 |publisher=]}}
::::::*"Hezbollah’s attempt to redeem its wa‘d al-sadiq (“faithful promise”) to secure the release of Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails...Hezbollah’s dramatic operation of July 12, 2006, was yet another attempt to deliver on its wa‘d al-sadiq."
::::::**{{cite book |last1=Norton |first1=Augustus R. |title=Hezbollah: a short history |date=2018 |publisher=] |location=Princeton Oxford |isbn=9780691180885 |pages=120-121 |edition=Updated and expanded third}}
::::::*"For years, Hezbollah had attempted to carry out Nasrallah's wa'd al-sadiq (faithful promise) to liberate Lebanese fighters still held in Israeli jails."
::::::**{{cite book |last1=Matthews |first1=Matt |title=We were caught unprepared: the 2006 Hezbollah-Israeli War |date=2008 |publisher=Combat Studies Institute Press, US Army Combined Arms Center |location=Fort Leavenworth, Kan |isbn=9780160798993|page=28-29}}
::::::*"Dubbed “Operation Truthful Promise” by Hezbollah, the raid fulfilled Hezbollah leader’s Hassan Nasrallah’s longstanding aim to take IDF soldiers hostage in order to pressure Israel to release remaining Lebanese prisoners in Israeli prisons, and to seek the return of the disputed Israeli-occupied Sheba` Farms area to Lebanese control. Immediately following the raid, Hezbollah stated that it would return the abducted soldiers to Israel through “indirect negotiations” resulting in a “trade” with Lebanese prisoners held in Israeli prisons."
::::::**{{cite book |title=Why They Died: Civilian Casualties in Lebanon During the 2006 War |date=2007 |publisher=] |page=37}}
::::::''']''' <sub>(Please ] on reply)</sub> 15:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
:::::::I reverted the banned sock's reversion of the second lede paragraph, but it still needs work. VR, seems you have read up on this war, so it could use a review from your side. ] (]) 11:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:30, 4 November 2024

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2006 Lebanon War article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
  1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
  2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
  • Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
Former good article2006 Lebanon War was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 5, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
May 9, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 9, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
September 21, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
November 11, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 14, 2009, August 14, 2010, and August 14, 2013.
Current status: Delisted good article
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Middle East / Post-Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Middle Eastern military history task force
Taskforce icon
Post-Cold War task force
WikiProject iconIsrael High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconLebanon High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


Lars Adaktusson as a neutral source

In the Media coverage section, there's a section where Lars Adaktusson is used a source with him only being described as a journalist. Adaktusson is in fact the current chairman of the Sweden-Israel Friendship Association and was previously the chair of pro-Israel lobby organisation European Israel Public Affairs. I feel this information should be included if he is used as a source. Conspiracy Raven (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

End date

Ceasefire was August 14, but the war officially ended on September 8 just saying that info box should include that. Dilbaggg (talk) 06:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Misspelling of hezbollah under "hezbullah prisoners"

title says it all Shrub4TheDub (talk) 08:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Add Lebanese Armed Forces to infobox?

There seemed to have been several confrontations between Israeli army and Lebanon army during the war:

  • Israel attacked Lebanese Army Barracks.
  • Israel attacked Lebanese Air Force base
  • Lebanese army opened fire on Israeli helicopters trying to land
  • According to this source, supposedly 49 Lebanese soldiers were killed.

VR (Please ping on reply) 05:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, neither Israel nor Lebanon said they were at war with eachother. If they were, surely there would've been a lot more attacks than these few incidents. There were similar incidents between Israeli and UNIFIL soldiers, but we don't name UNIFIL as a belligerent. Your source for the airbase strike says that it "could draw the Lebanese army into Israel's war with Hizbullah guerrillas". We'd need something from Israeli or Lebanese officials, or from mainstream news outlets, saying that they were actually at war with eachother. – Asarlaí 09:32, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
The above sources are all reliable as far as I can tell, so I'm not sure what you mean by "mainstream outlets". Secondly, many times in history countries often participate in a conflict without declaring they are. No one is saying that Lebanon declared war on Israel but rather, the Lebanese forces participated in the conflict as a belligerent. In fact, the infobox currently lists Iran as a belligerent even though Iran did not explicity declare war on Israel, nor vice versa. Finally, 43 dead Lebanese soldiers is too large an amount to simply ignore.VR (Please ping on reply) 16:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
It is really unfortunate that this discussion is being spread across several talk pages simultaneously. Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
No need for a long discussion. Take the tag and put the sources in its place.Ghazaalch (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
It is original research to suggest that the LAF was a belligerent over a few isolated incidents. Do we add UNIFIL as a belligerent in the South Lebanon conflict (1985–2000) too, for good measure? Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 12:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Can we take that conversation to Talk: South Lebanon conflict (1985–2000)? VR (Please ping on reply) 23:43, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Also, what exactly does the word "combatant" mean to you? If it implies being engaged in combat, then RS support that. Or are you suggesting that declaration of war must always be a requirement for being included in the infobox? Finally, can you also comment on the fact that the infobox also includes Iran, Amal militia and even Islamic Courts Union as combatants? The Lebanese Army lost more soldiers than all three of these parties combined. VR (Please ping on reply) 00:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Agree with @Mikrobølgeovn. If there are no sources supporting the claim that Lebanon's army was a belligerent, adding it based on personal opinion or analysis would violate WP:SYNTH and be a own research. I'm removing it. PeleYoetz (talk) 08:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Sockpuppet.
  • I looked into the Human Rights Watch investigation, which concluded that "Insofar as Israel was a war with Lebanon, Lebanese army soldiers are combatants under international humanitarian law." In fact, I'm not aware of anyone who has considered Israel's killing of Lebanese soldiers to be a war crime.VR (Please ping on reply) 04:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

POV tag

The lede has major POV issues. It gives only six lone sentences to the Israeli role in attacking Hezbollah, Lebanon and Lebanese civilian infrastructure, and dedicates the entirety of the last lede paragraph (which should focus on legacy of that war) on how -repetitively- no one disarmed Hezbollah. There is also POV language how "Israel responded" and "Hezbollah then launched." Nine sentences are dedicated to highlight how the war started with Hezbollah's actions. These are the actionable things that needs to be addressed for now. Makeandtoss (talk) 12:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

I agree the article has issues and this is a pretty wideranging edit by Galamore without much of an explanation. It should be reverted. VR (Please ping on reply) 13:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
It seems like they just went ahead and reverted several users' edits perhaps because they didn't like one or two things, which seems disruptive to me.VR (Please ping on reply) 13:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
I think we can restore the previous second lede paragraph as more neutral, at least relatively speaking. Makeandtoss (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Ok, I've undone that change and restored the second lede paragraph. I agree its more neutral.VR (Please ping on reply) 00:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
I reverted the second lead paragraph to the long-standing version because the new one introduced POV issues and odd framing. Hezbollah's aims since 2000 based on one analysis aren't lead-worthy in an article on a war. This paragraph should focus on events immediately leading to the start of the war, not interpretations of Hezbollah's strategy since 2000. PeleYoetz (talk) 08:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Why would Hezbollah's military objectives not be relevant? It sure feels more relevant than mentioning the brand of vehicle Israeli soldiers were in (Humvee) that you added. I already gave one scholarly source:
  • Wahab, Hadi (2022). Hezbollah:A Regional Armed Non-State Actor. Taylor & Francis. p. 69.
Here are some more scholarly sources:
  • "After 2000, Hezbollah entertained this legitimation by pointing to issues relating to the Israeli-Lebanese conflict that remain unresolved—namely, the area designated as Shebaa Farms and Kfarshuba Heights, occupied since 1967; the Lebanese prisoners detained by Israel...The party’s prestige was enhanced by the prisoner deal that took place in January 2004, through which Hezbollah obtained from Israel the liberation of 435 Lebanese and Palestinian prisoners, as well as the mortal remains of close to 60 militants, in exchange for 1 Israeli hostage and the bodies of 3 soldiers. This operation confirmed the party’s conviction that the only way to obtain the liberation of the Lebanese prisoners still held in Israel—among them Samir Kuntar, detained since 1979 as a result of his participation in a commando attack by the Palestine Liberation Front—is to exchange them for Israeli hostages. (p28)" "The hostage Taking of July 12, 2006: Keen on defending the Lebanese legitimacy of its ar- mament, Hezbollah raised its voice over two issues in particular: the Shebaa Farms and the Lebanese pris- oners held in Israel. In a speech delivered on April 24, 2006, at a ceremony marking the twenty-eighth anniversary of Samir Kuntar’s detention, Hassan Nasrallah pledged publicly to act for the liberation of the detainee, announcing that it would take place “very very very soon” and hinting at an imminent “resistance action” toward this end. (p31-32)"
    • Achcar, Gilbert; Warschawski, Michel (2015). The 33-day war: Israel's war on Hezbollah in Lebanon and its consequences. Taylor & Francis.
  • "Hezbollah’s attempt to redeem its wa‘d al-sadiq (“faithful promise”) to secure the release of Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails...Hezbollah’s dramatic operation of July 12, 2006, was yet another attempt to deliver on its wa‘d al-sadiq."
  • "For years, Hezbollah had attempted to carry out Nasrallah's wa'd al-sadiq (faithful promise) to liberate Lebanese fighters still held in Israeli jails."
    • Matthews, Matt (2008). We were caught unprepared: the 2006 Hezbollah-Israeli War. Fort Leavenworth, Kan: Combat Studies Institute Press, US Army Combined Arms Center. p. 28-29. ISBN 9780160798993.
  • "Dubbed “Operation Truthful Promise” by Hezbollah, the raid fulfilled Hezbollah leader’s Hassan Nasrallah’s longstanding aim to take IDF soldiers hostage in order to pressure Israel to release remaining Lebanese prisoners in Israeli prisons, and to seek the return of the disputed Israeli-occupied Sheba` Farms area to Lebanese control. Immediately following the raid, Hezbollah stated that it would return the abducted soldiers to Israel through “indirect negotiations” resulting in a “trade” with Lebanese prisoners held in Israeli prisons."
    • Why They Died: Civilian Casualties in Lebanon During the 2006 War. Human Rights Watch. 2007. p. 37.
VR (Please ping on reply) 15:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
I reverted the banned sock's reversion of the second lede paragraph, but it still needs work. VR, seems you have read up on this war, so it could use a review from your side. Makeandtoss (talk) 11:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
  1. "Why They Died". Human Rights Watch. 5 September 2007.
Categories: